Barrett Barnes

PosLF

B/TR/R

Born1991-07-29

Age (2027)36

No MLB projection yet. Career stats below are historical.

Overview

AALAST SEASON 2019

Year	Age	Lvl / Team	PA	AVG/OBP/SLG	HR	SB	wRC+	WAR	MLE AVG/OBP/SLG
2016	25	AAPIT	458	.306/.378/.477	9	10	88	—	.256/.312/.388
2017	26	AAAPIT	114	.247/.364/.366	1	1	84	—	.229/.327/.333
2019	28	AANYM	374	.228/.353/.399	12	4	70	—	.191/.291/.320

Contract

No contract data on file.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.

show model inputsbasis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral

Methodology▸ how these numbers are built

All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.

Year	Age	Lvl	Team	MLB%	PA	AB	H	2B	3B	HR	BB	SO	HBP	SB	CS	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	BABIP	K%	BB%	wOBA	wRC+	BAT	RUN	FLD	POS	REP	WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments)
2013	22	A	West Virginia Power	—	206	183	49	9	0	5	17	48	3	10	3	268	340	399	739	131	336	23	8	329	49	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	23	A+	Bradenton Marauders	—	24	21	5	2	0	0	3	5	0	1	0	238	333	333	667	95	312	21	12	307	47	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	23	A	West Virginia Power	—	15	13	2	0	0	0	2	2	0	2	0	154	267	154	421		182	13	13	214	-1	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	23	ROK	GCL Pirates	—	25	16	5	2	0	2	6	3	3	1	0	312	560	812	1.373	500	273	12	24	561	164	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	24	AA	Altoona Curve	—	146	126	31	6	0	3	16	25	2	4	4	246	340	365	705	119	283	17	11	318	75	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	24	A+	Bradenton Marauders	—	276	234	61	16	2	6	28	41	9	13	5	261	362	423	785	162	291	15	10	347	77	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	25	AA	Altoona Curve	—	458	405	124	28	7	9	41	105	6	10	4	306	378	477	855	170	392	23	9	374	88	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	26	AAA	Indianapolis Indians	—	114	93	23	8	0	1	10	34	7	1	0	247	364	366	729	118	367	30	9	326	84	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	28	AA	Binghamton Rumble Ponies	—	374	311	71	17	0	12	47	96	13	4	4	228	353	399	752	170	286	26	13	340	70	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents)
2013	22	A MLE	West Virginia Power	—	206	190	39	7	0	4	10	66	3	10	3	205	256	305	561	100	274	32	5	240	49	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	23	A+ MLE	Bradenton Marauders	—	24	22	5	2	0	0	2	7	0	1	0	227	292	318	610	91	282	29	8	237	47	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	23	A MLE	West Virginia Power	—	15	14	2	0	0	0	1	3	0	2	0	143	200	143	343		165	20	7	167	-1	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	23	ROK MLE	GCL Pirates	—	25	18	5	2	0	2	4	4	3	1	0	278	480	722	1.202	444	190	16	16	411	164	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	24	AA MLE	Altoona Curve	—	146	131	31	6	0	3	11	30	2	4	4	237	306	351	657	115	272	21	8	279	75	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	24	A+ MLE	Bradenton Marauders	—	276	243	52	13	2	5	19	57	9	13	5	214	295	346	641	132	249	21	7	282	77	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	25	AA MLE	Altoona Curve	—	458	418	107	22	6	7	28	131	6	10	4	256	312	388	700	132	344	29	6	299	88	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	26	AAA MLE	Indianapolis Indians	—	114	96	22	7	0	1	7	40	7	1	0	229	327	333	661	104	340	35	6	293	84	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	28	AA MLE	Binghamton Rumble Ponies	—	374	325	62	15	0	9	33	108	13	4	4	191	291	320	611	129	243	29	9	272	70	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	22	A MLE	West Virginia Power	—	206	190	39	7	0	4	10	66	3	10	3	205	256	305	561	100	289	32	5	240	49	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	22	A RAW	West Virginia Power	—	206	183	49	9	0	5	17	48	3	10	3	268	340	399	739	131	336	23	8	329	49	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	23	ROK MLE	3 teams	—	64	54	10	3	0	2	7	14	3	4	0	185	312	352	664	167	211	22	11	289	81	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	23	ROK RAW	3 teams	—	64	50	12	4	0	2	11	10	3	4	0	240	406	440	846	200	263	16	17	384	81	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	24	A+ MLE	2 teams	—	422	374	82	18	2	8	30	87	11	17	9	219	296	342	639	123	262	21	7	281	76	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	24	A+ RAW	2 teams	—	422	360	92	22	2	9	44	66	11	17	9	256	354	403	757	147	288	16	10	337	76	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	25	AA MLE	Altoona Curve	—	458	418	107	22	6	7	28	131	6	10	4	256	312	388	700	132	355	29	6	299	88	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	25	AA RAW	Altoona Curve	—	458	405	124	28	7	9	41	105	6	10	4	306	378	477	855	170	392	23	9	374	88	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	26	AAA MLE	Indianapolis Indians	—	114	96	22	7	0	1	7	40	7	1	0	229	327	333	661	104	368	35	6	293	84	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	26	AAA RAW	Indianapolis Indians	—	114	93	23	8	0	1	10	34	7	1	0	247	364	366	729	118	367	30	9	326	84	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	28	AA MLE	Binghamton Rumble Ponies	—	374	325	62	15	0	9	33	108	13	4	4	191	291	320	611	129	251	29	9	272	70	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	28	AA RAW	Binghamton Rumble Ponies	—	374	311	71	17	0	12	47	96	13	4	4	228	353	399	752	170	286	26	13	340	70	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	22	A MLE	West Virginia Power	—	206	191	39	7	0	4	10	66	3	10	3	204	256	304	560	99	274	32	5	240	49	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	23	ROK MLE	3 teams	—	64	54	10	3	0	2	7	14	3	4	0	185	312	352	664	167	219	22	11	289	81	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	24	A+ MLE	2 teams	—	422	378	82	18	2	8	30	87	11	17	9	217	296	339	635	122	257	21	7	281	76	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	25	AA MLE	Altoona Curve	—	458	421	107	22	6	7	28	131	6	10	4	254	312	385	697	131	344	29	6	299	88	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	26	AAA MLE	Indianapolis Indians	—	114	99	22	7	0	1	7	40	7	1	0	222	327	323	651	101	340	35	6	293	84	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	28	AA MLE	Binghamton Rumble Ponies	—	374	325	62	15	0	9	33	108	13	4	4	191	291	320	611	129	243	29	9	272	70	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career Totals
Career	—	MLE		—	1638	1457	322	72	8	31	115	446	43	46	20	221	297	345	642	124	294	27	7	280	76	-48	+1	+0	-18	+35	-2.9
/ 162G	—	MLE		—	650	578	128	29	3	12	46	177	17	18	8	221	298	344	642	123	295	27	7	280	76	-19	+0	+0	-7	+14	-1.2

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2019 AABinghamton Rumble Ponies · 374 PAwOBA .333 → .272 (−61)K% 25.7% → 28.9%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	25.67%	÷1.083	×1.220	—	—	28.91%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	12.30%	÷0.942	×0.700	—	×0.968	8.85%
HBP% /PA	3.48%	—	×0.850	—	×0.968	2.86%
Singles /BIP	19.53%	÷1.026	×0.970	×0.950	×0.968	16.99%
Doubles /BIP	7.91%	÷0.945	×0.860	×0.950	×0.968	6.62%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷0.900	×0.950	×0.950	×0.968	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	5.58%	÷1.012	×0.780	—	×0.968	4.16%

Factors used: league row EL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 102, 1B 105, 2B 89, 3B 80, K 117, BB 88 — applied at half strength. Age: age 28 vs a level average of 24.8 → −3.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (3.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.

Result: wOBA .333 → .272; ISO .170 → .136; BABIP .286 → .243. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2017 AAAIndianapolis Indians · 114 PAwOBA .320 → .293 (−27)K% 29.8% → 34.7%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	29.82%	÷1.030	×1.200	—	—	34.75%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	7.89%	÷0.952	×0.690	—	×1.018	5.82%
HBP% /PA	6.14%	—	×0.940	—	×1.018	5.88%
Singles /BIP	23.73%	÷0.950	×0.930	×0.999	×1.018	23.64%
Doubles /BIP	13.56%	÷1.046	×0.830	×0.999	×1.018	10.94%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.150	×0.970	×0.999	×1.018	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	1.69%	÷0.850	×0.840	—	×1.018	1.71%

Factors used: league row IL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 70, 1B 90, 2B 109, 3B 130, K 106, BB 90 — applied at half strength. Age: age 26 vs a level average of 27.2 → +1.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.999.

Result: wOBA .320 → .293; ISO .118 → .105; BABIP .367 → .340. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2016 AAAltoona Curve · 458 PAwOBA .365 → .299 (−67)K% 22.9% → 28.7%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	22.93%	÷0.975	×1.220	—	—	28.68%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	8.73%	÷0.988	×0.700	—	×0.998	6.17%
HBP% /PA	1.31%	—	×0.850	—	×0.998	1.11%
Singles /BIP	26.67%	÷1.050	×0.970	×0.992	×0.998	24.40%
Doubles /BIP	9.33%	÷1.059	×0.860	×0.992	×0.998	7.51%
Triples /BIP	2.33%	÷1.150	×0.950	×0.992	×0.998	1.91%
Home runs /BIP	3.00%	÷1.016	×0.780	—	×0.998	2.30%

Factors used: league row EL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 103, 1B 110, 2B 112, 3B 130, K 95, BB 98 — applied at half strength. Age: age 25 vs a level average of 24.8 → −0.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.992.

Result: wOBA .365 → .299; ISO .170 → .132; BABIP .392 → .344. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2015 A+Bradenton Marauders · 276 PAwOBA .340 → .282 (−58)K% 14.9% → 20.5%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	14.86%	÷1.027	×1.420	—	—	20.55%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	9.78%	÷1.051	×0.750	—	×0.988	6.90%
HBP% /PA	3.26%	—	×0.930	—	×0.988	3.00%
Singles /BIP	19.17%	÷0.981	×0.920	×0.950	×0.988	16.87%
Doubles /BIP	8.29%	÷1.117	×0.960	×0.950	×0.988	6.69%
Triples /BIP	1.04%	÷0.900	×0.810	×0.950	×0.988	0.88%
Home runs /BIP	3.11%	÷0.974	×0.880	—	×0.988	2.78%

Factors used: league row FSL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 95, 1B 96, 2B 123, 3B 80, K 105, BB 110 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 22.8 → −1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.

Result: wOBA .340 → .282; ISO .162 → .138; BABIP .291 → .249. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2015 AAAltoona Curve · 146 PAwOBA .313 → .279 (−33)K% 17.1% → 20.8%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	17.12%	÷1.005	×1.220	—	—	20.78%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	10.96%	÷1.004	×0.700	—	×1.012	7.73%
HBP% /PA	1.37%	—	×0.850	—	×1.012	1.18%
Singles /BIP	21.78%	÷0.997	×0.970	×0.996	×1.012	21.36%
Doubles /BIP	5.94%	÷0.953	×0.860	×0.996	×1.012	5.40%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.150	×0.950	×0.996	×1.012	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	2.97%	÷0.912	×0.780	—	×1.012	2.57%

Factors used: league row EL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 82, 1B 99, 2B 91, 3B 130, K 101, BB 101 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 24.8 → +1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.996.

Result: wOBA .313 → .279; ISO .119 → .107; BABIP .283 → .272. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2014 ROKGCL Pirates · 25 PAwOBA .547 → .411 (−137)K% 12.0% → 17.3%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	12.00%	÷1.000	×1.440	—	—	17.28%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	24.00%	÷1.000	×0.620	—	×0.965	14.36%
HBP% /PA	12.00%	—	×0.720	—	×0.965	8.34%
Singles /BIP	7.69%	÷1.000	×0.820	—	×0.965	6.09%
Doubles /BIP	15.38%	÷1.000	×0.720	—	×0.965	10.69%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.000	×0.720	—	×0.965	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	15.38%	÷1.000	×0.780	—	×0.965	11.58%

Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 19.5 → −3.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (3.5 yr older than average).

Result: wOBA .547 → .411; ISO .500 → .426; BABIP .273 → .190. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2014 A+Bradenton Marauders · 24 PAwOBA .300 → .237 (−63)K% 20.8% → 30.3%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	20.83%	÷0.975	×1.420	—	—	30.33%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	12.50%	÷1.059	×0.750	—	×0.998	8.84%
HBP% /PA	0.00%	—	×0.930	—	×0.998	0.00%
Singles /BIP	18.75%	÷1.004	×0.920	—	×0.998	17.14%
Doubles /BIP	12.50%	÷1.078	×0.960	—	×0.998	11.11%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷0.900	×0.810	—	×0.998	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	0.00%	÷1.337	×0.880	—	×0.998	0.00%

Factors used: league row FSL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 167, 1B 101, 2B 116, 3B 80, K 95, BB 112 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.8 → −0.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr older than average).

Result: wOBA .300 → .237; ISO .095 → .077; BABIP .312 → .282. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2014 AWest Virginia Power · 15 PAwOBA .209 → .167 (−43)K% 13.3% → 17.1%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	13.33%	÷1.047	×1.340	—	—	17.06%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	13.33%	÷1.032	×0.660	—	×0.990	8.44%
HBP% /PA	0.00%	—	×0.770	—	×0.990	0.00%
Singles /BIP	18.18%	÷1.002	×0.920	—	×0.990	16.53%
Doubles /BIP	0.00%	÷1.057	×0.820	—	×0.990	0.00%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.150	×0.940	—	×0.990	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	0.00%	÷0.935	×0.820	—	×0.990	0.00%

Factors used: league row SAL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 87, 1B 100, 2B 111, 3B 130, K 109, BB 106 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.0 → −1.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr older than average).

Result: wOBA .209 → .167; ISO .000 → .000; BABIP .182 → .165. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).