Erich Weiss

Pos2B

B/TL/R

Born1991-09-11

Age (2027)35

No MLB projection yet. Career stats below are historical.

Overview

AAALAST SEASON 2019

Year	Age	Lvl / Team	PA	AVG/OBP/SLG	HR	SB	wRC+	WAR	MLE AVG/OBP/SLG
2017	25	AAAPIT	377	.274/.356/.422	6	6	91	—	.249/.313/.371
2018	26	AAAPIT	236	.234/.292/.390	5	1	55	—	.195/.246/.321
2019	27	AAAKC	143	.262/.319/.477	6	1	53	—	.180/.227/.316

Contract

No contract data on file.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.

show model inputsbasis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral

Methodology▸ how these numbers are built

All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.

Year	Age	Lvl	Team	MLB%	PA	AB	H	2B	3B	HR	BB	SO	HBP	SB	CS	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	BABIP	K%	BB%	wOBA	wRC+	BAT	RUN	FLD	POS	REP	WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments)
2014	22	A	West Virginia Power	—	540	463	133	22	4	4	60	117	10	21	12	287	381	378	759	91	373	22	11	343	79	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	23	AA	Altoona Curve	—	124	112	28	4	1	0	8	22	0	4	2	250	300	304	604	54	298	18	6	267	56	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	23	A+	Bradenton Marauders	—	428	372	106	17	2	3	41	70	6	11	4	285	365	366	731	81	340	16	10	328	76	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	24	AA	Altoona Curve	—	520	456	126	24	9	6	49	90	5	6	3	276	353	408	761	132	331	17	9	335	77	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	25	AAA	Indianapolis Indians	—	377	332	91	23	4	6	38	67	4	6	2	274	356	422	777	148	324	18	10	346	91	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	26	AAA	Indianapolis Indians	—	236	218	51	11	4	5	15	54	3	1	0	234	292	390	682	156	289	23	6	304	55	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	27	AAA	Omaha Storm Chasers	—	143	130	34	6	2	6	10	37	1	1	1	262	319	477	796	215	315	26	7	344	53	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents)
2014	22	A MLE	West Virginia Power	—	540	488	123	18	3	3	35	150	10	21	12	252	315	320	635	68	345	28	6	285	79	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	23	AA MLE	Altoona Curve	—	124	115	28	4	1	0	5	27	0	4	2	243	275	296	571	52	290	22	4	251	56	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	23	A+ MLE	Bradenton Marauders	—	428	386	99	15	2	3	27	97	6	11	4	256	315	329	644	73	318	23	6	281	76	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	24	AA MLE	Altoona Curve	—	520	471	116	20	8	5	34	113	5	6	3	246	304	355	658	108	303	22	7	282	77	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	25	AAA MLE	Indianapolis Indians	—	377	342	85	18	3	6	28	78	4	6	2	249	313	371	684	123	301	21	7	303	91	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	26	AAA MLE	Indianapolis Indians	—	236	221	43	8	4	4	12	61	3	1	0	195	246	321	567	127	254	26	5	249	55	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	27	AAA MLE	Omaha Storm Chasers	—	143	133	24	4	1	4	7	49	1	1	1	180	227	316	543	135	251	34	5	247	53	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	22	A MLE	West Virginia Power	—	540	488	123	18	3	3	35	150	10	21	12	252	315	320	635	68	354	28	6	285	79	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	22	A RAW	West Virginia Power	—	540	463	133	22	4	4	60	117	10	21	12	287	381	378	759	91	373	22	11	343	79	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	23	A+ MLE	2 teams	—	552	501	126	18	3	3	32	123	6	15	6	251	304	317	622	66	321	22	6	274	72	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	23	A+ RAW	2 teams	—	552	484	134	21	3	3	49	92	6	15	6	277	351	351	702	74	330	17	9	314	72	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	24	AA MLE	Altoona Curve	—	520	471	116	20	8	5	34	113	5	6	3	246	304	355	658	108	313	22	7	282	77	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	24	AA RAW	Altoona Curve	—	520	456	126	24	9	6	49	90	5	6	3	276	353	408	761	132	331	17	9	335	77	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	25	AAA MLE	Indianapolis Indians	—	377	342	85	18	3	6	28	78	4	6	2	249	313	371	684	123	303	21	7	303	91	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	25	AAA RAW	Indianapolis Indians	—	377	332	91	23	4	6	38	67	4	6	2	274	356	422	777	148	324	18	10	346	91	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	26	AAA MLE	Indianapolis Indians	—	236	221	43	8	4	4	12	61	3	1	0	195	246	321	567	127	250	26	5	249	55	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	26	AAA RAW	Indianapolis Indians	—	236	218	51	11	4	5	15	54	3	1	0	234	292	390	682	156	289	23	6	304	55	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	27	AAA MLE	Omaha Storm Chasers	—	143	133	24	4	1	4	7	49	1	1	1	180	227	316	543	135	244	34	5	247	53	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	27	AAA RAW	Omaha Storm Chasers	—	143	130	34	6	2	6	10	37	1	1	1	262	319	477	796	215	315	26	7	344	53	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	22	A MLE	West Virginia Power	—	540	490	123	18	3	3	35	150	10	21	12	251	315	318	634	67	345	28	6	285	79	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	23	A+ MLE	2 teams	—	552	509	126	18	3	3	32	123	6	15	6	248	304	312	617	65	312	22	6	274	72	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	24	AA MLE	Altoona Curve	—	520	476	116	20	8	5	34	113	5	6	3	244	304	351	655	107	303	22	7	282	77	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	25	AAA MLE	Indianapolis Indians	—	377	342	85	18	3	6	28	78	4	6	2	249	313	371	684	123	301	21	7	303	91	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	26	AAA MLE	Indianapolis Indians	—	236	219	43	8	4	4	12	61	3	1	0	196	246	324	570	128	254	26	5	249	55	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	27	AAA MLE	Omaha Storm Chasers	—	143	134	24	4	1	4	7	49	1	1	1	179	227	313	540	134	251	34	5	247	53	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career Totals
Career	—	MLE		—	2368	2156	517	86	22	25	148	574	29	50	24	240	297	335	632	95	312	24	6	279	75	-71	+0	+0	+8	+51	-1.1
/ 162G	—	MLE		—	650	592	142	24	6	7	41	158	8	14	7	240	298	336	634	96	312	24	6	279	75	-19	+0	+0	+2	+14	-0.3

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2019 AAAOmaha Storm Chasers · 143 PAwOBA .339 → .247 (−93)K% 25.9% → 34.4%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	25.87%	÷0.971	×1.290	—	—	34.39%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	6.99%	÷1.065	×0.710	—	×0.992	4.62%
HBP% /PA	0.70%	—	×0.980	—	×0.992	0.68%
Singles /BIP	21.51%	÷1.024	×0.900	×0.950	×0.992	17.81%
Doubles /BIP	6.45%	÷0.973	×0.810	×0.950	×0.992	5.06%
Triples /BIP	2.15%	÷1.038	×0.810	×0.950	×0.992	1.58%
Home runs /BIP	6.45%	÷1.023	×0.780	—	×0.992	4.88%

Factors used: league row PCL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 105, 1B 105, 2B 95, 3B 108, K 94, BB 113 — applied at half strength. Age: age 28 vs a level average of 27.2 → −0.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.

Result: wOBA .339 → .247; ISO .215 → .152; BABIP .315 → .251. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2018 AAAIndianapolis Indians · 236 PAwOBA .296 → .249 (−47)K% 22.9% → 25.8%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	22.88%	÷1.063	×1.200	—	—	25.82%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	6.36%	÷0.890	×0.690	—	×1.003	4.94%
HBP% /PA	1.27%	—	×0.940	—	×1.003	1.20%
Singles /BIP	18.90%	÷0.984	×0.930	×0.954	×1.003	17.10%
Doubles /BIP	6.71%	÷1.040	×0.830	×0.954	×1.003	5.12%
Triples /BIP	2.44%	÷0.900	×0.970	×0.954	×1.003	2.52%
Home runs /BIP	3.05%	÷1.041	×0.840	—	×1.003	2.47%

Factors used: league row IL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 108, 1B 97, 2B 108, 3B 80, K 113, BB 78 — applied at half strength. Age: age 27 vs a level average of 27.2 → +0.3% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.954.

Result: wOBA .296 → .249; ISO .156 → .129; BABIP .289 → .254. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2017 AAAIndianapolis Indians · 377 PAwOBA .340 → .303 (−37)K% 17.8% → 20.7%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	17.77%	÷1.030	×1.200	—	—	20.71%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	10.08%	÷0.952	×0.690	—	×1.018	7.43%
HBP% /PA	1.06%	—	×0.940	—	×1.018	1.02%
Singles /BIP	21.89%	÷0.950	×0.930	×0.988	×1.018	21.56%
Doubles /BIP	8.68%	÷1.046	×0.830	×0.988	×1.018	6.93%
Triples /BIP	1.51%	÷1.150	×0.970	×0.988	×1.018	1.28%
Home runs /BIP	2.26%	÷0.850	×0.840	—	×1.018	2.28%

Factors used: league row IL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 70, 1B 90, 2B 109, 3B 130, K 106, BB 90 — applied at half strength. Age: age 26 vs a level average of 27.2 → +1.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.988.

Result: wOBA .340 → .303; ISO .148 → .131; BABIP .324 → .301. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2016 AAAltoona Curve · 520 PAwOBA .327 → .282 (−45)K% 17.3% → 21.7%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	17.31%	÷0.975	×1.220	—	—	21.65%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	9.23%	÷0.988	×0.700	—	×0.998	6.52%
HBP% /PA	0.96%	—	×0.850	—	×0.998	0.82%
Singles /BIP	23.77%	÷1.050	×0.970	×1.026	×0.998	22.50%
Doubles /BIP	6.56%	÷1.059	×0.860	×1.026	×0.998	5.46%
Triples /BIP	2.46%	÷1.150	×0.950	×1.026	×0.998	2.08%
Home runs /BIP	1.64%	÷1.016	×0.780	—	×0.998	1.26%

Factors used: league row EL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 103, 1B 110, 2B 112, 3B 130, K 95, BB 98 — applied at half strength. Age: age 25 vs a level average of 24.8 → −0.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.026.

Result: wOBA .327 → .282; ISO .132 → .108; BABIP .331 → .303. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2015 A+Bradenton Marauders · 428 PAwOBA .321 → .281 (−40)K% 16.4% → 22.6%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	16.36%	÷1.027	×1.420	—	—	22.62%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	9.11%	÷1.051	×0.750	—	×0.988	6.42%
HBP% /PA	1.40%	—	×0.930	—	×0.988	1.29%
Singles /BIP	27.81%	÷0.981	×0.920	×1.026	×0.988	26.42%
Doubles /BIP	5.63%	÷1.117	×0.960	×1.026	×0.988	4.90%
Triples /BIP	0.66%	÷0.900	×0.810	×1.026	×0.988	0.60%
Home runs /BIP	0.99%	÷0.974	×0.880	—	×0.988	0.89%

Factors used: league row FSL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 95, 1B 96, 2B 123, 3B 80, K 105, BB 110 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 22.8 → −1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.026.

Result: wOBA .321 → .281; ISO .081 → .070; BABIP .340 → .318. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2015 AAAltoona Curve · 124 PAwOBA .266 → .251 (−14)K% 17.7% → 21.5%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	17.74%	÷1.005	×1.220	—	—	21.53%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	5.65%	÷1.004	×0.700	—	×1.012	3.98%
HBP% /PA	0.00%	—	×0.850	—	×1.012	0.00%
Singles /BIP	25.56%	÷0.997	×0.970	×1.002	×1.012	25.21%
Doubles /BIP	4.44%	÷0.953	×0.860	×1.002	×1.012	4.07%
Triples /BIP	1.11%	÷1.150	×0.950	×1.002	×1.012	0.93%
Home runs /BIP	0.00%	÷0.912	×0.780	—	×1.012	0.00%

Factors used: league row EL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 82, 1B 99, 2B 91, 3B 130, K 101, BB 101 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 24.8 → +1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.002.

Result: wOBA .266 → .251; ISO .054 → .049; BABIP .298 → .290. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2014 AWest Virginia Power · 540 PAwOBA .334 → .285 (−50)K% 21.7% → 27.7%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	21.67%	÷1.047	×1.340	—	—	27.72%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	10.19%	÷1.032	×0.660	—	×0.990	6.45%
HBP% /PA	1.85%	—	×0.770	—	×0.990	1.41%
Singles /BIP	29.77%	÷1.002	×0.920	×1.050	×0.990	28.42%
Doubles /BIP	6.36%	÷1.057	×0.820	×1.050	×0.990	5.13%
Triples /BIP	1.16%	÷1.150	×0.940	×1.050	×0.990	0.98%
Home runs /BIP	1.16%	÷0.935	×0.820	—	×0.990	1.00%

Factors used: league row SAL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 87, 1B 100, 2B 111, 3B 130, K 109, BB 106 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.0 → −1.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.

Result: wOBA .334 → .285; ISO .091 → .076; BABIP .373 → .345. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).