Kevin Taylor
| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 25 | A+NYM | 464 | .288/.387/.404 | 8 | 0 | 91 | — | .252/.328/.356 |
| 2017 | 26 | AANYM | 448 | .292/.380/.373 | 3 | 2 | 96 | — | .288/.348/.352 |
| 2018 | 27 | AANYM | 478 | .263/.315/.332 | 2 | 3 | 58 | — | .240/.277/.300 |
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2012 | 21 | A | Great Lakes Loons | — | 197 | 183 | 44 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 25 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 240 | 284 | 317 | 600 | 77 | 269 | 13 | 5 | 269 | 43 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 22 | A | Great Lakes Loons | — | 299 | 259 | 64 | 7 | 1 | 5 | 32 | 43 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 247 | 339 | 340 | 679 | 93 | 280 | 14 | 11 | 309 | 65 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 25 | A+ | St. Lucie Mets | — | 464 | 399 | 115 | 20 | 1 | 8 | 56 | 55 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 288 | 387 | 404 | 790 | 115 | 318 | 12 | 12 | 359 | 91 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 26 | AA | Binghamton Rumble Ponies | — | 448 | 383 | 112 | 20 | 1 | 3 | 54 | 53 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 292 | 380 | 373 | 753 | 81 | 326 | 12 | 12 | 338 | 96 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 27 | AA | Binghamton Rumble Ponies | — | 478 | 437 | 115 | 18 | 3 | 2 | 31 | 55 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 263 | 315 | 332 | 647 | 69 | 294 | 12 | 6 | 291 | 58 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2012 | 21 | A MLE | Great Lakes Loons | — | 197 | 186 | 42 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 34 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 226 | 258 | 296 | 553 | 70 | 257 | 17 | 3 | 232 | 43 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 22 | A MLE | Great Lakes Loons | — | 299 | 269 | 60 | 6 | 1 | 4 | 22 | 57 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 223 | 292 | 297 | 589 | 74 | 266 | 19 | 7 | 264 | 65 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 25 | A+ MLE | St. Lucie Mets | — | 464 | 416 | 105 | 20 | 1 | 7 | 39 | 82 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 252 | 328 | 356 | 684 | 103 | 295 | 18 | 8 | 303 | 91 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 26 | AA MLE | Binghamton Rumble Ponies | — | 448 | 403 | 116 | 18 | 1 | 2 | 36 | 62 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 288 | 348 | 352 | 700 | 65 | 320 | 14 | 8 | 310 | 96 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 27 | AA MLE | Binghamton Rumble Ponies | — | 478 | 450 | 108 | 17 | 2 | 2 | 20 | 68 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 240 | 277 | 300 | 577 | 60 | 271 | 14 | 4 | 254 | 58 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 21 | A MLE | Great Lakes Loons | — | 197 | 186 | 42 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 34 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 226 | 258 | 296 | 553 | 70 | 267 | 17 | 3 | 232 | 43 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 21 | A RAW | Great Lakes Loons | — | 197 | 183 | 44 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 25 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 240 | 284 | 317 | 600 | 77 | 269 | 13 | 5 | 269 | 43 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 22 | A MLE | Great Lakes Loons | — | 299 | 269 | 60 | 6 | 1 | 4 | 22 | 57 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 223 | 292 | 297 | 589 | 74 | 269 | 19 | 7 | 264 | 65 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 22 | A RAW | Great Lakes Loons | — | 299 | 259 | 64 | 7 | 1 | 5 | 32 | 43 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 247 | 339 | 340 | 679 | 93 | 280 | 14 | 11 | 309 | 65 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 25 | A+ MLE | St. Lucie Mets | — | 464 | 416 | 105 | 20 | 1 | 7 | 39 | 82 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 252 | 328 | 356 | 684 | 103 | 299 | 18 | 8 | 303 | 91 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 25 | A+ RAW | St. Lucie Mets | — | 464 | 399 | 115 | 20 | 1 | 8 | 56 | 55 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 288 | 387 | 404 | 790 | 115 | 318 | 12 | 12 | 359 | 91 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 26 | AA MLE | Binghamton Rumble Ponies | — | 448 | 403 | 116 | 18 | 1 | 2 | 36 | 62 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 288 | 348 | 352 | 700 | 65 | 329 | 14 | 8 | 310 | 96 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 26 | AA RAW | Binghamton Rumble Ponies | — | 448 | 383 | 112 | 20 | 1 | 3 | 54 | 53 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 292 | 380 | 373 | 753 | 81 | 326 | 12 | 12 | 338 | 96 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 27 | AA MLE | Binghamton Rumble Ponies | — | 478 | 450 | 108 | 17 | 2 | 2 | 20 | 68 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 240 | 277 | 300 | 577 | 60 | 275 | 14 | 4 | 254 | 58 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 27 | AA RAW | Binghamton Rumble Ponies | — | 478 | 437 | 115 | 18 | 3 | 2 | 31 | 55 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 263 | 315 | 332 | 647 | 69 | 294 | 12 | 6 | 291 | 58 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 21 | A MLE | Great Lakes Loons | — | 197 | 187 | 42 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 34 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 225 | 258 | 294 | 552 | 70 | 257 | 17 | 3 | 232 | 43 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 22 | A MLE | Great Lakes Loons | — | 299 | 271 | 60 | 6 | 1 | 4 | 22 | 57 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 221 | 292 | 295 | 587 | 74 | 266 | 19 | 7 | 264 | 65 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 25 | A+ MLE | St. Lucie Mets | — | 464 | 414 | 105 | 20 | 1 | 7 | 39 | 82 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 254 | 328 | 357 | 686 | 104 | 295 | 18 | 8 | 303 | 91 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 26 | AA MLE | Binghamton Rumble Ponies | — | 448 | 408 | 116 | 18 | 1 | 2 | 36 | 62 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 284 | 348 | 348 | 696 | 64 | 320 | 14 | 8 | 310 | 96 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 27 | AA MLE | Binghamton Rumble Ponies | — | 478 | 452 | 108 | 17 | 2 | 2 | 20 | 68 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 239 | 277 | 299 | 576 | 60 | 271 | 14 | 4 | 254 | 58 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | MLE | — | 1886 | 1724 | 431 | 66 | 6 | 17 | 123 | 303 | 18 | 13 | 11 | 250 | 307 | 325 | 632 | 75 | 292 | 16 | 7 | 279 | 75 | -57 | -2 | +0 | +7 | +41 | -1.1 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 594 | 149 | 23 | 2 | 6 | 42 | 104 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 251 | 306 | 327 | 633 | 76 | 293 | 16 | 6 | 279 | 75 | -20 | -1 | +0 | +2 | +14 | -0.4 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2018 AABinghamton Rumble Ponies · 478 PAwOBA .286 → .254 (−32)K% 11.5% → 14.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 11.51% | ÷0.992 | ×1.220 | — | — | 14.15% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 6.28% | ÷1.028 | ×0.700 | — | ×0.978 | 4.18% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.63% | — | ×0.850 | — | ×0.978 | 0.52% |
| Singles /BIP | 24.08% | ÷1.009 | ×0.970 | ×0.987 | ×0.978 | 22.36% |
| Doubles /BIP | 4.71% | ÷0.906 | ×0.860 | ×0.987 | ×0.978 | 4.32% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.79% | ÷1.134 | ×0.950 | ×0.987 | ×0.978 | 0.64% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.52% | ÷1.013 | ×0.780 | — | ×0.978 | 0.39% |
Factors used: league row EL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 103, 1B 102, 2B 81, 3B 127, K 98, BB 106 — applied at half strength. Age: age 27 vs a level average of 24.8 → −2.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.987.
Result: wOBA .286 → .254; ISO .069 → .060; BABIP .294 → .271. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2017 AABinghamton Rumble Ponies · 448 PAwOBA .334 → .310 (−24)K% 11.8% → 13.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 11.83% | ÷1.046 | ×1.220 | — | — | 13.80% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 11.61% | ÷0.986 | ×0.700 | — | ×0.988 | 8.15% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.22% | — | ×0.850 | — | ×0.988 | 0.19% |
| Singles /BIP | 26.67% | ÷0.971 | ×0.970 | ×1.033 | ×0.988 | 27.19% |
| Doubles /BIP | 6.06% | ÷1.056 | ×0.860 | ×1.033 | ×0.988 | 5.04% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.30% | ÷1.150 | ×0.950 | ×1.033 | ×0.988 | 0.26% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.91% | ÷1.365 | ×0.780 | — | ×0.988 | 0.51% |
Factors used: league row EL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 173, 1B 94, 2B 111, 3B 130, K 109, BB 97 — applied at half strength. Age: age 26 vs a level average of 24.8 → −1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.033.
Result: wOBA .334 → .310; ISO .081 → .065; BABIP .326 → .320. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2016 A+St. Lucie Mets · 464 PAwOBA .350 → .303 (−47)K% 11.9% → 17.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 11.85% | ÷0.959 | ×1.420 | — | — | 17.56% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 11.64% | ÷1.032 | ×0.750 | — | ×0.978 | 8.27% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.72% | — | ×0.930 | — | ×0.978 | 1.57% |
| Singles /BIP | 25.00% | ÷0.994 | ×0.920 | ×1.014 | ×0.978 | 22.95% |
| Doubles /BIP | 5.81% | ÷0.956 | ×0.960 | ×1.014 | ×0.978 | 5.79% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.29% | ÷1.017 | ×0.810 | ×1.014 | ×0.978 | 0.23% |
| Home runs /BIP | 2.33% | ÷0.943 | ×0.880 | — | ×0.978 | 2.12% |
Factors used: league row FSL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 89, 1B 99, 2B 91, 3B 103, K 92, BB 106 — applied at half strength. Age: age 25 vs a level average of 22.8 → −2.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.014.
Result: wOBA .350 → .303; ISO .115 → .106; BABIP .318 → .295. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2013 AGreat Lakes Loons · 299 PAwOBA .302 → .264 (−37)K% 14.4% → 18.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 14.38% | ÷1.035 | ×1.360 | — | — | 18.90% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 10.70% | ÷1.023 | ×0.690 | — | — | 7.22% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.34% | — | ×0.780 | — | — | 1.04% |
| Singles /BIP | 23.61% | ÷1.006 | ×0.920 | ×1.050 | — | 22.68% |
| Doubles /BIP | 3.24% | ÷0.983 | ×0.830 | ×1.050 | — | 2.87% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.46% | ÷0.960 | ×0.910 | ×1.050 | — | 0.46% |
| Home runs /BIP | 2.31% | ÷0.898 | ×0.800 | — | — | 2.06% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 80, 1B 101, 2B 97, 3B 92, K 107, BB 105 — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 22.0 → +0.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.
Result: wOBA .302 → .264; ISO .093 → .084; BABIP .280 → .266. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2012 AGreat Lakes Loons · 197 PAwOBA .261 → .232 (−30)K% 12.7% → 17.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 12.69% | ÷0.999 | ×1.360 | — | — | 17.28% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 4.57% | ÷1.050 | ×0.690 | — | ×1.015 | 3.05% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.02% | — | ×0.780 | — | ×1.015 | 0.80% |
| Singles /BIP | 22.15% | ÷0.979 | ×0.920 | ×1.032 | ×1.015 | 21.80% |
| Doubles /BIP | 3.80% | ÷1.074 | ×0.830 | ×1.032 | ×1.015 | 3.07% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.63% | ÷0.992 | ×0.910 | ×1.032 | ×1.015 | 0.61% |
| Home runs /BIP | 1.27% | ÷1.034 | ×0.800 | — | ×1.015 | 0.99% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 107, 1B 96, 2B 115, 3B 98, K 100, BB 110 — applied at half strength. Age: age 21 vs a level average of 22.0 → +1.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.032.
Result: wOBA .261 → .232; ISO .077 → .062; BABIP .269 → .257. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).