John Schultz
| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 22 | ROKGCL Marlins | 194 | .278/.400/.367 | 0 | 4 | 61 | — | .212/.295/.271 |
| 2012 | 23 | APIT | 214 | .309/.387/.415 | 3 | 3 | 84 | — | .267/.325/.349 |
| 2015 | 26 | INTLAdelaide Bite | 117 | .279/.359/.413 | 3 | 0 | 122 | — |
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2011 | 22 | ROK | GCL Marlins | — | 194 | 158 | 44 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 29 | 33 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 278 | 400 | 367 | 767 | 89 | 341 | 17 | 15 | 347 | 61 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 23 | A | Greensboro Grasshoppers | — | 214 | 188 | 58 | 9 | 1 | 3 | 23 | 29 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 309 | 387 | 415 | 802 | 106 | 348 | 14 | 11 | 359 | 84 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 26 | INTL | Adelaide Bite | — | 117 | 104 | 29 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 13 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 279 | 359 | 413 | 772 | 135 | 321 | 17 | 11 | 348 | 122 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2011 | 22 | ROK MLE | GCL Marlins | — | 194 | 170 | 36 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 17 | 48 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 212 | 295 | 271 | 565 | 59 | 277 | 25 | 9 | 259 | 61 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 23 | A MLE | Greensboro Grasshoppers | — | 214 | 195 | 52 | 8 | 1 | 2 | 16 | 43 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 267 | 325 | 349 | 674 | 82 | 319 | 20 | 7 | 292 | 84 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 22 | ROK MLE | GCL Marlins | — | 194 | 170 | 36 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 17 | 48 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 212 | 295 | 271 | 565 | 59 | 286 | 25 | 9 | 259 | 61 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 22 | ROK RAW | GCL Marlins | — | 194 | 158 | 44 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 29 | 33 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 278 | 400 | 367 | 767 | 89 | 341 | 17 | 15 | 347 | 61 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 23 | A MLE | Greensboro Grasshoppers | — | 214 | 195 | 52 | 8 | 1 | 2 | 16 | 43 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 267 | 325 | 349 | 674 | 82 | 329 | 20 | 7 | 292 | 84 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 23 | A RAW | Greensboro Grasshoppers | — | 214 | 188 | 58 | 9 | 1 | 3 | 23 | 29 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 309 | 387 | 415 | 802 | 106 | 348 | 14 | 11 | 359 | 84 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 26 | INTL MLE | Adelaide Bite | — | 117 | 104 | 29 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 13 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 279 | 359 | 413 | 772 | 135 | 321 | 17 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 26 | INTL RAW | Adelaide Bite | — | 117 | 104 | 29 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 13 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 279 | 359 | 413 | 772 | 135 | 321 | 17 | 11 | 348 | 122 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 22 | ROK MLE | GCL Marlins | — | 194 | 172 | 36 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 17 | 48 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 209 | 295 | 267 | 562 | 58 | 277 | 25 | 9 | 259 | 61 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 23 | A MLE | Greensboro Grasshoppers | — | 214 | 195 | 52 | 8 | 1 | 2 | 16 | 43 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 267 | 325 | 349 | 674 | 82 | 319 | 20 | 7 | 292 | 84 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | MLE | — | 525 | 469 | 117 | 17 | 4 | 5 | 46 | 111 | 4 | 7 | 7 | 249 | 322 | 335 | 657 | 85 | 312 | 21 | 9 | 215 | 31 | -43 | -1 | +0 | -3 | +11 | -3.7 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 581 | 145 | 21 | 5 | 6 | 57 | 137 | 5 | 9 | 9 | 250 | 322 | 334 | 656 | 84 | 312 | 21 | 9 | 215 | 31 | -53 | -2 | +0 | -4 | +14 | -4.6 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2012 AGreensboro Grasshoppers · 214 PAwOBA .354 → .292 (−62)K% 13.6% → 20.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 13.55% | ÷0.908 | ×1.340 | — | — | 19.99% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 10.75% | ÷0.938 | ×0.660 | — | ×0.990 | 7.48% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.47% | — | ×0.770 | — | ×0.990 | 0.36% |
| Singles /BIP | 28.30% | ÷1.012 | ×0.920 | ×1.033 | ×0.990 | 26.31% |
| Doubles /BIP | 5.66% | ÷0.932 | ×0.820 | ×1.033 | ×0.990 | 5.10% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.63% | ÷1.023 | ×0.940 | ×1.033 | ×0.990 | 0.59% |
| Home runs /BIP | 1.89% | ÷1.462 | ×0.820 | — | ×0.990 | 1.05% |
Factors used: league row SAL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 192, 1B 102, 2B 86, 3B 105, K 82, BB 88 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.0 → −1.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.033.
Result: wOBA .354 → .292; ISO .106 → .077; BABIP .348 → .319. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2011 ROKGCL Marlins · 194 PAwOBA .347 → .259 (−88)K% 17.0% → 24.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 17.01% | ÷1.000 | ×1.440 | — | — | 24.49% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 14.95% | ÷1.000 | ×0.620 | — | ×0.975 | 9.04% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.55% | — | ×0.720 | — | ×0.975 | 1.09% |
| Singles /BIP | 27.20% | ÷1.000 | ×0.820 | ×1.045 | ×0.975 | 22.72% |
| Doubles /BIP | 4.80% | ÷1.000 | ×0.720 | ×1.045 | ×0.975 | 3.52% |
| Triples /BIP | 3.20% | ÷1.000 | ×0.720 | ×1.045 | ×0.975 | 2.35% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.780 | — | ×0.975 | 0.00% |
Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 19.5 → −2.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.5 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.045.
Result: wOBA .347 → .259; ISO .089 → .066; BABIP .341 → .277. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
Not traceable per stint: some stints lack the counting stats the component translation needs. Level-wide factors that apply instead — .