Raph Rhymes
| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | 23 | ADET | 146 | .345/.462/.420 | 0 | 4 | 107 | — | .291/.379/.354 |
| 2014 | 24 | ADET | 593 | .256/.332/.381 | 9 | 4 | 59 | — | .208/.266/.311 |
| 2015 | 25 | A+DET | 525 | .220/.310/.313 | 8 | 1 | 39 | — | .182/.246/.261 |
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2013 | 23 | A | West Michigan Whitecaps | — | 146 | 119 | 41 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 22 | 13 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 345 | 462 | 420 | 882 | 76 | 387 | 9 | 15 | 403 | 107 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 24 | A | West Michigan Whitecaps | — | 593 | 527 | 135 | 35 | 2 | 9 | 52 | 74 | 8 | 4 | 6 | 256 | 332 | 381 | 714 | 125 | 280 | 12 | 9 | 320 | 59 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 25 | A+ | Lakeland Flying Tigers | — | 525 | 460 | 101 | 19 | 0 | 8 | 54 | 80 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 220 | 310 | 313 | 623 | 93 | 249 | 15 | 10 | 286 | 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2013 | 23 | A MLE | West Michigan Whitecaps | — | 146 | 127 | 37 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 18 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 291 | 379 | 354 | 734 | 63 | 331 | 12 | 10 | 327 | 107 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 24 | A MLE | West Michigan Whitecaps | — | 593 | 544 | 113 | 28 | 2 | 8 | 35 | 110 | 8 | 4 | 6 | 208 | 266 | 311 | 576 | 103 | 239 | 19 | 6 | 255 | 59 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 25 | A+ MLE | Lakeland Flying Tigers | — | 525 | 479 | 87 | 17 | 0 | 7 | 35 | 118 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 182 | 246 | 261 | 507 | 79 | 222 | 22 | 7 | 226 | 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 23 | A MLE | West Michigan Whitecaps | — | 146 | 127 | 37 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 18 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 291 | 379 | 354 | 734 | 63 | 339 | 12 | 10 | 327 | 107 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 23 | A RAW | West Michigan Whitecaps | — | 146 | 119 | 41 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 22 | 13 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 345 | 462 | 420 | 882 | 76 | 387 | 9 | 15 | 403 | 107 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 24 | A MLE | West Michigan Whitecaps | — | 593 | 544 | 113 | 28 | 2 | 8 | 35 | 110 | 8 | 4 | 6 | 208 | 266 | 311 | 576 | 103 | 243 | 19 | 6 | 255 | 59 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 24 | A RAW | West Michigan Whitecaps | — | 593 | 527 | 135 | 35 | 2 | 9 | 52 | 74 | 8 | 4 | 6 | 256 | 332 | 381 | 714 | 125 | 280 | 12 | 9 | 320 | 59 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 25 | A+ MLE | Lakeland Flying Tigers | — | 525 | 479 | 87 | 17 | 0 | 7 | 35 | 118 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 182 | 246 | 261 | 507 | 79 | 225 | 22 | 7 | 226 | 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 25 | A+ RAW | Lakeland Flying Tigers | — | 525 | 460 | 101 | 19 | 0 | 8 | 54 | 80 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 220 | 310 | 313 | 623 | 93 | 249 | 15 | 10 | 286 | 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 23 | A MLE | West Michigan Whitecaps | — | 146 | 127 | 37 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 18 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 291 | 379 | 354 | 734 | 63 | 331 | 12 | 10 | 327 | 107 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 24 | A MLE | West Michigan Whitecaps | — | 593 | 545 | 113 | 28 | 2 | 8 | 35 | 110 | 8 | 4 | 6 | 207 | 266 | 310 | 576 | 103 | 239 | 19 | 6 | 255 | 59 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 25 | A+ MLE | Lakeland Flying Tigers | — | 525 | 479 | 87 | 17 | 0 | 7 | 35 | 118 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 182 | 246 | 261 | 507 | 79 | 222 | 22 | 7 | 226 | 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | MLE | — | 1264 | 1150 | 237 | 53 | 2 | 15 | 84 | 246 | 18 | 9 | 11 | 206 | 271 | 295 | 566 | 89 | 247 | 19 | 7 | 251 | 56 | -66 | -3 | +0 | -14 | +27 | -5.6 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 591 | 122 | 27 | 1 | 8 | 43 | 127 | 9 | 5 | 6 | 206 | 270 | 296 | 566 | 90 | 248 | 20 | 7 | 251 | 56 | -34 | -1 | +0 | -7 | +14 | -2.9 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2015 A+Lakeland Flying Tigers · 525 PAwOBA .280 → .226 (−54)K% 15.2% → 22.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 15.24% | ÷0.962 | ×1.420 | — | — | 22.48% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 10.29% | ÷1.116 | ×0.750 | — | ×0.968 | 6.69% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.14% | — | ×0.930 | — | ×0.968 | 1.03% |
| Singles /BIP | 19.47% | ÷0.976 | ×0.920 | ×0.971 | ×0.968 | 17.26% |
| Doubles /BIP | 5.00% | ÷0.973 | ×0.960 | ×0.971 | ×0.968 | 4.63% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.913 | ×0.810 | ×0.971 | ×0.968 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 2.11% | ÷0.981 | ×0.880 | — | ×0.968 | 1.83% |
Factors used: league row FSL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 96, 1B 95, 2B 95, 3B 83, K 92, BB 123 — applied at half strength. Age: age 26 vs a level average of 22.8 → −3.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (3.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.971.
Result: wOBA .280 → .226; ISO .093 → .081; BABIP .249 → .222. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2014 AWest Michigan Whitecaps · 593 PAwOBA .314 → .255 (−59)K% 12.5% → 18.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 12.48% | ÷0.914 | ×1.360 | — | — | 18.57% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 8.60% | ÷0.977 | ×0.690 | — | ×0.970 | 5.89% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.35% | — | ×0.780 | — | ×0.970 | 1.02% |
| Singles /BIP | 19.65% | ÷1.013 | ×0.920 | ×0.982 | ×0.970 | 16.99% |
| Doubles /BIP | 7.73% | ÷0.956 | ×0.830 | ×0.982 | ×0.970 | 6.39% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.44% | ÷0.954 | ×0.910 | ×0.982 | ×0.970 | 0.40% |
| Home runs /BIP | 1.99% | ÷0.817 | ×0.800 | — | ×0.970 | 1.89% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 63, 1B 103, 2B 91, 3B 91, K 83, BB 95 — applied at half strength. Age: age 25 vs a level average of 22.0 → −3.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (3.0 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.982.
Result: wOBA .314 → .255; ISO .125 → .108; BABIP .280 → .239. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2013 AWest Michigan Whitecaps · 146 PAwOBA .389 → .327 (−62)K% 8.9% → 12.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 8.90% | ÷0.990 | ×1.360 | — | — | 12.23% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 13.70% | ÷0.977 | ×0.690 | — | ×0.980 | 9.48% |
| HBP% /PA | 2.74% | — | ×0.780 | — | ×0.980 | 2.09% |
| Singles /BIP | 30.19% | ÷1.048 | ×0.920 | ×0.993 | ×0.980 | 25.77% |
| Doubles /BIP | 8.49% | ÷0.936 | ×0.830 | ×0.993 | ×0.980 | 7.33% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.900 | ×0.910 | ×0.993 | ×0.980 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.931 | ×0.800 | — | ×0.980 | 0.00% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 86, 1B 110, 2B 87, 3B 80, K 98, BB 95 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 22.0 → −2.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.0 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.993.
Result: wOBA .389 → .327; ISO .076 → .068; BABIP .387 → .331. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).