Trent Gilbert
| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 22 | A+/A2 orgs | 450 | .252/.294/.345 | 6 | 3 | 42 | — | .211/.245/.279 |
| 2016 | 23 | ABeloit Snappe… | 521 | .269/.328/.380 | 4 | 1 | 51 | — | .214/.255/.303 |
| 2017 | 24 | A+OAK | 121 | .278/.308/.435 | 3 | 1 | 55 | — | .233/.258/.353 |
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2014 | 21 | ROK | AZL Athletics | — | 53 | 49 | 16 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 327 | 377 | 449 | 826 | 122 | 372 | 11 | 8 | 368 | 63 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 22 | A+ | Stockton Ports | — | 97 | 90 | 18 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 28 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 200 | 250 | 256 | 506 | 56 | 279 | 29 | 5 | 231 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 22 | A | Beloit Snappers | — | 353 | 330 | 88 | 15 | 2 | 5 | 18 | 62 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 267 | 307 | 370 | 676 | 103 | 313 | 18 | 5 | 300 | 51 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 23 | A | Beloit Snappers | — | 521 | 476 | 128 | 35 | 3 | 4 | 37 | 104 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 269 | 328 | 380 | 708 | 111 | 335 | 20 | 7 | 318 | 51 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 24 | A+ | Stockton Ports | — | 121 | 115 | 32 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 32 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 278 | 308 | 435 | 743 | 157 | 362 | 26 | 2 | 326 | 55 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2014 | 21 | ROK MLE | AZL Athletics | — | 53 | 51 | 13 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 255 | 283 | 353 | 636 | 98 | 289 | 17 | 4 | 261 | 63 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 22 | A+ MLE | Stockton Ports | — | 97 | 91 | 15 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 35 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 165 | 208 | 209 | 417 | 44 | 256 | 36 | 4 | 180 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 22 | A MLE | Beloit Snappers | — | 353 | 335 | 75 | 12 | 2 | 3 | 13 | 85 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 224 | 255 | 299 | 554 | 75 | 284 | 24 | 4 | 243 | 51 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 23 | A MLE | Beloit Snappers | — | 521 | 491 | 105 | 29 | 3 | 3 | 22 | 143 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 214 | 255 | 303 | 558 | 90 | 290 | 27 | 4 | 244 | 51 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 24 | A+ MLE | Stockton Ports | — | 121 | 116 | 27 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 42 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 233 | 258 | 353 | 612 | 121 | 336 | 35 | 2 | 250 | 55 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 21 | ROK MLE | AZL Athletics | — | 53 | 51 | 13 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 255 | 283 | 353 | 636 | 98 | 310 | 17 | 4 | 261 | 63 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 21 | ROK RAW | AZL Athletics | — | 53 | 49 | 16 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 327 | 377 | 449 | 826 | 122 | 372 | 11 | 8 | 368 | 63 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 22 | A MLE | 2 teams | — | 450 | 426 | 90 | 13 | 2 | 4 | 17 | 120 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 211 | 245 | 279 | 524 | 68 | 283 | 27 | 4 | 229 | 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 22 | A RAW | 2 teams | — | 450 | 420 | 106 | 17 | 2 | 6 | 23 | 90 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 252 | 294 | 345 | 640 | 93 | 307 | 20 | 5 | 285 | 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 23 | A MLE | Beloit Snappers | — | 521 | 491 | 105 | 29 | 3 | 3 | 22 | 143 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 214 | 255 | 303 | 558 | 90 | 294 | 27 | 4 | 244 | 51 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 23 | A RAW | Beloit Snappers | — | 521 | 476 | 128 | 35 | 3 | 4 | 37 | 104 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 269 | 328 | 380 | 708 | 111 | 335 | 20 | 7 | 318 | 51 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 24 | A+ MLE | Stockton Ports | — | 121 | 116 | 27 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 42 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 233 | 258 | 353 | 612 | 121 | 347 | 35 | 2 | 250 | 55 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 24 | A+ RAW | Stockton Ports | — | 121 | 115 | 32 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 32 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 278 | 308 | 435 | 743 | 157 | 362 | 26 | 2 | 326 | 55 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 21 | ROK MLE | AZL Athletics | — | 53 | 51 | 13 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 255 | 283 | 353 | 636 | 98 | 289 | 17 | 4 | 261 | 63 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 22 | A MLE | 2 teams | — | 450 | 428 | 90 | 13 | 2 | 4 | 17 | 120 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 210 | 245 | 278 | 523 | 68 | 278 | 27 | 4 | 229 | 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 23 | A MLE | Beloit Snappers | — | 521 | 489 | 105 | 29 | 3 | 3 | 22 | 143 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 215 | 255 | 305 | 560 | 90 | 290 | 27 | 4 | 244 | 51 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 24 | A+ MLE | Stockton Ports | — | 121 | 116 | 27 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 42 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 233 | 258 | 353 | 612 | 121 | 336 | 35 | 2 | 250 | 55 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | MLE | — | 1145 | 1084 | 235 | 51 | 7 | 9 | 43 | 314 | 9 | 5 | 5 | 217 | 253 | 302 | 554 | 85 | 295 | 27 | 4 | 240 | 48 | -70 | -1 | +0 | +4 | +25 | -4.3 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 615 | 133 | 29 | 4 | 5 | 24 | 178 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 216 | 251 | 301 | 552 | 85 | 295 | 27 | 4 | 240 | 48 | -40 | -1 | +0 | +2 | +14 | -2.5 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2017 A+Stockton Ports · 121 PAwOBA .316 → .250 (−67)K% 26.4% → 35.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 26.45% | ÷1.010 | ×1.340 | — | — | 35.09% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 2.48% | ÷1.115 | ×0.710 | — | ×0.988 | 1.56% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.65% | — | ×0.790 | — | ×0.988 | 1.29% |
| Singles /BIP | 25.30% | ÷0.979 | ×0.910 | ×1.050 | ×0.988 | 24.39% |
| Doubles /BIP | 8.43% | ÷0.972 | ×0.820 | ×1.050 | ×0.988 | 7.38% |
| Triples /BIP | 1.20% | ÷0.900 | ×0.760 | ×1.050 | ×0.988 | 1.06% |
| Home runs /BIP | 3.61% | ÷1.397 | ×0.920 | — | ×0.988 | 2.35% |
Factors used: league row CAL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 179, 1B 96, 2B 94, 3B 80, K 102, BB 123 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 22.8 → −1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.
Result: wOBA .316 → .250; ISO .157 → .108; BABIP .362 → .336. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2016 ABeloit Snappers · 521 PAwOBA .310 → .244 (−66)K% 20.0% → 27.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 19.96% | ÷0.991 | ×1.360 | — | — | 27.41% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 6.91% | ÷1.100 | ×0.690 | — | ×0.990 | 4.29% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.96% | — | ×0.780 | — | ×0.990 | 0.74% |
| Singles /BIP | 23.12% | ÷1.058 | ×0.920 | ×1.001 | ×0.990 | 19.91% |
| Doubles /BIP | 9.41% | ÷0.940 | ×0.830 | ×1.001 | ×0.990 | 8.23% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.81% | ÷0.900 | ×0.910 | ×1.001 | ×0.990 | 0.81% |
| Home runs /BIP | 1.08% | ÷1.025 | ×0.800 | — | ×0.990 | 0.83% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 105, 1B 112, 2B 88, 3B 80, K 98, BB 120 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.0 → −1.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.001.
Result: wOBA .310 → .244; ISO .111 → .091; BABIP .335 → .290. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2015 ABeloit Snappers · 353 PAwOBA .294 → .243 (−50)K% 17.6% → 24.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 17.56% | ÷0.987 | ×1.360 | — | — | 24.20% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 5.10% | ÷0.936 | ×0.690 | — | — | 3.76% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.28% | — | ×0.780 | — | — | 0.22% |
| Singles /BIP | 24.63% | ÷1.018 | ×0.920 | ×1.026 | — | 22.83% |
| Doubles /BIP | 5.60% | ÷1.021 | ×0.830 | ×1.026 | — | 4.67% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.75% | ÷0.900 | ×0.910 | ×1.026 | — | 0.77% |
| Home runs /BIP | 1.87% | ÷1.084 | ×0.800 | — | — | 1.38% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 117, 1B 104, 2B 104, 3B 80, K 97, BB 87 — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 22.0 → +0.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.026.
Result: wOBA .294 → .243; ISO .103 → .080; BABIP .313 → .284. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2015 A+Stockton Ports · 97 PAwOBA .225 → .180 (−45)K% 28.9% → 36.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 28.87% | ÷1.072 | ×1.340 | — | — | 36.07% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 5.15% | ÷1.000 | ×0.710 | — | ×1.012 | 3.70% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.03% | — | ×0.790 | — | ×1.012 | 0.82% |
| Singles /BIP | 24.19% | ÷0.959 | ×0.910 | ×0.984 | ×1.012 | 22.85% |
| Doubles /BIP | 3.23% | ÷1.047 | ×0.820 | ×0.984 | ×1.012 | 2.52% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.926 | ×0.760 | ×0.984 | ×1.012 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 1.61% | ÷1.715 | ×0.920 | — | ×1.012 | 0.88% |
Factors used: league row CAL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 243, 1B 92, 2B 109, 3B 85, K 114, BB 100 — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 22.8 → +1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.984.
Result: wOBA .225 → .180; ISO .056 → .033; BABIP .279 → .256. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2014 ROKAZL Athletics · 53 PAwOBA .358 → .261 (−97)K% 11.3% → 16.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 11.32% | ÷1.000 | ×1.440 | — | — | 16.30% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 7.55% | ÷1.000 | ×0.620 | — | ×0.985 | 4.61% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.720 | — | ×0.985 | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 25.58% | ÷1.000 | ×0.820 | — | ×0.985 | 20.66% |
| Doubles /BIP | 9.30% | ÷1.000 | ×0.720 | — | ×0.985 | 6.60% |
| Triples /BIP | 2.33% | ÷1.000 | ×0.720 | — | ×0.985 | 1.65% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.780 | — | ×0.985 | 0.00% |
Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 21 vs a level average of 19.5 → −1.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.5 yr older than average).
Result: wOBA .358 → .261; ISO .122 → .085; BABIP .372 → .289. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).