Hunter Cole

PosRF

B/TR/R

Born1992-10-03

Age (2027)34

No MLB projection yet. Career stats below are historical.

Overview

AAALAST SEASON 2019

Year	Age	Lvl / Team	PA	AVG/OBP/SLG	HR	SB	wRC+	WAR	MLE AVG/OBP/SLG
2017	24	AASF	319	.249/.328/.431	7	2	74	—	.210/.271/.359
2018	25	AAA/AATEX	423	.299/.368/.479	16	1	88	—	.256/.303/.391
2019	26	AAAMIL	116	.308/.379/.529	5	0	88	—	.252/.310/.430

Contract

No contract data on file.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.

show model inputsbasis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral

Methodology▸ how these numbers are built

All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.

Year	Age	Lvl	Team	MLB%	PA	AB	H	2B	3B	HR	BB	SO	HBP	SB	CS	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	BABIP	K%	BB%	wOBA	wRC+	BAT	RUN	FLD	POS	REP	WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments)
2015	22	AA	Richmond Flying Squirrels	—	208	192	56	16	4	3	14	46	0	1	1	292	340	464	803	172	368	22	7	350	90	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	22	A+	San Jose Giants	—	245	217	68	11	5	6	19	42	4	4	3	313	379	493	872	180	358	17	8	378	93	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	22	A	Augusta GreenJackets	—	46	40	11	6	0	0	5	12	1	2	1	275	370	425	795	150	393	26	11	358	61	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	23	AA	Richmond Flying Squirrels	—	513	469	127	25	3	13	31	115	5	2	4	271	323	420	743	149	329	22	6	326	72	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	23	INTL	Scottsdale Scorpions	—	79	68	16	1	0	2	8	17	1	0	0	235	325	338	663	103	275	22	10	298	88	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	24	AA	Richmond Flying Squirrels	—	319	281	70	20	5	7	31	64	2	2	1	249	328	431	759	181	293	20	10	332	74	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	25	AAA	Round Rock Express	—	190	178	47	7	0	8	11	53	0	0	1	264	307	438	745	174	331	28	6	328	63	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	25	AA	Frisco RoughRiders	—	233	200	66	9	2	8	29	55	1	1	2	330	417	515	932	185	414	24	12	407	109	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	26	AAA	Nashville Sounds	—	116	104	32	6	1	5	12	33	0	0	1	308	379	529	908	221	409	28	10	398	88	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents)
2015	22	AA MLE	Richmond Flying Squirrels	—	208	196	52	14	4	3	10	56	0	1	1	265	301	423	724	158	344	27	5	301	90	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	22	A+ MLE	San Jose Giants	—	245	223	57	8	3	5	13	57	4	4	3	256	308	386	694	130	311	23	5	306	93	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	22	A MLE	Augusta GreenJackets	—	46	42	8	4	0	0	3	16	1	2	1	190	261	286	547	95	330	35	7	258	61	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	23	AA MLE	Richmond Flying Squirrels	—	513	481	115	21	2	10	19	144	5	2	4	239	275	353	629	114	309	28	4	275	72	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	24	AA MLE	Richmond Flying Squirrels	—	319	290	61	15	5	6	22	82	2	2	1	210	271	359	629	148	263	26	7	277	74	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	25	AAA MLE	Round Rock Express	—	190	181	40	5	0	6	8	65	0	0	1	221	254	348	602	127	303	34	4	262	63	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	25	AA MLE	Frisco RoughRiders	—	233	211	60	8	2	6	18	73	1	1	2	284	343	427	770	142	383	31	8	330	109	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	26	AAA MLE	Nashville Sounds	—	116	107	27	5	1	4	9	42	0	0	1	252	310	430	740	178	354	36	8	298	88	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	22	A+ MLE	3 teams	—	499	460	118	26	7	8	27	129	5	7	5	257	305	396	701	139	335	26	5	299	89	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	22	A+ RAW	3 teams	—	499	449	135	33	9	9	38	100	5	7	5	301	362	474	836	174	365	20	8	364	89	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	23	AA MLE	2 teams	—	592	554	134	25	3	12	22	166	6	2	4	242	278	363	641	121	318	28	4	275	72	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	23	AA RAW	2 teams	—	592	537	143	26	3	15	39	132	6	2	4	266	323	410	733	143	322	22	7	322	72	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	24	AA MLE	Richmond Flying Squirrels	—	319	290	61	15	5	6	22	82	2	2	1	210	271	359	629	148	266	26	7	277	74	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	24	AA RAW	Richmond Flying Squirrels	—	319	281	70	20	5	7	31	64	2	2	1	249	328	431	759	181	293	20	10	332	74	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	25	AA MLE	2 teams	—	423	392	100	13	2	12	26	137	1	1	3	255	303	390	693	135	356	32	6	299	89	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	25	AA RAW	2 teams	—	423	378	113	16	2	16	40	108	1	1	3	299	368	479	846	180	376	26	9	372	89	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	26	AAA MLE	Nashville Sounds	—	116	107	27	5	1	4	9	42	0	0	1	252	310	430	740	178	377	36	8	298	88	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	26	AAA RAW	Nashville Sounds	—	116	104	32	6	1	5	12	33	0	0	1	308	379	529	908	221	409	28	10	398	88	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	22	A+ MLE	3 teams	—	499	464	118	26	7	8	27	129	5	7	5	254	305	392	697	138	327	26	5	299	89	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	23	AA MLE	2 teams	—	592	559	134	25	3	12	22	166	6	2	4	240	278	360	638	120	309	28	4	275	72	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	24	AA MLE	Richmond Flying Squirrels	—	319	292	61	15	5	6	22	82	2	2	1	209	271	356	627	147	263	26	7	277	74	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	25	AA MLE	2 teams	—	423	393	100	13	2	12	26	137	1	1	3	254	303	389	692	135	347	32	6	299	89	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	26	AAA MLE	Nashville Sounds	—	116	106	27	5	1	4	9	42	0	0	1	255	310	434	744	179	354	36	8	298	88	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career Totals
Career	—	MLE		—	1949	1803	440	84	18	42	106	556	14	12	14	244	291	380	672	136	324	29	5	288	81	-44	-3	+0	-21	+42	-2.6
/ 162G	—	MLE		—	650	601	147	28	6	14	35	185	5	4	5	245	291	381	672	136	325	28	5	288	81	-15	-1	+0	-7	+14	-0.9

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2019 AAANashville Sounds · 116 PAwOBA .387 → .298 (−89)K% 28.4% → 36.2%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	28.45%	÷1.015	×1.290	—	—	36.17%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	10.34%	÷0.988	×0.710	—	×1.003	7.45%
HBP% /PA	0.00%	—	×0.980	—	×1.003	0.00%
Singles /BIP	28.17%	÷1.007	×0.900	—	×1.003	25.25%
Doubles /BIP	8.45%	÷0.967	×0.810	—	×1.003	7.10%
Triples /BIP	1.41%	÷1.069	×0.810	—	×1.003	1.07%
Home runs /BIP	7.04%	÷0.998	×0.780	—	×1.003	5.52%

Factors used: league row PCL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 100, 1B 101, 2B 93, 3B 114, K 103, BB 98 — applied at half strength. Age: age 27 vs a level average of 27.2 → +0.3% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr younger than average).

Result: wOBA .387 → .298; ISO .221 → .162; BABIP .409 → .354. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2018 AAFrisco RoughRiders · 233 PAwOBA .398 → .330 (−68)K% 23.6% → 31.2%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	23.61%	÷0.922	×1.220	—	—	31.22%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	11.16%	÷1.021	×0.700	—	×0.988	7.56%
HBP% /PA	0.43%	—	×0.870	—	×0.988	0.37%
Singles /BIP	32.41%	÷0.988	×0.920	×1.039	×0.988	30.99%
Doubles /BIP	6.21%	÷0.993	×0.840	×1.039	×0.988	5.39%
Triples /BIP	1.38%	÷1.150	×0.940	×1.039	×0.988	1.16%
Home runs /BIP	5.52%	÷1.088	×0.800	—	×0.988	4.01%

Factors used: league row TL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 118, 1B 98, 2B 99, 3B 130, K 84, BB 104 — applied at half strength. Age: age 26 vs a level average of 24.8 → −1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.039.

Result: wOBA .398 → .330; ISO .185 → .140; BABIP .414 → .383. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2018 AAARound Rock Express · 190 PAwOBA .320 → .262 (−58)K% 27.9% → 34.1%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	27.89%	÷1.055	×1.290	—	—	34.10%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	5.79%	÷0.978	×0.710	—	×1.018	4.28%
HBP% /PA	0.00%	—	×0.980	—	×1.018	0.00%
Singles /BIP	25.60%	÷0.962	×0.900	×1.002	×1.018	24.43%
Doubles /BIP	5.60%	÷1.019	×0.810	×1.002	×1.018	4.54%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷0.900	×0.810	×1.002	×1.018	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	6.40%	÷0.978	×0.780	—	×1.018	5.20%

Factors used: league row PCL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 96, 1B 92, 2B 104, 3B 80, K 111, BB 96 — applied at half strength. Age: age 26 vs a level average of 27.2 → +1.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.002.

Result: wOBA .320 → .262; ISO .174 → .132; BABIP .331 → .303. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2017 AARichmond Flying Squirrels · 319 PAwOBA .328 → .277 (−51)K% 20.1% → 25.8%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	20.06%	÷0.948	×1.220	—	—	25.82%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	9.72%	÷0.974	×0.700	—	×0.998	6.97%
HBP% /PA	0.63%	—	×0.850	—	×0.998	0.53%
Singles /BIP	17.51%	÷1.004	×0.970	×0.984	×0.998	16.61%
Doubles /BIP	9.22%	÷1.096	×0.860	×0.984	×0.998	7.11%
Triples /BIP	2.30%	÷0.900	×0.950	×0.984	×0.998	2.39%
Home runs /BIP	3.23%	÷0.848	×0.780	—	×0.998	2.96%

Factors used: league row EL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 70, 1B 101, 2B 119, 3B 80, K 90, BB 95 — applied at half strength. Age: age 25 vs a level average of 24.8 → −0.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.984.

Result: wOBA .328 → .277; ISO .181 → .157; BABIP .293 → .263. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2016 AARichmond Flying Squirrels · 513 PAwOBA .321 → .275 (−46)K% 22.4% → 28.1%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	22.42%	÷0.975	×1.220	—	—	28.05%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	6.04%	÷1.155	×0.700	—	×1.012	3.71%
HBP% /PA	0.97%	—	×0.850	—	×1.012	0.84%
Singles /BIP	24.29%	÷0.994	×0.970	×0.986	×1.012	23.64%
Doubles /BIP	7.06%	÷0.975	×0.860	×0.986	×1.012	6.21%
Triples /BIP	0.85%	÷1.150	×0.950	×0.986	×1.012	0.70%
Home runs /BIP	3.67%	÷0.978	×0.780	—	×1.012	2.96%

Factors used: league row EL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 96, 1B 99, 2B 95, 3B 130, K 95, BB 131 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 24.8 → +1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.986.

Result: wOBA .321 → .275; ISO .149 → .122; BABIP .329 → .309. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2015 A+San Jose Giants · 245 PAwOBA .374 → .306 (−68)K% 17.1% → 23.4%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	17.14%	÷0.983	×1.340	—	—	23.37%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	7.76%	÷0.996	×0.710	—	×0.998	5.52%
HBP% /PA	1.63%	—	×0.790	—	×0.998	1.29%
Singles /BIP	26.29%	÷0.971	×0.910	×0.987	×0.998	24.25%
Doubles /BIP	6.29%	÷1.071	×0.820	×0.987	×0.998	4.74%
Triples /BIP	2.86%	÷1.150	×0.760	×0.987	×0.998	1.86%
Home runs /BIP	3.43%	÷1.031	×0.920	—	×0.998	3.05%

Factors used: league row CAL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 106, 1B 94, 2B 114, 3B 130, K 97, BB 99 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.8 → −0.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.987.

Result: wOBA .374 → .306; ISO .180 → .139; BABIP .358 → .311. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2015 AARichmond Flying Squirrels · 208 PAwOBA .343 → .301 (−42)K% 22.1% → 26.9%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	22.12%	÷1.003	×1.220	—	—	26.91%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	6.73%	÷0.992	×0.700	—	×1.027	4.88%
HBP% /PA	0.00%	—	×0.850	—	×1.027	0.00%
Singles /BIP	22.60%	÷1.013	×0.970	×0.983	×1.027	21.84%
Doubles /BIP	10.96%	÷0.998	×0.860	×0.983	×1.027	9.53%
Triples /BIP	2.74%	÷1.025	×0.950	×0.983	×1.027	2.56%
Home runs /BIP	2.05%	÷0.860	×0.780	—	×1.027	1.91%

Factors used: league row EL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 72, 1B 103, 2B 100, 3B 105, K 101, BB 98 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 24.8 → +2.7% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.983.

Result: wOBA .343 → .301; ISO .172 → .151; BABIP .368 → .344. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2015 AAugusta GreenJackets · 46 PAwOBA .349 → .258 (−91)K% 26.1% → 35.1%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	26.09%	÷0.996	×1.340	—	—	35.08%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	10.87%	÷0.989	×0.660	—	×0.990	7.18%
HBP% /PA	2.17%	—	×0.770	—	×0.990	1.66%
Singles /BIP	17.86%	÷0.986	×0.920	—	×0.990	16.49%
Doubles /BIP	21.43%	÷1.055	×0.820	—	×0.990	16.49%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.150	×0.940	—	×0.990	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	0.00%	÷0.952	×0.820	—	×0.990	0.00%

Factors used: league row SAL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 90, 1B 97, 2B 111, 3B 130, K 99, BB 98 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.0 → −1.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr older than average).

Result: wOBA .349 → .258; ISO .150 → .106; BABIP .393 → .330. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

Not traceable per stint: some stints lack the counting stats the component translation needs. Level-wide factors that apply instead — .