Zach Houchins

Pos3B

B/TR/R

Born1992-09-16

Age (2027)34

No MLB projection yet. Career stats below are historical.

Overview

AALAST SEASON 2019

Year	Age	Lvl / Team	PA	AVG/OBP/SLG	HR	SB	wRC+	WAR	MLE AVG/OBP/SLG
2017	24	AAA/AA/INTL3 orgs	664	.258/.324/.428	18	7	76	—	.216/.257/.355
2018	25	AAA/AA/INTL3 orgs	358	.251/.308/.434	14	2	68	—	.215/.244/.377
2019	26	AASF	404	.228/.271/.371	10	2	39	—	.188/.221/.300

Contract

No contract data on file.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.

show model inputsbasis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral

Methodology▸ how these numbers are built

All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.

Year	Age	Lvl	Team	MLB%	PA	AB	H	2B	3B	HR	BB	SO	HBP	SB	CS	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	BABIP	K%	BB%	wOBA	wRC+	BAT	RUN	FLD	POS	REP	WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments)
2014	21	A	Burlington Bees	—	120	110	22	6	0	0	7	26	2	3	0	200	261	255	515	55	259	22	6	238	14	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	21	ROK	Orem Owlz	—	156	139	54	13	1	6	13	15	2	1	0	388	448	626	1.074	237	400	10	8	462	111	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	22	A	Burlington Bees	—	546	494	125	27	2	14	39	67	7	0	0	253	317	401	717	148	265	12	7	318	46	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	23	A+	Inland Empire 66ers	—	555	511	134	24	2	18	35	94	4	2	0	262	315	423	737	160	287	17	6	325	72	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	24	AAA	Salt Lake Bees	—	17	14	7	1	3	0	2	2	1	0	0	500	588	1.000	1.588	500	583	12	12	646	238	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	24	AA	Mobile BayBears	—	518	474	119	28	4	14	37	82	2	7	8	251	308	416	724	165	275	16	7	318	61	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	24	INTL	Aguilas del Zulia	—	129	110	28	5	0	4	15	26	2	0	0	255	354	409	763	155	293	20	12	340	116	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	25	AAA	Salt Lake Bees	—	100	94	29	6	0	3	3	15	2	1	2	309	343	468	812	160	338	15	3	356	80	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	25	AA	Mobile BayBears	—	198	183	43	7	1	11	13	52	0	1	1	235	286	464	750	230	262	26	7	325	60	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	25	INTL	Aguilas del Zulia	—	60	50	10	3	0	0	8	14	1	0	1	200	322	260	582	60	270	23	13	275	72	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	26	AA	Richmond Flying Squirrels	—	404	377	86	20	2	10	20	98	2	2	3	228	271	371	642	143	277	24	5	282	39	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents)
2014	21	A MLE	Burlington Bees	—	120	112	19	5	0	0	5	34	2	3	0	170	218	214	433	45	232	28	4	189	14	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	21	ROK MLE	Orem Owlz	—	156	144	41	9	1	4	8	22	2	1	0	285	331	444	776	160	298	14	5	332	111	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	22	A MLE	Burlington Bees	—	546	505	98	22	2	8	28	88	7	0	0	194	246	293	539	99	213	16	5	236	46	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	23	A+ MLE	Inland Empire 66ers	—	555	522	117	18	1	18	24	125	4	2	0	224	264	366	630	142	256	23	4	274	72	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	24	AAA MLE	Salt Lake Bees	—	17	15	6	1	2	0	1	3	1	0	0	400	471	733	1.204	333	496	18	6	520	238	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	24	AA MLE	Mobile BayBears	—	518	487	102	21	4	12	24	100	2	7	8	209	250	343	592	133	234	19	5	258	61	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	25	AAA MLE	Salt Lake Bees	—	100	96	24	5	0	2	1	19	2	1	2	250	273	365	637	115	286	19	1	287	80	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	25	AA MLE	Mobile BayBears	—	198	188	37	6	1	9	8	63	0	1	1	197	230	383	613	186	228	32	4	257	60	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	26	AA MLE	Richmond Flying Squirrels	—	404	383	72	17	1	8	14	122	2	2	3	188	221	300	521	112	242	30	3	226	39	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	21	ROK MLE	2 teams	—	276	256	60	14	1	4	13	56	4	4	0	234	282	344	626	109	281	20	5	270	69	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	21	ROK RAW	2 teams	—	276	249	76	19	1	6	20	41	4	4	0	305	366	462	828	157	341	15	7	365	69	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	22	A MLE	Burlington Bees	—	546	505	98	22	2	8	28	88	7	0	0	194	246	293	539	99	217	16	5	236	46	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	22	A RAW	Burlington Bees	—	546	494	125	27	2	14	39	67	7	0	0	253	317	401	717	148	265	12	7	318	46	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	23	A+ MLE	Inland Empire 66ers	—	555	522	117	18	1	18	24	125	4	2	0	224	264	366	630	142	258	23	4	274	72	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	23	A+ RAW	Inland Empire 66ers	—	555	511	134	24	2	18	35	94	4	2	0	262	315	423	737	160	287	17	6	325	72	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	24	AA MLE	3 teams	—	664	620	133	27	7	15	32	127	5	7	8	215	259	353	612	139	244	19	5	266	66	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	24	AA RAW	3 teams	—	664	598	154	34	7	18	54	110	5	7	8	258	324	428	752	171	286	17	8	331	66	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	25	AA MLE	3 teams	—	358	340	73	13	1	14	11	99	3	2	4	215	246	382	628	168	255	28	3	267	67	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	25	AA RAW	3 teams	—	358	327	82	16	1	14	24	81	3	2	4	251	308	434	742	183	288	23	7	325	67	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	26	AA MLE	Richmond Flying Squirrels	—	404	383	72	17	1	8	14	122	2	2	3	188	221	300	521	112	248	30	3	226	39	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	26	AA RAW	Richmond Flying Squirrels	—	404	377	86	20	2	10	20	98	2	2	3	228	271	371	642	143	277	24	5	282	39	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	21	ROK MLE	2 teams	—	276	257	60	14	1	4	13	56	4	4	0	233	282	342	624	109	269	20	5	270	69	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	22	A MLE	Burlington Bees	—	546	506	98	22	2	8	28	88	7	0	0	194	246	292	539	99	213	16	5	236	46	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	23	A+ MLE	Inland Empire 66ers	—	555	522	117	18	1	18	24	125	4	2	0	224	264	366	630	142	256	23	4	274	72	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	24	AA MLE	3 teams	—	664	622	133	27	7	15	32	127	5	7	8	214	259	352	611	138	242	19	5	266	66	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	25	AA MLE	3 teams	—	358	341	73	13	1	14	11	99	3	2	4	214	246	381	627	167	247	28	3	267	67	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	26	AA MLE	Richmond Flying Squirrels	—	404	385	72	17	1	8	14	122	2	2	3	187	221	299	519	112	242	30	3	226	39	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career Totals
Career	—	MLE		—	2803	2626	553	111	13	67	122	617	25	17	15	211	252	339	592	129	247	22	4	257	60	-134	-3	+0	+10	+61	-6.7
/ 162G	—	MLE		—	650	609	129	26	3	16	28	143	6	4	3	212	253	343	597	131	247	22	4	257	60	-31	-0	+0	+2	+14	-1.5

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2019 AARichmond Flying Squirrels · 404 PAwOBA .278 → .226 (−52)K% 24.3% → 30.3%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	24.26%	÷0.975	×1.220	—	—	30.34%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	4.95%	÷1.011	×0.700	—	×0.978	3.35%
HBP% /PA	0.50%	—	×0.850	—	×0.978	0.41%
Singles /BIP	19.35%	÷1.020	×0.970	×0.950	×0.978	17.09%
Doubles /BIP	7.17%	÷0.916	×0.860	×0.950	×0.978	6.26%
Triples /BIP	0.72%	÷1.147	×0.950	×0.950	×0.978	0.55%
Home runs /BIP	3.58%	÷0.890	×0.780	—	×0.978	3.07%

Factors used: league row EL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 78, 1B 104, 2B 83, 3B 129, K 95, BB 102 — applied at half strength. Age: age 27 vs a level average of 24.8 → −2.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.

Result: wOBA .278 → .226; ISO .143 → .117; BABIP .277 → .242. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2018 AAMobile BayBears · 198 PAwOBA .317 → .257 (−60)K% 26.3% → 31.7%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	26.26%	÷1.012	×1.220	—	—	31.67%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	6.06%	÷1.040	×0.680	—	×0.988	3.91%
HBP% /PA	0.00%	—	×0.840	—	×0.988	0.00%
Singles /BIP	18.32%	÷1.021	×0.920	×0.992	×0.988	16.18%
Doubles /BIP	5.34%	÷1.014	×0.910	×0.992	×0.988	4.70%
Triples /BIP	0.76%	÷0.944	×0.880	×0.992	×0.988	0.70%
Home runs /BIP	8.40%	÷0.959	×0.800	—	×0.988	6.92%

Factors used: league row SL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 92, 1B 104, 2B 103, 3B 89, K 102, BB 108 — applied at half strength. Age: age 26 vs a level average of 24.8 → −1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.992.

Result: wOBA .317 → .257; ISO .230 → .187; BABIP .262 → .228. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2018 AAASalt Lake Bees · 100 PAwOBA .346 → .287 (−59)K% 15.0% → 19.3%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	15.00%	÷1.003	×1.290	—	—	19.30%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	2.00%	÷1.068	×0.710	—	×1.018	1.35%
HBP% /PA	2.00%	—	×0.980	—	×1.018	2.00%
Singles /BIP	25.32%	÷1.064	×0.900	×1.012	×1.018	22.05%
Doubles /BIP	7.59%	÷1.045	×0.810	×1.012	×1.018	6.06%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷0.969	×0.810	×1.012	×1.018	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	3.80%	÷0.958	×0.780	—	×1.018	3.15%

Factors used: league row PCL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 92, 1B 113, 2B 109, 3B 94, K 101, BB 114 — applied at half strength. Age: age 26 vs a level average of 27.2 → +1.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.012.

Result: wOBA .346 → .287; ISO .160 → .128; BABIP .338 → .286. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2017 AAMobile BayBears · 518 PAwOBA .311 → .258 (−52)K% 15.8% → 19.3%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	15.83%	÷0.998	×1.220	—	—	19.34%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	6.76%	÷0.986	×0.680	—	×0.998	4.65%
HBP% /PA	0.39%	—	×0.840	—	×0.998	0.32%
Singles /BIP	18.62%	÷1.018	×0.920	×0.991	×0.998	16.64%
Doubles /BIP	7.14%	÷1.204	×0.910	×0.991	×0.998	5.34%
Triples /BIP	1.02%	÷0.930	×0.880	×0.991	×0.998	0.95%
Home runs /BIP	3.57%	÷0.896	×0.800	—	×0.998	3.18%

Factors used: league row SL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 79, 1B 104, 2B 141, 3B 86, K 100, BB 97 — applied at half strength. Age: age 25 vs a level average of 24.8 → −0.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.991.

Result: wOBA .311 → .258; ISO .165 → .139; BABIP .275 → .234. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2017 AAASalt Lake Bees · 17 PAwOBA .629 → .520 (−109)K% 11.8% → 15.0%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	11.76%	÷1.010	×1.290	—	—	15.02%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	11.76%	÷0.993	×0.710	—	×1.033	8.69%
HBP% /PA	5.88%	—	×0.980	—	×1.033	5.95%
Singles /BIP	25.00%	÷0.986	×0.900	—	×1.033	23.56%
Doubles /BIP	8.33%	÷1.009	×0.810	—	×1.033	6.91%
Triples /BIP	25.00%	÷1.093	×0.810	—	×1.033	19.13%
Home runs /BIP	0.00%	÷0.989	×0.780	—	×1.033	0.00%

Factors used: league row PCL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 98, 1B 97, 2B 102, 3B 119, K 102, BB 99 — applied at half strength. Age: age 25 vs a level average of 27.2 → +3.3% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.2 yr younger than average).

Result: wOBA .629 → .520; ISO .500 → .386; BABIP .583 → .496. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2016 A+Inland Empire 66ers · 555 PAwOBA .319 → .274 (−45)K% 16.9% → 22.5%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	16.94%	÷1.009	×1.340	—	—	22.49%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	6.31%	÷0.998	×0.710	—	×0.988	4.43%
HBP% /PA	0.72%	—	×0.790	—	×0.988	0.56%
Singles /BIP	21.58%	÷0.968	×0.910	×0.994	×0.988	19.93%
Doubles /BIP	5.76%	÷1.034	×0.820	×0.994	×0.988	4.48%
Triples /BIP	0.48%	÷1.150	×0.760	×0.994	×0.988	0.31%
Home runs /BIP	4.32%	÷0.873	×0.920	—	×0.988	4.49%

Factors used: league row CAL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 75, 1B 94, 2B 107, 3B 130, K 102, BB 100 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 22.8 → −1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.994.

Result: wOBA .319 → .274; ISO .160 → .146; BABIP .287 → .256. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2015 ABurlington Bees · 546 PAwOBA .313 → .236 (−77)K% 12.3% → 16.2%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	12.27%	÷1.029	×1.360	—	—	16.21%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	7.14%	÷0.936	×0.690	—	×0.990	5.21%
HBP% /PA	1.28%	—	×0.780	—	×0.990	0.99%
Singles /BIP	19.20%	÷1.107	×0.920	×0.991	×0.990	15.66%
Doubles /BIP	6.32%	÷0.992	×0.830	×0.991	×0.990	5.19%
Triples /BIP	0.47%	÷1.150	×0.910	×0.991	×0.990	0.36%
Home runs /BIP	3.28%	÷1.423	×0.800	—	×0.990	1.83%

Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 185, 1B 121, 2B 98, 3B 130, K 106, BB 87 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.0 → −1.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.991.

Result: wOBA .313 → .236; ISO .148 → .098; BABIP .265 → .213. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2014 ROKOrem Owlz · 156 PAwOBA .455 → .332 (−123)K% 9.6% → 13.8%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	9.62%	÷1.000	×1.440	—	—	13.85%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	8.33%	÷1.000	×0.610	—	×0.975	4.96%
HBP% /PA	1.28%	—	×0.720	—	×0.975	0.90%
Singles /BIP	27.42%	÷1.000	×0.820	×0.978	×0.975	21.44%
Doubles /BIP	10.48%	÷1.000	×0.720	×0.978	×0.975	7.20%
Triples /BIP	0.81%	÷1.000	×0.720	×0.978	×0.975	0.55%
Home runs /BIP	4.84%	÷1.000	×0.750	—	×0.975	3.54%

Factors used: league row PIO. Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 19.5 → −2.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.5 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.978.

Result: wOBA .455 → .332; ISO .237 → .171; BABIP .400 → .298. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

Not traceable per stint: some stints lack the counting stats the component translation needs. Level-wide factors that apply instead — .