Matt Williams

PosSS

B/TR/R

Born1989-08-29

Age (2027)37

No MLB projection yet. Career stats below are historical.

Overview

AAALAST SEASON 2017

Year	Age	Lvl / Team	PA	AVG/OBP/SLG	HR	SB	wRC+	WAR	MLE AVG/OBP/SLG
2015	25	AAA/AASTL	248	.233/.355/.316	3	7	57	—	.199/.294/.259
2016	26	AAASTL	395	.263/.358/.346	1	11	66	—	.232/.299/.305
2017	27	AAAPHI	306	.241/.307/.369	6	10	51	—	.206/.253/.312

Contract

No contract data on file.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.

show model inputsbasis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral

Methodology▸ how these numbers are built

All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.

Year	Age	Lvl	Team	MLB%	PA	AB	H	2B	3B	HR	BB	SO	HBP	SB	CS	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	BABIP	K%	BB%	wOBA	wRC+	BAT	RUN	FLD	POS	REP	WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments)
2011	21	ROK	Johnson City Cardinals	—	265	229	67	19	1	6	27	45	6	20	2	293	382	463	845	170	343	17	10	373	63	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	22	A	Quad Cities River Bandits	—	587	525	141	32	5	6	48	91	4	23	12	269	334	383	717	114	314	16	8	318	61	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	23	AA	Springfield Cardinals	—	31	28	3	0	0	0	1	3	0	1	0	107	138	107	245		115	10	3	110	-43	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	23	A+	Palm Beach Cardinals	—	266	237	62	10	0	3	26	33	2	11	4	262	340	342	681	80	294	12	10	312	59	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	24	AA	Springfield Cardinals	—	357	304	76	10	2	1	43	62	2	14	7	250	347	306	653	56	307	17	12	299	60	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	24	A+	Palm Beach Cardinals	—	29	24	6	0	1	1	3	7	2	0	0	250	379	458	838	208	312	24	10	375	86	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	25	AAA	Memphis Redbirds	—	178	146	35	6	1	0	29	27	1	5	2	240	369	295	664	55	289	15	16	313	59	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	25	AA	Springfield Cardinals	—	70	60	13	0	0	3	8	11	1	2	2	217	319	367	686	150	217	16	11	309	53	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	26	AAA	Memphis Redbirds	—	395	338	89	19	3	1	49	67	1	11	7	263	358	346	704	83	321	17	12	319	66	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	27	AAA	Lehigh Valley IronPigs	—	306	274	66	13	2	6	24	38	2	10	8	241	307	369	675	128	260	12	8	299	51	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents)
2011	21	ROK MLE	Johnson City Cardinals	—	265	239	51	13	1	5	17	64	6	20	2	213	282	339	621	126	260	24	6	262	63	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	22	A MLE	Quad Cities River Bandits	—	587	545	125	29	4	5	28	119	4	23	12	229	272	325	597	95	277	20	5	259	61	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	23	AA MLE	Springfield Cardinals	—	31	28	3	0	0	0	1	4	0	1	0	107	138	107	245		109	13	3	104	-43	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	23	A+ MLE	Palm Beach Cardinals	—	266	244	54	9	0	3	19	48	2	11	4	221	283	295	578	74	264	18	7	256	59	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	24	AA MLE	Springfield Cardinals	—	357	318	74	9	2	1	29	78	2	14	7	233	301	283	584	50	289	22	8	257	60	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	24	A+ MLE	Palm Beach Cardinals	—	29	25	5	0	1	1	2	10	2	0	0	200	310	400	710	200	266	34	7	295	86	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	25	AAA MLE	Memphis Redbirds	—	178	154	31	5	1	0	21	36	1	5	2	201	301	247	548	45	255	20	12	256	59	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	25	AA MLE	Springfield Cardinals	—	70	62	12	0	0	2	6	14	1	2	2	194	275	290	566	97	203	20	9	246	53	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	26	AAA MLE	Memphis Redbirds	—	395	354	82	17	3	1	33	87	1	11	7	232	299	305	604	73	288	22	8	266	66	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	27	AAA MLE	Lehigh Valley IronPigs	—	306	282	58	11	2	5	16	47	2	10	8	206	253	312	565	106	223	15	5	243	51	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	21	ROK MLE	Johnson City Cardinals	—	265	239	51	13	1	5	17	64	6	20	2	213	282	339	621	126	271	24	6	262	63	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	21	ROK RAW	Johnson City Cardinals	—	265	229	67	19	1	6	27	45	6	20	2	293	382	463	845	170	343	17	10	373	63	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	22	A MLE	Quad Cities River Bandits	—	587	545	125	29	4	5	28	119	4	23	12	229	272	325	597	95	284	20	5	259	61	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	22	A RAW	Quad Cities River Bandits	—	587	525	141	32	5	6	48	91	4	23	12	269	334	383	717	114	314	16	8	318	61	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	23	A+ MLE	2 teams	—	297	272	57	9	0	3	20	52	2	12	4	210	269	276	544	66	248	18	7	240	49	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	23	A+ RAW	2 teams	—	297	265	65	10	0	3	27	36	2	12	4	245	320	317	637	72	273	12	9	291	49	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	24	AA MLE	2 teams	—	386	343	79	9	3	2	31	88	4	14	7	230	302	292	593	61	301	23	8	260	62	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	24	AA RAW	2 teams	—	386	328	82	10	3	2	46	69	4	14	7	250	349	317	666	67	308	18	12	304	62	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	25	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	248	217	43	5	1	2	26	50	2	7	4	198	290	258	548	60	246	20	10	253	57	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	25	AAA RAW	2 teams	—	248	206	48	6	1	3	37	38	2	7	4	233	355	316	671	83	269	15	15	311	57	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	26	AAA MLE	Memphis Redbirds	—	395	354	82	17	3	1	33	87	1	11	7	232	299	305	604	73	300	22	8	266	66	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	26	AAA RAW	Memphis Redbirds	—	395	338	89	19	3	1	49	67	1	11	7	263	358	346	704	83	321	17	12	319	66	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	27	AAA MLE	Lehigh Valley IronPigs	—	306	282	58	11	2	5	16	47	2	10	8	206	253	312	565	106	229	15	5	243	51	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	27	AAA RAW	Lehigh Valley IronPigs	—	306	274	66	13	2	6	24	38	2	10	8	241	307	369	675	128	260	12	8	299	51	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	21	ROK MLE	Johnson City Cardinals	—	265	240	51	13	1	5	17	64	6	20	2	212	282	338	620	125	260	24	6	262	63	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	22	A MLE	Quad Cities River Bandits	—	587	550	125	29	4	5	28	119	4	23	12	227	272	322	594	95	277	20	5	259	61	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	23	A+ MLE	2 teams	—	297	273	57	9	0	3	20	52	2	12	4	209	269	275	543	66	248	18	7	240	49	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	24	AA MLE	2 teams	—	386	348	79	9	3	2	31	88	4	14	7	227	302	287	589	60	287	23	8	260	62	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	25	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	248	218	43	5	1	2	26	50	2	7	4	197	290	257	547	60	240	20	10	253	57	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	26	AAA MLE	Memphis Redbirds	—	395	358	82	17	3	1	33	87	1	11	7	229	299	302	601	73	288	22	8	266	66	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	27	AAA MLE	Lehigh Valley IronPigs	—	306	285	58	11	2	5	16	47	2	10	8	204	253	309	562	105	223	15	5	243	51	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career Totals
Career	—	MLE		—	2484	2252	495	93	14	23	171	507	21	97	44	220	281	304	585	84	272	20	7	256	59	-120	+2	+0	+27	+54	-3.9
/ 162G	—	MLE		—	650	589	130	24	4	6	45	133	5	25	12	221	281	306	587	85	274	20	7	256	59	-32	+0	+0	+7	+14	-1.0

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2017 AAALehigh Valley IronPigs · 306 PAwOBA .292 → .243 (−49)K% 12.4% → 15.5%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	12.42%	÷0.961	×1.200	—	—	15.50%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	7.84%	÷1.014	×0.690	—	×0.992	5.29%
HBP% /PA	0.65%	—	×0.940	—	×0.992	0.61%
Singles /BIP	19.07%	÷1.055	×0.930	×0.989	×0.992	16.49%
Doubles /BIP	5.51%	÷0.969	×0.830	×0.989	×0.992	4.63%
Triples /BIP	0.85%	÷1.047	×0.970	×0.989	×0.992	0.77%
Home runs /BIP	2.54%	÷1.043	×0.840	—	×0.992	2.03%

Factors used: league row IL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 109, 1B 111, 2B 94, 3B 109, K 92, BB 103 — applied at half strength. Age: age 28 vs a level average of 27.2 → −0.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.989.

Result: wOBA .292 → .243; ISO .128 → .108; BABIP .260 → .223. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2016 AAAMemphis Redbirds · 395 PAwOBA .312 → .266 (−45)K% 17.0% → 22.1%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	16.96%	÷0.988	×1.290	—	—	22.14%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	11.65%	÷0.983	×0.710	—	×1.003	8.44%
HBP% /PA	0.25%	—	×0.980	—	×1.003	0.25%
Singles /BIP	24.35%	÷0.989	×0.900	×0.998	×1.003	22.18%
Doubles /BIP	7.01%	÷0.941	×0.810	×0.998	×1.003	6.04%
Triples /BIP	1.11%	÷0.951	×0.810	×0.998	×1.003	0.94%
Home runs /BIP	0.37%	÷0.931	×0.780	—	×1.003	0.31%

Factors used: league row PCL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 86, 1B 98, 2B 88, 3B 90, K 98, BB 97 — applied at half strength. Age: age 27 vs a level average of 27.2 → +0.3% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.998.

Result: wOBA .312 → .266; ISO .083 → .072; BABIP .321 → .288. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2015 AAAMemphis Redbirds · 178 PAwOBA .309 → .256 (−53)K% 15.2% → 20.2%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	15.17%	÷0.967	×1.290	—	—	20.23%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	16.29%	÷1.013	×0.710	—	×1.018	11.63%
HBP% /PA	0.56%	—	×0.980	—	×1.018	0.56%
Singles /BIP	23.53%	÷1.030	×0.900	×0.994	×1.018	20.80%
Doubles /BIP	5.04%	÷0.946	×0.810	×0.994	×1.018	4.37%
Triples /BIP	0.84%	÷0.900	×0.810	×0.994	×1.018	0.77%
Home runs /BIP	0.00%	÷1.224	×0.780	—	×1.018	0.00%

Factors used: league row PCL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 145, 1B 106, 2B 89, 3B 80, K 93, BB 103 — applied at half strength. Age: age 26 vs a level average of 27.2 → +1.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.994.

Result: wOBA .309 → .256; ISO .055 → .049; BABIP .289 → .255. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2015 AASpringfield Cardinals · 70 PAwOBA .301 → .246 (−55)K% 15.7% → 19.6%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	15.71%	÷0.978	×1.220	—	—	19.61%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	11.43%	÷1.000	×0.700	—	×0.988	7.90%
HBP% /PA	1.43%	—	×0.870	—	×0.988	1.23%
Singles /BIP	20.41%	÷0.982	×0.920	×1.031	×0.988	19.49%
Doubles /BIP	0.00%	÷1.003	×0.840	×1.031	×0.988	0.00%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.003	×0.940	×1.031	×0.988	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	6.12%	÷1.140	×0.800	—	×0.988	4.25%

Factors used: league row TL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 128, 1B 96, 2B 101, 3B 101, K 96, BB 100 — applied at half strength. Age: age 26 vs a level average of 24.8 → −1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.031.

Result: wOBA .301 → .246; ISO .150 → .106; BABIP .217 → .203. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2014 AASpringfield Cardinals · 357 PAwOBA .293 → .257 (−36)K% 17.4% → 21.8%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	17.37%	÷0.972	×1.220	—	—	21.80%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	11.76%	÷1.033	×0.700	—	×0.998	7.95%
HBP% /PA	0.56%	—	×0.870	—	×0.998	0.49%
Singles /BIP	26.03%	÷0.974	×0.920	×1.009	×0.998	24.78%
Doubles /BIP	4.13%	÷0.982	×0.840	×1.009	×0.998	3.56%
Triples /BIP	0.83%	÷0.991	×0.940	×1.009	×0.998	0.79%
Home runs /BIP	0.41%	÷1.221	×0.800	—	×0.998	0.27%

Factors used: league row TL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 144, 1B 95, 2B 96, 3B 98, K 94, BB 107 — applied at half strength. Age: age 25 vs a level average of 24.8 → −0.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.009.

Result: wOBA .293 → .257; ISO .056 → .049; BABIP .307 → .289. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2014 A+Palm Beach Cardinals · 29 PAwOBA .366 → .295 (−70)K% 24.1% → 34.3%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	24.14%	÷0.998	×1.420	—	—	34.33%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	10.34%	÷0.971	×0.750	—	×0.978	7.82%
HBP% /PA	6.90%	—	×0.930	—	×0.978	6.27%
Singles /BIP	23.53%	÷1.073	×0.920	—	×0.978	19.72%
Doubles /BIP	0.00%	÷0.933	×0.960	—	×0.978	0.00%
Triples /BIP	5.88%	÷0.900	×0.810	—	×0.978	5.18%
Home runs /BIP	5.88%	÷0.809	×0.880	—	×0.978	6.26%

Factors used: league row FSL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 62, 1B 115, 2B 87, 3B 80, K 100, BB 94 — applied at half strength. Age: age 25 vs a level average of 22.8 → −2.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.2 yr older than average).

Result: wOBA .366 → .295; ISO .208 → .182; BABIP .312 → .266. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2013 A+Palm Beach Cardinals · 266 PAwOBA .304 → .256 (−49)K% 12.4% → 18.1%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	12.41%	÷0.974	×1.420	—	—	18.10%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	9.77%	÷1.026	×0.750	—	×0.988	7.06%
HBP% /PA	0.75%	—	×0.930	—	×0.988	0.69%
Singles /BIP	24.02%	÷1.024	×0.920	×1.006	×0.988	21.45%
Doubles /BIP	4.90%	÷1.015	×0.960	×1.006	×0.988	4.61%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷0.964	×0.810	×1.006	×0.988	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	1.47%	÷0.972	×0.880	—	×0.988	1.31%

Factors used: league row FSL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 94, 1B 105, 2B 103, 3B 93, K 95, BB 105 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 22.8 → −1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.006.

Result: wOBA .304 → .256; ISO .080 → .071; BABIP .294 → .264. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2013 AASpringfield Cardinals · 31 PAwOBA .111 → .104 (−7)K% 9.7% → 11.4%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	9.68%	÷1.032	×1.220	—	—	11.44%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	3.23%	÷1.030	×0.700	—	×1.012	2.22%
HBP% /PA	0.00%	—	×0.870	—	×1.012	0.00%
Singles /BIP	12.00%	÷0.991	×0.920	—	×1.012	11.27%
Doubles /BIP	0.00%	÷1.184	×0.840	—	×1.012	0.00%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.150	×0.940	—	×1.012	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	0.00%	÷1.143	×0.800	—	×1.012	0.00%

Factors used: league row TL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 129, 1B 98, 2B 137, 3B 130, K 106, BB 106 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 24.8 → +1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr younger than average).

Result: wOBA .111 → .104; ISO .000 → .000; BABIP .115 → .109. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).