John Norwood

PosRF

B/TR/R

Born1992-09-24

Age (2027)34

No MLB projection yet. Career stats below are historical.

Overview

AALAST SEASON 2018

Year	Age	Lvl / Team	PA	AVG/OBP/SLG	HR	SB	wRC+	WAR	MLE AVG/OBP/SLG
2016	23	A+MIA	531	.271/.350/.397	9	14	73	—	.225/.293/.331
2017	24	AAMIA	539	.285/.369/.459	19	4	80	—	.235/.295/.352
2018	25	AAMIA	439	.242/.313/.351	7	14	53	—	.211/.256/.303

Contract

No contract data on file.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.

show model inputsbasis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral

Methodology▸ how these numbers are built

All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.

Year	Age	Lvl	Team	MLB%	PA	AB	H	2B	3B	HR	BB	SO	HBP	SB	CS	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	BABIP	K%	BB%	wOBA	wRC+	BAT	RUN	FLD	POS	REP	WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments)
2015	22	A	Greensboro Grasshoppers	—	499	446	104	19	2	16	42	113	5	34	14	233	306	392	699	159	274	23	8	310	40	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	23	A+	Jupiter Hammerheads	—	531	469	127	24	4	9	49	116	8	14	12	271	350	397	746	126	339	22	9	334	73	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	24	AA	Jacksonville Jumbo Shrimp	—	539	473	135	17	4	19	59	134	4	4	4	285	369	459	828	173	359	25	11	367	80	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	25	AA	Jacksonville Jumbo Shrimp	—	439	396	96	18	2	7	41	120	0	14	9	242	313	351	664	109	330	27	9	301	53	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents)
2015	22	A MLE	Greensboro Grasshoppers	—	499	460	84	15	2	9	28	157	5	34	14	183	237	283	520	100	246	31	6	227	40	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	23	A+ MLE	Jupiter Hammerheads	—	531	480	108	21	3	8	38	167	8	14	12	225	293	331	624	106	318	31	7	276	73	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	24	AA MLE	Jacksonville Jumbo Shrimp	—	539	494	116	16	3	12	38	167	4	4	4	235	295	352	647	117	326	31	7	287	80	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	25	AA MLE	Jacksonville Jumbo Shrimp	—	439	413	87	19	2	5	25	139	0	14	9	211	256	303	558	92	303	32	6	247	53	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	22	A MLE	Greensboro Grasshoppers	—	499	460	84	15	2	9	28	157	5	34	14	183	237	283	520	100	252	31	6	227	40	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	22	A RAW	Greensboro Grasshoppers	—	499	446	104	19	2	16	42	113	5	34	14	233	306	392	699	159	274	23	8	310	40	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	23	A+ MLE	Jupiter Hammerheads	—	531	480	108	21	3	8	38	167	8	14	12	225	293	331	624	106	324	31	7	276	73	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	23	A+ RAW	Jupiter Hammerheads	—	531	469	127	24	4	9	49	116	8	14	12	271	350	397	746	126	339	22	9	334	73	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	24	AA MLE	Jacksonville Jumbo Shrimp	—	539	494	116	16	3	12	38	167	4	4	4	235	295	352	647	117	327	31	7	287	80	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	24	AA RAW	Jacksonville Jumbo Shrimp	—	539	473	135	17	4	19	59	134	4	4	4	285	369	459	828	173	359	25	11	367	80	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	25	AA MLE	Jacksonville Jumbo Shrimp	—	439	413	87	19	2	5	25	139	0	14	9	211	256	303	558	92	304	32	6	247	53	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	25	AA RAW	Jacksonville Jumbo Shrimp	—	439	396	96	18	2	7	41	120	0	14	9	242	313	351	664	109	330	27	9	301	53	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	22	A MLE	Greensboro Grasshoppers	—	499	463	84	15	2	9	28	157	5	34	14	181	237	281	518	99	246	31	6	227	40	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	23	A+ MLE	Jupiter Hammerheads	—	531	480	108	21	3	8	38	167	8	14	12	225	293	331	624	106	318	31	7	276	73	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	24	AA MLE	Jacksonville Jumbo Shrimp	—	539	492	116	16	3	12	38	167	4	4	4	236	295	354	648	118	326	31	7	287	80	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	25	AA MLE	Jacksonville Jumbo Shrimp	—	439	411	87	19	2	5	25	139	0	14	9	212	256	304	560	92	303	32	6	247	53	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career Totals
Career	—	MLE		—	2008	1847	395	71	10	34	129	630	17	66	39	214	271	318	590	104	302	31	6	260	62	-90	-2	+0	-22	+44	-7.2
/ 162G	—	MLE		—	650	598	128	23	3	11	42	204	6	21	13	214	273	318	591	104	302	31	6	260	62	-29	-1	+0	-7	+14	-2.3

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2018 AAJacksonville Jumbo Shrimp · 439 PAwOBA .294 → .247 (−47)K% 27.3% → 31.7%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	27.33%	÷1.052	×1.220	—	—	31.70%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	9.34%	÷1.122	×0.680	—	×0.988	5.59%
HBP% /PA	0.00%	—	×0.840	—	×0.988	0.00%
Singles /BIP	25.00%	÷1.050	×0.920	×1.027	×0.988	22.23%
Doubles /BIP	6.52%	÷0.875	×0.910	×1.027	×0.988	6.89%
Triples /BIP	0.72%	÷0.900	×0.880	×1.027	×0.988	0.72%
Home runs /BIP	2.54%	÷1.041	×0.800	—	×0.988	1.93%

Factors used: league row SL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 108, 1B 110, 2B 75, 3B 80, K 110, BB 124 — applied at half strength. Age: age 26 vs a level average of 24.8 → −1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.027.

Result: wOBA .294 → .247; ISO .109 → .098; BABIP .330 → .303. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2017 AAJacksonville Jumbo Shrimp · 539 PAwOBA .360 → .287 (−72)K% 24.9% → 31.0%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	24.86%	÷0.978	×1.220	—	—	31.01%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	10.95%	÷1.042	×0.680	—	×0.998	7.13%
HBP% /PA	0.74%	—	×0.840	—	×0.998	0.62%
Singles /BIP	28.02%	÷1.029	×0.920	×1.035	×0.998	25.86%
Doubles /BIP	5.01%	÷0.985	×0.910	×1.035	×0.998	4.78%
Triples /BIP	1.18%	÷1.070	×0.880	×1.035	×0.998	1.00%
Home runs /BIP	5.60%	÷1.185	×0.800	—	×0.998	3.78%

Factors used: league row SL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 137, 1B 106, 2B 97, 3B 114, K 96, BB 108 — applied at half strength. Age: age 25 vs a level average of 24.8 → −0.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.035.

Result: wOBA .360 → .287; ISO .173 → .126; BABIP .359 → .326. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2016 A+Jupiter Hammerheads · 531 PAwOBA .328 → .276 (−52)K% 21.8% → 31.4%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	21.85%	÷0.987	×1.420	—	—	31.44%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	9.04%	÷0.933	×0.750	—	×0.988	7.18%
HBP% /PA	1.51%	—	×0.930	—	×0.988	1.38%
Singles /BIP	25.50%	÷1.005	×0.920	×1.030	×0.988	23.76%
Doubles /BIP	6.80%	÷1.003	×0.960	×1.030	×0.988	6.62%
Triples /BIP	1.13%	÷0.900	×0.810	×1.030	×0.988	1.04%
Home runs /BIP	2.55%	÷0.918	×0.880	—	×0.988	2.41%

Factors used: league row FSL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 84, 1B 101, 2B 101, 3B 80, K 97, BB 87 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 22.8 → −1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.030.

Result: wOBA .328 → .276; ISO .126 → .108; BABIP .339 → .318. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2015 AGreensboro Grasshoppers · 499 PAwOBA .304 → .227 (−77)K% 22.6% → 31.5%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	22.65%	÷0.962	×1.340	—	—	31.53%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	8.42%	÷0.973	×0.660	—	×0.990	5.65%
HBP% /PA	1.00%	—	×0.770	—	×0.990	0.76%
Singles /BIP	20.12%	÷1.006	×0.920	×1.035	×0.990	18.86%
Doubles /BIP	5.71%	÷1.014	×0.820	×1.035	×0.990	4.73%
Triples /BIP	0.60%	÷0.900	×0.940	×1.035	×0.990	0.64%
Home runs /BIP	4.80%	÷1.391	×0.820	—	×0.990	2.80%

Factors used: league row SAL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 178, 1B 101, 2B 103, 3B 80, K 92, BB 95 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.0 → −1.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.035.

Result: wOBA .304 → .227; ISO .159 → .100; BABIP .274 → .246. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).