Jose Rojas
| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | 20 | ROKTB | 303 | .280/.394/.468 | 8 | 5 | 47 | — | .172/.269/.275 |
| 2014 | 21 | ROKGCL Rays | 138 | .258/.301/.367 | 1 | 2 | 28 | — | .183/.213/.260 |
| 2015 | 22 | ROKPrinceton Rays | 99 | .266/.296/.415 | 3 | 0 | 40 | — | .189/.214/.284 |
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2011 | 18 | ROK | DSL Rays | — | 55 | 48 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 188 | 291 | 208 | 499 | 21 | 220 | 13 | 13 | 244 | -1 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 19 | ROK | DSL Rays | — | 257 | 219 | 56 | 16 | 3 | 2 | 32 | 36 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 256 | 353 | 384 | 737 | 128 | 292 | 14 | 12 | 328 | 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 20 | ROK | DSL Rays | — | 303 | 250 | 70 | 21 | 1 | 8 | 39 | 31 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 280 | 394 | 468 | 862 | 188 | 287 | 10 | 13 | 378 | 47 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 21 | ROK | GCL Rays | — | 138 | 128 | 33 | 11 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 21 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 258 | 301 | 367 | 669 | 109 | 296 | 15 | 4 | 296 | 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 22 | ROK | Princeton Rays | — | 99 | 94 | 25 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 11 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 266 | 296 | 415 | 711 | 149 | 275 | 11 | 2 | 312 | 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2011 | 18 | ROK MLE | DSL Rays | — | 55 | 50 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 140 | 218 | 160 | 378 | 20 | 151 | 16 | 9 | 166 | -1 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 19 | ROK MLE | DSL Rays | — | 257 | 229 | 37 | 10 | 2 | 1 | 22 | 44 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 162 | 238 | 236 | 474 | 74 | 183 | 17 | 9 | 212 | 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 20 | ROK MLE | DSL Rays | — | 303 | 262 | 45 | 13 | 1 | 4 | 27 | 38 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 172 | 269 | 275 | 544 | 103 | 172 | 13 | 9 | 237 | 47 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 21 | ROK MLE | GCL Rays | — | 138 | 131 | 24 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 30 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 183 | 213 | 260 | 473 | 76 | 226 | 22 | 2 | 209 | 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 22 | ROK MLE | Princeton Rays | — | 99 | 95 | 18 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 16 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 189 | 214 | 284 | 498 | 95 | 214 | 16 | 1 | 227 | 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 18 | ROK MLE | DSL Rays | — | 55 | 50 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 140 | 218 | 160 | 378 | 20 | 171 | 16 | 9 | 166 | -1 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 18 | ROK RAW | DSL Rays | — | 55 | 48 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 188 | 291 | 208 | 499 | 21 | 220 | 13 | 13 | 244 | -1 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 19 | ROK MLE | DSL Rays | — | 257 | 229 | 37 | 10 | 2 | 1 | 22 | 44 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 162 | 238 | 236 | 474 | 74 | 191 | 17 | 9 | 212 | 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 19 | ROK RAW | DSL Rays | — | 257 | 219 | 56 | 16 | 3 | 2 | 32 | 36 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 256 | 353 | 384 | 737 | 128 | 292 | 14 | 12 | 328 | 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 20 | ROK MLE | DSL Rays | — | 303 | 262 | 45 | 13 | 1 | 4 | 27 | 38 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 172 | 269 | 275 | 544 | 103 | 182 | 13 | 9 | 237 | 47 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 20 | ROK RAW | DSL Rays | — | 303 | 250 | 70 | 21 | 1 | 8 | 39 | 31 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 280 | 394 | 468 | 862 | 188 | 287 | 10 | 13 | 378 | 47 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 21 | ROK MLE | GCL Rays | — | 138 | 131 | 24 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 30 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 183 | 213 | 260 | 473 | 76 | 225 | 22 | 2 | 209 | 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 21 | ROK RAW | GCL Rays | — | 138 | 128 | 33 | 11 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 21 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 258 | 301 | 367 | 669 | 109 | 296 | 15 | 4 | 296 | 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 22 | ROK MLE | Princeton Rays | — | 99 | 95 | 18 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 16 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 189 | 214 | 284 | 498 | 95 | 208 | 16 | 1 | 227 | 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 22 | ROK RAW | Princeton Rays | — | 99 | 94 | 25 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 11 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 266 | 296 | 415 | 711 | 149 | 275 | 11 | 2 | 312 | 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 18 | ROK MLE | DSL Rays | — | 55 | 50 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 140 | 218 | 160 | 378 | 20 | 151 | 16 | 9 | 166 | -1 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 19 | ROK MLE | DSL Rays | — | 257 | 232 | 37 | 10 | 2 | 1 | 22 | 44 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 159 | 238 | 233 | 471 | 73 | 183 | 17 | 9 | 212 | 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 20 | ROK MLE | DSL Rays | — | 303 | 265 | 45 | 13 | 1 | 4 | 27 | 38 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 170 | 269 | 272 | 541 | 102 | 172 | 13 | 9 | 237 | 47 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 21 | ROK MLE | GCL Rays | — | 138 | 132 | 24 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 30 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 182 | 213 | 258 | 471 | 76 | 226 | 22 | 2 | 209 | 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 22 | ROK MLE | Princeton Rays | — | 99 | 96 | 18 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 16 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 188 | 214 | 281 | 496 | 94 | 214 | 16 | 1 | 227 | 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | MLE | — | 852 | 767 | 131 | 34 | 3 | 8 | 58 | 137 | 13 | 8 | 9 | 171 | 241 | 254 | 495 | 83 | 194 | 16 | 7 | 219 | 34 | -66 | -2 | +0 | -15 | +18 | -6.7 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 585 | 100 | 26 | 2 | 6 | 44 | 105 | 10 | 6 | 7 | 171 | 241 | 253 | 494 | 82 | 195 | 16 | 7 | 219 | 34 | -51 | -2 | +0 | -12 | +14 | -5.1 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2015 ROKPrinceton Rays · 99 PAwOBA .303 → .227 (−76)K% 11.1% → 15.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 11.11% | ÷1.000 | ×1.420 | — | — | 15.78% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 2.02% | ÷1.000 | ×0.640 | — | ×0.975 | 1.26% |
| HBP% /PA | 2.02% | — | ×0.740 | — | ×0.975 | 1.46% |
| Singles /BIP | 20.48% | ÷1.000 | ×0.840 | ×0.987 | ×0.975 | 16.55% |
| Doubles /BIP | 6.02% | ÷1.000 | ×0.740 | ×0.987 | ×0.975 | 4.29% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.740 | ×0.987 | ×0.975 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 3.61% | ÷1.000 | ×0.800 | — | ×0.975 | 2.82% |
Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 19.5 → −2.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.5 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.987.
Result: wOBA .303 → .227; ISO .149 → .109; BABIP .275 → .214. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2014 ROKGCL Rays · 138 PAwOBA .289 → .209 (−81)K% 15.2% → 21.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 15.22% | ÷1.000 | ×1.440 | — | — | 21.91% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 3.62% | ÷1.000 | ×0.620 | — | ×0.985 | 2.21% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.45% | — | ×0.720 | — | ×0.985 | 1.03% |
| Singles /BIP | 19.63% | ÷1.000 | ×0.820 | ×0.990 | ×0.985 | 15.70% |
| Doubles /BIP | 10.28% | ÷1.000 | ×0.720 | ×0.990 | ×0.985 | 7.22% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.720 | ×0.990 | ×0.985 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.93% | ÷1.000 | ×0.780 | — | ×0.985 | 0.72% |
Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 21 vs a level average of 19.5 → −1.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.5 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.990.
Result: wOBA .289 → .209; ISO .109 → .076; BABIP .296 → .226. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2013 DSLDSL Rays · 303 PAwOBA .375 → .237 (−137)K% 10.2% → 12.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 10.23% | ÷1.000 | ×1.220 | — | — | 12.48% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 12.87% | ÷1.000 | ×0.700 | — | ×0.985 | 8.87% |
| HBP% /PA | 2.64% | — | ×0.700 | — | ×0.985 | 1.82% |
| Singles /BIP | 18.26% | ÷1.000 | ×0.680 | ×0.950 | ×0.985 | 11.62% |
| Doubles /BIP | 9.59% | ÷1.000 | ×0.600 | ×0.950 | ×0.985 | 5.38% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.46% | ÷1.000 | ×0.600 | ×0.950 | ×0.985 | 0.26% |
| Home runs /BIP | 3.65% | ÷1.000 | ×0.470 | — | ×0.985 | 1.69% |
Factors used: level-wide DSL factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 20 vs a level average of 18.5 → −1.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.5 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.
Result: wOBA .375 → .237; ISO .188 → .102; BABIP .287 → .172. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2012 DSLDSL Rays · 257 PAwOBA .324 → .212 (−112)K% 14.0% → 17.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 14.01% | ÷1.000 | ×1.220 | — | — | 17.09% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 12.06% | ÷1.000 | ×0.700 | — | ×0.995 | 8.40% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.39% | — | ×0.700 | — | ×0.995 | 0.27% |
| Singles /BIP | 19.13% | ÷1.000 | ×0.680 | ×0.974 | ×0.995 | 12.60% |
| Doubles /BIP | 8.74% | ÷1.000 | ×0.600 | ×0.974 | ×0.995 | 5.08% |
| Triples /BIP | 1.64% | ÷1.000 | ×0.600 | ×0.974 | ×0.995 | 0.95% |
| Home runs /BIP | 1.09% | ÷1.000 | ×0.470 | — | ×0.995 | 0.51% |
Factors used: level-wide DSL factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 19 vs a level average of 18.5 → −0.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.5 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.974.
Result: wOBA .324 → .212; ISO .128 → .074; BABIP .292 → .183. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2011 DSLDSL Rays · 55 PAwOBA .238 → .166 (−72)K% 12.7% → 15.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 12.73% | ÷1.000 | ×1.220 | — | — | 15.53% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 12.73% | ÷1.000 | ×0.700 | — | ×1.008 | 8.98% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.700 | — | ×1.008 | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 19.51% | ÷1.000 | ×0.680 | ×1.018 | ×1.008 | 13.61% |
| Doubles /BIP | 2.44% | ÷1.000 | ×0.600 | ×1.018 | ×1.008 | 1.50% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.600 | ×1.018 | ×1.008 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.470 | — | ×1.008 | 0.00% |
Factors used: level-wide DSL factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 18 vs a level average of 18.5 → +0.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.5 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.018.
Result: wOBA .238 → .166; ISO .021 → .013; BABIP .220 → .151. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).