Michael Suiter

PosLF
B/TR/R
Born1992-04-09
Age (2027)35
No MLB projection yet. Career stats below are historical.
Overview
A+LAST SEASON 2016
YearAgeLvl / TeamPAAVG/OBP/SLGHRSBwRC+WARMLE AVG/OBP/SLG
201422ROKCWS182.263/.365/.39741453—.198/.282/.296
201523A+/A2 orgs467.226/.289/.29731529—.187/.236/.247
201624A+/A2 orgs237.279/.364/.4176563—.227/.290/.336
Contract
No contract data on file.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.
basis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built

All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.

YearAge LvlTeam MLB% PAAB H2B3BHR BBSOHBP SBCS AVGOBPSLGOPS ISOBABIP K%BB% wOBAwRC+ BATRUNFLDPOSREP WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments)
201422 ROKACL White Sox — 182156 41714 152810 143 263365397762 135296 158 346 53 — — — — — —
201523 A+Winston-Salem Dash — 136123 21301 7274 31 171239220458 49208 205 214 -2 — — — — — —
201523 AKannapolis Intimidators — 331301 751422 17599 126 249309329638 80303 185 288 42 — — — — — —
201624 A+Winston-Salem Dash — 196167 48906 20414 50 287377449826 162347 2110 361 70 — — — — — —
201624 AKannapolis Intimidators — 4137 9100 271 00 243300270570 27290 175 260 31 — — — — — —
▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents)
201422 ROK MLEACL White Sox — 182162 32513 94010 143 198282296578 99230 225 246 53 — — — — — —
201523 A+ MLEWinston-Salem Dash — 136126 18201 4414 31 143194183377 40191 303 165 -2 — — — — — —
201523 A MLEKannapolis Intimidators — 331307 631122 11829 126 205254274527 68268 253 230 42 — — — — — —
201624 A+ MLEWinston-Salem Dash — 196174 40705 13624 50 230298356655 126300 327 271 70 — — — — — —
201624 A MLEKannapolis Intimidators — 4138 8100 191 00 211250237487 26255 222 214 31 — — — — — —
201422 ROK MLEACL White Sox — 182162 32513 94010 143 198282296578 99242 225 246 53 — — — — — —
201422 ROK RAWACL White Sox — 182156 41714 152810 143 263365397762 135296 158 346 53 — — — — — —
201523 A MLE2 teams — 467433 811323 1512313 157 187236247484 60252 263 211 29 — — — — — —
201523 A RAW2 teams — 467424 961723 248613 157 226289297586 71276 185 267 29 — — — — — —
201624 A+ MLE2 teams — 237212 48805 14715 50 226290335625 108312 306 261 63 — — — — — —
201624 A+ RAW2 teams — 237204 571006 22485 50 279364417780 137336 209 344 63 — — — — — —
201422 ROK MLEACL White Sox — 182161 32513 94010 143 199282298580 99230 225 246 53 — — — — — —
201523 A MLE2 teams — 467436 811323 1512313 157 186236245482 60246 263 211 29 — — — — — —
201624 A+ MLE2 teams — 237216 48805 14715 50 222290329619 106292 306 261 63 — — — — — —
▸ Career Totals
Career— MLE — 886807 16126311 3823428 3410 200260280540 81265 264 232 43 -60 +3 +0 -9 +19 -4.9
/ 162G— MLE — 650592 1181928 2817221 257 199261279540 79264 264 232 43 -44 +2 +0 -7 +14 -3.6

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2016 A+Winston-Salem Dash · 196 PAwOBA .354 → .271 (−82)K% 20.9% → 31.7%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×GB/FB ×Age ×= MLE
K% /PA20.92%÷0.938×1.420——31.66%
BB% (unintentional) /PA10.20%÷0.996×0.630—×0.9886.37%
HBP% /PA2.04%—×0.860—×0.9881.73%
Singles /BIP26.19%÷0.994×0.940×0.954×0.98823.34%
Doubles /BIP7.14%÷0.970×0.830×0.954×0.9885.76%
Triples /BIP0.00%÷1.013×0.800×0.954×0.9880.00%
Home runs /BIP4.76%÷1.098×0.900—×0.9883.86%

Factors used: league row CAR. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 120, 1B 99, 2B 94, 3B 103, K 88, BB 99 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 22.8 → −1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.954.

Result: wOBA .354 → .271; ISO .162 → .122; BABIP .347 → .300. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2016 AKannapolis Intimidators · 41 PAwOBA .260 → .214 (−45)K% 17.1% → 22.4%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×GB/FB ×Age ×= MLE
K% /PA17.07%÷1.020×1.340——22.42%
BB% (unintentional) /PA4.88%÷1.148×0.660—×0.9802.75%
HBP% /PA2.44%—×0.770—×0.9801.84%
Singles /BIP26.67%÷1.019×0.920—×0.98023.60%
Doubles /BIP3.33%÷0.959×0.820—×0.9802.79%
Triples /BIP0.00%÷0.991×0.940—×0.9800.00%
Home runs /BIP0.00%÷0.994×0.820—×0.9800.00%

Factors used: league row SAL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 99, 1B 104, 2B 92, 3B 98, K 104, BB 130 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 22.0 → −2.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.0 yr older than average).

Result: wOBA .260 → .214; ISO .027 → .023; BABIP .290 → .255. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2015 AKannapolis Intimidators · 331 PAwOBA .282 → .230 (−52)K% 17.8% → 24.8%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×GB/FB ×Age ×= MLE
K% /PA17.82%÷0.963×1.340——24.81%
BB% (unintentional) /PA5.14%÷1.029×0.660—×0.9903.26%
HBP% /PA2.72%—×0.770—×0.9902.07%
Singles /BIP23.55%÷1.008×0.920×0.984×0.99020.93%
Doubles /BIP5.79%÷0.940×0.820×0.984×0.9904.91%
Triples /BIP0.83%÷0.914×0.940×0.984×0.9900.83%
Home runs /BIP0.83%÷0.848×0.820—×0.9900.79%

Factors used: league row SAL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 70, 1B 102, 2B 88, 3B 83, K 93, BB 106 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.0 → −1.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.984.

Result: wOBA .282 → .230; ISO .080 → .069; BABIP .303 → .268. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2015 A+Winston-Salem Dash · 136 PAwOBA .210 → .165 (−46)K% 19.9% → 30.2%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×GB/FB ×Age ×= MLE
K% /PA19.85%÷0.932×1.420——30.24%
BB% (unintentional) /PA5.15%÷1.060×0.630—×0.9983.05%
HBP% /PA2.94%—×0.860—×0.9982.52%
Singles /BIP17.71%÷0.963×0.940×0.984×0.99816.98%
Doubles /BIP3.12%÷1.175×0.830×0.984×0.9982.17%
Triples /BIP0.00%÷1.150×0.800×0.984×0.9980.00%
Home runs /BIP1.04%÷1.090×0.900—×0.9980.86%

Factors used: league row CAR. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 118, 1B 93, 2B 135, 3B 130, K 86, BB 112 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.8 → −0.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.984.

Result: wOBA .210 → .165; ISO .049 → .034; BABIP .208 → .191. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2014 ROKACL White Sox · 182 PAwOBA .339 → .246 (−93)K% 15.4% → 22.2%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×GB/FB ×Age ×= MLE
K% /PA15.38%÷1.000×1.440——22.15%
BB% (unintentional) /PA8.24%÷1.000×0.620—×0.9754.98%
HBP% /PA5.49%—×0.720—×0.9753.86%
Singles /BIP22.66%÷1.000×0.820×1.005×0.97518.21%
Doubles /BIP5.47%÷1.000×0.720×1.005×0.9753.86%
Triples /BIP0.78%÷1.000×0.720×1.005×0.9750.55%
Home runs /BIP3.12%÷1.000×0.780—×0.9752.38%

Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 19.5 → −2.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.5 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.005.

Result: wOBA .339 → .246; ISO .135 → .097; BABIP .296 → .230. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).