James Harris
| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 21 | AAA/A2 orgs | 376 | .251/.360/.368 | 5 | 14 | 61 | — | .204/.293/.298 |
| 2016 | 22 | AA/A+OAK | 599 | .297/.373/.410 | 7 | 23 | 81 | — | .256/.312/.349 |
| 2017 | 23 | A+OAK | 89 | .244/.303/.341 | 1 | 2 | 39 | — | .212/.247/.294 |
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2011 | 17 | ROK | GCL Rays | — | 180 | 158 | 26 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 39 | 7 | 13 | 4 | 165 | 258 | 203 | 461 | 38 | 217 | 22 | 7 | 222 | -4 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 18 | ROK | Princeton Rays | — | 196 | 170 | 31 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 22 | 38 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 182 | 284 | 282 | 566 | 100 | 229 | 19 | 11 | 261 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 20 | A | Bowling Green Hot Rods | — | 268 | 244 | 56 | 8 | 0 | 7 | 23 | 69 | 1 | 11 | 3 | 230 | 299 | 348 | 647 | 119 | 292 | 26 | 9 | 294 | 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 20 | ROK | GCL Rays | — | 17 | 15 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 267 | 353 | 333 | 686 | 67 | 308 | 12 | 6 | 320 | 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 21 | AAA | Nashville Sounds | — | 17 | 13 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 154 | 312 | 154 | 466 | 250 | 35 | 18 | 230 | 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| 2015 | 21 | A | Beloit Snappers | — | 359 | 302 | 77 | 14 | 4 | 5 | 48 | 75 | 3 | 11 | 13 | 255 | 363 | 377 | 740 | 123 | 319 | 21 | 13 | 333 | 63 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 22 | AA | Midland RockHounds | — | 40 | 37 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 11 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 216 | 256 | 243 | 500 | 27 | 296 | 28 | 5 | 225 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 22 | A+ | Stockton Ports | — | 559 | 492 | 149 | 30 | 4 | 7 | 54 | 118 | 8 | 21 | 9 | 303 | 381 | 423 | 804 | 120 | 384 | 21 | 10 | 359 | 86 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 23 | A+ | Stockton Ports | — | 89 | 82 | 20 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 20 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 244 | 303 | 341 | 645 | 98 | 311 | 22 | 8 | 293 | 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2011 | 17 | ROK MLE | GCL Rays | — | 180 | 163 | 20 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 56 | 7 | 13 | 4 | 123 | 197 | 147 | 344 | 25 | 184 | 31 | 4 | 162 | -4 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 18 | ROK MLE | Princeton Rays | — | 196 | 178 | 25 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 14 | 54 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 140 | 211 | 213 | 425 | 73 | 192 | 28 | 7 | 190 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 20 | A MLE | Bowling Green Hot Rods | — | 268 | 252 | 48 | 7 | 0 | 5 | 15 | 95 | 1 | 11 | 3 | 190 | 239 | 278 | 517 | 87 | 281 | 35 | 6 | 230 | 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 20 | ROK MLE | GCL Rays | — | 17 | 15 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 200 | 294 | 267 | 561 | 67 | 241 | 18 | 6 | 230 | 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 21 | AAA MLE | Nashville Sounds | — | 17 | 14 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 143 | 250 | 143 | 393 | 249 | 41 | 12 | 209 | 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| 2015 | 21 | A MLE | Beloit Snappers | — | 359 | 314 | 65 | 11 | 4 | 4 | 36 | 103 | 3 | 11 | 13 | 207 | 295 | 306 | 600 | 99 | 275 | 29 | 10 | 261 | 63 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 22 | AA MLE | Midland RockHounds | — | 40 | 38 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 15 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 184 | 205 | 211 | 416 | 26 | 269 | 38 | 2 | 183 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 22 | A+ MLE | Stockton Ports | — | 559 | 510 | 133 | 26 | 3 | 6 | 36 | 153 | 8 | 21 | 9 | 261 | 319 | 359 | 678 | 98 | 352 | 27 | 6 | 296 | 86 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 23 | A+ MLE | Stockton Ports | — | 89 | 85 | 18 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 27 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 212 | 247 | 294 | 541 | 82 | 286 | 30 | 4 | 226 | 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 17 | ROK MLE | GCL Rays | — | 180 | 163 | 20 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 56 | 7 | 13 | 4 | 123 | 197 | 147 | 344 | 25 | 185 | 31 | 4 | 162 | -4 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 17 | ROK RAW | GCL Rays | — | 180 | 158 | 26 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 39 | 7 | 13 | 4 | 165 | 258 | 203 | 461 | 38 | 217 | 22 | 7 | 222 | -4 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 18 | ROK MLE | Princeton Rays | — | 196 | 178 | 25 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 14 | 54 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 140 | 211 | 213 | 425 | 73 | 195 | 28 | 7 | 190 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 18 | ROK RAW | Princeton Rays | — | 196 | 170 | 31 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 22 | 38 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 182 | 284 | 282 | 566 | 100 | 229 | 19 | 11 | 261 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 20 | A MLE | 2 teams | — | 285 | 267 | 51 | 7 | 0 | 5 | 16 | 97 | 2 | 12 | 3 | 191 | 242 | 273 | 516 | 82 | 279 | 34 | 6 | 230 | 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 20 | A RAW | 2 teams | — | 285 | 259 | 60 | 9 | 0 | 7 | 24 | 71 | 2 | 12 | 3 | 232 | 302 | 347 | 649 | 116 | 293 | 25 | 8 | 295 | 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 21 | A MLE | 2 teams | — | 376 | 328 | 67 | 11 | 4 | 4 | 38 | 111 | 3 | 14 | 13 | 204 | 293 | 299 | 591 | 95 | 289 | 30 | 10 | 259 | 61 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 21 | A RAW | 2 teams | — | 376 | 315 | 79 | 14 | 4 | 5 | 51 | 81 | 3 | 14 | 13 | 251 | 360 | 368 | 729 | 117 | 316 | 22 | 14 | 328 | 61 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 22 | A+ MLE | 2 teams | — | 599 | 548 | 139 | 26 | 3 | 6 | 37 | 167 | 8 | 23 | 10 | 254 | 310 | 345 | 655 | 91 | 351 | 28 | 6 | 288 | 81 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 22 | A+ RAW | 2 teams | — | 599 | 529 | 157 | 31 | 4 | 7 | 56 | 129 | 8 | 23 | 10 | 297 | 373 | 410 | 783 | 113 | 378 | 22 | 9 | 350 | 81 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 23 | A+ MLE | Stockton Ports | — | 89 | 85 | 18 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 27 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 212 | 247 | 294 | 541 | 82 | 298 | 30 | 4 | 226 | 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 23 | A+ RAW | Stockton Ports | — | 89 | 82 | 20 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 20 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 244 | 303 | 341 | 645 | 98 | 311 | 22 | 8 | 293 | 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 17 | ROK MLE | GCL Rays | — | 180 | 163 | 20 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 56 | 7 | 13 | 4 | 123 | 197 | 147 | 344 | 25 | 184 | 31 | 4 | 162 | -4 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 18 | ROK MLE | Princeton Rays | — | 196 | 178 | 25 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 14 | 54 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 140 | 211 | 213 | 425 | 73 | 192 | 28 | 7 | 190 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 20 | A MLE | 2 teams | — | 285 | 265 | 51 | 7 | 0 | 5 | 16 | 97 | 2 | 12 | 3 | 192 | 242 | 275 | 518 | 83 | 279 | 34 | 6 | 230 | 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 21 | A MLE | 2 teams | — | 376 | 332 | 67 | 11 | 4 | 4 | 38 | 111 | 3 | 14 | 13 | 202 | 293 | 295 | 588 | 93 | 274 | 30 | 10 | 259 | 61 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 22 | A+ MLE | 2 teams | — | 599 | 549 | 139 | 26 | 3 | 6 | 37 | 167 | 8 | 23 | 10 | 253 | 310 | 344 | 655 | 91 | 346 | 28 | 6 | 288 | 81 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 23 | A+ MLE | Stockton Ports | — | 89 | 85 | 18 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 27 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 212 | 247 | 294 | 541 | 82 | 286 | 30 | 4 | 226 | 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | MLE | — | 1725 | 1569 | 320 | 56 | 10 | 17 | 117 | 512 | 22 | 70 | 39 | 204 | 269 | 285 | 554 | 81 | 289 | 30 | 7 | 245 | 52 | -99 | -2 | +0 | +6 | +37 | -5.8 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 591 | 120 | 21 | 4 | 6 | 44 | 193 | 8 | 26 | 15 | 203 | 267 | 283 | 550 | 80 | 288 | 30 | 7 | 245 | 52 | -37 | -1 | +0 | +2 | +14 | -2.2 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2017 A+Stockton Ports · 89 PAwOBA .281 → .226 (−54)K% 22.5% → 29.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 22.47% | ÷1.010 | ×1.340 | — | — | 29.82% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 6.74% | ÷1.115 | ×0.710 | — | ×0.988 | 4.24% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.790 | — | ×0.988 | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 22.58% | ÷0.979 | ×0.910 | ×1.030 | ×0.988 | 21.35% |
| Doubles /BIP | 8.06% | ÷0.972 | ×0.820 | ×1.030 | ×0.988 | 6.92% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.900 | ×0.760 | ×1.030 | ×0.988 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 1.61% | ÷1.397 | ×0.920 | — | ×0.988 | 1.05% |
Factors used: league row CAL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 179, 1B 96, 2B 94, 3B 80, K 102, BB 123 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 22.8 → −1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.030.
Result: wOBA .281 → .226; ISO .098 → .072; BABIP .311 → .286. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2016 A+Stockton Ports · 559 PAwOBA .352 → .296 (−56)K% 21.1% → 27.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 21.11% | ÷1.035 | ×1.340 | — | — | 27.32% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 9.66% | ÷1.065 | ×0.710 | — | ×0.998 | 6.42% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.43% | — | ×0.790 | — | ×0.998 | 1.13% |
| Singles /BIP | 28.88% | ÷0.978 | ×0.910 | ×1.008 | ×0.998 | 27.05% |
| Doubles /BIP | 8.02% | ÷0.939 | ×0.820 | ×1.008 | ×0.998 | 7.05% |
| Triples /BIP | 1.07% | ÷0.990 | ×0.760 | ×1.008 | ×0.998 | 0.83% |
| Home runs /BIP | 1.87% | ÷1.066 | ×0.920 | — | ×0.998 | 1.61% |
Factors used: league row CAL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 113, 1B 96, 2B 88, 3B 98, K 107, BB 113 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.8 → −0.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.008.
Result: wOBA .352 → .296; ISO .120 → .100; BABIP .384 → .352. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2016 AAMidland RockHounds · 40 PAwOBA .225 → .183 (−43)K% 27.5% → 36.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 27.50% | ÷0.920 | ×1.220 | — | — | 36.48% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 5.00% | ÷1.062 | ×0.700 | — | ×1.027 | 3.39% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.870 | — | ×1.027 | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 26.92% | ÷1.022 | ×0.920 | — | ×1.027 | 24.88% |
| Doubles /BIP | 3.85% | ÷1.075 | ×0.840 | — | ×1.027 | 3.09% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.150 | ×0.940 | — | ×1.027 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.999 | ×0.800 | — | ×1.027 | 0.00% |
Factors used: league row TL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 100, 1B 104, 2B 115, 3B 130, K 84, BB 112 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 24.8 → +2.7% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.8 yr younger than average).
Result: wOBA .225 → .183; ISO .027 → .020; BABIP .296 → .269. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2015 ABeloit Snappers · 359 PAwOBA .328 → .261 (−67)K% 20.9% → 28.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 20.89% | ÷0.987 | ×1.360 | — | — | 28.79% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 13.37% | ÷0.936 | ×0.690 | — | — | 9.85% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.84% | — | ×0.780 | — | — | 0.65% |
| Singles /BIP | 23.79% | ÷1.018 | ×0.920 | ×0.976 | — | 20.97% |
| Doubles /BIP | 6.17% | ÷1.021 | ×0.830 | ×0.976 | — | 4.89% |
| Triples /BIP | 1.76% | ÷0.900 | ×0.910 | ×0.976 | — | 1.74% |
| Home runs /BIP | 2.20% | ÷1.084 | ×0.800 | — | — | 1.63% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 117, 1B 104, 2B 104, 3B 80, K 97, BB 87 — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 22.0 → +0.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.976.
Result: wOBA .328 → .261; ISO .123 → .096; BABIP .319 → .275. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2015 AAANashville Sounds · 17 PAwOBA .239 → .209 (−31)K% 35.3% → 44.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 35.29% | ÷1.034 | ×1.290 | — | — | 44.01% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 17.65% | ÷1.018 | ×0.710 | — | ×1.050 | 12.93% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.980 | — | ×1.050 | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 28.57% | ÷0.953 | ×0.900 | — | ×1.050 | 28.32% |
| Doubles /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.063 | ×0.810 | — | ×1.050 | 0.00% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.952 | ×0.810 | — | ×1.050 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.843 | ×0.780 | — | ×1.050 | 0.00% |
Factors used: league row PCL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 69, 1B 91, 2B 113, 3B 90, K 107, BB 104 — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 27.2 → +5.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (5.2 yr younger than average).
Result: wOBA .239 → .209; ISO .000 → .000; BABIP .250 → .249. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2014 ABowling Green Hot Rods · 268 PAwOBA .286 → .230 (−56)K% 25.7% → 35.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 25.75% | ÷0.991 | ×1.360 | — | — | 35.33% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 8.58% | ÷1.073 | ×0.690 | — | ×1.015 | 5.60% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.37% | — | ×0.780 | — | ×1.015 | 0.30% |
| Singles /BIP | 23.43% | ÷0.976 | ×0.920 | ×1.024 | ×1.015 | 22.95% |
| Doubles /BIP | 4.57% | ÷0.946 | ×0.830 | ×1.024 | ×1.015 | 4.17% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.920 | ×0.910 | ×1.024 | ×1.015 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 4.00% | ÷0.966 | ×0.800 | — | ×1.015 | 3.36% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 93, 1B 95, 2B 89, 3B 84, K 98, BB 115 — applied at half strength. Age: age 21 vs a level average of 22.0 → +1.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.024.
Result: wOBA .286 → .230; ISO .119 → .092; BABIP .292 → .281. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2014 ROKGCL Rays · 17 PAwOBA .312 → .230 (−82)K% 11.8% → 16.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 11.76% | ÷1.000 | ×1.440 | — | — | 16.94% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 5.88% | ÷1.000 | ×0.620 | — | ×0.985 | 3.59% |
| HBP% /PA | 5.88% | — | ×0.720 | — | ×0.985 | 4.17% |
| Singles /BIP | 23.08% | ÷1.000 | ×0.820 | — | ×0.985 | 18.64% |
| Doubles /BIP | 7.69% | ÷1.000 | ×0.720 | — | ×0.985 | 5.46% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.720 | — | ×0.985 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.780 | — | ×0.985 | 0.00% |
Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 21 vs a level average of 19.5 → −1.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.5 yr older than average).
Result: wOBA .312 → .230; ISO .067 → .047; BABIP .308 → .241. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2012 ROKPrinceton Rays · 196 PAwOBA .255 → .190 (−65)K% 19.4% → 27.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 19.39% | ÷1.000 | ×1.420 | — | — | 27.53% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 11.22% | ÷1.000 | ×0.640 | — | ×1.008 | 7.24% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.02% | — | ×0.740 | — | ×1.008 | 0.76% |
| Singles /BIP | 15.15% | ÷1.000 | ×0.840 | ×1.031 | ×1.008 | 13.22% |
| Doubles /BIP | 4.55% | ÷1.000 | ×0.740 | ×1.031 | ×1.008 | 3.49% |
| Triples /BIP | 3.03% | ÷1.000 | ×0.740 | ×1.031 | ×1.008 | 2.33% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.76% | ÷1.000 | ×0.800 | — | ×1.008 | 0.61% |
Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 19 vs a level average of 19.5 → +0.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.5 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.031.
Result: wOBA .255 → .190; ISO .100 → .074; BABIP .229 → .192. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).