José Fernández
P Miami Marlins| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | 22 | MLBMIA | 8 | 8 | 52 | 2.44 | 2.09 | 34.1% | 5.9% | 2.3 | ||
| 2015 | 23 | MIX3 levels | 16 | 16 | 89 | 3.22 | 2.14 | 30.9% | 5.5% | 3.8 | K 28.8% · BB 5.5% · FIP 2.28 | |
| 2016 | 24 | MLBMIA | 29 | 29 | 182 | 2.86 | 2.06 | 34.3% | 6.6% | 8.2 | ||
| 2017 | 25 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2018 | 26 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2019 | 27 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2020 | 28 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2021 | 29 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2022 | 30 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2023 | 31 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2024 | 32 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2025 | 33 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2026 | 34 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
Statcast · Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2013 | 21 | MLB MLE | Miami Marlins | 28 | 28 | 173 | 681 | 187 | 53 | 10 | 100% | 6.2 | 27.5% | 7.8% | 19.7% | 1.5% | 2.19 | 2.62 | +6.2 |
| 2013 | 21 | MLB RAW | Miami Marlins | 28 | 28 | 173 | 681 | 187 | 53 | 10 | 100% | 6.2 | 27.5% | 7.8% | 19.7% | 1.5% | 2.19 | 2.61 | +6.2 |
| 2014 | 22 | MLB MLE | Miami Marlins | 8 | 8 | 52 | 205 | 70 | 12 | 4 | 100% | 6.5 | 34.1% | 5.9% | 28.3% | 2.1% | 2.44 | 2.09 | +2.3 |
| 2014 | 22 | MLB RAW | Miami Marlins | 8 | 8 | 52 | 205 | 70 | 12 | 4 | 100% | 6.5 | 34.1% | 5.9% | 28.3% | 2.0% | 2.44 | 2.09 | +2.3 |
| 2015 | 23 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 16 | 16 | 89 | 363 | 112 | 20 | 6 | 100% | 5.6 | 28.8% | 5.5% | 23.4% | 1.7% | 3.22 | 2.28 | +3.6 |
| 2015 | 23 | MIX RAW | 3 levels | 16 | 16 | 89 | 363 | 112 | 20 | 6 | 100% | 5.6 | 30.9% | 5.5% | 25.3% | 1.7% | 3.22 | 2.14 | +3.8 |
| 2016 | 24 | MLB MLE | Miami Marlins | 29 | 29 | 182 | 737 | 253 | 49 | 13 | 100% | 6.3 | 34.3% | 6.6% | 27.7% | 1.9% | 2.86 | 2.06 | +8.1 |
| 2016 | 24 | MLB RAW | Miami Marlins | 29 | 29 | 182 | 737 | 253 | 49 | 13 | 100% | 6.3 | 34.3% | 6.6% | 27.7% | 1.8% | 2.86 | 2.06 | +8.2 |
| ▸ Career totals (raw MLB only — as recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| MLB Career | — | 76 | 76 | 471 | 1888 | 589 | 128 | 31 | 100% | 6.2 | 31.2% | 6.8% | 24.4% | 1.6% | 2.58 | 2.27 | +19.5 | ||
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 76 | 76 | 471 | 1888 | 589 | 128 | 31 | 100% | 6.2 | 31.2% | 6.8% | 24.4% | 1.6% | 2.58 | 2.23 | +19.8 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 32 | 32 | 200 | 801 | 250 | 54 | 13 | 100% | 6.2 | 31.2% | 6.8% | 24.4% | 1.6% | 2.58 | 2.23 | +8.4 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 81 | 81 | 496 | 1986 | 615 | 134 | 35 | 100% | 6.1 | 30.9% | 6.7% | 24.2% | 1.7% | 2.65 | 2.29 | +19.4 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 33 | 33 | 200 | 801 | 248 | 54 | 14 | 100% | 6.1 | 30.9% | 6.7% | 24.2% | 1.7% | 2.65 | 2.29 | +8.2 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2015 A+Jupiter Hammerheads · 20 IPFIP 1.71 → 2.83 (+1.12)K% 32.9% → 25.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 32.89% | — | ×0.770 | 25.33% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 5.26% | — | ×1.150 | 6.05% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.32% | ÷0.819 | ×1.250 | 2.01% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 64).
Result: FIP 1.71 → 2.83, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2015 AAJacksonville Suns · 5 IPFIP 3.68 → 4.96 (+1.28)K% 36.4% → 29.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 36.36% | — | ×0.810 | 29.45% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 9.09% | — | ×1.100 | 10.00% |
| HR / BF /BF | 4.55% | ÷0.973 | ×1.200 | 5.60% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 95).
Result: FIP 3.68 → 4.96, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).