Rehiner Cordova
| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 22 | A+/INTL2 orgs | 182 | .163/.264/.170 | 0 | 1 | 12 | — | .155/.245/.162 |
| 2017 | 23 | AAMIA | 18 | .133/.278/.133 | 0 | 0 | -8 | — | .118/.167/.118 |
| 2019 | 25 | INTLTigres de Ara… | 65 | .203/.277/.254 | 0 | 0 | 55 | — |
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2011 | 17 | ROK | DSL Marlins | — | 175 | 147 | 34 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 22 | 35 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 231 | 351 | 245 | 595 | 14 | 301 | 20 | 13 | 289 | 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 18 | ROK | GCL Marlins | — | 118 | 102 | 29 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 20 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 284 | 365 | 314 | 679 | 29 | 354 | 17 | 9 | 310 | 50 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 19 | A | Greensboro Grasshoppers | — | 55 | 50 | 11 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 220 | 278 | 280 | 558 | 60 | 333 | 31 | 7 | 252 | 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 19 | ROK | GCL Marlins | — | 24 | 22 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 91 | 167 | 91 | 258 | 118 | 21 | 8 | 134 | -52 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| 2014 | 20 | A | Greensboro Grasshoppers | — | 303 | 266 | 66 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 24 | 51 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 248 | 320 | 282 | 602 | 34 | 302 | 17 | 8 | 273 | 57 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 21 | A+ | Jupiter Hammerheads | — | 99 | 87 | 14 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 24 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 161 | 232 | 172 | 404 | 11 | 222 | 24 | 8 | 188 | -5 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 21 | ROK | GCL Marlins | — | 24 | 15 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 267 | 542 | 333 | 875 | 67 | 400 | 21 | 29 | 431 | 93 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 22 | A+ | Jupiter Hammerheads | — | 165 | 139 | 23 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 22 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 165 | 270 | 173 | 443 | 7 | 197 | 13 | 12 | 213 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 22 | INTL | Tiburones de La Guaira | — | 17 | 14 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 143 | 200 | 143 | 343 | 200 | 24 | 6 | 148 | -14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| 2017 | 23 | AA | Jacksonville Jumbo Shrimp | — | 18 | 15 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 133 | 278 | 133 | 411 | 167 | 17 | 17 | 217 | -8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| 2019 | 25 | INTL | Tigres de Aragua | — | 65 | 59 | 12 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 203 | 277 | 254 | 531 | 51 | 267 | 22 | 9 | 249 | 55 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2011 | 17 | ROK MLE | DSL Marlins | — | 175 | 153 | 24 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 43 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 157 | 259 | 163 | 422 | 7 | 213 | 25 | 9 | 203 | 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 18 | ROK MLE | GCL Marlins | — | 118 | 106 | 25 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 29 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 236 | 296 | 255 | 550 | 19 | 307 | 25 | 6 | 242 | 50 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 19 | A MLE | Greensboro Grasshoppers | — | 55 | 52 | 10 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 24 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 192 | 222 | 250 | 472 | 58 | 323 | 44 | 4 | 199 | 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 19 | ROK MLE | GCL Marlins | — | 24 | 23 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 87 | 125 | 87 | 212 | 97 | 29 | 4 | 91 | -52 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| 2014 | 20 | A MLE | Greensboro Grasshoppers | — | 303 | 273 | 68 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 17 | 69 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 249 | 303 | 282 | 585 | 33 | 313 | 23 | 6 | 252 | 57 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 21 | A+ MLE | Jupiter Hammerheads | — | 99 | 89 | 13 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 34 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 146 | 200 | 157 | 357 | 11 | 220 | 34 | 6 | 161 | -5 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 21 | ROK MLE | GCL Marlins | — | 24 | 18 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 222 | 417 | 278 | 694 | 56 | 313 | 29 | 17 | 305 | 93 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 22 | A+ MLE | Jupiter Hammerheads | — | 165 | 142 | 22 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 32 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 155 | 245 | 162 | 407 | 7 | 192 | 19 | 10 | 191 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 23 | AA MLE | Jacksonville Jumbo Shrimp | — | 18 | 17 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 118 | 167 | 118 | 284 | 153 | 22 | 6 | 157 | -8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| 2011 | 17 | ROK MLE | DSL Marlins | — | 175 | 153 | 24 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 43 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 157 | 259 | 163 | 422 | 7 | 216 | 25 | 9 | 203 | 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 17 | ROK RAW | DSL Marlins | — | 175 | 147 | 34 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 22 | 35 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 231 | 351 | 245 | 595 | 14 | 301 | 20 | 13 | 289 | 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 18 | ROK MLE | GCL Marlins | — | 118 | 106 | 25 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 29 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 236 | 296 | 255 | 550 | 19 | 325 | 25 | 6 | 242 | 50 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 18 | ROK RAW | GCL Marlins | — | 118 | 102 | 29 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 20 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 284 | 365 | 314 | 679 | 29 | 354 | 17 | 9 | 310 | 50 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 19 | A MLE | 2 teams | — | 79 | 74 | 11 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 31 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 149 | 192 | 189 | 381 | 41 | 256 | 39 | 5 | 166 | -1 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 19 | A RAW | 2 teams | — | 79 | 72 | 13 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 22 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 181 | 244 | 222 | 466 | 42 | 260 | 28 | 8 | 216 | -1 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 20 | A MLE | Greensboro Grasshoppers | — | 303 | 273 | 68 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 17 | 69 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 249 | 303 | 282 | 585 | 33 | 328 | 23 | 6 | 252 | 57 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 20 | A RAW | Greensboro Grasshoppers | — | 303 | 266 | 66 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 24 | 51 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 248 | 320 | 282 | 602 | 34 | 302 | 17 | 8 | 273 | 57 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 21 | A+ MLE | 2 teams | — | 123 | 107 | 17 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 41 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 159 | 244 | 178 | 421 | 19 | 258 | 33 | 8 | 189 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 21 | A+ RAW | 2 teams | — | 123 | 102 | 18 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 29 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 176 | 294 | 196 | 490 | 20 | 247 | 24 | 12 | 236 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 22 | A+ MLE | 2 teams | — | 182 | 156 | 25 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 35 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 160 | 247 | 167 | 414 | 6 | 207 | 19 | 9 | 191 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 22 | A+ RAW | 2 teams | — | 182 | 153 | 25 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 26 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 163 | 264 | 170 | 434 | 7 | 197 | 14 | 11 | 207 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 23 | AA MLE | Jacksonville Jumbo Shrimp | — | 18 | 17 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 118 | 167 | 118 | 284 | 154 | 22 | 6 | 157 | -8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| 2017 | 23 | AA RAW | Jacksonville Jumbo Shrimp | — | 18 | 15 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 133 | 278 | 133 | 411 | 167 | 17 | 17 | 217 | -8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| 2019 | 25 | INTL MLE | Tigres de Aragua | — | 65 | 59 | 12 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 203 | 277 | 254 | 531 | 51 | 267 | 22 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 25 | INTL RAW | Tigres de Aragua | — | 65 | 59 | 12 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 203 | 277 | 254 | 531 | 51 | 267 | 22 | 9 | 249 | 55 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 17 | ROK MLE | DSL Marlins | — | 175 | 152 | 24 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 43 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 158 | 259 | 164 | 423 | 7 | 213 | 25 | 9 | 203 | 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 18 | ROK MLE | GCL Marlins | — | 118 | 108 | 25 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 29 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 231 | 296 | 250 | 546 | 19 | 307 | 25 | 6 | 242 | 50 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 19 | A MLE | 2 teams | — | 79 | 75 | 11 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 31 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 147 | 192 | 187 | 379 | 40 | 254 | 39 | 5 | 166 | -1 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 20 | A MLE | Greensboro Grasshoppers | — | 303 | 279 | 68 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 17 | 69 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 244 | 303 | 276 | 579 | 32 | 313 | 23 | 6 | 252 | 57 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 21 | A+ MLE | 2 teams | — | 123 | 110 | 17 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 41 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 155 | 244 | 173 | 416 | 18 | 238 | 33 | 8 | 189 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 22 | A+ MLE | 2 teams | — | 182 | 162 | 25 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 35 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 154 | 247 | 160 | 408 | 6 | 192 | 19 | 9 | 191 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 23 | AA MLE | Jacksonville Jumbo Shrimp | — | 18 | 17 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 118 | 167 | 118 | 284 | 153 | 22 | 6 | 157 | -8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | MLE | — | 1063 | 945 | 184 | 14 | 2 | 1 | 78 | 266 | 14 | 12 | 5 | 195 | 266 | 217 | 483 | 22 | 269 | 25 | 7 | 202 | 23 | -98 | +0 | +0 | +11 | +23 | -6.4 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 578 | 113 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 48 | 163 | 9 | 7 | 3 | 196 | 268 | 220 | 488 | 24 | 270 | 25 | 7 | 202 | 23 | -60 | +0 | +0 | +7 | +14 | -3.9 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2017 AAJacksonville Jumbo Shrimp · 18 PAwOBA .185 → .157 (−28)K% 16.7% → 20.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 16.67% | ÷0.978 | ×1.220 | — | — | 20.79% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 11.11% | ÷1.042 | ×0.680 | — | ×1.027 | 7.44% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.840 | — | ×1.027 | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 16.67% | ÷1.029 | ×0.920 | — | ×1.027 | 15.30% |
| Doubles /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.985 | ×0.910 | — | ×1.027 | 0.00% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.070 | ×0.880 | — | ×1.027 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.185 | ×0.800 | — | ×1.027 | 0.00% |
Factors used: league row SL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 137, 1B 106, 2B 97, 3B 114, K 96, BB 108 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 24.8 → +2.7% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.8 yr younger than average).
Result: wOBA .185 → .157; ISO .000 → .000; BABIP .167 → .153. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2016 A+Jupiter Hammerheads · 165 PAwOBA .209 → .191 (−18)K% 13.3% → 19.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 13.33% | ÷0.987 | ×1.420 | — | — | 19.19% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 11.52% | ÷0.933 | ×0.750 | — | ×1.012 | 9.37% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.61% | — | ×0.930 | — | ×1.012 | 0.57% |
| Singles /BIP | 18.80% | ÷1.005 | ×0.920 | ×1.050 | ×1.012 | 18.30% |
| Doubles /BIP | 0.85% | ÷1.003 | ×0.960 | ×1.050 | ×1.012 | 0.87% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.900 | ×0.810 | ×1.050 | ×1.012 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.918 | ×0.880 | — | ×1.012 | 0.00% |
Factors used: league row FSL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 84, 1B 101, 2B 101, 3B 80, K 97, BB 87 — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 22.8 → +1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.
Result: wOBA .209 → .191; ISO .007 → .007; BABIP .197 → .192. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2015 A+Jupiter Hammerheads · 99 PAwOBA .184 → .161 (−23)K% 24.2% → 33.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 24.24% | ÷1.014 | ×1.420 | — | — | 33.94% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 8.08% | ÷1.037 | ×0.750 | — | ×1.027 | 6.00% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.930 | — | ×1.027 | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 20.63% | ÷1.002 | ×0.920 | ×1.050 | ×1.027 | 20.43% |
| Doubles /BIP | 1.59% | ÷1.064 | ×0.960 | ×1.050 | ×1.027 | 1.54% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.900 | ×0.810 | ×1.050 | ×1.027 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.819 | ×0.880 | — | ×1.027 | 0.00% |
Factors used: league row FSL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 64, 1B 100, 2B 113, 3B 80, K 103, BB 107 — applied at half strength. Age: age 21 vs a level average of 22.8 → +2.7% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.
Result: wOBA .184 → .161; ISO .011 → .011; BABIP .222 → .220. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2015 ROKGCL Marlins · 24 PAwOBA .423 → .305 (−118)K% 20.8% → 30.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 20.83% | ÷1.000 | ×1.440 | — | — | 30.00% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 29.17% | ÷1.000 | ×0.620 | — | ×0.985 | 17.81% |
| HBP% /PA | 8.33% | — | ×0.720 | — | ×0.985 | 5.91% |
| Singles /BIP | 30.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.820 | — | ×0.985 | 24.23% |
| Doubles /BIP | 10.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.720 | — | ×0.985 | 7.09% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.720 | — | ×0.985 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.780 | — | ×0.985 | 0.00% |
Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 21 vs a level average of 19.5 → −1.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.5 yr older than average).
Result: wOBA .423 → .305; ISO .067 → .053; BABIP .400 → .313. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2014 AGreensboro Grasshoppers · 303 PAwOBA .268 → .252 (−15)K% 16.8% → 22.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 16.83% | ÷0.985 | ×1.340 | — | — | 22.90% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 7.92% | ÷0.987 | ×0.660 | — | ×1.030 | 5.46% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.32% | — | ×0.770 | — | ×1.030 | 1.05% |
| Singles /BIP | 27.91% | ÷0.952 | ×0.920 | ×1.050 | ×1.030 | 29.18% |
| Doubles /BIP | 1.86% | ÷0.982 | ×0.820 | ×1.050 | ×1.030 | 1.68% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.47% | ÷0.900 | ×0.940 | ×1.050 | ×1.030 | 0.53% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.47% | ÷1.245 | ×0.820 | — | ×1.030 | 0.32% |
Factors used: league row SAL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 149, 1B 90, 2B 96, 3B 80, K 97, BB 97 — applied at half strength. Age: age 20 vs a level average of 22.0 → +3.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.
Result: wOBA .268 → .252; ISO .034 → .030; BABIP .302 → .313. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2013 AGreensboro Grasshoppers · 55 PAwOBA .237 → .199 (−38)K% 30.9% → 43.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 30.91% | ÷0.963 | ×1.340 | — | — | 43.01% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 5.45% | ÷0.920 | ×0.660 | — | ×1.045 | 4.09% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.770 | — | ×1.045 | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 27.27% | ÷0.992 | ×0.920 | — | ×1.045 | 26.43% |
| Doubles /BIP | 3.03% | ÷0.945 | ×0.820 | — | ×1.045 | 2.75% |
| Triples /BIP | 3.03% | ÷0.959 | ×0.940 | — | ×1.045 | 3.10% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.235 | ×0.820 | — | ×1.045 | 0.00% |
Factors used: league row SAL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 147, 1B 98, 2B 89, 3B 92, K 93, BB 84 — applied at half strength. Age: age 19 vs a level average of 22.0 → +4.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (3.0 yr younger than average).
Result: wOBA .237 → .199; ISO .060 → .052; BABIP .333 → .323. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2013 ROKGCL Marlins · 24 PAwOBA .131 → .091 (−39)K% 20.8% → 30.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 20.83% | ÷1.000 | ×1.440 | — | — | 30.00% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 8.33% | ÷1.000 | ×0.620 | — | ×1.008 | 5.21% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.720 | — | ×1.008 | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 11.76% | ÷1.000 | ×0.820 | — | ×1.008 | 9.72% |
| Doubles /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.720 | — | ×1.008 | 0.00% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.720 | — | ×1.008 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.780 | — | ×1.008 | 0.00% |
Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 19 vs a level average of 19.5 → +0.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.5 yr younger than average).
Result: wOBA .131 → .091; ISO .000 → .000; BABIP .118 → .097. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2012 ROKGCL Marlins · 118 PAwOBA .302 → .242 (−60)K% 16.9% → 24.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 16.95% | ÷1.000 | ×1.440 | — | — | 24.41% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 9.32% | ÷1.000 | ×0.620 | — | ×1.022 | 5.91% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.69% | — | ×0.720 | — | ×1.022 | 1.25% |
| Singles /BIP | 31.71% | ÷1.000 | ×0.820 | ×1.050 | ×1.022 | 27.91% |
| Doubles /BIP | 3.66% | ÷1.000 | ×0.720 | ×1.050 | ×1.022 | 2.83% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.720 | ×1.050 | ×1.022 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.780 | — | ×1.022 | 0.00% |
Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 18 vs a level average of 19.5 → +2.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.5 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.
Result: wOBA .302 → .242; ISO .029 → .022; BABIP .354 → .307. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
Not traceable per stint: some stints lack the counting stats the component translation needs. Level-wide factors that apply instead — .