Steven Mateo
| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | 20 | ROKLAA | 280 | .279/.432/.406 | 2 | 14 | 57 | — | .178/.302/.254 |
| 2014 | 21 | ROKAZL Angels | 181 | .306/.394/.420 | 1 | 2 | 65 | — | .230/.294/.309 |
| 2015 | 22 | A/ROK2 orgs | 256 | .262/.323/.330 | 1 | 1 | 29 | — | .192/.240/.247 |
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2010 | 17 | ROK | DSL Angels | — | 118 | 105 | 24 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 31 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 229 | 302 | 276 | 578 | 48 | 316 | 26 | 8 | 265 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 18 | ROK | DSL Angels | — | 108 | 85 | 23 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 16 | 23 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 271 | 404 | 376 | 780 | 106 | 339 | 21 | 15 | 349 | 47 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 19 | ROK | DSL Angels | — | 97 | 71 | 12 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 24 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 169 | 366 | 211 | 577 | 42 | 250 | 25 | 20 | 283 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 20 | ROK | DSL Angels | — | 280 | 219 | 61 | 20 | 1 | 2 | 55 | 62 | 4 | 14 | 6 | 279 | 432 | 406 | 838 | 128 | 376 | 22 | 20 | 383 | 57 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 21 | ROK | AZL Angels | — | 181 | 157 | 48 | 9 | 3 | 1 | 21 | 31 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 306 | 394 | 420 | 815 | 115 | 376 | 17 | 12 | 366 | 65 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 22 | A | Burlington Bees | — | 211 | 193 | 49 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 15 | 57 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 254 | 311 | 321 | 632 | 67 | 353 | 27 | 7 | 286 | 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 22 | ROK | Orem Owlz | — | 45 | 40 | 12 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 300 | 378 | 375 | 753 | 75 | 387 | 20 | 11 | 343 | 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2010 | 17 | ROK MLE | DSL Angels | — | 118 | 109 | 17 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 38 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 156 | 207 | 183 | 390 | 28 | 222 | 32 | 5 | 180 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 18 | ROK MLE | DSL Angels | — | 108 | 91 | 16 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 28 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 176 | 279 | 231 | 510 | 55 | 223 | 26 | 9 | 237 | 47 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 19 | ROK MLE | DSL Angels | — | 97 | 78 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 29 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 115 | 258 | 141 | 399 | 26 | 171 | 30 | 12 | 198 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 20 | ROK MLE | DSL Angels | — | 280 | 236 | 42 | 13 | 1 | 1 | 38 | 76 | 4 | 14 | 6 | 178 | 302 | 254 | 556 | 76 | 245 | 27 | 14 | 253 | 57 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 21 | ROK MLE | AZL Angels | — | 181 | 165 | 38 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 13 | 45 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 230 | 294 | 309 | 604 | 79 | 305 | 25 | 7 | 264 | 65 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 22 | A MLE | Burlington Bees | — | 211 | 197 | 37 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 75 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 188 | 234 | 239 | 473 | 51 | 289 | 36 | 5 | 207 | 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 22 | ROK MLE | Orem Owlz | — | 45 | 42 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 214 | 267 | 286 | 552 | 71 | 300 | 29 | 7 | 231 | 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 17 | ROK MLE | DSL Angels | — | 118 | 109 | 17 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 38 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 156 | 207 | 183 | 390 | 28 | 233 | 32 | 5 | 180 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 17 | ROK RAW | DSL Angels | — | 118 | 105 | 24 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 31 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 229 | 302 | 276 | 578 | 48 | 316 | 26 | 8 | 265 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 18 | ROK MLE | DSL Angels | — | 108 | 91 | 16 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 28 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 176 | 279 | 231 | 510 | 55 | 234 | 26 | 9 | 237 | 47 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 18 | ROK RAW | DSL Angels | — | 108 | 85 | 23 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 16 | 23 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 271 | 404 | 376 | 780 | 106 | 339 | 21 | 15 | 349 | 47 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 19 | ROK MLE | DSL Angels | — | 97 | 78 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 29 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 115 | 258 | 141 | 399 | 26 | 180 | 30 | 12 | 198 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 19 | ROK RAW | DSL Angels | — | 97 | 71 | 12 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 24 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 169 | 366 | 211 | 577 | 42 | 250 | 25 | 20 | 283 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 20 | ROK MLE | DSL Angels | — | 280 | 236 | 42 | 13 | 1 | 1 | 38 | 76 | 4 | 14 | 6 | 178 | 302 | 254 | 556 | 76 | 255 | 27 | 14 | 253 | 57 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 20 | ROK RAW | DSL Angels | — | 280 | 219 | 61 | 20 | 1 | 2 | 55 | 62 | 4 | 14 | 6 | 279 | 432 | 406 | 838 | 128 | 376 | 22 | 20 | 383 | 57 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 21 | ROK MLE | AZL Angels | — | 181 | 165 | 38 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 13 | 45 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 230 | 294 | 309 | 604 | 79 | 311 | 25 | 7 | 264 | 65 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 21 | ROK RAW | AZL Angels | — | 181 | 157 | 48 | 9 | 3 | 1 | 21 | 31 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 306 | 394 | 420 | 815 | 115 | 376 | 17 | 12 | 366 | 65 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 22 | A MLE | 2 teams | — | 256 | 239 | 45 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 14 | 88 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 188 | 236 | 238 | 475 | 50 | 291 | 34 | 5 | 211 | 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 22 | A RAW | 2 teams | — | 256 | 233 | 61 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 20 | 66 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 262 | 323 | 330 | 653 | 69 | 359 | 26 | 8 | 296 | 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 17 | ROK MLE | DSL Angels | — | 118 | 110 | 17 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 38 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 155 | 207 | 182 | 389 | 27 | 222 | 32 | 5 | 180 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 18 | ROK MLE | DSL Angels | — | 108 | 94 | 16 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 28 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 170 | 279 | 223 | 502 | 53 | 223 | 26 | 9 | 237 | 47 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 19 | ROK MLE | DSL Angels | — | 97 | 82 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 29 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 110 | 258 | 134 | 392 | 24 | 171 | 30 | 12 | 198 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 20 | ROK MLE | DSL Angels | — | 280 | 236 | 42 | 13 | 1 | 1 | 38 | 76 | 4 | 14 | 6 | 178 | 302 | 254 | 556 | 76 | 245 | 27 | 14 | 253 | 57 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 21 | ROK MLE | AZL Angels | — | 181 | 164 | 38 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 13 | 45 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 232 | 294 | 311 | 605 | 79 | 305 | 25 | 7 | 264 | 65 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 22 | A MLE | 2 teams | — | 256 | 239 | 45 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 14 | 88 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 188 | 236 | 238 | 475 | 50 | 291 | 34 | 5 | 211 | 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | MLE | — | 1040 | 918 | 167 | 31 | 5 | 4 | 93 | 304 | 14 | 21 | 13 | 182 | 267 | 240 | 507 | 58 | 264 | 29 | 9 | 230 | 42 | -72 | -1 | +0 | -19 | +23 | -7.1 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 574 | 103 | 19 | 3 | 2 | 58 | 190 | 9 | 13 | 8 | 179 | 265 | 233 | 499 | 54 | 261 | 29 | 9 | 230 | 42 | -45 | -1 | +0 | -12 | +14 | -4.4 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2015 ABurlington Bees · 211 PAwOBA .280 → .207 (−74)K% 27.0% → 35.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 27.01% | ÷1.029 | ×1.360 | — | — | 35.70% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 7.11% | ÷0.936 | ×0.690 | — | ×0.990 | 5.19% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.47% | — | ×0.780 | — | ×0.990 | 0.37% |
| Singles /BIP | 29.41% | ÷1.107 | ×0.920 | ×1.000 | ×0.990 | 24.19% |
| Doubles /BIP | 4.41% | ÷0.992 | ×0.830 | ×1.000 | ×0.990 | 3.66% |
| Triples /BIP | 1.47% | ÷1.150 | ×0.910 | ×1.000 | ×0.990 | 1.15% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.74% | ÷1.423 | ×0.800 | — | ×0.990 | 0.41% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 185, 1B 121, 2B 98, 3B 130, K 106, BB 87 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.0 → −1.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.000.
Result: wOBA .280 → .207; ISO .067 → .046; BABIP .353 → .289. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2015 ROKOrem Owlz · 45 PAwOBA .335 → .231 (−104)K% 20.0% → 28.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 20.00% | ÷1.000 | ×1.440 | — | — | 28.80% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 11.11% | ÷1.000 | ×0.610 | — | ×0.965 | 6.54% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.720 | — | ×0.965 | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 32.26% | ÷1.000 | ×0.820 | — | ×0.965 | 25.53% |
| Doubles /BIP | 3.23% | ÷1.000 | ×0.720 | — | ×0.965 | 2.24% |
| Triples /BIP | 3.23% | ÷1.000 | ×0.720 | — | ×0.965 | 2.24% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.750 | — | ×0.965 | 0.00% |
Factors used: league row PIO. Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 19.5 → −3.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (3.5 yr older than average).
Result: wOBA .335 → .231; ISO .075 → .049; BABIP .387 → .300. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2014 ROKAZL Angels · 181 PAwOBA .357 → .264 (−94)K% 17.1% → 24.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 17.13% | ÷1.000 | ×1.440 | — | — | 24.66% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 11.60% | ÷1.000 | ×0.620 | — | ×0.975 | 7.01% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.10% | — | ×0.720 | — | ×0.975 | 0.78% |
| Singles /BIP | 27.78% | ÷1.000 | ×0.820 | ×1.050 | ×0.975 | 23.32% |
| Doubles /BIP | 7.14% | ÷1.000 | ×0.720 | ×1.050 | ×0.975 | 5.26% |
| Triples /BIP | 2.38% | ÷1.000 | ×0.720 | ×1.050 | ×0.975 | 1.75% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.79% | ÷1.000 | ×0.780 | — | ×0.975 | 0.60% |
Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 19.5 → −2.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.5 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.
Result: wOBA .357 → .264; ISO .115 → .082; BABIP .376 → .305. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2013 DSLDSL Angels · 280 PAwOBA .377 → .253 (−124)K% 22.1% → 27.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 22.14% | ÷1.000 | ×1.220 | — | — | 27.01% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 19.64% | ÷1.000 | ×0.700 | — | ×0.975 | 13.41% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.43% | — | ×0.700 | — | ×0.975 | 0.97% |
| Singles /BIP | 24.20% | ÷1.000 | ×0.680 | ×1.031 | ×0.975 | 16.54% |
| Doubles /BIP | 12.74% | ÷1.000 | ×0.600 | ×1.031 | ×0.975 | 7.68% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.64% | ÷1.000 | ×0.600 | ×1.031 | ×0.975 | 0.38% |
| Home runs /BIP | 1.27% | ÷1.000 | ×0.470 | — | ×0.975 | 0.58% |
Factors used: level-wide DSL factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 21 vs a level average of 18.5 → −2.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.5 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.031.
Result: wOBA .377 → .253; ISO .128 → .076; BABIP .376 → .245. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2012 DSLDSL Angels · 97 PAwOBA .272 → .198 (−74)K% 24.7% → 30.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 24.74% | ÷1.000 | ×1.220 | — | — | 30.19% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 17.53% | ÷1.000 | ×0.700 | — | ×0.985 | 12.08% |
| HBP% /PA | 3.09% | — | ×0.700 | — | ×0.985 | 2.13% |
| Singles /BIP | 19.15% | ÷1.000 | ×0.680 | ×1.050 | ×0.985 | 13.47% |
| Doubles /BIP | 6.38% | ÷1.000 | ×0.600 | ×1.050 | ×0.985 | 3.96% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.600 | ×1.050 | ×0.985 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.470 | — | ×0.985 | 0.00% |
Factors used: level-wide DSL factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 20 vs a level average of 18.5 → −1.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.5 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.
Result: wOBA .272 → .198; ISO .042 → .030; BABIP .250 → .171. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2011 DSLDSL Angels · 108 PAwOBA .344 → .237 (−107)K% 21.3% → 26.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 21.30% | ÷1.000 | ×1.220 | — | — | 25.98% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 13.89% | ÷1.000 | ×0.700 | — | ×0.995 | 9.67% |
| HBP% /PA | 2.78% | — | ×0.700 | — | ×0.995 | 1.93% |
| Singles /BIP | 29.03% | ÷1.000 | ×0.680 | ×1.006 | ×0.995 | 19.75% |
| Doubles /BIP | 4.84% | ÷1.000 | ×0.600 | ×1.006 | ×0.995 | 2.91% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.600 | ×1.006 | ×0.995 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 3.23% | ÷1.000 | ×0.470 | — | ×0.995 | 1.51% |
Factors used: level-wide DSL factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 19 vs a level average of 18.5 → −0.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.5 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.006.
Result: wOBA .344 → .237; ISO .106 → .059; BABIP .339 → .223. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2010 DSLDSL Angels · 118 PAwOBA .260 → .180 (−80)K% 26.3% → 32.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 26.27% | ÷1.000 | ×1.220 | — | — | 32.05% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 7.63% | ÷1.000 | ×0.700 | — | ×1.008 | 5.38% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.85% | — | ×0.700 | — | ×1.008 | 0.60% |
| Singles /BIP | 25.68% | ÷1.000 | ×0.680 | ×1.050 | ×1.008 | 18.47% |
| Doubles /BIP | 6.76% | ÷1.000 | ×0.600 | ×1.050 | ×1.008 | 4.29% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.600 | ×1.050 | ×1.008 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.470 | — | ×1.008 | 0.00% |
Factors used: level-wide DSL factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 18 vs a level average of 18.5 → +0.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.5 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.
Result: wOBA .260 → .180; ISO .048 → .030; BABIP .316 → .222. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).