Jerad Eickhoff
P Columbus Clippers| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 31 | MIX2 levels | 21 | 20 | 99 | 5.62 | 5.50 | 21.2% | 6.5% | -0.1 | K 19.0% · BB 6.7% · FIP 5.76 | |
| 2022 | 32 | MIX2 levels | 29 | 21 | 119 | 5.54 | 4.09 | 22.1% | 6.2% | 1.8 | K 19.8% · BB 6.6% · FIP 4.40 | |
| 2023 | 33 | AAACLE | 14 | 13 | 68 | 6.92 | 6.00 | 13.1% | 10.2% | — | K 11.3% · BB 9.2% · FIP 5.92 | |
| 2024 | 34 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2025 | 35 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2026 | 36 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
Statcast · Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2015 | 25 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 31 | 30 | 184 | 756 | 175 | 51 | 20 | 97% | 5.9 | 20.6% | 6.9% | 13.7% | 3.0% | 3.52 | 3.89 | +3.3 |
| 2015 | 25 | MIX RAW | 3 levels | 31 | 30 | 184 | 756 | 175 | 51 | 20 | 97% | 5.9 | 23.1% | 6.7% | 16.4% | 2.6% | 3.52 | 3.44 | +4.4 |
| 2016 | 26 | MLB MLE | Philadelphia Phillies | 33 | 33 | 197 | 811 | 167 | 40 | 30 | 100% | 6.0 | 20.6% | 4.9% | 15.7% | 3.4% | 3.65 | 3.88 | +3.6 |
| 2016 | 26 | MLB RAW | Philadelphia Phillies | 33 | 33 | 197 | 811 | 167 | 40 | 30 | 100% | 6.0 | 20.6% | 4.9% | 15.7% | 3.7% | 3.65 | 3.99 | +3.3 |
| 2017 | 27 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 25 | 25 | 133 | 594 | 123 | 50 | 17 | 100% | 5.3 | 20.5% | 8.5% | 12.0% | 2.6% | 4.60 | 3.87 | +2.4 |
| 2017 | 27 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 25 | 25 | 133 | 594 | 123 | 50 | 17 | 100% | 5.3 | 20.7% | 8.4% | 12.3% | 2.9% | 4.60 | 4.04 | +2.2 |
| 2018 | 28 | MIX MLE | 4 levels | 11 | 9 | 36 | 156 | 34 | 13 | 5 | 82% | 3.3 | 10.9% | 10.4% | 0.5% | 1.4% | 3.47 | 4.28 | +0.5 |
| 2018 | 28 | MIX RAW | 4 levels | 11 | 9 | 36 | 156 | 34 | 13 | 5 | 82% | 3.3 | 21.8% | 8.3% | 13.5% | 3.2% | 3.47 | 4.09 | +0.6 |
| 2019 | 29 | MIX MLE | 4 levels | 20 | 18 | 86 | 362 | 75 | 30 | 23 | 90% | 4.3 | 20.4% | 8.3% | 12.1% | 6.5% | 5.78 | 5.97 | -0.5 |
| 2019 | 29 | MIX RAW | 4 levels | 20 | 18 | 86 | 362 | 75 | 30 | 23 | 90% | 4.3 | 20.7% | 8.3% | 12.4% | 6.4% | 5.78 | 5.89 | -0.5 |
| 2021 | 31 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 21 | 20 | 99 | 434 | 92 | 28 | 26 | 95% | 4.7 | 19.0% | 6.7% | 12.3% | 6.2% | 5.62 | 5.76 | -0.4 |
| 2021 | 31 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 21 | 20 | 99 | 434 | 92 | 28 | 26 | 95% | 4.7 | 21.2% | 6.5% | 14.7% | 6.0% | 5.62 | 5.50 | -0.1 |
| 2022 | 32 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 29 | 21 | 119 | 502 | 111 | 31 | 19 | 72% | 4.1 | 19.8% | 6.6% | 13.2% | 3.9% | 5.54 | 4.40 | +1.4 |
| 2022 | 32 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 29 | 21 | 119 | 502 | 111 | 31 | 19 | 72% | 4.1 | 22.1% | 6.2% | 15.9% | 3.8% | 5.54 | 4.09 | +1.8 |
| 2023 | 33 | AAA MLE | Columbus Clippers | 14 | 13 | 68 | 313 | 41 | 32 | 14 | 93% | 4.8 | 11.3% | 9.2% | 2.1% | 4.7% | 6.92 | 5.92 | — |
| 2023 | 33 | AAA RAW | Columbus Clippers | 14 | 13 | 68 | 313 | 41 | 32 | 14 | 93% | 4.8 | 13.1% | 10.2% | 2.9% | 4.5% | 6.92 | 6.00 | — |
| ▸ Career totals (raw MLB only — as recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| MLB Career | — | 86 | 81 | 464 | 1992 | 413 | 129 | 81 | 94% | 5.4 | 20.7% | 6.5% | 14.3% | 4.1% | 4.50 | 4.42 | +5.3 | ||
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 86 | 81 | 464 | 1992 | 413 | 129 | 81 | 94% | 5.4 | 20.7% | 6.5% | 14.3% | 4.1% | 4.50 | 4.40 | +5.4 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 37 | 35 | 200 | 859 | 178 | 56 | 35 | 94% | 5.4 | 20.7% | 6.5% | 14.3% | 4.1% | 4.50 | 4.40 | +2.3 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 184 | 169 | 922 | 3928 | 753 | 280 | 153 | 92% | 5.0 | 19.2% | 7.1% | 12.0% | 3.9% | 4.64 | 4.53 | +5.3 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 40 | 37 | 200 | 852 | 163 | 61 | 33 | 92% | 5.0 | 19.2% | 7.1% | 12.0% | 3.9% | 4.64 | 4.53 | +2.3 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2023 AAAColumbus Clippers · 68 IPFIP 5.74 → 5.92 (+0.17)K% 13.1% → 11.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 13.10% | — | ×0.860 | 11.27% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 10.22% | — | ×0.900 | 9.20% |
| HR / BF /BF | 4.47% | ÷1.037 | ×1.100 | 4.74% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 107).
Result: FIP 5.74 → 5.92, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 AAAIndianapolis Indians · 114 IPFIP 3.96 → 4.40 (+0.44)K% 22.5% → 19.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 22.53% | — | ×0.880 | 19.82% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 6.32% | — | ×1.050 | 6.63% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.58% | ÷1.013 | ×1.100 | 3.89% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors — K ×0.88, BB ×1.05, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 103).
Result: FIP 3.96 → 4.40, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2021 AAASyracuse Mets · 80 IPFIP 4.67 → 5.12 (+0.45)K% 23.9% → 21.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 23.94% | — | ×0.880 | 21.07% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 6.06% | — | ×1.050 | 6.36% |
| HR / BF /BF | 5.15% | ÷1.039 | ×1.100 | 5.45% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors — K ×0.88, BB ×1.05, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 108).
Result: FIP 4.67 → 5.12, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2019 AAALehigh Valley IronPigs · 17 IPFIP 4.87 → 5.76 (+0.89)K% 21.6% → 19.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 21.62% | — | ×0.880 | 19.03% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 10.81% | — | ×1.050 | 11.35% |
| HR / BF /BF | 4.05% | ÷0.866 | ×1.100 | 5.15% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors — K ×0.88, BB ×1.05, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 73).
Result: FIP 4.87 → 5.76, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2019 AAReading Fightin Phils · 7 IPFIP 6.23 → 6.72 (+0.49)K% 19.4% → 15.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 19.35% | — | ×0.810 | 15.68% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 9.68% | — | ×1.100 | 10.65% |
| HR / BF /BF | 6.45% | ÷1.182 | ×1.200 | 6.55% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 136).
Result: FIP 6.23 → 6.72, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2018 AAALehigh Valley IronPigs · 19 IPFIP 3.99 → 4.28 (+0.29)K% 12.3% → 10.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 12.35% | — | ×0.880 | 10.86% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 9.88% | — | ×1.050 | 10.37% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.23% | ÷0.954 | ×1.100 | 1.42% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors — K ×0.88, BB ×1.05, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 91).
Result: FIP 3.99 → 4.28, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2018 A+Clearwater Threshers · 9 IPFIP 5.40 → 6.37 (+0.97)K% 30.3% → 23.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 30.30% | — | ×0.770 | 23.33% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 12.12% | — | ×1.150 | 13.94% |
| HR / BF /BF | 6.06% | ÷1.197 | ×1.250 | 6.33% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 139).
Result: FIP 5.40 → 6.37, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2015 AAALehigh Valley IronPigs · 123 IPFIP 3.51 → 4.20 (+0.68)K% 21.8% → 19.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 21.83% | — | ×0.880 | 19.21% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 6.82% | — | ×1.050 | 7.16% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.53% | ÷0.845 | ×1.100 | 3.30% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors — K ×0.88, BB ×1.05, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 69).
Result: FIP 3.51 → 4.20, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).