Carlos Alonso

Pos2B

B/TR/R

Born1988-02-15

Age (2027)39

No MLB projection yet. Career stats below are historical.

Overview

AAALAST SEASON 2016

Year	Age	Lvl / Team	PA	AVG/OBP/SLG	HR	SB	wRC+	WAR	MLE AVG/OBP/SLG
2014	26	AAPHI	546	.272/.367/.396	10	8	83	—	.253/.321/.343
2015	27	AAPHI	51	.262/.392/.333	0	2	82	—	.244/.333/.311
2016	28	AAA/AAPHI	118	.204/.299/.301	1	1	34	—	.168/.239/.244

Contract

No contract data on file.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.

show model inputsbasis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral

Methodology▸ how these numbers are built

All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.

Year	Age	Lvl	Team	MLB%	PA	AB	H	2B	3B	HR	BB	SO	HBP	SB	CS	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	BABIP	K%	BB%	wOBA	wRC+	BAT	RUN	FLD	POS	REP	WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments)
2011	23	A	Lakewood BlueClaws	—	194	160	50	10	0	2	25	13	7	2	1	312	427	412	840	100	329	7	13	381	108	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	24	A+	Clearwater Threshers	—	379	328	91	12	0	4	34	49	10	2	1	277	363	351	714	73	312	13	9	324	72	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	24	INTL	Brisbane Bandits	—	175	158	33	7	0	1	8	22	8	3	0	209	282	272	554	63	237	13	5	258	61	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	25	A+	Clearwater Threshers	—	536	453	118	24	2	4	59	71	14	2	2	260	363	349	712	88	298	13	11	324	74	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	26	AA	Reading Fightin Phils	—	546	467	127	22	3	10	60	70	11	8	4	272	367	396	763	124	302	13	11	343	83	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	27	AA	Reading Fightin Phils	—	51	42	11	3	0	0	9	6	0	2	0	262	392	333	725	71	306	12	18	341	82	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	28	AAA	Lehigh Valley IronPigs	—	68	58	13	4	0	1	9	16	0	1	0	224	328	345	673	121	293	24	13	305	49	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	28	AA	Reading Fightin Phils	—	50	45	8	3	0	0	4	9	1	0	0	178	260	244	504	67	222	18	8	238	13	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents)
2011	23	A MLE	Lakewood BlueClaws	—	194	170	50	9	0	2	15	18	7	2	1	294	375	382	757	88	305	9	8	328	108	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	24	A+ MLE	Clearwater Threshers	—	379	338	82	11	0	3	24	70	10	2	1	243	312	302	614	59	284	18	6	274	72	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	25	A+ MLE	Clearwater Threshers	—	536	471	111	24	2	3	41	103	14	2	2	236	316	314	630	79	284	19	8	278	74	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	26	AA MLE	Reading Fightin Phils	—	546	490	124	20	3	6	38	88	11	8	4	253	321	343	664	90	290	16	7	291	83	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	27	AA MLE	Reading Fightin Phils	—	51	45	11	3	0	0	6	7	0	2	0	244	333	311	644	67	286	14	12	289	82	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	28	AAA MLE	Lehigh Valley IronPigs	—	68	61	11	3	0	1	6	19	0	1	0	180	254	279	532	98	249	28	9	241	49	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	28	AA MLE	Reading Fightin Phils	—	50	46	7	2	0	0	3	12	1	0	0	152	220	196	416	43	200	24	6	188	13	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	23	A MLE	Lakewood BlueClaws	—	194	170	50	9	0	2	15	18	7	2	1	294	375	382	757	88	318	9	8	328	108	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	23	A RAW	Lakewood BlueClaws	—	194	160	50	10	0	2	25	13	7	2	1	312	427	412	840	100	329	7	13	381	108	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	24	A+ MLE	2 teams	—	554	493	118	15	0	4	35	102	18	5	1	239	313	294	607	55	292	18	6	274	72	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	24	A+ RAW	2 teams	—	554	486	124	19	0	5	42	71	18	5	1	255	337	325	662	70	287	13	8	303	72	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	25	A+ MLE	Clearwater Threshers	—	536	471	111	24	2	3	41	103	14	2	2	236	316	314	630	79	293	19	8	278	74	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	25	A+ RAW	Clearwater Threshers	—	536	453	118	24	2	4	59	71	14	2	2	260	363	349	712	88	298	13	11	324	74	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	26	AA MLE	Reading Fightin Phils	—	546	490	124	20	3	6	38	88	11	8	4	253	321	343	664	90	297	16	7	291	83	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	26	AA RAW	Reading Fightin Phils	—	546	467	127	22	3	10	60	70	11	8	4	272	367	396	763	124	302	13	11	343	83	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	27	AA MLE	Reading Fightin Phils	—	51	45	11	3	0	0	6	7	0	2	0	244	333	311	644	67	289	14	12	289	82	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	27	AA RAW	Reading Fightin Phils	—	51	42	11	3	0	0	9	6	0	2	0	262	392	333	725	71	306	12	18	341	82	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	28	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	118	107	19	6	0	1	9	31	1	1	0	178	248	262	510	84	240	26	8	219	34	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	28	AAA RAW	2 teams	—	118	103	21	7	0	1	13	25	1	1	0	204	299	301	600	97	260	21	11	277	34	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	23	A MLE	Lakewood BlueClaws	—	194	170	50	9	0	2	15	18	7	2	1	294	375	382	757	88	305	9	8	328	108	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	24	A+ MLE	2 teams	—	554	496	118	15	0	4	35	102	18	5	1	238	313	292	606	54	284	18	6	274	72	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	25	A+ MLE	Clearwater Threshers	—	536	476	111	24	2	3	41	103	14	2	2	233	316	311	627	78	284	19	8	278	74	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	26	AA MLE	Reading Fightin Phils	—	546	492	124	20	3	6	38	88	11	8	4	252	321	341	662	89	290	16	7	291	83	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	27	AA MLE	Reading Fightin Phils	—	51	45	11	3	0	0	6	7	0	2	0	244	333	311	644	67	286	14	12	289	82	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	28	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	118	107	19	6	0	1	9	31	1	1	0	178	248	262	510	84	228	26	8	219	34	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career Totals
Career	—	MLE		—	1999	1776	433	77	5	16	144	349	51	20	8	244	319	320	638	76	293	17	7	282	77	-55	+1	+0	+7	+43	-0.3
/ 162G	—	MLE		—	650	577	141	25	2	5	47	113	17	7	3	244	320	321	640	76	294	17	7	282	77	-18	+0	+0	+2	+14	-0.1

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2016 AAALehigh Valley IronPigs · 68 PAwOBA .298 → .241 (−56)K% 23.5% → 27.7%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	23.53%	÷1.018	×1.200	—	—	27.74%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	13.24%	÷1.035	×0.690	—	×0.992	8.76%
HBP% /PA	0.00%	—	×0.940	—	×0.992	0.00%
Singles /BIP	19.05%	÷1.028	×0.930	×0.984	×0.992	16.83%
Doubles /BIP	9.52%	÷1.018	×0.830	×0.984	×0.992	7.59%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.107	×0.970	×0.984	×0.992	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	2.38%	÷0.942	×0.840	—	×0.992	2.11%

Factors used: league row IL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 88, 1B 106, 2B 104, 3B 121, K 104, BB 107 — applied at half strength. Age: age 28 vs a level average of 27.2 → −0.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.984.

Result: wOBA .298 → .241; ISO .121 → .103; BABIP .293 → .249. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2016 AAReading Fightin Phils · 50 PAwOBA .232 → .188 (−44)K% 18.0% → 23.5%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	18.00%	÷0.936	×1.220	—	—	23.46%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	8.00%	÷1.042	×0.700	—	×0.968	5.20%
HBP% /PA	2.00%	—	×0.850	—	×0.968	1.65%
Singles /BIP	13.89%	÷1.002	×0.970	—	×0.968	13.02%
Doubles /BIP	8.33%	÷0.998	×0.860	—	×0.968	6.95%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.150	×0.950	—	×0.968	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	0.00%	÷1.273	×0.780	—	×0.968	0.00%

Factors used: league row EL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 155, 1B 100, 2B 100, 3B 130, K 87, BB 108 — applied at half strength. Age: age 28 vs a level average of 24.8 → −3.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (3.2 yr older than average).

Result: wOBA .232 → .188; ISO .067 → .054; BABIP .222 → .200. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2015 AAReading Fightin Phils · 51 PAwOBA .333 → .289 (−44)K% 11.8% → 13.5%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	11.76%	÷1.060	×1.220	—	—	13.54%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	17.65%	÷1.029	×0.700	—	×0.978	11.74%
HBP% /PA	0.00%	—	×0.850	—	×0.978	0.00%
Singles /BIP	22.22%	÷0.995	×0.970	—	×0.978	21.18%
Doubles /BIP	8.33%	÷0.949	×0.860	—	×0.978	7.39%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.150	×0.950	—	×0.978	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	0.00%	÷1.021	×0.780	—	×0.978	0.00%

Factors used: league row EL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 104, 1B 99, 2B 90, 3B 130, K 112, BB 106 — applied at half strength. Age: age 27 vs a level average of 24.8 → −2.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.2 yr older than average).

Result: wOBA .333 → .289; ISO .071 → .067; BABIP .306 → .286. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2014 AAReading Fightin Phils · 546 PAwOBA .334 → .291 (−43)K% 12.8% → 16.1%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	12.82%	÷0.974	×1.220	—	—	16.05%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	10.81%	÷1.064	×0.700	—	×0.988	7.02%
HBP% /PA	2.01%	—	×0.850	—	×0.988	1.69%
Singles /BIP	23.17%	÷0.974	×0.970	×1.010	×0.988	23.04%
Doubles /BIP	5.54%	÷0.984	×0.860	×1.010	×0.988	4.83%
Triples /BIP	0.76%	÷0.923	×0.950	×1.010	×0.988	0.78%
Home runs /BIP	2.52%	÷1.317	×0.780	—	×0.988	1.47%

Factors used: league row EL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 163, 1B 95, 2B 97, 3B 85, K 95, BB 113 — applied at half strength. Age: age 26 vs a level average of 24.8 → −1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.010.

Result: wOBA .334 → .291; ISO .124 → .095; BABIP .302 → .290. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2013 A+Clearwater Threshers · 536 PAwOBA .318 → .278 (−40)K% 13.2% → 19.2%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	13.25%	÷0.980	×1.420	—	—	19.20%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	11.01%	÷1.045	×0.750	—	×0.978	7.73%
HBP% /PA	2.61%	—	×0.930	—	×0.978	2.38%
Singles /BIP	23.04%	÷0.988	×0.920	×1.037	×0.978	21.76%
Doubles /BIP	6.28%	÷0.978	×0.960	×1.037	×0.978	6.26%
Triples /BIP	0.52%	÷0.900	×0.810	×1.037	×0.978	0.48%
Home runs /BIP	1.05%	÷1.253	×0.880	—	×0.978	0.72%

Factors used: league row FSL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 151, 1B 98, 2B 96, 3B 80, K 96, BB 109 — applied at half strength. Age: age 25 vs a level average of 22.8 → −2.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.037.

Result: wOBA .318 → .278; ISO .088 → .078; BABIP .298 → .284. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2012 A+Clearwater Threshers · 379 PAwOBA .317 → .274 (−43)K% 12.9% → 18.4%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	12.93%	÷0.995	×1.420	—	—	18.44%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	8.44%	÷0.995	×0.750	—	×0.988	6.29%
HBP% /PA	2.64%	—	×0.930	—	×0.988	2.42%
Singles /BIP	26.88%	÷0.989	×0.920	×0.998	×0.988	24.64%
Doubles /BIP	4.30%	÷1.060	×0.960	×0.998	×0.988	3.84%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷0.958	×0.810	×0.998	×0.988	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	1.43%	÷1.148	×0.880	—	×0.988	1.09%

Factors used: league row FSL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 130, 1B 98, 2B 112, 3B 92, K 99, BB 99 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 22.8 → −1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.998.

Result: wOBA .317 → .274; ISO .073 → .060; BABIP .312 → .284. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2011 ALakewood BlueClaws · 194 PAwOBA .372 → .328 (−44)K% 6.7% → 9.1%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	6.70%	÷0.991	×1.340	—	—	9.06%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	12.37%	÷1.025	×0.660	—	×0.990	7.89%
HBP% /PA	3.61%	—	×0.770	—	×0.990	2.75%
Singles /BIP	25.85%	÷0.979	×0.920	×1.030	×0.990	24.77%
Doubles /BIP	6.80%	÷1.025	×0.820	×1.030	×0.990	5.55%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.078	×0.940	×1.030	×0.990	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	1.36%	÷0.880	×0.820	—	×0.990	1.26%

Factors used: league row SAL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 76, 1B 96, 2B 105, 3B 116, K 98, BB 105 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.0 → −1.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.030.

Result: wOBA .372 → .328; ISO .100 → .091; BABIP .329 → .305. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

Not traceable per stint: some stints lack the counting stats the component translation needs. Level-wide factors that apply instead — .