Josh Whitaker

PosRF

B/TR/R

Born1989-02-08

Age (2027)38

No MLB projection yet. Career stats below are historical.

Overview

AALAST SEASON 2015

Year	Age	Lvl / Team	PA	AVG/OBP/SLG	HR	SB	wRC+	WAR	MLE AVG/OBP/SLG
2013	24	AA/A+OAK	372	.258/.339/.450	12	8	67	—	.204/.268/.354
2014	25	AAA/AA2 orgs	308	.295/.347/.488	12	4	87	—	.250/.290/.397
2015	26	AAOAK	387	.256/.312/.437	12	7	51	—	.200/.240/.329

Contract

No contract data on file.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.

show model inputsbasis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral

Methodology▸ how these numbers are built

All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.

Year	Age	Lvl	Team	MLB%	PA	AB	H	2B	3B	HR	BB	SO	HBP	SB	CS	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	BABIP	K%	BB%	wOBA	wRC+	BAT	RUN	FLD	POS	REP	WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments)
2010	21	ROK	AZL Athletics	—	41	39	13	6	0	0	2	7	0	1	0	333	366	487	853	154	406	17	5	376	57	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	22	A	Burlington Bees	—	448	396	129	34	3	17	44	107	7	10	2	326	403	556	958	230	410	24	10	419	95	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	23	A+	Stockton Ports	—	429	386	100	16	3	20	33	122	6	11	5	259	327	472	799	212	324	28	8	349	71	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	24	AA	Midland RockHounds	—	138	125	30	12	1	3	11	35	1	2	0	240	307	424	731	184	307	25	8	321	49	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	24	A+	Stockton Ports	—	234	204	55	13	0	9	22	49	6	6	3	270	358	466	823	196	311	21	9	363	78	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	25	AAA	Sacramento River Cats	—	93	84	20	5	0	3	6	26	0	1	0	238	289	405	694	167	298	28	6	298	51	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	25	AA	Midland RockHounds	—	215	197	63	11	1	9	14	38	2	3	2	320	371	523	894	203	355	18	7	389	102	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	26	AA	Midland RockHounds	—	387	355	91	26	1	12	27	85	2	7	3	256	312	437	749	180	305	22	7	329	51	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents)
2010	21	ROK MLE	AZL Athletics	—	41	40	9	4	0	0	1	10	0	1	0	225	244	325	569	100	310	24	2	253	57	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	22	A MLE	Burlington Bees	—	448	414	105	28	3	9	26	153	7	10	2	254	309	401	710	147	378	34	6	308	95	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	23	A+ MLE	Stockton Ports	—	429	395	82	12	2	16	24	162	6	11	5	208	264	370	633	162	293	38	6	273	71	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	24	AA MLE	Midland RockHounds	—	138	128	23	8	1	3	8	45	1	2	0	180	234	328	562	148	247	33	6	240	49	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	24	A+ MLE	Stockton Ports	—	234	211	46	11	0	7	15	63	6	6	3	218	289	370	658	152	264	27	6	283	78	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	25	AAA MLE	Sacramento River Cats	—	93	85	17	4	0	2	5	34	0	1	0	200	244	318	562	118	277	37	5	244	51	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	25	AA MLE	Midland RockHounds	—	215	202	55	9	1	7	9	48	2	3	2	272	310	431	741	158	317	22	4	319	102	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	26	AA MLE	Midland RockHounds	—	387	365	73	18	1	9	17	112	2	7	3	200	240	329	568	129	255	29	4	244	51	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	21	ROK MLE	AZL Athletics	—	41	40	9	4	0	0	1	10	0	1	0	225	244	325	569	100	300	24	2	253	57	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	21	ROK RAW	AZL Athletics	—	41	39	13	6	0	0	2	7	0	1	0	333	366	487	853	154	406	17	5	376	57	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	22	A MLE	Burlington Bees	—	448	414	105	28	3	9	26	153	7	10	2	254	309	401	710	147	379	34	6	308	95	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	22	A RAW	Burlington Bees	—	448	396	129	34	3	17	44	107	7	10	2	326	403	556	958	230	410	24	10	419	95	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	23	A+ MLE	Stockton Ports	—	429	395	82	12	2	16	24	162	6	11	5	208	264	370	633	162	300	38	6	273	71	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	23	A+ RAW	Stockton Ports	—	429	386	100	16	3	20	33	122	6	11	5	259	327	472	799	212	324	28	8	349	71	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	24	A+ MLE	2 teams	—	372	339	69	19	1	10	23	108	7	8	3	204	268	354	622	150	263	29	6	267	67	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	24	A+ RAW	2 teams	—	372	329	85	25	1	12	33	84	7	8	3	258	339	450	789	191	309	23	9	348	67	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	25	AA MLE	2 teams	—	308	287	72	13	1	9	14	82	2	4	2	251	290	397	688	146	315	27	5	296	87	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	25	AA RAW	2 teams	—	308	281	83	16	1	12	20	64	2	4	2	295	347	488	834	192	340	21	6	362	87	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	26	AA MLE	Midland RockHounds	—	387	365	73	18	1	9	17	112	2	7	3	200	240	329	568	129	261	29	4	244	51	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	26	AA RAW	Midland RockHounds	—	387	355	91	26	1	12	27	85	2	7	3	256	312	437	749	180	305	22	7	329	51	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	21	ROK MLE	AZL Athletics	—	41	40	9	4	0	0	1	10	0	1	0	225	244	325	569	100	310	24	2	253	57	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	22	A MLE	Burlington Bees	—	448	412	105	28	3	9	26	153	7	10	2	255	309	403	712	148	378	34	6	308	95	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	23	A+ MLE	Stockton Ports	—	429	396	82	12	2	16	24	162	6	11	5	207	264	369	632	162	293	38	6	273	71	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	24	A+ MLE	2 teams	—	372	339	69	19	1	10	23	108	7	8	3	204	268	354	622	150	258	29	6	267	67	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	25	AA MLE	2 teams	—	308	289	72	13	1	9	14	82	2	4	2	249	290	394	685	145	305	27	5	296	87	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	26	AA MLE	Midland RockHounds	—	387	365	73	18	1	9	17	112	2	7	3	200	240	329	568	129	255	29	4	244	51	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career Totals
Career	—	MLE		—	1985	1840	410	94	8	53	105	627	24	41	15	223	274	369	643	146	305	32	5	277	74	-62	+2	+0	-21	+43	-3.9
/ 162G	—	MLE		—	650	603	135	31	3	17	34	205	8	13	5	224	274	370	644	146	306	32	5	277	74	-20	+1	+0	-7	+14	-1.3

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2015 AAMidland RockHounds · 387 PAwOBA .321 → .244 (−77)K% 22.0% → 28.9%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	21.96%	÷0.928	×1.220	—	—	28.89%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	6.98%	÷1.106	×0.700	—	×0.988	4.36%
HBP% /PA	0.52%	—	×0.870	—	×0.988	0.44%
Singles /BIP	19.26%	÷0.990	×0.920	×0.985	×0.988	17.42%
Doubles /BIP	9.63%	÷1.125	×0.840	×0.985	×0.988	7.00%
Triples /BIP	0.37%	÷1.150	×0.940	×0.985	×0.988	0.29%
Home runs /BIP	4.44%	÷0.982	×0.800	—	×0.988	3.58%

Factors used: league row TL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 96, 1B 98, 2B 125, 3B 130, K 86, BB 121 — applied at half strength. Age: age 26 vs a level average of 24.8 → −1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.985.

Result: wOBA .321 → .244; ISO .180 → .132; BABIP .305 → .255. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2014 AAMidland RockHounds · 215 PAwOBA .382 → .319 (−63)K% 17.7% → 22.5%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	17.67%	÷0.957	×1.220	—	—	22.53%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	6.51%	÷1.078	×0.700	—	×0.998	4.22%
HBP% /PA	0.93%	—	×0.870	—	×0.998	0.81%
Singles /BIP	26.42%	÷0.982	×0.920	×0.993	×0.998	24.53%
Doubles /BIP	6.92%	÷1.049	×0.840	×0.993	×0.998	5.49%
Triples /BIP	0.63%	÷1.012	×0.940	×0.993	×0.998	0.58%
Home runs /BIP	5.66%	÷0.961	×0.800	—	×0.998	4.70%

Factors used: league row TL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 92, 1B 96, 2B 110, 3B 102, K 91, BB 116 — applied at half strength. Age: age 25 vs a level average of 24.8 → −0.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.993.

Result: wOBA .382 → .319; ISO .203 → .164; BABIP .355 → .317. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2014 AAASacramento River Cats · 93 PAwOBA .296 → .244 (−52)K% 28.0% → 36.1%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	27.96%	÷0.998	×1.290	—	—	36.15%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	6.45%	÷0.953	×0.710	—	×1.033	4.97%
HBP% /PA	0.00%	—	×0.980	—	×1.033	0.00%
Singles /BIP	20.69%	÷0.975	×0.900	×1.004	×1.033	19.82%
Doubles /BIP	8.62%	÷0.929	×0.810	×1.004	×1.033	7.80%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.072	×0.810	×1.004	×1.033	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	5.17%	÷1.092	×0.780	—	×1.033	3.82%

Factors used: league row PCL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 118, 1B 95, 2B 86, 3B 114, K 100, BB 91 — applied at half strength. Age: age 25 vs a level average of 27.2 → +3.3% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.2 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.004.

Result: wOBA .296 → .244; ISO .167 → .125; BABIP .298 → .277. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2013 A+Stockton Ports · 234 PAwOBA .357 → .283 (−73)K% 20.9% → 26.9%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	20.94%	÷1.042	×1.340	—	—	26.94%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	9.40%	÷1.020	×0.710	—	×0.988	6.47%
HBP% /PA	2.56%	—	×0.790	—	×0.988	2.00%
Singles /BIP	21.29%	÷1.022	×0.910	×0.990	×0.988	18.53%
Doubles /BIP	8.39%	÷0.968	×0.820	×0.990	×0.988	6.95%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.095	×0.760	×0.990	×0.988	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	5.81%	÷1.129	×0.920	—	×0.988	4.68%

Factors used: league row CAL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 126, 1B 104, 2B 94, 3B 119, K 108, BB 104 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 22.8 → −1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.990.

Result: wOBA .357 → .283; ISO .196 → .155; BABIP .311 → .264. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2013 AAMidland RockHounds · 138 PAwOBA .315 → .240 (−75)K% 25.4% → 32.9%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	25.36%	÷0.942	×1.220	—	—	32.86%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	7.97%	÷0.978	×0.700	—	×1.012	5.77%
HBP% /PA	0.72%	—	×0.870	—	×1.012	0.64%
Singles /BIP	15.56%	÷1.052	×0.920	×0.977	×1.012	13.44%
Doubles /BIP	13.33%	÷1.124	×0.840	×0.977	×1.012	9.84%
Triples /BIP	1.11%	÷1.150	×0.940	×0.977	×1.012	0.90%
Home runs /BIP	3.33%	÷0.852	×0.800	—	×1.012	3.17%

Factors used: league row TL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 70, 1B 110, 2B 125, 3B 130, K 88, BB 96 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 24.8 → +1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.977.

Result: wOBA .315 → .240; ISO .184 → .142; BABIP .307 → .247. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2012 A+Stockton Ports · 429 PAwOBA .341 → .273 (−68)K% 28.4% → 37.8%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	28.44%	÷1.009	×1.340	—	—	37.75%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	7.46%	÷0.942	×0.710	—	×0.998	5.61%
HBP% /PA	1.40%	—	×0.790	—	×0.998	1.10%
Singles /BIP	23.11%	÷0.959	×0.910	×0.993	×0.998	21.73%
Doubles /BIP	6.06%	÷0.951	×0.820	×0.993	×0.998	5.18%
Triples /BIP	1.14%	÷1.023	×0.760	×0.993	×0.998	0.84%
Home runs /BIP	7.58%	÷1.038	×0.920	—	×0.998	6.70%

Factors used: league row CAL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 108, 1B 92, 2B 90, 3B 105, K 102, BB 88 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.8 → −0.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.993.

Result: wOBA .341 → .273; ISO .212 → .166; BABIP .324 → .293. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2011 ABurlington Bees · 448 PAwOBA .407 → .308 (−99)K% 23.9% → 34.2%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	23.88%	÷0.950	×1.360	—	—	34.19%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	9.38%	÷1.098	×0.690	—	—	5.89%
HBP% /PA	1.56%	—	×0.780	—	—	1.22%
Singles /BIP	25.95%	÷0.964	×0.920	×1.005	—	24.90%
Doubles /BIP	11.76%	÷0.919	×0.830	×1.005	—	10.67%
Triples /BIP	1.04%	÷0.900	×0.910	×1.005	—	1.05%
Home runs /BIP	5.88%	÷1.375	×0.800	—	—	3.42%

Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 175, 1B 93, 2B 84, 3B 80, K 90, BB 120 — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 22.0 → +0.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.005.

Result: wOBA .407 → .308; ISO .230 → .153; BABIP .410 → .378. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2010 ROKAZL Athletics · 41 PAwOBA .366 → .253 (−113)K% 17.1% → 24.6%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	17.07%	÷1.000	×1.440	—	—	24.59%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	4.88%	÷1.000	×0.620	—	×0.985	2.98%
HBP% /PA	0.00%	—	×0.720	—	×0.985	0.00%
Singles /BIP	21.88%	÷1.000	×0.820	—	×0.985	17.67%
Doubles /BIP	18.75%	÷1.000	×0.720	—	×0.985	13.30%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.000	×0.720	—	×0.985	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	0.00%	÷1.000	×0.780	—	×0.985	0.00%

Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 21 vs a level average of 19.5 → −1.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.5 yr older than average).

Result: wOBA .366 → .253; ISO .154 → .101; BABIP .406 → .310. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).