Alfredo Lopez

Pos2B

B/TR/R

Born1989-10-07

Age (2027)37

No MLB projection yet. Career stats below are historical.

Overview

INTLLAST SEASON 2022

Year	Age	Lvl / Team	PA	AVG/OBP/SLG	HR	SB	wRC+	WAR	MLE AVG/OBP/SLG
2017	27	AAAOlmecas de Ta…	210	.263/.317/.316	1	7	60	—	.256/.293/.303
2019	29	AAAAcereros del …	94	.338/.452/.481	0	9	116	—	.284/.376/.407
2022	32	INTLTomateros de …	101	.226/.356/.250	0	4	86	—

Contract

No contract data on file.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.

show model inputsbasis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral

Methodology▸ how these numbers are built

All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.

Year	Age	Lvl	Team	MLB%	PA	AB	H	2B	3B	HR	BB	SO	HBP	SB	CS	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	BABIP	K%	BB%	wOBA	wRC+	BAT	RUN	FLD	POS	REP	WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments)
2010	20	A+	Jupiter Hammerheads	—	19	16	7	0	0	0	2	2	1	0	1	438	526	438	964		500	11	11	446	150	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	20	ROK	GCL Marlins	—	30	27	6	0	0	0	2	4	1	0	0	222	300	222	522		261	13	7	252	10	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	21	A+	Jupiter Hammerheads	—	92	82	26	2	1	0	8	15	2	5	2	317	391	366	757	49	388	16	9	348	96	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	22	AA	Jacksonville Suns	—	77	65	15	0	0	0	9	10	1	3	4	231	333	231	564		273	13	12	267	49	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	22	A+	Jupiter Hammerheads	—	183	157	44	8	1	1	22	22	2	9	2	280	376	363	739	83	319	12	12	336	84	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	22	A	Greensboro Grasshoppers	—	33	28	7	1	0	0	1	4	3	4	1	250	344	286	629	36	292	12	3	291	50	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	23	A+	Jupiter Hammerheads	—	241	209	62	8	1	1	25	31	4	5	3	297	382	359	741	62	339	13	10	338	85	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	23	A	Greensboro Grasshoppers	—	113	102	22	6	0	0	8	14	0	2	2	216	273	275	547	59	247	12	7	246	30	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	24	AA	Jacksonville Suns	—	241	213	46	10	0	0	22	41	3	11	4	216	298	263	561	47	267	17	9	261	40	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	26	AAA	Tigres de Quintana Roo	—	135	121	34	6	0	0	10	17	1	6	1	281	341	331	671	50	327	13	7	302	78	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	27	AAA	Olmecas de Tabasco	—	210	190	50	7	0	1	15	26	0	7	4	263	317	316	633	53	301	12	7	284	60	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	29	AAA	Acereros del Norte	—	94	77	26	7	2	0	13	14	3	9	1	338	452	481	932	143	413	15	14	414	116	—	—	—	—	—	—
2022	32	INTL	Tomateros de Culiacan	—	101	84	19	2	0	0	15	14	2	4	2	226	356	250	606	24	271	14	15	296	86	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents)
2010	20	A+ MLE	Jupiter Hammerheads	—	19	16	6	0	0	0	2	3	1	0	1	375	474	375	849		470	16	11	390	150	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	20	ROK MLE	GCL Marlins	—	30	28	5	0	0	0	1	6	1	0	0	179	233	179	412		211	20	3	183	10	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	21	A+ MLE	Jupiter Hammerheads	—	92	84	25	2	1	0	6	21	2	5	2	298	359	345	704	48	392	23	7	310	96	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	22	AA MLE	Jacksonville Suns	—	77	68	15	0	0	0	6	12	1	3	4	221	293	221	514		269	16	8	241	49	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	22	A+ MLE	Jupiter Hammerheads	—	183	162	41	8	1	1	17	33	2	9	2	253	331	333	665	80	303	18	9	293	84	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	22	A MLE	Greensboro Grasshoppers	—	33	28	6	1	0	0	1	6	3	4	1	214	312	250	562	36	261	18	3	242	50	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	23	A+ MLE	Jupiter Hammerheads	—	241	216	57	7	1	1	18	43	4	5	3	264	332	319	651	56	314	18	7	294	85	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	23	A MLE	Greensboro Grasshoppers	—	113	104	20	5	0	0	6	19	0	2	2	192	236	240	477	48	231	17	5	213	30	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	24	AA MLE	Jacksonville Suns	—	241	220	44	10	0	0	15	49	3	11	4	200	261	245	506	45	255	20	6	227	40	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	26	AAA MLE	Tigres de Quintana Roo	—	135	124	35	6	0	0	7	20	1	6	1	282	326	331	656	48	325	15	5	283	78	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	27	AAA MLE	Olmecas de Tabasco	—	210	195	50	6	0	1	10	31	0	7	4	256	293	303	595	46	291	15	5	257	60	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	29	AAA MLE	Acereros del Norte	—	94	81	23	6	2	0	9	17	3	9	1	284	376	407	784	123	352	18	10	339	116	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	20	ROK MLE	2 teams	—	49	44	11	0	0	0	3	9	2	0	1	250	327	250	577		314	18	6	263	64	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	20	ROK RAW	2 teams	—	49	43	13	0	0	0	4	6	2	0	1	302	388	302	690		351	12	8	327	64	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	21	A+ MLE	Jupiter Hammerheads	—	92	84	25	2	1	0	6	21	2	5	2	298	359	345	704	48	397	23	7	310	96	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	21	A+ RAW	Jupiter Hammerheads	—	92	82	26	2	1	0	8	15	2	5	2	317	391	366	757	49	388	16	9	348	96	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	22	A+ MLE	3 teams	—	293	258	63	9	1	1	24	51	6	16	7	244	323	298	621	54	300	17	8	274	71	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	22	A+ RAW	3 teams	—	293	250	66	9	1	1	32	36	6	16	7	264	361	320	681	56	304	12	11	313	71	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	23	A+ MLE	2 teams	—	354	320	78	13	1	1	24	63	4	7	5	244	305	300	605	56	296	18	7	268	68	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	23	A+ RAW	2 teams	—	354	311	84	14	1	1	33	45	4	7	5	270	348	331	679	61	309	13	9	308	68	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	24	AA MLE	Jacksonville Suns	—	241	220	44	10	0	0	15	49	3	11	4	200	261	245	506	45	257	20	6	227	40	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	24	AA RAW	Jacksonville Suns	—	241	213	46	10	0	0	22	41	3	11	4	216	298	263	561	47	267	17	9	261	40	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	26	AAA MLE	Tigres de Quintana Roo	—	135	124	35	6	0	0	7	20	1	6	1	282	326	331	656	48	337	15	5	283	78	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	26	AAA RAW	Tigres de Quintana Roo	—	135	121	34	6	0	0	10	17	1	6	1	281	341	331	671	50	327	13	7	302	78	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	27	AAA MLE	Olmecas de Tabasco	—	210	195	50	6	0	1	10	31	0	7	4	256	293	303	595	46	301	15	5	257	60	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	27	AAA RAW	Olmecas de Tabasco	—	210	190	50	7	0	1	15	26	0	7	4	263	317	316	633	53	301	12	7	284	60	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	29	AAA MLE	Acereros del Norte	—	94	81	23	6	2	0	9	17	3	9	1	284	376	407	784	123	359	18	10	339	116	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	29	AAA RAW	Acereros del Norte	—	94	77	26	7	2	0	13	14	3	9	1	338	452	481	932	143	413	15	14	414	116	—	—	—	—	—	—
2022	32	INTL MLE	Tomateros de Culiacan	—	101	84	19	2	0	0	15	14	2	4	2	226	356	250	606	24	271	14	15	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
2022	32	INTL RAW	Tomateros de Culiacan	—	101	84	19	2	0	0	15	14	2	4	2	226	356	250	606	24	271	14	15	296	86	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	20	ROK MLE	2 teams	—	49	44	11	0	0	0	3	9	2	0	1	250	327	250	577		311	18	6	263	64	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	21	A+ MLE	Jupiter Hammerheads	—	92	84	25	2	1	0	6	21	2	5	2	298	359	345	704	48	392	23	7	310	96	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	22	A+ MLE	3 teams	—	293	261	63	9	1	1	24	51	6	16	7	241	323	295	618	54	289	17	8	274	71	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	23	A+ MLE	2 teams	—	354	323	78	13	1	1	24	63	4	7	5	241	305	297	602	56	288	18	7	268	68	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	24	AA MLE	Jacksonville Suns	—	241	221	44	10	0	0	15	49	3	11	4	199	261	244	505	45	255	20	6	227	40	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	26	AAA MLE	Tigres de Quintana Roo	—	135	126	35	6	0	0	7	20	1	6	1	278	326	325	651	48	325	15	5	283	78	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	27	AAA MLE	Olmecas de Tabasco	—	210	198	50	6	0	1	10	31	0	7	4	253	293	298	591	45	291	15	5	257	60	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	29	AAA MLE	Acereros del Norte	—	94	82	23	6	2	0	9	17	3	9	1	280	376	402	779	122	352	18	10	339	116	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career Totals
Career	—	MLE		—	1569	1410	348	54	5	3	113	275	23	65	27	247	313	299	612	52	303	18	7	252	57	-81	+2	+0	+6	+34	-4.0
/ 162G	—	MLE		—	650	584	143	22	2	1	47	114	10	27	11	245	312	295	607	50	301	18	7	252	57	-34	+1	+0	+2	+14	-1.6

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2019 AAAAcereros del Norte · 94 PAwOBA .404 → .339 (−65)K% 14.9% → 18.1%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	14.89%	÷0.988	×1.200	—	—	18.09%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	13.83%	÷0.960	×0.690	—	×0.972	9.67%
HBP% /PA	3.19%	—	×0.940	—	×0.972	2.92%
Singles /BIP	26.98%	÷1.036	×0.930	—	×0.972	23.55%
Doubles /BIP	11.11%	÷1.048	×0.830	—	×0.972	8.55%
Triples /BIP	3.17%	÷0.922	×0.920	—	×0.972	3.08%
Home runs /BIP	0.00%	÷1.015	×0.700	—	×0.972	0.00%

Factors used: level-wide AAA factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 103, 1B 107, 2B 110, 3B 84, K 98, BB 92 — applied at half strength. Age: age 30 vs a level average of 27.2 → −2.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.8 yr older than average).

Result: wOBA .404 → .339; ISO .143 → .124; BABIP .413 → .352. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2017 AAAOlmecas de Tabasco · 210 PAwOBA .276 → .257 (−19)K% 12.4% → 14.6%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	12.38%	÷1.020	×1.200	—	—	14.57%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	7.14%	÷1.045	×0.690	—	×0.992	4.68%
HBP% /PA	0.00%	—	×0.940	—	×0.992	0.00%
Singles /BIP	25.61%	÷0.984	×0.930	×1.050	×0.992	25.22%
Doubles /BIP	4.27%	÷0.976	×0.830	×1.050	×0.992	3.78%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.150	×0.920	×1.050	×0.992	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	0.61%	÷0.886	×0.700	—	×0.992	0.48%

Factors used: level-wide AAA factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 77, 1B 97, 2B 95, 3B 130, K 104, BB 109 — applied at half strength. Age: age 28 vs a level average of 27.2 → −0.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.

Result: wOBA .276 → .257; ISO .053 → .047; BABIP .301 → .291. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2016 AAATigres de Quintana Roo · 135 PAwOBA .294 → .283 (−11)K% 12.6% → 14.5%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	12.59%	÷1.042	×1.200	—	—	14.50%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	7.41%	÷1.031	×0.690	—	×1.003	4.97%
HBP% /PA	0.74%	—	×0.940	—	×1.003	0.70%
Singles /BIP	26.92%	÷0.945	×0.930	×1.026	×1.003	27.27%
Doubles /BIP	5.77%	÷0.941	×0.830	×1.026	×1.003	5.24%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷0.910	×0.920	×1.026	×1.003	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	0.00%	÷1.105	×0.700	—	×1.003	0.00%

Factors used: level-wide AAA factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 121, 1B 89, 2B 88, 3B 82, K 108, BB 106 — applied at half strength. Age: age 27 vs a level average of 27.2 → +0.3% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.026.

Result: wOBA .294 → .283; ISO .050 → .047; BABIP .327 → .325. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2014 AAJacksonville Suns · 241 PAwOBA .255 → .227 (−28)K% 17.0% → 20.5%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	17.01%	÷1.010	×1.220	—	—	20.55%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	9.13%	÷0.995	×0.680	—	×0.998	6.23%
HBP% /PA	1.24%	—	×0.840	—	×0.998	1.04%
Singles /BIP	20.93%	÷1.012	×0.920	×1.034	×0.998	19.64%
Doubles /BIP	5.81%	÷0.940	×0.910	×1.034	×0.998	5.81%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.064	×0.880	×1.034	×0.998	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	0.00%	÷1.006	×0.800	—	×0.998	0.00%

Factors used: league row SL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 101, 1B 102, 2B 88, 3B 113, K 102, BB 99 — applied at half strength. Age: age 25 vs a level average of 24.8 → −0.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.034.

Result: wOBA .255 → .227; ISO .047 → .047; BABIP .267 → .255. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2013 A+Jupiter Hammerheads · 241 PAwOBA .332 → .294 (−39)K% 12.9% → 17.9%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	12.86%	÷1.019	×1.420	—	—	17.92%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	9.96%	÷0.970	×0.750	—	×0.988	7.61%
HBP% /PA	1.66%	—	×0.930	—	×0.988	1.53%
Singles /BIP	29.21%	÷1.029	×0.920	×1.050	×0.988	27.09%
Doubles /BIP	4.49%	÷1.073	×0.960	×1.050	×0.988	4.17%
Triples /BIP	0.56%	÷0.900	×0.810	×1.050	×0.988	0.52%
Home runs /BIP	0.56%	÷0.942	×0.880	—	×0.988	0.52%

Factors used: league row FSL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 88, 1B 106, 2B 115, 3B 80, K 104, BB 94 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 22.8 → −1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.

Result: wOBA .332 → .294; ISO .062 → .057; BABIP .339 → .314. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2013 AGreensboro Grasshoppers · 113 PAwOBA .242 → .213 (−28)K% 12.4% → 17.2%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	12.39%	÷0.963	×1.340	—	—	17.24%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	7.08%	÷0.920	×0.660	—	×0.980	4.98%
HBP% /PA	0.00%	—	×0.770	—	×0.980	0.00%
Singles /BIP	18.18%	÷0.992	×0.920	×1.047	×0.980	17.30%
Doubles /BIP	6.82%	÷0.945	×0.820	×1.047	×0.980	6.07%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷0.959	×0.940	×1.047	×0.980	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	0.00%	÷1.235	×0.820	—	×0.980	0.00%

Factors used: league row SAL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 147, 1B 98, 2B 89, 3B 92, K 93, BB 84 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 22.0 → −2.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.0 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.047.

Result: wOBA .242 → .213; ISO .059 → .052; BABIP .247 → .231. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2012 A+Jupiter Hammerheads · 183 PAwOBA .330 → .293 (−37)K% 12.0% → 17.9%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	12.02%	÷0.956	×1.420	—	—	17.86%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	12.02%	÷0.971	×0.750	—	×0.998	9.26%
HBP% /PA	1.09%	—	×0.930	—	×0.998	1.01%
Singles /BIP	25.19%	÷1.027	×0.920	×1.050	×0.998	23.63%
Doubles /BIP	5.93%	÷0.977	×0.960	×1.050	×0.998	6.10%
Triples /BIP	0.74%	÷1.150	×0.810	×1.050	×0.998	0.55%
Home runs /BIP	0.74%	÷0.939	×0.880	—	×0.998	0.69%

Factors used: league row FSL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 88, 1B 105, 2B 95, 3B 130, K 91, BB 94 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.8 → −0.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.

Result: wOBA .330 → .293; ISO .083 → .078; BABIP .319 → .303. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2012 AAJacksonville Suns · 77 PAwOBA .261 → .241 (−21)K% 13.0% → 16.2%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	12.99%	÷0.976	×1.220	—	—	16.23%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	11.69%	÷0.997	×0.680	—	×1.027	8.19%
HBP% /PA	1.30%	—	×0.840	—	×1.027	1.12%
Singles /BIP	27.27%	÷1.007	×0.920	×1.050	×1.027	26.86%
Doubles /BIP	0.00%	÷0.995	×0.910	×1.050	×1.027	0.00%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.078	×0.880	×1.050	×1.027	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	0.00%	÷0.896	×0.800	—	×1.027	0.00%

Factors used: league row SL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 79, 1B 102, 2B 99, 3B 116, K 95, BB 99 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 24.8 → +2.7% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.

Result: wOBA .261 → .241; ISO .000 → .000; BABIP .273 → .269. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

Not traceable per stint: some stints lack the counting stats the component translation needs. Level-wide factors that apply instead — .