Rowan Wick
P Buffalo Bisons| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 28 | MIX3 levels | 30 | 0 | 30 | 4.75 | 2.21 | 33.3% | 12.1% | 0.9 | K 29.0% · BB 14.0% · FIP 2.99 | |
| 2022 | 29 | MLBCHC | 64 | 0 | 64 | 4.22 | 4.04 | 23.5% | 9.2% | 0.4 | ||
| 2023 | 30 | AAATOR | 43 | 1 | 51 | 6.66 | 5.18 | 32.0% | 12.3% | — | K 27.5% · BB 11.1% · FIP 5.93 | |
| 2024 | 31 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2025 | 32 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2026 | 33 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
Statcast · Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2015 | 22 | ROK MLE | GCL Cardinals | 3 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0.7 | 8.3% | 16.7% | -8.3% | 0.0% | 9.00 | 4.51 | — |
| 2015 | 22 | ROK RAW | GCL Cardinals | 3 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0.7 | 8.3% | 16.7% | -8.3% | 0.0% | 9.00 | 5.10 | — |
| 2016 | 23 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 44 | 0 | 44 | 184 | 57 | 20 | 1 | 0% | 1.0 | 24.3% | 12.1% | 12.2% | 0.6% | 2.44 | 2.89 | — |
| 2016 | 23 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 44 | 0 | 44 | 184 | 57 | 20 | 1 | 0% | 1.0 | 31.0% | 10.9% | 20.1% | 0.5% | 2.44 | 2.18 | — |
| 2017 | 24 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 34 | 0 | 42 | 179 | 42 | 19 | 3 | 0% | 1.2 | 17.2% | 11.6% | 5.6% | 1.9% | 3.19 | 4.16 | — |
| 2017 | 24 | MIX RAW | 3 levels | 34 | 0 | 42 | 179 | 42 | 19 | 3 | 0% | 1.2 | 23.5% | 10.6% | 12.8% | 1.7% | 3.19 | 3.38 | — |
| 2018 | 25 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 59 | 0 | 62 | 265 | 71 | 29 | 4 | 0% | 1.1 | 23.5% | 13.4% | 10.1% | 1.4% | 3.18 | 3.57 | +0.7 |
| 2018 | 25 | MIX RAW | 3 levels | 59 | 0 | 62 | 265 | 71 | 29 | 4 | 0% | 1.1 | 26.8% | 10.9% | 15.8% | 1.5% | 3.18 | 3.05 | +1.1 |
| 2019 | 26 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 58 | 0 | 68 | 278 | 79 | 22 | 3 | 0% | 1.2 | 26.5% | 8.0% | 18.5% | 1.1% | 2.11 | 2.50 | +1.7 |
| 2019 | 26 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 58 | 0 | 68 | 278 | 79 | 22 | 3 | 0% | 1.2 | 28.4% | 7.9% | 20.5% | 1.1% | 2.11 | 2.32 | +1.8 |
| 2020 | 27 | MLB MLE | Chicago Cubs | 19 | 0 | 17 | 74 | 20 | 5 | 1 | 0% | 0.9 | 27.0% | 6.8% | 20.3% | 1.4% | 3.12 | 2.44 | +0.4 |
| 2020 | 27 | MLB RAW | Chicago Cubs | 19 | 0 | 17 | 74 | 20 | 5 | 1 | 0% | 0.9 | 27.0% | 6.8% | 20.3% | 1.4% | 3.12 | 2.41 | +0.4 |
| 2021 | 28 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 30 | 0 | 30 | 132 | 44 | 16 | 1 | 0% | 1.0 | 29.0% | 14.0% | 15.0% | 1.0% | 4.75 | 2.99 | +0.6 |
| 2021 | 28 | MIX RAW | 3 levels | 30 | 0 | 30 | 132 | 44 | 16 | 1 | 0% | 1.0 | 33.3% | 12.1% | 21.2% | 0.8% | 4.75 | 2.21 | +0.9 |
| 2022 | 29 | MLB MLE | Chicago Cubs | 64 | 0 | 64 | 294 | 69 | 27 | 9 | 0% | 1.0 | 23.5% | 9.2% | 14.3% | 3.2% | 4.22 | 4.03 | +0.4 |
| 2022 | 29 | MLB RAW | Chicago Cubs | 64 | 0 | 64 | 294 | 69 | 27 | 9 | 0% | 1.0 | 23.5% | 9.2% | 14.3% | 3.1% | 4.22 | 4.04 | +0.4 |
| 2023 | 30 | AAA MLE | Buffalo Bisons | 43 | 1 | 51 | 228 | 73 | 28 | 13 | 2% | 1.2 | 27.5% | 11.1% | 16.5% | 6.8% | 6.66 | 5.93 | — |
| 2023 | 30 | AAA RAW | Buffalo Bisons | 43 | 1 | 51 | 228 | 73 | 28 | 13 | 2% | 1.2 | 32.0% | 12.3% | 19.7% | 5.7% | 6.66 | 5.18 | — |
| ▸ Career totals (raw MLB only — as recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| MLB Career | — | 146 | 0 | 146 | 646 | 160 | 62 | 12 | 0% | 1.0 | 24.8% | 9.6% | 15.2% | 1.9% | 3.82 | 3.25 | +2.3 | ||
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 146 | 0 | 146 | 646 | 160 | 62 | 12 | 0% | 1.0 | 24.8% | 9.6% | 15.2% | 1.9% | 3.82 | 3.24 | +2.3 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 200 | 0 | 200 | 885 | 219 | 85 | 16 | 0% | 1.0 | 24.8% | 9.6% | 15.2% | 1.9% | 3.82 | 3.24 | +3.1 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 354 | 1 | 382 | 1646 | 403 | 179 | 39 | 0% | 1.1 | 24.5% | 10.9% | 13.6% | 2.3% | 3.70 | 3.70 | +2.3 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 185 | 1 | 200 | 861 | 211 | 93 | 20 | 0% | 1.1 | 24.5% | 10.9% | 13.6% | 2.3% | 3.70 | 3.70 | +3.1 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2023 AAABuffalo Bisons · 51 IPFIP 5.08 → 5.93 (+0.85)K% 32.0% → 27.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 32.02% | — | ×0.860 | 27.54% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 12.28% | — | ×0.900 | 11.05% |
| HR / BF /BF | 5.70% | ÷0.916 | ×1.100 | 6.84% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 83).
Result: FIP 5.08 → 5.93, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2021 AAAIowa Cubs · 4 IPFIP 1.18 → 1.61 (+0.43)K% 36.4% → 32.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 36.36% | — | ×0.880 | 32.00% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 9.09% | — | ×1.050 | 9.55% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷1.081 | ×1.100 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors — K ×0.88, BB ×1.05, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 116).
Result: FIP 1.18 → 1.61, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2019 AAAIowa Cubs · 35 IPFIP 2.24 → 2.65 (+0.41)K% 31.9% → 28.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 31.88% | — | ×0.880 | 28.06% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 5.07% | — | ×1.050 | 5.33% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.17% | ÷1.050 | ×1.100 | 2.28% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors — K ×0.88, BB ×1.05, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 110).
Result: FIP 2.24 → 2.65, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2018 AASan Antonio Missions · 31 IPFIP 2.34 → 3.04 (+0.69)K% 31.3% → 25.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 31.34% | — | ×0.810 | 25.39% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 14.93% | — | ×1.100 | 16.42% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷0.824 | ×1.200 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 65).
Result: FIP 2.34 → 3.04, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2018 AAAEl Paso Chihuahuas · 23 IPFIP 3.96 → 4.35 (+0.39)K% 23.7% → 20.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 23.66% | — | ×0.880 | 20.82% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 8.60% | — | ×1.050 | 9.03% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.23% | ÷1.045 | ×1.100 | 3.40% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors — K ×0.88, BB ×1.05, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 109).
Result: FIP 3.96 → 4.35, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2017 AASpringfield Cardinals · 22 IPFIP 3.66 → 4.06 (+0.40)K% 18.7% → 15.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 18.68% | — | ×0.810 | 15.13% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 12.09% | — | ×1.100 | 13.30% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.10% | ÷1.315 | ×1.200 | 1.00% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 163).
Result: FIP 3.66 → 4.06, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2017 AAAMemphis Redbirds · 17 IPFIP 3.82 → 4.28 (+0.46)K% 22.4% → 19.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 22.37% | — | ×0.880 | 19.68% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 9.21% | — | ×1.050 | 9.67% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.63% | ÷0.980 | ×1.100 | 2.95% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors — K ×0.88, BB ×1.05, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 96).
Result: FIP 3.82 → 4.28, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2016 A+Palm Beach Cardinals · 25 IPFIP 0.64 → 1.50 (+0.87)K% 38.5% → 29.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 38.54% | — | ×0.770 | 29.68% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 6.25% | — | ×1.150 | 7.19% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷0.979 | ×1.250 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 96).
Result: FIP 0.64 → 1.50, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).