Stefan Sabol

PosLF

B/TR/R

Born1992-02-02

Age (2027)35

No MLB projection yet. Career stats below are historical.

Overview

AALAST SEASON 2016

Year	Age	Lvl / Team	PA	AVG/OBP/SLG	HR	SB	wRC+	WAR	MLE AVG/OBP/SLG
2014	22	ASavannah Sand…	388	.199/.318/.339	8	16	36	—	.152/.229/.255
2015	23	A+/A2 orgs	466	.258/.357/.360	6	10	53	—	.197/.275/.276
2016	24	AABinghamton Me…	250	.229/.320/.362	5	3	58	—	.204/.271/.310

Contract

No contract data on file.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.

show model inputsbasis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral

Methodology▸ how these numbers are built

All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.

Year	Age	Lvl	Team	MLB%	PA	AB	H	2B	3B	HR	BB	SO	HBP	SB	CS	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	BABIP	K%	BB%	wOBA	wRC+	BAT	RUN	FLD	POS	REP	WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments)
2013	21	A	Savannah Sand Gnats	—	417	365	74	18	5	8	47	116	3	13	7	203	299	345	644	142	273	28	11	292	37	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	22	A	Savannah Sand Gnats	—	388	327	65	16	3	8	56	105	1	16	5	199	318	339	657	141	263	27	14	300	36	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	23	A+	St. Lucie Mets	—	310	268	71	14	0	3	38	80	2	5	4	265	360	351	711	86	366	26	12	326	50	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	23	A	Savannah Sand Gnats	—	156	132	32	9	0	3	21	40	1	5	5	242	351	379	729	136	322	26	13	329	58	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	24	AA	Binghamton Mets	—	250	218	50	12	1	5	27	86	2	3	2	229	320	362	682	133	346	34	11	307	58	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents)
2013	21	A MLE	Savannah Sand Gnats	—	417	379	60	13	5	8	33	158	3	13	7	158	231	282	514	124	237	38	8	223	37	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	22	A MLE	Savannah Sand Gnats	—	388	349	53	12	3	6	34	138	1	16	5	152	229	255	484	103	225	36	9	222	36	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	23	A+ MLE	St. Lucie Mets	—	310	278	55	11	0	2	28	114	2	5	4	198	276	259	535	61	320	37	9	242	50	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	23	A MLE	Savannah Sand Gnats	—	156	139	27	7	0	3	14	53	1	5	5	194	273	309	582	115	273	34	9	254	58	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	24	AA MLE	Binghamton Mets	—	250	226	46	10	1	4	19	99	2	3	2	204	271	310	581	106	321	40	8	254	58	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	21	A MLE	Savannah Sand Gnats	—	417	379	60	13	5	8	33	158	3	13	7	158	231	282	514	124	243	38	8	223	37	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	21	A RAW	Savannah Sand Gnats	—	417	365	74	18	5	8	47	116	3	13	7	203	299	345	644	142	273	28	11	292	37	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	22	A MLE	Savannah Sand Gnats	—	388	349	53	12	3	6	34	138	1	16	5	152	229	255	484	103	226	36	9	222	36	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	22	A RAW	Savannah Sand Gnats	—	388	327	65	16	3	8	56	105	1	16	5	199	318	339	657	141	263	27	14	300	36	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	23	A+ MLE	2 teams	—	466	417	81	18	0	5	42	167	3	10	9	194	273	273	546	79	308	36	9	246	53	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	23	A+ RAW	2 teams	—	466	400	103	23	0	6	59	120	3	10	9	258	357	360	717	102	351	26	13	327	53	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	24	AA MLE	Binghamton Mets	—	250	226	46	10	1	4	19	99	2	3	2	204	271	310	581	106	333	40	8	254	58	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	24	AA RAW	Binghamton Mets	—	250	218	50	12	1	5	27	86	2	3	2	229	320	362	682	133	346	34	11	307	58	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	21	A MLE	Savannah Sand Gnats	—	417	378	60	13	5	8	33	158	3	13	7	159	231	283	514	124	237	38	8	223	37	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	22	A MLE	Savannah Sand Gnats	—	388	350	53	12	3	6	34	138	1	16	5	151	229	254	483	103	225	36	9	222	36	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	23	A+ MLE	2 teams	—	466	418	81	18	0	5	42	167	3	10	9	194	273	273	545	79	304	36	9	246	53	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	24	AA MLE	Binghamton Mets	—	250	227	46	10	1	4	19	99	2	3	2	203	271	308	580	106	321	40	8	254	58	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career Totals
Career	—	MLE		—	1521	1371	240	53	9	23	128	562	9	42	23	175	250	277	527	102	273	37	8	235	45	-99	-1	+0	-16	+33	-8.5
/ 162G	—	MLE		—	650	586	103	23	4	10	55	240	4	18	10	176	252	280	531	104	274	37	8	235	45	-42	-0	+0	-7	+14	-3.6

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2016 AABinghamton Mets · 250 PAwOBA .303 → .254 (−49)K% 34.4% → 39.5%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	34.40%	÷1.062	×1.220	—	—	39.51%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	10.80%	÷0.996	×0.700	—	×1.012	7.68%
HBP% /PA	0.80%	—	×0.850	—	×1.012	0.69%
Singles /BIP	24.24%	÷1.034	×0.970	×1.025	×1.012	23.58%
Doubles /BIP	9.09%	÷1.070	×0.860	×1.025	×1.012	7.58%
Triples /BIP	0.76%	÷0.956	×0.950	×1.025	×1.012	0.78%
Home runs /BIP	3.79%	÷1.085	×0.780	—	×1.012	2.76%

Factors used: league row EL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 117, 1B 107, 2B 114, 3B 91, K 112, BB 99 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 24.8 → +1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.025.

Result: wOBA .303 → .254; ISO .133 → .104; BABIP .346 → .321. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2015 A+St. Lucie Mets · 310 PAwOBA .319 → .242 (−78)K% 25.8% → 36.9%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	25.81%	÷0.992	×1.420	—	—	36.94%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	12.26%	÷1.023	×0.750	—	×0.998	8.97%
HBP% /PA	0.65%	—	×0.930	—	×0.998	0.60%
Singles /BIP	28.72%	÷1.049	×0.920	×0.997	×0.998	25.05%
Doubles /BIP	7.45%	÷1.055	×0.960	×0.997	×0.998	6.74%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷0.900	×0.810	×0.997	×0.998	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	1.60%	÷1.269	×0.880	—	×0.998	1.10%

Factors used: league row FSL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 154, 1B 110, 2B 111, 3B 80, K 98, BB 105 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.8 → −0.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.997.

Result: wOBA .319 → .242; ISO .086 → .062; BABIP .366 → .320. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2015 ASavannah Sand Gnats · 156 PAwOBA .323 → .254 (−69)K% 25.6% → 33.7%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	25.64%	÷1.019	×1.340	—	—	33.71%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	13.46%	÷0.976	×0.660	—	×0.990	9.01%
HBP% /PA	0.64%	—	×0.770	—	×0.990	0.49%
Singles /BIP	21.74%	÷1.012	×0.920	×0.978	×0.990	19.14%
Doubles /BIP	9.78%	÷1.028	×0.820	×0.978	×0.990	7.55%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.053	×0.940	×0.978	×0.990	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	3.26%	÷0.804	×0.820	—	×0.990	3.29%

Factors used: league row SAL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 61, 1B 102, 2B 106, 3B 111, K 104, BB 95 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.0 → −1.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.978.

Result: wOBA .323 → .254; ISO .136 → .117; BABIP .322 → .273. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2014 ASavannah Sand Gnats · 388 PAwOBA .293 → .222 (−70)K% 27.1% → 35.6%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	27.06%	÷1.018	×1.340	—	—	35.62%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	13.92%	÷1.053	×0.660	—	—	8.72%
HBP% /PA	0.26%	—	×0.770	—	—	0.20%
Singles /BIP	17.12%	÷1.017	×0.920	×0.965	—	14.94%
Doubles /BIP	7.21%	÷0.984	×0.820	×0.965	—	5.80%
Triples /BIP	1.35%	÷0.908	×0.940	×0.965	—	1.35%
Home runs /BIP	3.60%	÷0.987	×0.820	—	—	2.99%

Factors used: league row SAL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 97, 1B 103, 2B 97, 3B 82, K 104, BB 111 — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 22.0 → +0.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.965.

Result: wOBA .293 → .222; ISO .141 → .115; BABIP .263 → .225. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2013 ASavannah Sand Gnats · 417 PAwOBA .285 → .223 (−62)K% 27.8% → 37.8%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	27.82%	÷0.986	×1.340	—	—	37.80%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	11.27%	÷0.960	×0.660	—	×1.015	7.87%
HBP% /PA	0.72%	—	×0.770	—	×1.015	0.56%
Singles /BIP	17.27%	÷1.011	×0.920	×0.950	×1.015	15.16%
Doubles /BIP	7.23%	÷0.980	×0.820	×0.950	×1.015	5.83%
Triples /BIP	2.01%	÷0.902	×0.940	×0.950	×1.015	2.02%
Home runs /BIP	3.21%	÷0.793	×0.820	—	×1.015	3.37%

Factors used: league row SAL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 59, 1B 102, 2B 96, 3B 80, K 97, BB 92 — applied at half strength. Age: age 21 vs a level average of 22.0 → +1.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.

Result: wOBA .285 → .223; ISO .142 → .123; BABIP .273 → .237. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).