Mike Kickham
P Oklahoma City Dodgers| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 30 | AAANew Orleans B… | 31 | 13 | 86 | 4.27 | 3.88 | 21.9% | 9.1% | — | K 19.3% · BB 9.6% · FIP 4.12 | |
| 2020 | 31 | MLBBOS | 6 | 2 | 14 | 7.71 | 7.10 | 24.3% | 5.7% | -0.4 | ||
| 2021 | 32 | MIX2 levels | 21 | 9 | 49 | 6.80 | 5.71 | 19.3% | 10.7% | -0.7 | K 17.1% · BB 11.4% · FIP 5.79 | |
| 2022 | 33 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2023 | 34 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2024 | 35 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2025 | 36 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2026 | 37 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
Statcast · Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2013 | 24 | MLB MLE | San Francisco Giants | 12 | 3 | 28 | 144 | 29 | 8 | 8 | 25% | 2.4 | 20.1% | 5.6% | 14.6% | 6.0% | 10.16 | 5.40 | -0.3 |
| 2013 | 24 | MLB RAW | San Francisco Giants | 12 | 3 | 28 | 144 | 29 | 8 | 8 | 25% | 2.4 | 20.1% | 5.6% | 14.6% | 5.6% | 10.16 | 5.57 | -0.3 |
| 2014 | 25 | MLB MLE | San Francisco Giants | 2 | 0 | 2 | 16 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1.0 | 6.2% | 6.2% | 0.0% | 6.2% | 22.50 | 6.79 | -0.1 |
| 2014 | 25 | MLB RAW | San Francisco Giants | 2 | 0 | 2 | 16 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1.0 | 6.2% | 6.2% | 0.0% | 6.2% | 22.50 | 10.10 | -0.1 |
| 2015 | 26 | AAA MLE | Round Rock Express | 12 | 5 | 27 | 135 | 16 | 35 | 3 | 42% | 2.2 | 10.4% | 27.2% | -16.8% | 2.1% | 7.00 | 6.80 | — |
| 2015 | 26 | AAA RAW | Round Rock Express | 12 | 5 | 27 | 135 | 16 | 35 | 3 | 42% | 2.2 | 11.9% | 25.9% | -14.1% | 2.2% | 7.00 | 7.25 | — |
| 2016 | 27 | AA MLE | Richmond Flying Squirrels | 6 | 0 | 11 | 58 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 1.8 | 9.8% | 5.7% | 4.1% | 0.0% | 6.75 | 3.00 | — |
| 2016 | 27 | AA RAW | Richmond Flying Squirrels | 6 | 0 | 11 | 58 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 1.8 | 12.1% | 5.2% | 6.9% | 0.0% | 6.75 | 2.63 | — |
| 2017 | 28 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 27 | 25 | 146 | 596 | 119 | 24 | 14 | 93% | 5.4 | 16.6% | 4.4% | 12.2% | 2.5% | 3.65 | 3.64 | — |
| 2017 | 28 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 27 | 25 | 146 | 596 | 119 | 24 | 14 | 93% | 5.4 | 20.0% | 4.0% | 15.9% | 2.3% | 3.65 | 3.21 | — |
| 2018 | 29 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 20 | 3 | 42 | 172 | 38 | 7 | 4 | 15% | 2.1 | 18.4% | 4.7% | 13.7% | 2.9% | 3.64 | 3.74 | — |
| 2018 | 29 | MIX RAW | 3 levels | 20 | 3 | 42 | 172 | 38 | 7 | 4 | 15% | 2.1 | 22.1% | 4.1% | 18.0% | 2.3% | 3.64 | 3.03 | — |
| 2019 | 30 | AAA MLE | New Orleans Baby Cakes | 31 | 13 | 86 | 383 | 84 | 35 | 10 | 42% | 2.8 | 19.3% | 9.6% | 9.7% | 2.6% | 4.27 | 4.12 | — |
| 2019 | 30 | AAA RAW | New Orleans Baby Cakes | 31 | 13 | 86 | 383 | 84 | 35 | 10 | 42% | 2.8 | 21.9% | 9.1% | 12.8% | 2.6% | 4.27 | 3.88 | — |
| 2020 | 31 | MLB MLE | Boston Red Sox | 6 | 2 | 14 | 70 | 17 | 4 | 6 | 33% | 2.3 | 24.3% | 5.7% | 18.6% | 8.8% | 7.71 | 6.60 | -0.3 |
| 2020 | 31 | MLB RAW | Boston Red Sox | 6 | 2 | 14 | 70 | 17 | 4 | 6 | 33% | 2.3 | 24.3% | 5.7% | 18.6% | 8.6% | 7.71 | 7.10 | -0.4 |
| 2021 | 32 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 21 | 9 | 49 | 233 | 45 | 25 | 11 | 43% | 2.3 | 17.1% | 11.4% | 5.7% | 4.9% | 6.80 | 5.79 | -0.7 |
| 2021 | 32 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 21 | 9 | 49 | 233 | 45 | 25 | 11 | 43% | 2.3 | 19.3% | 10.7% | 8.6% | 4.7% | 6.80 | 5.71 | -0.7 |
| ▸ Career totals (raw MLB only — as recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| MLB Career | — | 21 | 5 | 46 | 242 | 49 | 14 | 16 | 24% | 2.2 | 20.2% | 5.8% | 14.5% | 6.6% | 10.10 | 6.38 | -1.0 | ||
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 21 | 5 | 46 | 242 | 49 | 14 | 16 | 24% | 2.2 | 20.2% | 5.8% | 14.5% | 6.6% | 10.10 | 5.75 | -0.6 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 91 | 22 | 200 | 1045 | 212 | 60 | 69 | 24% | 2.2 | 20.2% | 5.8% | 14.5% | 6.6% | 10.10 | 5.75 | -2.8 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 137 | 60 | 405 | 1807 | 311 | 150 | 60 | 44% | 3.0 | 17.2% | 8.3% | 8.9% | 3.3% | 5.16 | 4.53 | -0.9 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 68 | 30 | 200 | 892 | 154 | 74 | 30 | 44% | 3.0 | 17.2% | 8.3% | 8.9% | 3.3% | 5.16 | 4.53 | -4.1 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2021 AAAOklahoma City Dodgers · 47 IPFIP 5.32 → 5.79 (+0.47)K% 19.5% → 17.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 19.46% | — | ×0.880 | 17.12% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 10.86% | — | ×1.050 | 11.40% |
| HR / BF /BF | 4.52% | ÷1.016 | ×1.100 | 4.90% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors — K ×0.88, BB ×1.05, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 103).
Result: FIP 5.32 → 5.79, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2019 AAANew Orleans Baby Cakes · 86 IPFIP 3.84 → 4.12 (+0.28)K% 21.9% → 19.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 21.93% | — | ×0.880 | 19.30% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 9.14% | — | ×1.050 | 9.60% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.61% | ÷1.100 | ×1.100 | 2.61% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors — K ×0.88, BB ×1.05, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 120).
Result: FIP 3.84 → 4.12, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2018 AAANew Orleans Baby Cakes · 38 IPFIP 3.29 → 3.74 (+0.46)K% 20.9% → 18.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 20.89% | — | ×0.880 | 18.38% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 4.43% | — | ×1.050 | 4.65% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.53% | ÷0.952 | ×1.100 | 2.92% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors — K ×0.88, BB ×1.05, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 90).
Result: FIP 3.29 → 3.74, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2017 AAJacksonville Jumbo Shrimp · 97 IPFIP 3.03 → 3.44 (+0.42)K% 21.8% → 17.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 21.77% | — | ×0.810 | 17.64% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 4.05% | — | ×1.100 | 4.46% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.28% | ÷1.185 | ×1.200 | 2.31% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 137).
Result: FIP 3.03 → 3.44, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2017 AAANew Orleans Baby Cakes · 48 IPFIP 3.58 → 4.03 (+0.44)K% 16.4% → 14.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 16.42% | — | ×0.880 | 14.45% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 3.98% | — | ×1.050 | 4.18% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.49% | ÷0.928 | ×1.100 | 2.95% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors — K ×0.88, BB ×1.05, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 86).
Result: FIP 3.58 → 4.03, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2016 AARichmond Flying Squirrels · 11 IPFIP 2.74 → 3.00 (+0.26)K% 12.1% → 9.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 12.07% | — | ×0.810 | 9.78% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 5.17% | — | ×1.100 | 5.69% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷0.978 | ×1.200 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 96).
Result: FIP 2.74 → 3.00, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2015 AAARound Rock Express · 27 IPFIP 6.60 → 6.80 (+0.20)K% 11.9% → 10.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 11.85% | — | ×0.880 | 10.43% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 25.93% | — | ×1.050 | 27.22% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.22% | ÷1.184 | ×1.100 | 2.06% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors — K ×0.88, BB ×1.05, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 137).
Result: FIP 6.60 → 6.80, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).