Todd Cunningham

PosLF

B/TS/R

Born1989-03-20

Age (2027)38

No MLB projection yet. Career stats below are historical.

Overview

AAALAST SEASON 2018

Year	Age	Lvl / Team	PA	AVG/OBP/SLG	HR	SB	wRC+	WAR	MLE AVG/OBP/SLG
2016	27	AAALAA	417	.278/.381/.387	6	23	74	—	.230/.310/.312
2016	27	MLBLAA	29	.148/.179/.259	0	0	17	-0.7
2017	28	AAAOklahoma City…	358	.284/.408/.414	4	7	95	—	.242/.343/.337
2018	29	AAACWS	60	.163/.255/.204	0	2	8	—	.157/.218/.196
2019	30	No MLB games played
2020	31	No MLB games played
2021	32	No MLB games played
2022	33	No MLB games played
2023	34	No MLB games played
2024	35	No MLB games played
2025	36	No MLB games played
2026	37	No MLB games played

Last 3 seasons WAR -0.7

Contract

No contract data on file.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.

show model inputsbasis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral

Methodology▸ how these numbers are built

All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.

Year	Age	Lvl	Team	MLB%	PA	AB	H	2B	3B	HR	BB	SO	HBP	SB	CS	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	BABIP	K%	BB%	wOBA	wRC+	BAT	RUN	FLD	POS	REP	WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments)
2010	21	A	Rome Braves	—	263	231	60	9	3	1	14	30	15	7	4	260	342	338	680	78	294	11	5	311	72	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	22	A+	Lynchburg Hillcats	—	386	334	86	12	4	4	33	47	14	14	6	257	349	353	702	96	289	12	9	319	74	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	22	INTL	Surprise Saguaros	—	73	64	16	4	1	0	5	13	2	3	1	250	324	344	668	94	308	18	7	297	87	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	23	AA	Mississippi Braves	—	519	466	144	23	6	3	38	51	4	24	8	309	366	403	770	94	340	10	7	340	88	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	23	INTL	Naranjeros de Hermosillo	—	115	95	26	5	0	3	8	21	6	3	2	274	367	421	788	147	324	18	7	339	115	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	24	AAA	Gwinnett Braves	—	487	427	113	13	5	2	41	62	10	20	7	265	343	333	676	68	305	13	8	306	72	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	25	AAA	Gwinnett Braves	—	531	470	135	28	2	8	35	79	10	19	8	287	350	406	756	119	329	15	7	330	82	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	25	INTL	Tigres del Licey	—	78	70	16	2	0	0	3	7	1	2	0	229	270	257	527	29	250	9	4	232	43	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	26	MLB	Atlanta Braves	—	93	86	19	4	0	0	5	17	2	2	1	221	280	267	547	47	275	18	5	255	51	-5	+0	+2	-5	+2	-0.6
2015	26	AAA	Gwinnett Braves	—	375	329	86	13	3	2	23	34	10	9	4	261	329	337	666	76	283	9	6	295	70	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	27	MLB	Los Angeles Angels	—	29	27	4	3	0	0	1	6	0	0	1	148	179	259	438	111	190	21	3	188	17	-3	-0	+1	-5	+1	-0.7
2016	27	AAA	Salt Lake Bees	—	417	349	97	16	2	6	51	56	7	23	5	278	381	387	768	109	314	13	12	343	74	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	28	AAA	Oklahoma City Dodgers	—	358	292	83	20	3	4	43	50	18	7	3	284	408	414	822	130	328	14	12	371	95	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	29	AAA	Charlotte Knights	—	60	49	8	2	0	0	5	9	1	2	2	163	255	204	459	41	190	15	8	204	8	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career Totals (raw MLB only — historical actual)
MLB Career	—			—	122	113	23	7	0	0	6	23	2	2	2	204	256	265	522	62	256	19	5	239	48	-8	-0	+3	-10	+3	-1.2
▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents)
2010	21	A MLE	Rome Braves	—	263	236	57	8	3	1	9	42	15	7	4	242	312	314	625	72	283	16	3	274	72	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	22	A+ MLE	Lynchburg Hillcats	—	386	346	84	10	4	3	21	66	14	14	6	243	312	321	633	78	283	17	5	277	74	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	23	AA MLE	Mississippi Braves	—	519	482	135	22	6	3	22	64	4	24	8	280	317	369	686	89	310	12	4	298	88	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	24	AAA MLE	Gwinnett Braves	—	487	438	109	12	5	2	30	76	10	20	7	249	312	313	625	64	289	16	6	274	72	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	25	AAA MLE	Gwinnett Braves	—	531	481	127	25	2	6	24	97	10	19	8	264	313	362	674	98	304	18	5	290	82	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	26	MLB MLE	Atlanta Braves	—	93	87	19	4	0	0	4	17	2	2	1	218	269	264	533	46	275	18	4	244	51	-5	+0	+2	-5	+2	-0.6
2015	26	AAA MLE	Gwinnett Braves	—	375	338	86	12	3	2	14	44	10	9	4	254	304	325	629	71	270	12	4	271	70	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	27	MLB MLE	Los Angeles Angels	—	29	27	4	3	0	0	1	6	0	0	1	148	179	259	438	111	190	21	3	194	17	-3	-0	+1	-5	+1	-0.7
2016	27	AAA MLE	Salt Lake Bees	—	417	365	84	13	1	5	35	75	7	23	5	230	310	312	622	82	267	18	8	277	74	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	28	AAA MLE	Oklahoma City Dodgers	—	358	306	74	16	2	3	29	64	18	7	3	242	343	337	679	95	289	18	8	309	95	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	29	AAA MLE	Charlotte Knights	—	60	51	8	2	0	0	3	11	1	2	2	157	218	196	414	39	166	18	5	180	8	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	21	A MLE	Rome Braves	—	263	236	57	8	3	1	9	42	15	7	4	242	312	314	625	72	289	16	3	274	72	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	21	A RAW	Rome Braves	—	263	231	60	9	3	1	14	30	15	7	4	260	342	338	680	78	294	11	5	311	72	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	22	A+ MLE	2 teams	—	459	411	99	12	4	4	25	78	16	17	7	241	310	319	628	78	287	17	5	277	74	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	22	A+ RAW	2 teams	—	459	398	102	16	5	4	38	60	16	17	7	256	345	352	697	95	292	13	8	316	74	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	23	AA MLE	2 teams	—	634	580	166	27	8	4	27	79	10	27	10	286	329	381	710	95	324	12	4	298	88	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	23	AA RAW	2 teams	—	634	561	170	28	6	6	46	72	10	27	10	303	366	406	773	103	337	11	7	339	88	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	24	AAA MLE	Gwinnett Braves	—	487	438	109	12	5	2	30	76	10	20	7	249	312	313	625	64	296	16	6	274	72	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	24	AAA RAW	Gwinnett Braves	—	487	427	113	13	5	2	41	62	10	20	7	265	343	333	676	68	305	13	8	306	72	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	25	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	609	551	145	28	2	7	27	111	11	21	8	263	311	359	670	96	316	18	4	290	82	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	25	AAA RAW	2 teams	—	609	540	151	30	2	8	38	86	11	21	8	280	340	387	727	107	318	14	6	318	82	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	26	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	468	425	105	16	3	2	18	61	12	11	5	247	297	313	610	66	281	13	4	266	66	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	26	AAA RAW	2 teams	—	468	415	105	17	3	2	28	51	12	11	5	253	319	323	642	70	281	11	6	287	66	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	27	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	446	392	88	16	1	5	36	81	7	23	6	224	301	309	610	84	269	18	8	272	70	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	27	AAA RAW	2 teams	—	446	376	101	19	2	6	52	62	7	23	6	269	368	378	745	109	305	14	12	333	70	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	28	AAA MLE	Oklahoma City Dodgers	—	358	306	74	16	2	3	29	64	18	7	3	242	343	337	679	95	293	18	8	309	95	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	28	AAA RAW	Oklahoma City Dodgers	—	358	292	83	20	3	4	43	50	18	7	3	284	408	414	822	130	328	14	12	371	95	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	29	AAA MLE	Charlotte Knights	—	60	51	8	2	0	0	3	11	1	2	2	157	218	196	414	39	190	18	5	180	8	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	29	AAA RAW	Charlotte Knights	—	60	49	8	2	0	0	5	9	1	2	2	163	255	204	459	41	190	15	8	204	8	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	21	A MLE	Rome Braves	—	263	237	57	8	3	1	9	42	15	7	4	241	312	312	624	72	283	16	3	274	72	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	22	A+ MLE	2 teams	—	459	415	99	12	4	4	25	78	16	17	7	239	310	316	625	77	283	17	5	277	74	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	23	AA MLE	2 teams	—	634	592	166	27	8	4	27	79	10	27	10	280	329	373	702	93	310	12	4	298	88	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	24	AAA MLE	Gwinnett Braves	—	487	444	109	12	5	2	30	76	10	20	7	245	312	309	620	63	289	16	6	274	72	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	25	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	609	566	145	28	2	7	27	111	11	21	8	256	311	350	661	94	304	18	4	290	82	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	26	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	468	435	105	16	3	2	18	61	12	11	5	241	297	306	602	64	271	13	4	266	66	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	27	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	446	400	88	16	1	5	36	81	7	23	6	220	301	302	604	82	262	18	8	272	70	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	28	AAA MLE	Oklahoma City Dodgers	—	358	308	74	16	2	3	29	64	18	7	3	240	343	334	677	94	289	18	8	309	95	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	29	AAA MLE	Charlotte Knights	—	60	56	8	2	0	0	3	11	1	2	2	143	218	179	397	36	166	18	5	180	8	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career Totals
▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected)
Career	—	A+C		—	122	113	23	7	0	0	6	23	2	2	2	204	256	265	522	62	256	19	5	239	77	-8	-0	+3	-10	+3	-1.2
/ 162G	—	A+C		—	650	602	122	37	0	0	32	123	11	11	11	203	256	264	520	61	255	19	5	239	77	-40	-2	+16	-52	+14	-6.6
Career	—	MLE		—	3784	3390	851	137	28	28	204	603	100	135	52	251	313	333	645	82	296	16	5	281	77	-8	-0	+3	-10	+3	-1.2
/ 162G	—	MLE		—	650	582	147	24	5	5	35	104	17	23	9	253	314	337	651	84	298	16	5	281	77	-40	-2	+16	-52	+14	-6.6

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2018 AAACharlotte Knights · 60 PAwOBA .206 → .180 (−26)K% 15.0% → 18.2%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	15.00%	÷0.986	×1.200	—	—	18.25%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	8.33%	÷1.030	×0.690	—	×0.982	5.48%
HBP% /PA	1.67%	—	×0.940	—	×0.982	1.54%
Singles /BIP	15.00%	÷1.030	×0.930	×1.017	×0.982	13.52%
Doubles /BIP	5.00%	÷1.077	×0.830	×1.017	×0.982	3.85%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.150	×0.970	×1.017	×0.982	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	0.00%	÷1.319	×0.840	—	×0.982	0.00%

Factors used: league row IL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 164, 1B 106, 2B 115, 3B 130, K 97, BB 106 — applied at half strength. Age: age 29 vs a level average of 27.2 → −1.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.8 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.017.

Result: wOBA .206 → .180; ISO .041 → .035; BABIP .190 → .166. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2017 AAAOklahoma City Dodgers · 358 PAwOBA .364 → .309 (−55)K% 14.0% → 18.0%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	13.97%	÷1.000	×1.290	—	—	18.02%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	11.73%	÷1.017	×0.710	—	×0.992	8.12%
HBP% /PA	5.03%	—	×0.980	—	×0.992	4.89%
Singles /BIP	23.14%	÷0.978	×0.900	×1.018	×0.992	21.51%
Doubles /BIP	8.26%	÷1.038	×0.810	×1.018	×0.992	6.51%
Triples /BIP	1.24%	÷1.150	×0.810	×1.018	×0.992	0.88%
Home runs /BIP	1.65%	÷0.989	×0.780	—	×0.992	1.29%

Factors used: league row PCL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 98, 1B 96, 2B 108, 3B 130, K 100, BB 103 — applied at half strength. Age: age 28 vs a level average of 27.2 → −0.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.018.

Result: wOBA .364 → .309; ISO .130 → .103; BABIP .328 → .289. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2016 AAASalt Lake Bees · 417 PAwOBA .337 → .277 (−60)K% 13.4% → 17.9%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	13.43%	÷0.969	×1.290	—	—	17.88%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	12.23%	÷1.021	×0.710	—	×1.003	8.53%
HBP% /PA	1.68%	—	×0.980	—	×1.003	1.65%
Singles /BIP	24.91%	÷1.033	×0.900	×0.997	×1.003	21.70%
Doubles /BIP	5.46%	÷1.020	×0.810	×0.997	×1.003	4.34%
Triples /BIP	0.68%	÷1.137	×0.810	×0.997	×1.003	0.49%
Home runs /BIP	2.05%	÷1.035	×0.780	—	×1.003	1.55%

Factors used: league row PCL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 107, 1B 107, 2B 104, 3B 127, K 94, BB 104 — applied at half strength. Age: age 27 vs a level average of 27.2 → +0.3% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.997.

Result: wOBA .337 → .277; ISO .109 → .086; BABIP .314 → .267. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2015 AAAGwinnett Braves · 375 PAwOBA .290 → .271 (−18)K% 9.1% → 11.6%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	9.07%	÷0.940	×1.200	—	—	11.57%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	5.87%	÷1.103	×0.690	—	×1.018	3.74%
HBP% /PA	2.67%	—	×0.940	—	×1.018	2.55%
Singles /BIP	23.05%	÷0.996	×0.930	×1.019	×1.018	22.32%
Doubles /BIP	4.41%	÷0.988	×0.830	×1.019	×1.018	3.84%
Triples /BIP	1.02%	÷0.988	×0.970	×1.019	×1.018	1.04%
Home runs /BIP	0.68%	÷1.014	×0.840	—	×1.018	0.57%

Factors used: league row IL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 103, 1B 99, 2B 98, 3B 98, K 88, BB 121 — applied at half strength. Age: age 26 vs a level average of 27.2 → +1.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.019.

Result: wOBA .290 → .271; ISO .076 → .071; BABIP .283 → .270. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2014 AAAGwinnett Braves · 531 PAwOBA .322 → .290 (−32)K% 14.9% → 18.3%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	14.88%	÷0.975	×1.200	—	—	18.30%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	6.21%	÷0.984	×0.690	—	×1.033	4.50%
HBP% /PA	1.88%	—	×0.940	—	×1.033	1.83%
Singles /BIP	24.81%	÷1.012	×0.930	×0.998	×1.033	23.50%
Doubles /BIP	7.16%	÷0.992	×0.830	×0.998	×1.033	6.18%
Triples /BIP	0.51%	÷1.150	×0.970	×0.998	×1.033	0.44%
Home runs /BIP	2.05%	÷1.120	×0.840	—	×1.033	1.59%

Factors used: league row IL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 124, 1B 102, 2B 98, 3B 130, K 95, BB 97 — applied at half strength. Age: age 25 vs a level average of 27.2 → +3.3% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.2 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.998.

Result: wOBA .322 → .290; ISO .119 → .101; BABIP .329 → .304. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2013 AAAGwinnett Braves · 487 PAwOBA .299 → .274 (−25)K% 12.7% → 15.7%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	12.73%	÷0.971	×1.200	—	—	15.73%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	8.42%	÷0.991	×0.690	—	×1.048	6.14%
HBP% /PA	2.05%	—	×0.940	—	×1.048	2.02%
Singles /BIP	25.48%	÷1.038	×0.930	×1.012	×1.048	24.21%
Doubles /BIP	3.56%	÷0.964	×0.830	×1.012	×1.048	3.25%
Triples /BIP	1.37%	÷1.047	×0.970	×1.012	×1.048	1.35%
Home runs /BIP	0.55%	÷0.949	×0.840	—	×1.048	0.51%

Factors used: league row IL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 90, 1B 108, 2B 93, 3B 109, K 94, BB 98 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 27.2 → +4.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (3.2 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.012.

Result: wOBA .299 → .274; ISO .068 → .065; BABIP .305 → .289. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2012 AAMississippi Braves · 519 PAwOBA .331 → .298 (−33)K% 9.8% → 12.4%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	9.83%	÷0.964	×1.220	—	—	12.44%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	6.94%	÷1.114	×0.680	—	×1.027	4.35%
HBP% /PA	0.77%	—	×0.840	—	×1.027	0.66%
Singles /BIP	26.99%	÷1.041	×0.920	×0.994	×1.027	24.34%
Doubles /BIP	5.54%	÷0.987	×0.910	×0.994	×1.027	5.22%
Triples /BIP	1.45%	÷0.900	×0.880	×0.994	×1.027	1.44%
Home runs /BIP	0.72%	÷0.852	×0.800	—	×1.027	0.70%

Factors used: league row SL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 70, 1B 108, 2B 97, 3B 80, K 93, BB 123 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 24.8 → +2.7% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.994.

Result: wOBA .331 → .298; ISO .094 → .094; BABIP .340 → .310. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2011 A+Lynchburg Hillcats · 386 PAwOBA .312 → .277 (−35)K% 12.2% → 17.1%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	12.18%	÷1.009	×1.420	—	—	17.13%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	8.55%	÷0.988	×0.630	—	×1.012	5.52%
HBP% /PA	3.63%	—	×0.860	—	×1.012	3.16%
Singles /BIP	23.00%	÷0.981	×0.940	×1.044	×1.012	23.28%
Doubles /BIP	4.18%	÷1.052	×0.830	×1.044	×1.012	3.48%
Triples /BIP	1.39%	÷0.900	×0.800	×1.044	×1.012	1.31%
Home runs /BIP	1.39%	÷1.166	×0.900	—	×1.012	1.09%

Factors used: league row CAR. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 133, 1B 96, 2B 110, 3B 80, K 102, BB 98 — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 22.8 → +1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.044.

Result: wOBA .312 → .277; ISO .096 → .080; BABIP .289 → .283. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

Not traceable per stint: some stints lack the counting stats the component translation needs. Level-wide factors that apply instead — .