Vince Belnome
| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | 25 | AAA/INTL2 orgs | 558 | .293/.409/.434 | 8 | 0 | 92 | — | .254/.328/.363 |
| 2014 | 26 | AAATB | 492 | .245/.361/.383 | 10 | 2 | 79 | — | .215/.303/.323 |
| 2015 | 27 | AAA/AA2 orgs | 327 | .204/.313/.287 | 2 | 2 | 35 | — | .169/.242/.230 |
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2009 | 21 | A | Fort Wayne TinCaps | — | 37 | 32 | 16 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 500 | 556 | 656 | 1.212 | 156 | 593 | 14 | 11 | 517 | 190 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 22 | A+ | Lake Elsinore Storm | — | 606 | 498 | 136 | 31 | 1 | 16 | 102 | 136 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 273 | 399 | 436 | 834 | 163 | 344 | 22 | 17 | 375 | 101 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 23 | AA | San Antonio Missions | — | 318 | 267 | 89 | 19 | 1 | 17 | 47 | 59 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 333 | 435 | 603 | 1.038 | 270 | 373 | 19 | 15 | 446 | 142 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 24 | AAA | Tucson Padres | — | 303 | 258 | 71 | 11 | 1 | 5 | 43 | 72 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 275 | 381 | 384 | 765 | 109 | 363 | 24 | 14 | 349 | 75 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 24 | A+ | Lake Elsinore Storm | — | 17 | 14 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 571 | 647 | 1.000 | 1.647 | 429 | 636 | 12 | 18 | 685 | 273 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 25 | AAA | Durham Bulls | — | 533 | 444 | 133 | 35 | 3 | 8 | 84 | 109 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 300 | 411 | 446 | 857 | 146 | 378 | 20 | 16 | 382 | 93 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 25 | INTL | Estrellas de Oriente | — | 25 | 17 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 118 | 375 | 118 | 493 | 167 | 24 | 28 | 268 | 67 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| 2014 | 26 | AAA | Durham Bulls | — | 492 | 413 | 101 | 25 | 1 | 10 | 72 | 128 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 245 | 361 | 383 | 743 | 138 | 326 | 26 | 15 | 337 | 79 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 27 | AAA | Durham Bulls | — | 191 | 160 | 27 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 27 | 57 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 169 | 296 | 225 | 521 | 56 | 257 | 30 | 14 | 252 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 27 | AA | Binghamton Mets | — | 136 | 119 | 30 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 15 | 38 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 252 | 336 | 370 | 706 | 118 | 346 | 28 | 11 | 316 | 55 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2009 | 21 | A MLE | Fort Wayne TinCaps | — | 37 | 33 | 15 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 455 | 500 | 606 | 1.106 | 152 | 543 | 19 | 8 | 449 | 190 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 22 | A+ MLE | Lake Elsinore Storm | — | 606 | 529 | 126 | 27 | 1 | 17 | 71 | 185 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 238 | 331 | 389 | 720 | 151 | 327 | 31 | 12 | 318 | 101 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 23 | AA MLE | San Antonio Missions | — | 318 | 285 | 83 | 17 | 1 | 16 | 29 | 76 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 291 | 359 | 526 | 885 | 235 | 340 | 24 | 9 | 378 | 142 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 24 | AAA MLE | Tucson Padres | — | 303 | 271 | 63 | 9 | 1 | 4 | 30 | 95 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 232 | 311 | 317 | 629 | 85 | 336 | 31 | 10 | 279 | 75 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 24 | A+ MLE | Lake Elsinore Storm | — | 17 | 15 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 467 | 529 | 800 | 1.329 | 333 | 548 | 18 | 12 | 572 | 273 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 25 | AAA MLE | Durham Bulls | — | 533 | 476 | 121 | 28 | 3 | 6 | 52 | 132 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 254 | 328 | 363 | 691 | 109 | 332 | 25 | 10 | 306 | 93 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 26 | AAA MLE | Durham Bulls | — | 492 | 433 | 93 | 21 | 1 | 8 | 52 | 144 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 215 | 303 | 323 | 627 | 109 | 295 | 29 | 11 | 285 | 79 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 27 | AAA MLE | Durham Bulls | — | 191 | 171 | 25 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 16 | 67 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 146 | 228 | 193 | 420 | 47 | 231 | 35 | 8 | 198 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 27 | AA MLE | Binghamton Mets | — | 136 | 124 | 25 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 48 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 202 | 261 | 282 | 543 | 81 | 306 | 35 | 7 | 249 | 55 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 21 | A MLE | Fort Wayne TinCaps | — | 37 | 33 | 15 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 455 | 500 | 606 | 1.106 | 152 | 577 | 19 | 8 | 449 | 190 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 21 | A RAW | Fort Wayne TinCaps | — | 37 | 32 | 16 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 500 | 556 | 656 | 1.212 | 156 | 593 | 14 | 11 | 517 | 190 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 22 | A+ MLE | Lake Elsinore Storm | — | 606 | 529 | 126 | 27 | 1 | 17 | 71 | 185 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 238 | 331 | 389 | 720 | 151 | 330 | 31 | 12 | 318 | 101 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 22 | A+ RAW | Lake Elsinore Storm | — | 606 | 498 | 136 | 31 | 1 | 16 | 102 | 136 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 273 | 399 | 436 | 834 | 163 | 344 | 22 | 17 | 375 | 101 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 23 | AA MLE | San Antonio Missions | — | 318 | 285 | 83 | 17 | 1 | 16 | 29 | 76 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 291 | 359 | 526 | 885 | 235 | 344 | 24 | 9 | 378 | 142 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 23 | AA RAW | San Antonio Missions | — | 318 | 267 | 89 | 19 | 1 | 17 | 47 | 59 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 333 | 435 | 603 | 1.038 | 270 | 373 | 19 | 15 | 446 | 142 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 24 | AAA MLE | 2 teams | — | 320 | 286 | 70 | 11 | 1 | 5 | 32 | 98 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 245 | 323 | 343 | 666 | 98 | 353 | 31 | 10 | 295 | 85 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 24 | AAA RAW | 2 teams | — | 320 | 272 | 79 | 14 | 1 | 6 | 46 | 74 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 290 | 395 | 415 | 810 | 125 | 378 | 23 | 14 | 367 | 85 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 25 | AAA MLE | 2 teams | — | 558 | 497 | 126 | 29 | 3 | 6 | 55 | 138 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 254 | 328 | 360 | 688 | 107 | 335 | 25 | 10 | 306 | 93 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 25 | AAA RAW | 2 teams | — | 558 | 461 | 135 | 35 | 3 | 8 | 91 | 115 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 293 | 409 | 434 | 843 | 141 | 370 | 21 | 16 | 377 | 93 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 26 | AAA MLE | Durham Bulls | — | 492 | 433 | 93 | 21 | 1 | 8 | 52 | 144 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 215 | 303 | 323 | 627 | 109 | 298 | 29 | 11 | 285 | 79 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 26 | AAA RAW | Durham Bulls | — | 492 | 413 | 101 | 25 | 1 | 10 | 72 | 128 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 245 | 361 | 383 | 743 | 138 | 326 | 26 | 15 | 337 | 79 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 27 | AAA MLE | 2 teams | — | 327 | 295 | 50 | 10 | 2 | 1 | 26 | 114 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 169 | 241 | 227 | 469 | 58 | 266 | 35 | 8 | 219 | 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 27 | AAA RAW | 2 teams | — | 327 | 279 | 57 | 13 | 2 | 2 | 42 | 95 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 204 | 313 | 287 | 599 | 82 | 296 | 29 | 13 | 278 | 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 21 | A MLE | Fort Wayne TinCaps | — | 37 | 34 | 15 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 441 | 500 | 588 | 1.088 | 147 | 543 | 19 | 8 | 449 | 190 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 22 | A+ MLE | Lake Elsinore Storm | — | 606 | 528 | 126 | 27 | 1 | 17 | 71 | 185 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 239 | 331 | 390 | 721 | 152 | 327 | 31 | 12 | 318 | 101 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 23 | AA MLE | San Antonio Missions | — | 318 | 285 | 83 | 17 | 1 | 16 | 29 | 76 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 291 | 359 | 526 | 885 | 235 | 340 | 24 | 9 | 378 | 142 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 24 | AAA MLE | 2 teams | — | 320 | 284 | 70 | 11 | 1 | 5 | 32 | 98 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 246 | 323 | 345 | 668 | 99 | 347 | 31 | 10 | 295 | 85 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 25 | AAA MLE | 2 teams | — | 558 | 498 | 126 | 29 | 3 | 6 | 55 | 138 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 253 | 328 | 359 | 687 | 106 | 332 | 25 | 10 | 306 | 93 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 26 | AAA MLE | Durham Bulls | — | 492 | 434 | 93 | 21 | 1 | 8 | 52 | 144 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 214 | 303 | 323 | 626 | 108 | 295 | 29 | 11 | 285 | 79 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 27 | AAA MLE | 2 teams | — | 327 | 296 | 50 | 10 | 2 | 1 | 26 | 114 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 169 | 241 | 226 | 468 | 57 | 262 | 35 | 8 | 219 | 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | MLE | — | 2658 | 2358 | 563 | 118 | 10 | 53 | 268 | 762 | 9 | 14 | 9 | 239 | 319 | 365 | 684 | 126 | 327 | 29 | 10 | 303 | 91 | -27 | -1 | +0 | -66 | +58 | -3.7 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 577 | 137 | 29 | 2 | 13 | 66 | 186 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 237 | 318 | 362 | 681 | 125 | 324 | 29 | 10 | 303 | 91 | -7 | -0 | +0 | -16 | +14 | -0.9 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2015 AAADurham Bulls · 191 PAwOBA .247 → .198 (−49)K% 29.8% → 34.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 29.84% | ÷1.025 | ×1.200 | — | — | 34.94% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 13.61% | ÷1.148 | ×0.690 | — | ×1.003 | 8.20% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.05% | — | ×0.940 | — | ×1.003 | 0.99% |
| Singles /BIP | 18.45% | ÷1.025 | ×0.930 | ×1.016 | ×1.003 | 17.06% |
| Doubles /BIP | 6.80% | ÷1.062 | ×0.830 | ×1.016 | ×1.003 | 5.41% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.97% | ÷0.900 | ×0.970 | ×1.016 | ×1.003 | 1.07% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.039 | ×0.840 | — | ×1.003 | 0.00% |
Factors used: league row IL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 108, 1B 105, 2B 112, 3B 80, K 105, BB 130 — applied at half strength. Age: age 27 vs a level average of 27.2 → +0.3% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.016.
Result: wOBA .247 → .198; ISO .056 → .050; BABIP .257 → .231. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2015 AABinghamton Mets · 136 PAwOBA .313 → .249 (−63)K% 27.9% → 35.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 27.94% | ÷0.974 | ×1.220 | — | — | 35.00% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 11.03% | ÷0.988 | ×0.700 | — | ×0.978 | 7.64% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.850 | — | ×0.978 | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 25.93% | ÷1.030 | ×0.970 | ×0.989 | ×0.978 | 23.63% |
| Doubles /BIP | 7.41% | ÷1.034 | ×0.860 | ×0.989 | ×0.978 | 5.96% |
| Triples /BIP | 1.23% | ÷0.900 | ×0.950 | ×0.989 | ×0.978 | 1.26% |
| Home runs /BIP | 2.47% | ÷1.088 | ×0.780 | — | ×0.978 | 1.73% |
Factors used: league row EL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 118, 1B 106, 2B 107, 3B 80, K 95, BB 98 — applied at half strength. Age: age 27 vs a level average of 24.8 → −2.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.989.
Result: wOBA .313 → .249; ISO .118 → .090; BABIP .346 → .306. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2014 AAADurham Bulls · 492 PAwOBA .330 → .285 (−45)K% 26.0% → 29.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 26.02% | ÷1.070 | ×1.200 | — | — | 29.19% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 14.23% | ÷0.950 | ×0.690 | — | ×1.018 | 10.52% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.61% | — | ×0.940 | — | ×1.018 | 0.58% |
| Singles /BIP | 22.81% | ÷1.005 | ×0.930 | ×0.999 | ×1.018 | 21.48% |
| Doubles /BIP | 8.77% | ÷1.023 | ×0.830 | ×0.999 | ×1.018 | 7.24% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.35% | ÷0.900 | ×0.970 | ×0.999 | ×1.018 | 0.38% |
| Home runs /BIP | 3.51% | ÷1.046 | ×0.840 | — | ×1.018 | 2.87% |
Factors used: league row IL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 109, 1B 101, 2B 105, 3B 80, K 114, BB 90 — applied at half strength. Age: age 26 vs a level average of 27.2 → +1.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.999.
Result: wOBA .330 → .285; ISO .138 → .118; BABIP .326 → .295. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2013 AAADurham Bulls · 533 PAwOBA .373 → .306 (−67)K% 20.5% → 24.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 20.45% | ÷0.988 | ×1.200 | — | — | 24.84% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 15.01% | ÷1.093 | ×0.690 | — | ×1.033 | 9.79% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.940 | — | ×1.033 | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 25.97% | ÷1.032 | ×0.930 | ×0.996 | ×1.033 | 24.07% |
| Doubles /BIP | 10.45% | ÷1.113 | ×0.830 | ×0.996 | ×1.033 | 8.01% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.90% | ÷0.961 | ×0.970 | ×0.996 | ×1.033 | 0.93% |
| Home runs /BIP | 2.39% | ÷1.299 | ×0.840 | — | ×1.033 | 1.60% |
Factors used: league row IL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 160, 1B 106, 2B 123, 3B 92, K 98, BB 119 — applied at half strength. Age: age 25 vs a level average of 27.2 → +3.3% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.2 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.996.
Result: wOBA .373 → .306; ISO .146 → .115; BABIP .378 → .332. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2012 AAATucson Padres · 303 PAwOBA .342 → .279 (−62)K% 23.8% → 31.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 23.76% | ÷0.979 | ×1.290 | — | — | 31.31% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 14.19% | ÷1.052 | ×0.710 | — | ×1.048 | 10.04% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.33% | — | ×0.980 | — | ×1.048 | 0.34% |
| Singles /BIP | 29.03% | ÷1.007 | ×0.900 | ×1.018 | ×1.048 | 27.67% |
| Doubles /BIP | 5.91% | ÷1.013 | ×0.810 | ×1.018 | ×1.048 | 5.05% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.54% | ÷1.150 | ×0.810 | ×1.018 | ×1.048 | 0.40% |
| Home runs /BIP | 2.69% | ÷1.050 | ×0.780 | — | ×1.048 | 2.09% |
Factors used: league row PCL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 110, 1B 101, 2B 103, 3B 130, K 96, BB 110 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 27.2 → +4.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (3.2 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.018.
Result: wOBA .342 → .279; ISO .109 → .083; BABIP .363 → .336. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2012 A+Lake Elsinore Storm · 17 PAwOBA .666 → .572 (−95)K% 11.8% → 15.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 11.76% | ÷0.993 | ×1.340 | — | — | 15.87% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 17.65% | ÷0.979 | ×0.710 | — | ×0.988 | 12.64% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.790 | — | ×0.988 | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 33.33% | ÷0.973 | ×0.910 | — | ×0.988 | 30.80% |
| Doubles /BIP | 25.00% | ÷1.036 | ×0.820 | — | ×0.988 | 19.55% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.993 | ×0.760 | — | ×0.988 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 8.33% | ÷0.930 | ×0.920 | — | ×0.988 | 8.14% |
Factors used: league row CAL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 86, 1B 95, 2B 107, 3B 99, K 99, BB 96 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 22.8 → −1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr older than average).
Result: wOBA .666 → .572; ISO .429 → .382; BABIP .636 → .548. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2011 AASan Antonio Missions · 318 PAwOBA .437 → .378 (−58)K% 18.6% → 23.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 18.55% | ÷0.950 | ×1.220 | — | — | 23.83% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 14.47% | ÷1.128 | ×0.700 | — | ×1.027 | 9.22% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.31% | — | ×0.870 | — | ×1.027 | 0.28% |
| Singles /BIP | 25.00% | ÷1.069 | ×0.920 | ×1.050 | ×1.027 | 23.20% |
| Doubles /BIP | 9.13% | ÷1.037 | ×0.840 | ×1.050 | ×1.027 | 7.98% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.48% | ÷0.900 | ×0.940 | ×1.050 | ×1.027 | 0.54% |
| Home runs /BIP | 8.17% | ÷0.889 | ×0.800 | — | ×1.027 | 7.55% |
Factors used: league row TL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 78, 1B 114, 2B 107, 3B 80, K 90, BB 126 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 24.8 → +2.7% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.
Result: wOBA .437 → .378; ISO .270 → .252; BABIP .373 → .340. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2010 A+Lake Elsinore Storm · 606 PAwOBA .366 → .318 (−49)K% 22.4% → 30.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 22.44% | ÷0.986 | ×1.340 | — | — | 30.51% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 16.50% | ÷1.017 | ×0.710 | — | ×1.012 | 11.66% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.33% | — | ×0.790 | — | ×1.012 | 0.26% |
| Singles /BIP | 24.31% | ÷1.008 | ×0.910 | ×1.050 | ×1.012 | 23.33% |
| Doubles /BIP | 8.56% | ÷0.953 | ×0.820 | ×1.050 | ×1.012 | 7.83% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.28% | ÷0.900 | ×0.760 | ×1.050 | ×1.012 | 0.25% |
| Home runs /BIP | 4.42% | ÷0.845 | ×0.920 | — | ×1.012 | 4.87% |
Factors used: league row CAL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 69, 1B 102, 2B 91, 3B 80, K 97, BB 103 — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 22.8 → +1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.
Result: wOBA .366 → .318; ISO .163 → .161; BABIP .344 → .327. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
Not traceable per stint: some stints lack the counting stats the component translation needs. Level-wide factors that apply instead — .