Robbie Erlin
P Oklahoma City Dodgers| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 29 | MLBATL | 9 | 5 | 27 | 8.10 | 5.80 | 20.5% | 4.9% | -0.1 | ||
| 2022 | 31 | MIX2 levels | 23 | 14 | 79 | 7.06 | 5.16 | 18.9% | 9.7% | 0.2 | K 16.8% · BB 10.2% · FIP 5.31 | |
| 2023 | 32 | AAAOklahoma City… | 17 | 16 | 79 | 5.83 | 5.77 | 17.9% | 8.5% | — | K 15.4% · BB 7.7% · FIP 5.92 | |
| 2024 | 33 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2025 | 34 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2026 | 35 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
Statcast · Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2013 | 22 | MLB MLE | San Diego Padres | 11 | 9 | 55 | 227 | 40 | 15 | 6 | 82% | 5.0 | 17.6% | 6.6% | 11.0% | 2.6% | 4.12 | 3.86 | +1.0 |
| 2013 | 22 | MLB RAW | San Diego Padres | 11 | 9 | 55 | 227 | 40 | 15 | 6 | 82% | 5.0 | 17.6% | 6.6% | 11.0% | 2.6% | 4.12 | 3.89 | +1.0 |
| 2014 | 23 | MLB MLE | San Diego Padres | 13 | 11 | 61 | 264 | 46 | 14 | 6 | 85% | 4.7 | 17.4% | 5.3% | 12.1% | 2.2% | 4.99 | 3.52 | +1.4 |
| 2014 | 23 | MLB RAW | San Diego Padres | 13 | 11 | 61 | 264 | 46 | 14 | 6 | 85% | 4.7 | 17.4% | 5.3% | 12.1% | 2.3% | 4.99 | 3.56 | +1.4 |
| 2015 | 24 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 27 | 27 | 142 | 627 | 115 | 39 | 23 | 100% | 5.3 | 16.3% | 6.5% | 9.8% | 4.4% | 5.50 | 4.94 | +0.8 |
| 2015 | 24 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 27 | 27 | 142 | 627 | 115 | 39 | 23 | 100% | 5.3 | 18.3% | 6.2% | 12.1% | 3.7% | 5.50 | 4.41 | +1.7 |
| 2016 | 25 | MLB MLE | San Diego Padres | 3 | 2 | 16 | 58 | 13 | 3 | 3 | 67% | 5.2 | 22.4% | 5.2% | 17.2% | 5.0% | 4.02 | 4.63 | +0.1 |
| 2016 | 25 | MLB RAW | San Diego Padres | 3 | 2 | 16 | 58 | 13 | 3 | 3 | 67% | 5.2 | 22.4% | 5.2% | 17.2% | 5.2% | 4.02 | 4.50 | +0.2 |
| 2018 | 27 | MLB MLE | San Diego Padres | 39 | 12 | 109 | 439 | 88 | 12 | 12 | 31% | 2.8 | 20.0% | 2.7% | 17.3% | 2.7% | 4.21 | 3.22 | +1.8 |
| 2018 | 27 | MLB RAW | San Diego Padres | 39 | 12 | 109 | 439 | 88 | 12 | 12 | 31% | 2.8 | 20.0% | 2.7% | 17.3% | 2.7% | 4.21 | 3.25 | +1.7 |
| 2019 | 28 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 50 | 1 | 74 | 341 | 72 | 18 | 9 | 2% | 1.5 | 19.9% | 5.3% | 14.6% | 2.5% | 6.05 | 3.48 | +1.0 |
| 2019 | 28 | MIX RAW | 3 levels | 50 | 1 | 74 | 341 | 72 | 18 | 9 | 2% | 1.5 | 21.1% | 5.3% | 15.8% | 2.6% | 6.05 | 3.46 | +1.0 |
| 2020 | 29 | MLB MLE | Atlanta Braves | 9 | 5 | 27 | 122 | 25 | 6 | 8 | 56% | 3.0 | 20.5% | 4.9% | 15.6% | 6.6% | 8.10 | 5.59 | -0.1 |
| 2020 | 29 | MLB RAW | Atlanta Braves | 9 | 5 | 27 | 122 | 25 | 6 | 8 | 56% | 3.0 | 20.5% | 4.9% | 15.6% | 6.6% | 8.10 | 5.80 | -0.1 |
| 2022 | 31 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 23 | 14 | 79 | 371 | 70 | 36 | 15 | 61% | 3.4 | 16.8% | 10.2% | 6.6% | 4.3% | 7.06 | 5.31 | +0.1 |
| 2022 | 31 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 23 | 14 | 79 | 371 | 70 | 36 | 15 | 61% | 3.4 | 18.9% | 9.7% | 9.2% | 4.0% | 7.06 | 5.16 | +0.2 |
| 2023 | 32 | AAA MLE | Oklahoma City Dodgers | 17 | 16 | 79 | 363 | 65 | 31 | 19 | 94% | 4.6 | 15.4% | 7.7% | 7.7% | 5.7% | 5.83 | 5.92 | — |
| 2023 | 32 | AAA RAW | Oklahoma City Dodgers | 17 | 16 | 79 | 363 | 65 | 31 | 19 | 94% | 4.6 | 17.9% | 8.5% | 9.4% | 5.2% | 5.83 | 5.77 | — |
| ▸ Career totals (raw MLB only — as recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| MLB Career | — | 117 | 43 | 342 | 1435 | 275 | 68 | 43 | 37% | 2.9 | 19.2% | 4.7% | 14.4% | 3.0% | 4.87 | 3.72 | +3.4 | ||
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 117 | 43 | 342 | 1435 | 275 | 68 | 43 | 37% | 2.9 | 19.2% | 4.7% | 14.4% | 3.0% | 4.87 | 3.73 | +3.4 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 68 | 25 | 200 | 840 | 161 | 40 | 25 | 37% | 2.9 | 19.2% | 4.7% | 14.4% | 3.0% | 4.87 | 3.73 | +2.0 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 192 | 97 | 642 | 2812 | 500 | 174 | 107 | 51% | 3.3 | 17.8% | 6.2% | 11.6% | 3.8% | 5.48 | 4.47 | +6.9 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 60 | 30 | 200 | 876 | 156 | 54 | 33 | 51% | 3.3 | 17.8% | 6.2% | 11.6% | 3.8% | 5.48 | 4.47 | +4.0 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2023 AAAOklahoma City Dodgers · 79 IPFIP 5.54 → 5.92 (+0.37)K% 17.9% → 15.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 17.91% | — | ×0.860 | 15.40% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 8.54% | — | ×0.900 | 7.69% |
| HR / BF /BF | 5.23% | ÷1.006 | ×1.100 | 5.72% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 101).
Result: FIP 5.54 → 5.92, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 AAAOklahoma City Dodgers · 77 IPFIP 4.84 → 5.31 (+0.47)K% 19.1% → 16.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 19.06% | — | ×0.880 | 16.77% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 9.67% | — | ×1.050 | 10.15% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.87% | ÷0.997 | ×1.100 | 4.27% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors — K ×0.88, BB ×1.05, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 99).
Result: FIP 4.84 → 5.31, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2019 AAAEl Paso Chihuahuas · 15 IPFIP 3.33 → 3.78 (+0.45)K% 19.2% → 16.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 19.18% | — | ×0.880 | 16.88% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 2.74% | — | ×1.050 | 2.88% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.74% | ÷0.950 | ×1.100 | 3.17% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors — K ×0.88, BB ×1.05, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 90).
Result: FIP 3.33 → 3.78, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2015 AAAEl Paso Chihuahuas · 125 IPFIP 4.50 → 5.16 (+0.66)K% 18.7% → 16.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 18.68% | — | ×0.880 | 16.44% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 6.58% | — | ×1.050 | 6.91% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.91% | ÷0.919 | ×1.100 | 4.69% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors — K ×0.88, BB ×1.05, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 84).
Result: FIP 4.50 → 5.16, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).