Brandon Thomas
| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | 23 | ATB | 353 | .204/.320/.311 | 5 | 22 | 32 | — | .152/.237/.225 |
| 2015 | 24 | A+/A2 orgs | 147 | .213/.320/.291 | 1 | 8 | 17 | — | .151/.224/.212 |
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2014 | 23 | A | Charleston RiverDogs | — | 353 | 299 | 61 | 11 | 3 | 5 | 41 | 96 | 10 | 22 | 4 | 204 | 320 | 311 | 631 | 107 | 280 | 27 | 12 | 293 | 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 24 | A+ | Tampa Yankees | — | 31 | 30 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 67 | 97 | 67 | 163 | 105 | 35 | 3 | 81 | -77 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| 2015 | 24 | A | Charleston RiverDogs | — | 116 | 97 | 25 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 17 | 41 | 2 | 8 | 1 | 258 | 379 | 361 | 740 | 103 | 436 | 35 | 15 | 343 | 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2014 | 23 | A MLE | Charleston RiverDogs | — | 353 | 315 | 48 | 7 | 2 | 4 | 25 | 132 | 10 | 22 | 4 | 152 | 237 | 225 | 463 | 73 | 243 | 37 | 7 | 216 | 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 24 | A+ MLE | Tampa Yankees | — | 31 | 30 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 33 | 65 | 33 | 98 | 91 | 48 | 3 | 55 | -77 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| 2015 | 24 | A MLE | Charleston RiverDogs | — | 116 | 104 | 19 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 57 | 2 | 8 | 1 | 183 | 267 | 260 | 527 | 77 | 373 | 49 | 9 | 231 | 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 23 | A MLE | Charleston RiverDogs | — | 353 | 315 | 48 | 7 | 2 | 4 | 25 | 132 | 10 | 22 | 4 | 152 | 237 | 225 | 463 | 73 | 243 | 37 | 7 | 216 | 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 23 | A RAW | Charleston RiverDogs | — | 353 | 299 | 61 | 11 | 3 | 5 | 41 | 96 | 10 | 22 | 4 | 204 | 320 | 311 | 631 | 107 | 280 | 27 | 12 | 293 | 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 24 | A MLE | 2 teams | — | 147 | 134 | 20 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 72 | 2 | 8 | 2 | 149 | 224 | 209 | 433 | 60 | 311 | 49 | 7 | 194 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 24 | A RAW | 2 teams | — | 147 | 127 | 27 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 18 | 52 | 2 | 8 | 2 | 213 | 320 | 291 | 611 | 79 | 351 | 35 | 12 | 288 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 23 | A MLE | Charleston RiverDogs | — | 353 | 315 | 48 | 7 | 2 | 4 | 25 | 132 | 10 | 22 | 4 | 152 | 237 | 225 | 463 | 73 | 243 | 37 | 7 | 216 | 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 24 | A MLE | 2 teams | — | 147 | 133 | 20 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 72 | 2 | 8 | 2 | 150 | 224 | 211 | 435 | 60 | 314 | 49 | 7 | 194 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | MLE | — | 500 | 449 | 68 | 12 | 2 | 5 | 36 | 204 | 12 | 30 | 6 | 151 | 233 | 220 | 454 | 69 | 260 | 41 | 7 | 209 | 28 | -43 | +4 | +0 | +2 | +11 | -2.7 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 584 | 89 | 16 | 3 | 6 | 47 | 265 | 16 | 39 | 8 | 152 | 235 | 221 | 456 | 68 | 263 | 41 | 7 | 209 | 28 | -56 | +5 | +0 | +2 | +14 | -3.5 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2015 ACharleston RiverDogs · 116 PAwOBA .335 → .231 (−104)K% 35.3% → 48.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 35.34% | ÷0.968 | ×1.340 | — | — | 48.91% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 14.66% | ÷1.054 | ×0.660 | — | ×0.980 | 9.00% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.72% | — | ×0.770 | — | ×0.980 | 1.30% |
| Singles /BIP | 30.36% | ÷1.031 | ×0.920 | ×1.000 | ×0.980 | 26.54% |
| Doubles /BIP | 12.50% | ÷0.989 | ×0.820 | ×1.000 | ×0.980 | 10.15% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.041 | ×0.940 | ×1.000 | ×0.980 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 1.79% | ÷0.937 | ×0.820 | — | ×0.980 | 1.53% |
Factors used: league row SAL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 87, 1B 106, 2B 98, 3B 108, K 94, BB 111 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 22.0 → −2.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.0 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.000.
Result: wOBA .335 → .231; ISO .103 → .072; BABIP .436 → .373. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2015 A+Tampa Yankees · 31 PAwOBA .079 → .055 (−24)K% 35.5% → 49.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 35.48% | ÷1.016 | ×1.420 | — | — | 49.59% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 3.23% | ÷1.015 | ×0.750 | — | ×0.988 | 2.36% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.930 | — | ×0.988 | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 10.53% | ÷1.046 | ×0.920 | — | ×0.988 | 9.15% |
| Doubles /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.044 | ×0.960 | — | ×0.988 | 0.00% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.150 | ×0.810 | — | ×0.988 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.832 | ×0.880 | — | ×0.988 | 0.00% |
Factors used: league row FSL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 66, 1B 109, 2B 109, 3B 130, K 103, BB 103 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 22.8 → −1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr older than average).
Result: wOBA .079 → .055; ISO .000 → .000; BABIP .105 → .091. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2014 ACharleston RiverDogs · 353 PAwOBA .287 → .216 (−72)K% 27.2% → 37.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 27.20% | ÷0.975 | ×1.340 | — | — | 37.37% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 11.61% | ÷1.050 | ×0.660 | — | ×0.990 | 7.23% |
| HBP% /PA | 2.83% | — | ×0.770 | — | ×0.990 | 2.16% |
| Singles /BIP | 20.69% | ÷0.953 | ×0.920 | ×0.950 | ×0.990 | 18.79% |
| Doubles /BIP | 5.42% | ÷1.073 | ×0.820 | ×0.950 | ×0.990 | 3.89% |
| Triples /BIP | 1.48% | ÷0.991 | ×0.940 | ×0.950 | ×0.990 | 1.32% |
| Home runs /BIP | 2.46% | ÷0.883 | ×0.820 | — | ×0.990 | 2.26% |
Factors used: league row SAL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 77, 1B 91, 2B 115, 3B 98, K 95, BB 110 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.0 → −1.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.
Result: wOBA .287 → .216; ISO .107 → .084; BABIP .280 → .243. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).