Jose Rivera

Pos2B

B/TR/R

Born1990-04-18

Age (2027)37

No MLB projection yet. Career stats below are historical.

Overview

INTLLAST SEASON 2016

Year	Age	Lvl / Team	PA	AVG/OBP/SLG	HR	SB	wRC+	WAR	MLE AVG/OBP/SLG
2014	24	AA/A+2 orgs	127	.233/.288/.362	1	1	45	—	.195/.240/.305
2015	25	AAA/INTL2 orgs	193	.244/.296/.318	1	0	43	—	.216/.245/.284
2016	26	INTLGigantes de C…	33	.103/.161/.172	0	0	-12	—

Contract

No contract data on file.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.

show model inputsbasis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral

Methodology▸ how these numbers are built

All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.

Year	Age	Lvl	Team	MLB%	PA	AB	H	2B	3B	HR	BB	SO	HBP	SB	CS	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	BABIP	K%	BB%	wOBA	wRC+	BAT	RUN	FLD	POS	REP	WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments)
2009	19	ROK	Casper Ghosts	—	129	112	21	3	0	0	13	21	1	2	5	188	278	214	492	27	228	16	10	232	5	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	20	ROK	Casper Ghosts	—	164	150	30	3	1	0	8	23	2	2	1	200	250	233	483	33	236	14	5	220	0	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	21	ROK	Casper Ghosts	—	131	123	28	5	1	1	5	28	1	2	4	228	264	309	573	81	287	21	4	255	8	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	22	A	Asheville Tourists	—	235	210	54	14	1	2	12	21	5	2	4	257	313	362	675	105	277	9	5	295	55	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	23	A+	Modesto Nuts	—	123	104	19	1	0	0	7	19	5	2	1	183	267	192	460	10	224	15	6	212	11	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	23	A	Asheville Tourists	—	119	103	28	8	2	1	14	23	0	2	1	272	359	417	776	146	342	19	12	342	57	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	24	AA	Tulsa Drillers	—	105	96	24	7	2	0	5	21	3	0	1	250	308	365	672	115	316	20	5	300	51	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	24	A+	Modesto Nuts	—	22	20	3	1	0	1	1	4	0	1	0	150	190	350	540	200	125	18	5	226	15	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	25	AAA	Albuquerque Isotopes	—	141	132	34	8	0	1	6	36	1	0	1	258	295	341	636	83	347	26	4	283	38	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	25	INTL	Gigantes de Carolina	—	52	44	9	2	0	0	5	11	1	0	1	205	300	250	550	45	273	21	10	252	57	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	26	INTL	Gigantes de Carolina	—	33	29	3	2	0	0	0	8	2	0	0	103	161	172	334	69	143	24	0	150	-12	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents)
2009	19	ROK MLE	Casper Ghosts	—	129	117	17	2	0	0	8	30	1	2	5	145	206	162	369	17	195	23	6	175	5	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	20	ROK MLE	Casper Ghosts	—	164	153	25	2	1	0	5	33	2	2	1	163	200	190	390	26	199	20	3	168	0	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	21	ROK MLE	Casper Ghosts	—	131	125	21	3	1	1	3	40	1	2	4	168	194	232	426	64	236	31	2	180	8	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	22	A MLE	Asheville Tourists	—	235	214	50	11	1	1	8	30	5	2	4	234	278	308	586	75	252	13	3	250	55	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	23	A+ MLE	Modesto Nuts	—	123	106	19	1	0	0	5	26	5	2	1	179	250	189	439	9	209	21	4	185	11	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	23	A MLE	Asheville Tourists	—	119	108	23	5	2	1	9	33	0	2	1	213	274	324	598	111	290	28	8	253	57	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	24	AA MLE	Tulsa Drillers	—	105	98	20	5	2	0	3	26	3	0	1	204	250	296	546	92	273	25	3	244	51	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	24	A+ MLE	Modesto Nuts	—	22	20	3	1	0	1	1	5	0	1	0	150	190	350	540	200	104	23	5	190	15	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	25	AAA MLE	Albuquerque Isotopes	—	141	134	29	6	0	1	4	48	1	0	1	216	245	284	528	67	322	34	3	224	38	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	19	ROK MLE	Casper Ghosts	—	129	117	17	2	0	0	8	30	1	2	5	145	206	162	369	17	193	23	6	175	5	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	19	ROK RAW	Casper Ghosts	—	129	112	21	3	0	0	13	21	1	2	5	188	278	214	492	27	228	16	10	232	5	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	20	ROK MLE	Casper Ghosts	—	164	153	25	2	1	0	5	33	2	2	1	163	200	190	390	26	208	20	3	168	0	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	20	ROK RAW	Casper Ghosts	—	164	150	30	3	1	0	8	23	2	2	1	200	250	233	483	33	236	14	5	220	0	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	21	ROK MLE	Casper Ghosts	—	131	125	21	3	1	1	3	40	1	2	4	168	194	232	426	64	238	31	2	180	8	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	21	ROK RAW	Casper Ghosts	—	131	123	28	5	1	1	5	28	1	2	4	228	264	309	573	81	287	21	4	255	8	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	22	A MLE	Asheville Tourists	—	235	214	50	11	1	1	8	30	5	2	4	234	278	308	586	75	266	13	3	250	55	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	22	A RAW	Asheville Tourists	—	235	210	54	14	1	2	12	21	5	2	4	257	313	362	675	105	277	9	5	295	55	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	23	A+ MLE	2 teams	—	242	214	42	6	2	1	14	58	5	4	2	196	262	257	519	61	265	24	6	218	34	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	23	A+ RAW	2 teams	—	242	207	47	9	2	1	21	42	5	4	2	227	313	304	618	77	280	17	9	276	34	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	24	AA MLE	2 teams	—	127	118	23	6	2	1	4	31	3	1	1	195	240	305	545	110	250	24	3	235	45	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	24	AA RAW	2 teams	—	127	116	27	8	2	1	6	25	3	1	1	233	288	362	650	129	283	20	5	287	45	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	25	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	193	182	39	8	0	1	5	66	2	0	2	214	243	275	518	60	330	34	3	224	38	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	25	AAA RAW	2 teams	—	193	176	43	10	0	1	11	47	2	0	2	244	296	318	614	74	328	24	6	275	38	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	26	INTL MLE	Gigantes de Carolina	—	33	29	3	2	0	0	0	8	2	0	0	103	161	172	334	69	143	24	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	26	INTL RAW	Gigantes de Carolina	—	33	29	3	2	0	0	0	8	2	0	0	103	161	172	334	69	143	24	0	150	-12	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	19	ROK MLE	Casper Ghosts	—	129	119	17	2	0	0	8	30	1	2	5	143	206	160	366	17	195	23	6	175	5	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	20	ROK MLE	Casper Ghosts	—	164	156	25	2	1	0	5	33	2	2	1	160	200	186	386	26	199	20	3	168	0	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	21	ROK MLE	Casper Ghosts	—	131	126	21	3	1	1	3	40	1	2	4	167	194	230	424	63	236	31	2	180	8	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	22	A MLE	Asheville Tourists	—	235	220	50	11	1	1	8	30	5	2	4	227	278	300	578	73	252	13	3	250	55	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	23	A+ MLE	2 teams	—	242	221	42	6	2	1	14	58	5	4	2	190	262	249	511	59	249	24	6	218	34	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	24	AA MLE	2 teams	—	127	119	23	6	2	1	4	31	3	1	1	193	240	303	543	109	244	24	3	235	45	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	25	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	193	184	39	8	0	1	5	66	2	0	2	212	243	272	515	60	322	34	3	224	38	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career Totals
Career	—	MLE		—	1254	1152	220	40	7	5	47	296	21	13	19	191	236	251	487	60	251	24	4	206	26	-111	-5	+0	+4	+27	-8.6
/ 162G	—	MLE		—	650	597	115	21	4	3	24	153	11	7	10	193	237	256	494	64	253	24	4	206	26	-58	-3	+0	+2	+14	-4.5

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2015 AAAAlbuquerque Isotopes · 141 PAwOBA .272 → .224 (−48)K% 25.5% → 34.3%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	25.53%	÷0.960	×1.290	—	—	34.31%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	3.55%	÷1.056	×0.710	—	×1.033	2.46%
HBP% /PA	0.71%	—	×0.980	—	×1.033	0.72%
Singles /BIP	26.04%	÷1.010	×0.900	×1.047	×1.033	25.11%
Doubles /BIP	8.33%	÷1.075	×0.810	×1.047	×1.033	6.79%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷0.933	×0.810	×1.047	×1.033	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	1.04%	÷1.105	×0.780	—	×1.033	0.76%

Factors used: league row PCL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 121, 1B 102, 2B 115, 3B 87, K 92, BB 111 — applied at half strength. Age: age 25 vs a level average of 27.2 → +3.3% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.2 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.047.

Result: wOBA .272 → .224; ISO .083 → .061; BABIP .347 → .322. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2014 AATulsa Drillers · 105 PAwOBA .295 → .244 (−51)K% 20.0% → 24.5%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	20.00%	÷0.998	×1.220	—	—	24.45%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	4.76%	÷1.038	×0.700	—	×1.012	3.25%
HBP% /PA	2.86%	—	×0.870	—	×1.012	2.52%
Singles /BIP	20.00%	÷0.995	×0.920	×0.959	×1.012	17.96%
Doubles /BIP	9.33%	÷1.087	×0.840	×0.959	×1.012	7.00%
Triples /BIP	2.67%	÷0.901	×0.940	×0.959	×1.012	2.70%
Home runs /BIP	0.00%	÷0.894	×0.800	—	×1.012	0.00%

Factors used: league row TL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 79, 1B 99, 2B 117, 3B 80, K 100, BB 108 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 24.8 → +1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.959.

Result: wOBA .295 → .244; ISO .115 → .095; BABIP .316 → .273. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2014 A+Modesto Nuts · 22 PAwOBA .229 → .190 (−39)K% 18.2% → 24.9%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	18.18%	÷0.977	×1.340	—	—	24.95%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	4.55%	÷0.947	×0.710	—	×0.988	3.37%
HBP% /PA	0.00%	—	×0.790	—	×0.988	0.00%
Singles /BIP	6.25%	÷1.004	×0.910	—	×0.988	5.60%
Doubles /BIP	6.25%	÷1.047	×0.820	—	×0.988	4.84%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.150	×0.760	—	×0.988	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	6.25%	÷1.019	×0.920	—	×0.988	5.57%

Factors used: league row CAL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 104, 1B 101, 2B 109, 3B 130, K 95, BB 89 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 22.8 → −1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr older than average).

Result: wOBA .229 → .190; ISO .200 → .170; BABIP .125 → .104. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2013 A+Modesto Nuts · 123 PAwOBA .208 → .185 (−23)K% 15.4% → 20.8%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	15.45%	÷0.994	×1.340	—	—	20.82%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	5.69%	÷1.037	×0.710	—	×0.998	3.89%
HBP% /PA	4.07%	—	×0.790	—	×0.998	3.20%
Singles /BIP	21.18%	÷0.994	×0.910	×1.032	×0.998	19.97%
Doubles /BIP	1.18%	÷1.080	×0.820	×1.032	×0.998	0.92%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.150	×0.760	×1.032	×0.998	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	0.00%	÷0.831	×0.920	—	×0.998	0.00%

Factors used: league row CAL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 66, 1B 99, 2B 116, 3B 130, K 99, BB 107 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.8 → −0.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.032.

Result: wOBA .208 → .185; ISO .010 → .008; BABIP .224 → .209. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2013 AAsheville Tourists · 119 PAwOBA .334 → .253 (−81)K% 19.3% → 27.5%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	19.33%	÷0.940	×1.340	—	—	27.54%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	11.76%	÷1.043	×0.660	—	×0.990	7.37%
HBP% /PA	0.00%	—	×0.770	—	×0.990	0.00%
Singles /BIP	21.25%	÷0.992	×0.920	×1.017	×0.990	19.85%
Doubles /BIP	10.00%	÷1.305	×0.820	×1.017	×0.990	6.33%
Triples /BIP	2.50%	÷0.900	×0.940	×1.017	×0.990	2.63%
Home runs /BIP	1.25%	÷1.331	×0.820	—	×0.990	0.76%

Factors used: league row SAL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 166, 1B 98, 2B 161, 3B 80, K 88, BB 109 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.0 → −1.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.017.

Result: wOBA .334 → .253; ISO .146 → .104; BABIP .342 → .290. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2012 AAsheville Tourists · 235 PAwOBA .288 → .250 (−38)K% 8.9% → 12.7%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	8.94%	÷0.942	×1.340	—	—	12.72%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	5.11%	÷1.055	×0.660	—	—	3.19%
HBP% /PA	2.13%	—	×0.770	—	—	1.64%
Singles /BIP	19.58%	÷0.971	×0.920	×1.022	—	18.96%
Doubles /BIP	7.41%	÷1.079	×0.820	×1.022	—	5.75%
Triples /BIP	0.53%	÷1.061	×0.940	×1.022	—	0.48%
Home runs /BIP	1.06%	÷1.191	×0.820	—	—	0.73%

Factors used: league row SAL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 138, 1B 94, 2B 116, 3B 112, K 88, BB 111 — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 22.0 → +0.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.022.

Result: wOBA .288 → .250; ISO .105 → .082; BABIP .277 → .252. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2011 ROKCasper Ghosts · 131 PAwOBA .248 → .180 (−68)K% 21.4% → 30.8%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	21.37%	÷1.000	×1.440	—	—	30.78%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	3.82%	÷1.000	×0.610	—	×0.985	2.29%
HBP% /PA	0.76%	—	×0.720	—	×0.985	0.54%
Singles /BIP	22.11%	÷1.000	×0.820	×1.050	×0.985	18.75%
Doubles /BIP	5.26%	÷1.000	×0.720	×1.050	×0.985	3.92%
Triples /BIP	1.05%	÷1.000	×0.720	×1.050	×0.985	0.78%
Home runs /BIP	1.05%	÷1.000	×0.750	—	×0.985	0.78%

Factors used: league row PIO. Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 21 vs a level average of 19.5 → −1.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.5 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.

Result: wOBA .248 → .180; ISO .081 → .055; BABIP .287 → .236. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2010 ROKCasper Ghosts · 164 PAwOBA .214 → .168 (−46)K% 14.0% → 20.2%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	14.02%	÷1.000	×1.440	—	—	20.20%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	4.88%	÷1.000	×0.610	—	×0.995	2.96%
HBP% /PA	1.22%	—	×0.720	—	×0.995	0.87%
Singles /BIP	20.47%	÷1.000	×0.820	×1.050	×0.995	17.54%
Doubles /BIP	2.36%	÷1.000	×0.720	×1.050	×0.995	1.78%
Triples /BIP	0.79%	÷1.000	×0.720	×1.050	×0.995	0.59%
Home runs /BIP	0.00%	÷1.000	×0.750	—	×0.995	0.00%

Factors used: league row PIO. Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 20 vs a level average of 19.5 → −0.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.5 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.

Result: wOBA .214 → .168; ISO .033 → .025; BABIP .236 → .199. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

Not traceable per stint: some stints lack the counting stats the component translation needs. Level-wide factors that apply instead — .