Telvin Nash

Pos1B

B/TR/R

Born1991-02-20

Age (2027)36

No MLB projection yet. Career stats below are historical.

Overview

INTLLAST SEASON 2019

Year	Age	Lvl / Team	PA	AVG/OBP/SLG	HR	wRC+	WAR	MLE AVG/OBP/SLG
2017	26	AA/A+CWS	171	.205/.318/.390	6	20	—	.135/.212/.252
2018	27	INTLMayos de Navo…	83	.171/.293/.243	0	59	—
2019	28	INTLMayos de Navo…	39	.108/.154/.135	0	-20	—

Contract

No contract data on file.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.

show model inputsbasis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral

Methodology▸ how these numbers are built

All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.

Year	Age	Lvl	Team	MLB%	PA	AB	H	2B	3B	HR	BB	SO	HBP	SB	CS	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	BABIP	K%	BB%	wOBA	wRC+	BAT	RUN	FLD	POS	REP	WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments)
2009	18	ROK	GCL Astros	—	157	142	31	10	1	1	12	45	1	1	2	218	284	324	608	106	306	29	8	273	9	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	19	ROK	Greeneville Astros	—	227	200	53	12	1	12	25	64	1	1	1	265	350	515	865	250	328	28	11	377	60	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	20	A	Lexington Legends	—	316	268	72	16	0	14	40	103	6	2	0	269	376	485	861	216	379	33	13	380	81	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	20	ROK	GCL Astros	—	16	13	5	2	0	0	3	2	0	0	0	385	500	538	1.038	154	455	12	19	461	111	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	21	A+	Lancaster JetHawks	—	449	393	88	19	0	29	47	198	7	0	1	224	318	494	811	270	351	44	10	354	38	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	22	A+	Lancaster JetHawks	—	269	228	56	10	0	16	37	93	3	1	0	246	358	500	858	254	333	35	14	377	52	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	23	AA	Corpus Christi Hooks	—	321	273	62	4	0	22	34	112	9	1	1	227	332	484	816	256	284	35	11	355	74	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	24	AA	Corpus Christi Hooks	—	130	114	26	5	0	7	13	49	2	0	0	228	318	456	774	228	328	38	10	340	51	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	25	A+	Winston-Salem Dash	—	188	145	37	11	0	11	40	58	1	0	0	255	419	559	978	303	333	31	21	421	80	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	26	AA	Birmingham Barons	—	36	34	6	1	0	1	2	18	0	0	0	176	222	294	516	118	333	50	6	233	-10	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	26	A+	Winston-Salem Dash	—	135	112	24	8	0	5	19	44	3	0	0	214	343	420	763	205	297	33	14	341	28	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	27	INTL	Mayos de Navojoa	—	83	70	12	5	0	0	10	27	2	0	1	171	293	243	536	71	273	33	12	255	59	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	28	INTL	Mayos de Navojoa	—	39	37	4	1	0	0	2	18	0	0	0	108	154	135	289	27	211	46	5	138	-20	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents)
2009	18	ROK MLE	GCL Astros	—	157	146	22	6	1	1	8	65	1	1	2	151	200	226	426	75	245	41	5	182	9	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	19	ROK MLE	Greeneville Astros	—	227	209	38	8	1	8	16	91	1	1	1	182	243	344	588	163	265	40	7	257	60	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	20	A MLE	Lexington Legends	—	316	283	60	13	0	11	25	138	6	2	0	212	290	375	664	163	350	44	8	288	81	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	20	ROK MLE	GCL Astros	—	16	14	4	1	0	0	2	3	0	0	0	286	375	357	732	71	353	19	12	332	111	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	21	A+ MLE	Lancaster JetHawks	—	449	409	56	10	0	19	31	272	7	0	1	137	210	301	511	164	300	61	7	224	38	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	22	A+ MLE	Lancaster JetHawks	—	269	239	37	6	0	10	26	134	3	1	0	155	246	305	552	151	274	50	10	245	52	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	23	AA MLE	Corpus Christi Hooks	—	321	283	51	3	0	18	24	138	9	1	1	180	266	382	647	201	245	43	7	277	74	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	24	AA MLE	Corpus Christi Hooks	—	130	118	20	4	0	5	9	62	2	0	0	169	240	331	571	161	288	48	7	244	51	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	25	A+ MLE	Winston-Salem Dash	—	188	161	28	8	0	8	24	88	1	0	0	174	285	373	658	199	286	47	13	286	80	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	26	AA MLE	Birmingham Barons	—	36	35	5	1	0	1	1	22	0	0	0	143	167	257	424	114	297	61	3	154	-10	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	26	A+ MLE	Winston-Salem Dash	—	135	120	16	5	0	3	11	65	3	0	0	133	224	250	474	117	231	48	8	209	28	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	18	ROK MLE	GCL Astros	—	157	146	22	6	1	1	8	65	1	1	2	151	200	226	426	75	256	41	5	182	9	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	18	ROK RAW	GCL Astros	—	157	142	31	10	1	1	12	45	1	1	2	218	284	324	608	106	306	29	8	273	9	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	19	ROK MLE	Greeneville Astros	—	227	209	38	8	1	8	16	91	1	1	1	182	243	344	588	163	270	40	7	257	60	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	19	ROK RAW	Greeneville Astros	—	227	200	53	12	1	12	25	64	1	1	1	265	350	515	865	250	328	28	11	377	60	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	20	A MLE	2 teams	—	332	297	63	14	0	11	27	141	6	2	0	212	291	370	661	158	354	42	8	290	82	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	20	A RAW	2 teams	—	332	281	77	18	0	14	43	105	6	2	0	274	382	488	869	214	384	32	13	384	82	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	21	A+ MLE	Lancaster JetHawks	—	449	409	56	10	0	19	31	272	7	0	1	137	210	301	511	164	308	61	7	224	38	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	21	A+ RAW	Lancaster JetHawks	—	449	393	88	19	0	29	47	198	7	0	1	224	318	494	811	270	351	44	10	354	38	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	22	A+ MLE	Lancaster JetHawks	—	269	239	37	6	0	10	26	134	3	1	0	155	246	305	552	151	281	50	10	245	52	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	22	A+ RAW	Lancaster JetHawks	—	269	228	56	10	0	16	37	93	3	1	0	246	358	500	858	254	333	35	14	377	52	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	23	AA MLE	Corpus Christi Hooks	—	321	283	51	3	0	18	24	138	9	1	1	180	266	382	647	201	256	43	7	277	74	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	23	AA RAW	Corpus Christi Hooks	—	321	273	62	4	0	22	34	112	9	1	1	227	332	484	816	256	284	35	11	355	74	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	24	AA MLE	Corpus Christi Hooks	—	130	118	20	4	0	5	9	62	2	0	0	169	240	331	571	161	294	48	7	244	51	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	24	AA RAW	Corpus Christi Hooks	—	130	114	26	5	0	7	13	49	2	0	0	228	318	456	774	228	328	38	10	340	51	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	25	A+ MLE	Winston-Salem Dash	—	188	161	28	8	0	8	24	88	1	0	0	174	285	373	658	199	299	47	13	286	80	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	25	A+ RAW	Winston-Salem Dash	—	188	145	37	11	0	11	40	58	1	0	0	255	419	559	978	303	333	31	21	421	80	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	26	A+ MLE	2 teams	—	171	155	20	5	0	4	12	87	3	0	0	129	206	239	445	110	246	51	7	197	20	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	26	A+ RAW	2 teams	—	171	146	30	9	0	6	21	62	3	0	0	205	318	390	708	185	304	36	12	319	20	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	27	INTL MLE	Mayos de Navojoa	—	83	70	12	5	0	0	10	27	2	0	1	171	293	243	536	71	273	33	12	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	27	INTL RAW	Mayos de Navojoa	—	83	70	12	5	0	0	10	27	2	0	1	171	293	243	536	71	273	33	12	255	59	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	28	INTL MLE	Mayos de Navojoa	—	39	37	4	1	0	0	2	18	0	0	0	108	154	135	289	27	211	46	5	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	28	INTL RAW	Mayos de Navojoa	—	39	37	4	1	0	0	2	18	0	0	0	108	154	135	289	27	211	46	5	138	-20	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	18	ROK MLE	GCL Astros	—	157	147	22	6	1	1	8	65	1	1	2	150	200	224	424	75	245	41	5	182	9	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	19	ROK MLE	Greeneville Astros	—	227	208	38	8	1	8	16	91	1	1	1	183	243	346	590	163	265	40	7	257	60	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	20	A MLE	2 teams	—	332	296	63	14	0	11	27	141	6	2	0	213	291	372	663	159	350	42	8	290	82	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	21	A+ MLE	Lancaster JetHawks	—	449	408	56	10	0	19	31	272	7	0	1	137	210	301	512	164	300	61	7	224	38	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	22	A+ MLE	Lancaster JetHawks	—	269	238	37	6	0	10	26	134	3	1	0	155	246	307	553	151	274	50	10	245	52	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	23	AA MLE	Corpus Christi Hooks	—	321	285	51	3	0	18	24	138	9	1	1	179	266	379	645	200	245	43	7	277	74	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	24	AA MLE	Corpus Christi Hooks	—	130	118	20	4	0	5	9	62	2	0	0	169	240	331	571	161	288	48	7	244	51	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	25	A+ MLE	Winston-Salem Dash	—	188	161	28	8	0	8	24	88	1	0	0	174	285	373	658	199	286	47	13	286	80	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	26	A+ MLE	2 teams	—	171	154	20	5	0	4	12	87	3	0	0	130	206	240	446	110	245	51	7	197	20	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career Totals
Career	—	MLE		—	2366	2124	351	70	2	84	189	1123	35	6	6	165	245	319	564	153	287	47	8	236	46	-153	-1	+0	-42	+51	-14.8
/ 162G	—	MLE		—	650	584	97	19	1	23	52	309	10	2	2	166	247	320	567	154	289	48	8	236	46	-42	-0	+0	-12	+14	-4.1

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2017 A+Winston-Salem Dash · 135 PAwOBA .333 → .209 (−124)K% 32.6% → 47.9%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	32.59%	÷0.966	×1.420	—	—	47.89%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	13.33%	÷1.046	×0.630	—	×0.968	7.77%
HBP% /PA	2.22%	—	×0.860	—	×0.968	1.85%
Singles /BIP	16.18%	÷0.999	×0.940	×0.950	×0.968	14.00%
Doubles /BIP	11.76%	÷1.080	×0.830	×0.950	×0.968	8.31%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷0.902	×0.800	×0.950	×0.968	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	7.35%	÷1.275	×0.900	—	×0.968	5.02%

Factors used: league row CAR. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 155, 1B 100, 2B 116, 3B 80, K 93, BB 109 — applied at half strength. Age: age 26 vs a level average of 22.8 → −3.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (3.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.

Result: wOBA .333 → .209; ISO .205 → .120; BABIP .297 → .231. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2017 AABirmingham Barons · 36 PAwOBA .226 → .154 (−72)K% 50.0% → 62.3%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	50.00%	÷0.980	×1.220	—	—	62.27%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	5.56%	÷1.001	×0.680	—	×0.988	3.73%
HBP% /PA	0.00%	—	×0.840	—	×0.988	0.00%
Singles /BIP	25.00%	÷1.009	×0.920	—	×0.988	22.52%
Doubles /BIP	6.25%	÷1.021	×0.910	—	×0.988	5.50%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.086	×0.880	—	×0.988	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	6.25%	÷0.894	×0.800	—	×0.988	5.52%

Factors used: league row SL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 79, 1B 102, 2B 104, 3B 117, K 96, BB 100 — applied at half strength. Age: age 26 vs a level average of 24.8 → −1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr older than average).

Result: wOBA .226 → .154; ISO .118 → .079; BABIP .333 → .297. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2016 A+Winston-Salem Dash · 188 PAwOBA .414 → .286 (−128)K% 30.9% → 46.7%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	30.85%	÷0.938	×1.420	—	—	46.70%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	20.74%	÷0.996	×0.630	—	×0.978	12.83%
HBP% /PA	0.53%	—	×0.860	—	×0.978	0.45%
Singles /BIP	17.24%	÷0.994	×0.940	×0.999	×0.978	15.93%
Doubles /BIP	12.64%	÷0.970	×0.830	×0.999	×0.978	10.57%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.013	×0.800	×0.999	×0.978	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	12.64%	÷1.098	×0.900	—	×0.978	10.14%

Factors used: league row CAR. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 120, 1B 99, 2B 94, 3B 103, K 88, BB 99 — applied at half strength. Age: age 25 vs a level average of 22.8 → −2.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.999.

Result: wOBA .414 → .286; ISO .303 → .213; BABIP .333 → .286. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2015 AACorpus Christi Hooks · 130 PAwOBA .331 → .244 (−87)K% 37.7% → 47.7%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	37.69%	÷0.964	×1.220	—	—	47.72%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	10.00%	÷1.003	×0.700	—	×1.012	7.06%
HBP% /PA	1.54%	—	×0.870	—	×1.012	1.35%
Singles /BIP	21.54%	÷1.022	×0.920	×1.002	×1.012	19.66%
Doubles /BIP	7.69%	÷0.963	×0.840	×1.002	×1.012	6.80%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷0.900	×0.940	×1.002	×1.012	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	10.77%	÷1.059	×0.800	—	×1.012	8.23%

Factors used: league row TL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 112, 1B 104, 2B 93, 3B 80, K 93, BB 101 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 24.8 → +1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.002.

Result: wOBA .331 → .244; ISO .228 → .158; BABIP .328 → .288. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2014 AACorpus Christi Hooks · 321 PAwOBA .346 → .277 (−69)K% 34.9% → 43.1%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	34.89%	÷0.988	×1.220	—	—	43.11%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	10.28%	÷0.991	×0.700	—	×1.027	7.46%
HBP% /PA	2.80%	—	×0.870	—	×1.027	2.51%
Singles /BIP	22.36%	÷1.022	×0.920	×0.950	×1.027	19.63%
Doubles /BIP	2.48%	÷0.890	×0.840	×0.950	×1.027	2.29%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷0.900	×0.940	×0.950	×1.027	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	13.66%	÷0.956	×0.800	—	×1.027	11.74%

Factors used: league row TL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 91, 1B 104, 2B 78, 3B 80, K 98, BB 98 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 24.8 → +2.7% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.

Result: wOBA .346 → .277; ISO .256 → .207; BABIP .284 → .245. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2013 A+Lancaster JetHawks · 269 PAwOBA .368 → .245 (−123)K% 34.6% → 49.8%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	34.57%	÷0.929	×1.340	—	—	49.85%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	13.75%	÷1.035	×0.710	—	×1.012	9.54%
HBP% /PA	1.12%	—	×0.790	—	×1.012	0.89%
Singles /BIP	22.22%	÷1.037	×0.910	×0.988	×1.012	19.49%
Doubles /BIP	7.41%	÷1.090	×0.820	×0.988	×1.012	5.57%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.150	×0.760	×0.988	×1.012	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	11.85%	÷1.147	×0.920	—	×1.012	9.62%

Factors used: league row CAL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 129, 1B 107, 2B 118, 3B 130, K 86, BB 107 — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 22.8 → +1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.988.

Result: wOBA .368 → .245; ISO .254 → .161; BABIP .333 → .274. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2012 A+Lancaster JetHawks · 449 PAwOBA .346 → .224 (−122)K% 44.1% → 60.6%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	44.10%	÷0.975	×1.340	—	—	60.59%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	10.47%	÷1.095	×0.710	—	×1.027	6.97%
HBP% /PA	1.56%	—	×0.790	—	×1.027	1.26%
Singles /BIP	20.51%	÷1.022	×0.910	×1.013	×1.027	19.00%
Doubles /BIP	9.74%	÷1.138	×0.820	×1.013	×1.027	7.31%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.150	×0.760	×1.013	×1.027	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	14.87%	÷1.030	×0.920	—	×1.027	13.64%

Factors used: league row CAL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 106, 1B 104, 2B 128, 3B 130, K 95, BB 119 — applied at half strength. Age: age 21 vs a level average of 22.8 → +2.7% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.013.

Result: wOBA .346 → .224; ISO .270 → .172; BABIP .351 → .300. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2011 ALexington Legends · 316 PAwOBA .369 → .288 (−81)K% 32.6% → 43.8%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	32.59%	÷0.998	×1.340	—	—	43.77%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	11.71%	÷0.996	×0.660	—	×1.030	8.00%
HBP% /PA	1.90%	—	×0.770	—	×1.030	1.51%
Singles /BIP	25.45%	÷1.006	×0.920	×1.009	×1.030	24.18%
Doubles /BIP	9.70%	÷0.939	×0.820	×1.009	×1.030	8.80%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.034	×0.940	×1.009	×1.030	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	8.48%	÷1.002	×0.820	—	×1.030	7.15%

Factors used: league row SAL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 100, 1B 101, 2B 88, 3B 107, K 100, BB 99 — applied at half strength. Age: age 20 vs a level average of 22.0 → +3.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.009.

Result: wOBA .369 → .288; ISO .216 → .167; BABIP .379 → .350. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

Not traceable per stint: some stints lack the counting stats the component translation needs. Level-wide factors that apply instead — .