Mycal Jones

PosCF

B/TR/R

Born1987-05-30

Age (2027)40

No MLB projection yet. Career stats below are historical.

Overview

AAALAST SEASON 2015

Year	Age	Lvl / Team	PA	AVG/OBP/SLG	HR	SB	wRC+	WAR	MLE AVG/OBP/SLG
2013	26	AAMississippi B…	396	.261/.339/.348	4	29	64	—	.234/.288/.309
2014	27	AAMississippi B…	443	.255/.342/.347	3	21	59	—	.223/.286/.306
2015	28	AAA/AA2 orgs	224	.262/.365/.387	4	7	67	—	.218/.288/.317

Contract

No contract data on file.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.

show model inputsbasis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral

Methodology▸ how these numbers are built

All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.

Year	Age	Lvl	Team	MLB%	PA	AB	H	2B	3B	HR	BB	SO	HBP	SB	CS	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	BABIP	K%	BB%	wOBA	wRC+	BAT	RUN	FLD	POS	REP	WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments)
2009	22	ROK	Danville Braves	—	282	244	63	18	6	4	26	55	5	19	4	258	342	430	772	172	312	20	9	336	43	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	23	AA	Mississippi Braves	—	33	30	6	0	1	2	1	9	0	1	0	200	226	467	692	267	211	27	3	278	39	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	23	A+	Myrtle Beach Pelicans	—	318	275	74	19	1	7	31	66	7	15	4	269	358	422	780	153	327	21	10	346	72	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	23	A	Rome Braves	—	219	199	52	12	0	6	11	48	2	6	3	261	307	412	719	151	309	22	5	310	49	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	24	AA	Mississippi Braves	—	449	373	94	25	1	7	56	90	7	17	6	252	360	381	741	129	314	20	12	329	76	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	25	AA	Mississippi Braves	—	98	85	12	0	0	0	9	25	1	7	5	141	232	141	373		200	26	9	182	-22	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	25	A+	Lynchburg Hillcats	—	437	383	97	27	3	3	34	64	9	22	8	253	329	363	692	110	296	15	8	307	45	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	26	AA	Mississippi Braves	—	396	345	90	18	0	4	36	63	5	29	11	261	339	348	687	87	306	16	9	307	64	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	27	AA	Mississippi Braves	—	443	380	97	22	2	3	42	72	8	21	7	255	342	347	689	92	302	16	9	308	59	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	28	AAA	Gwinnett Braves	—	187	164	43	7	1	4	20	42	1	4	2	262	346	390	736	128	328	22	11	330	60	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	28	AA	Mississippi Braves	—	37	27	7	3	0	0	10	7	0	3	0	259	459	370	830	111	350	19	27	391	105	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents)
2009	22	ROK MLE	Danville Braves	—	282	254	46	12	4	3	16	78	5	19	4	181	244	295	539	114	230	28	6	232	43	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	23	AA MLE	Mississippi Braves	—	33	30	6	0	1	2	1	11	0	1	0	200	226	467	692	267	174	33	3	226	39	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	23	A+ MLE	Myrtle Beach Pelicans	—	318	287	65	16	1	6	19	95	7	15	4	226	291	352	643	125	298	30	6	274	72	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	23	A MLE	Rome Braves	—	219	203	42	9	0	5	7	66	2	6	3	207	241	325	566	118	258	30	3	241	49	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	24	AA MLE	Mississippi Braves	—	449	390	88	25	1	7	39	110	7	17	6	226	307	349	656	123	279	24	9	281	76	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	25	AA MLE	Mississippi Braves	—	98	89	10	0	0	0	5	32	1	7	5	112	168	112	281		170	33	5	136	-22	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	25	A+ MLE	Lynchburg Hillcats	—	437	396	80	20	2	3	21	96	9	22	8	202	258	285	544	83	247	22	5	234	45	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	26	AA MLE	Mississippi Braves	—	396	359	84	18	0	3	22	80	5	29	11	234	288	309	597	75	282	20	6	263	64	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	27	AA MLE	Mississippi Braves	—	443	395	88	20	2	3	27	90	8	21	7	223	286	306	592	84	262	20	6	256	59	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	28	AAA MLE	Gwinnett Braves	—	187	172	37	6	1	3	12	54	1	4	2	215	270	314	584	99	284	29	6	257	60	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	28	AA MLE	Mississippi Braves	—	37	30	7	3	0	0	7	8	0	3	0	233	378	333	712	100	317	22	19	323	105	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	22	ROK MLE	Danville Braves	—	282	254	46	12	4	3	16	78	5	19	4	181	244	295	539	114	243	28	6	232	43	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	22	ROK RAW	Danville Braves	—	282	244	63	18	6	4	26	55	5	19	4	258	342	430	772	172	312	20	9	336	43	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	23	A+ MLE	3 teams	—	570	520	110	25	1	12	27	173	9	22	7	212	263	333	595	121	287	30	5	259	61	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	23	A+ RAW	3 teams	—	570	504	132	31	2	15	43	123	9	22	7	262	331	421	752	159	314	22	8	328	61	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	24	AA MLE	Mississippi Braves	—	449	390	88	25	1	7	39	110	7	17	6	226	307	349	656	123	296	24	9	281	76	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	24	AA RAW	Mississippi Braves	—	449	373	94	25	1	7	56	90	7	17	6	252	360	381	741	129	314	20	12	329	76	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	25	A+ MLE	2 teams	—	535	485	90	20	2	3	26	128	10	29	13	186	242	254	495	68	244	24	5	216	32	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	25	A+ RAW	2 teams	—	535	468	109	27	3	3	43	89	10	29	13	233	311	323	634	90	280	17	8	284	32	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	26	AA MLE	Mississippi Braves	—	396	359	84	18	0	3	22	80	5	29	11	234	288	309	597	75	290	20	6	263	64	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	26	AA RAW	Mississippi Braves	—	396	345	90	18	0	4	36	63	5	29	11	261	339	348	687	87	306	16	9	307	64	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	27	AA MLE	Mississippi Braves	—	443	395	88	20	2	3	27	90	8	21	7	223	286	306	592	84	276	20	6	256	59	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	27	AA RAW	Mississippi Braves	—	443	380	97	22	2	3	42	72	8	21	7	255	342	347	689	92	302	16	9	308	59	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	28	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	224	202	44	9	1	3	19	62	1	7	2	218	288	317	605	99	297	28	8	268	67	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	28	AAA RAW	2 teams	—	224	191	50	10	1	4	30	49	1	7	2	262	365	387	752	126	331	22	13	340	67	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	22	ROK MLE	Danville Braves	—	282	259	46	12	4	3	16	78	5	19	4	178	244	290	533	112	230	28	6	232	43	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	23	A+ MLE	3 teams	—	570	529	110	25	1	12	27	173	9	22	7	208	263	327	590	119	275	30	5	259	61	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	24	AA MLE	Mississippi Braves	—	449	400	88	25	1	7	39	110	7	17	6	220	307	340	647	120	279	24	9	281	76	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	25	A+ MLE	2 teams	—	535	494	90	20	2	3	26	128	10	29	13	182	242	249	491	67	233	24	5	216	32	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	26	AA MLE	Mississippi Braves	—	396	366	84	18	0	3	22	80	5	29	11	230	288	303	591	74	282	20	6	263	64	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	27	AA MLE	Mississippi Braves	—	443	405	88	20	2	3	27	90	8	21	7	217	286	299	585	81	262	20	6	256	59	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	28	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	224	202	44	9	1	3	19	62	1	7	2	218	288	317	605	99	289	28	8	268	67	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career Totals
Career	—	MLE		—	2899	2605	550	129	11	34	176	721	45	144	50	211	273	308	581	97	275	25	6	253	57	-148	+9	+0	+10	+63	-6.8
/ 162G	—	MLE		—	650	584	123	29	2	8	39	162	10	32	11	211	271	308	580	98	274	25	6	253	57	-33	+2	+0	+2	+14	-1.5

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2015 AAAGwinnett Braves · 187 PAwOBA .323 → .257 (−66)K% 22.5% → 28.7%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	22.46%	÷0.940	×1.200	—	—	28.66%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	10.70%	÷1.103	×0.690	—	×0.992	6.64%
HBP% /PA	0.53%	—	×0.940	—	×0.992	0.50%
Singles /BIP	25.41%	÷0.996	×0.930	×0.958	×0.992	22.55%
Doubles /BIP	5.74%	÷0.988	×0.830	×0.958	×0.992	4.58%
Triples /BIP	0.82%	÷0.988	×0.970	×0.958	×0.992	0.77%
Home runs /BIP	3.28%	÷1.014	×0.840	—	×0.992	2.70%

Factors used: league row IL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 103, 1B 99, 2B 98, 3B 98, K 88, BB 121 — applied at half strength. Age: age 28 vs a level average of 27.2 → −0.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.958.

Result: wOBA .323 → .257; ISO .128 → .104; BABIP .328 → .284. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2015 AAMississippi Braves · 37 PAwOBA .383 → .323 (−59)K% 18.9% → 22.4%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	18.92%	÷1.031	×1.220	—	—	22.39%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	27.03%	÷0.965	×0.680	—	×0.968	18.44%
HBP% /PA	0.00%	—	×0.840	—	×0.968	0.00%
Singles /BIP	20.00%	÷1.019	×0.920	—	×0.968	17.47%
Doubles /BIP	15.00%	÷0.927	×0.910	—	×0.968	14.26%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.005	×0.880	—	×0.968	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	0.00%	÷0.784	×0.800	—	×0.968	0.00%

Factors used: league row SL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 57, 1B 104, 2B 85, 3B 101, K 106, BB 93 — applied at half strength. Age: age 28 vs a level average of 24.8 → −3.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (3.2 yr older than average).

Result: wOBA .383 → .323; ISO .111 → .116; BABIP .350 → .317. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2014 AAMississippi Braves · 443 PAwOBA .304 → .256 (−48)K% 16.3% → 20.3%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	16.25%	÷0.975	×1.220	—	—	20.33%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	9.48%	÷1.056	×0.680	—	×0.978	5.97%
HBP% /PA	1.81%	—	×0.840	—	×0.978	1.48%
Singles /BIP	22.73%	÷1.030	×0.920	×0.992	×0.978	19.70%
Doubles /BIP	7.14%	÷1.015	×0.910	×0.992	×0.978	6.21%
Triples /BIP	0.65%	÷1.004	×0.880	×0.992	×0.978	0.55%
Home runs /BIP	0.97%	÷0.813	×0.800	—	×0.978	0.94%

Factors used: league row SL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 63, 1B 106, 2B 103, 3B 101, K 95, BB 111 — applied at half strength. Age: age 27 vs a level average of 24.8 → −2.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.992.

Result: wOBA .304 → .256; ISO .092 → .085; BABIP .302 → .262. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2013 AAMississippi Braves · 396 PAwOBA .302 → .263 (−39)K% 15.9% → 20.1%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	15.91%	÷0.965	×1.220	—	—	20.12%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	9.09%	÷1.089	×0.680	—	×0.988	5.61%
HBP% /PA	1.26%	—	×0.840	—	×0.988	1.05%
Singles /BIP	24.11%	÷1.023	×0.920	×1.019	×0.988	21.84%
Doubles /BIP	6.38%	÷0.921	×0.910	×1.019	×0.988	6.35%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.150	×0.880	×1.019	×0.988	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	1.42%	÷1.010	×0.800	—	×0.988	1.11%

Factors used: league row SL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 102, 1B 105, 2B 84, 3B 130, K 93, BB 118 — applied at half strength. Age: age 26 vs a level average of 24.8 → −1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.019.

Result: wOBA .302 → .263; ISO .087 → .081; BABIP .306 → .282. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2012 A+Lynchburg Hillcats · 437 PAwOBA .300 → .234 (−66)K% 14.6% → 22.0%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	14.65%	÷0.944	×1.420	—	—	22.04%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	7.78%	÷1.021	×0.630	—	×0.978	4.69%
HBP% /PA	2.06%	—	×0.860	—	×0.978	1.73%
Singles /BIP	20.06%	÷0.994	×0.940	×0.952	×0.978	17.68%
Doubles /BIP	8.46%	÷1.025	×0.830	×0.952	×0.978	6.38%
Triples /BIP	0.94%	÷1.150	×0.800	×0.952	×0.978	0.61%
Home runs /BIP	0.94%	÷0.905	×0.900	—	×0.978	0.92%

Factors used: league row CAR. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 81, 1B 99, 2B 105, 3B 130, K 89, BB 104 — applied at half strength. Age: age 25 vs a level average of 22.8 → −2.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.952.

Result: wOBA .300 → .234; ISO .110 → .084; BABIP .296 → .247. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2012 AAMississippi Braves · 98 PAwOBA .178 → .136 (−42)K% 25.5% → 32.3%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	25.51%	÷0.964	×1.220	—	—	32.29%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	9.18%	÷1.114	×0.680	—	×0.998	5.60%
HBP% /PA	1.02%	—	×0.840	—	×0.998	0.86%
Singles /BIP	20.00%	÷1.041	×0.920	×0.963	×0.998	16.98%
Doubles /BIP	0.00%	÷0.987	×0.910	×0.963	×0.998	0.00%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷0.900	×0.880	×0.963	×0.998	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	0.00%	÷0.852	×0.800	—	×0.998	0.00%

Factors used: league row SL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 70, 1B 108, 2B 97, 3B 80, K 93, BB 123 — applied at half strength. Age: age 25 vs a level average of 24.8 → −0.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.963.

Result: wOBA .178 → .136; ISO .000 → .000; BABIP .200 → .170. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2011 AAMississippi Braves · 449 PAwOBA .321 → .281 (−40)K% 20.0% → 24.5%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	20.04%	÷1.000	×1.220	—	—	24.46%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	12.25%	÷0.978	×0.680	—	×1.012	8.62%
HBP% /PA	1.56%	—	×0.840	—	×1.012	1.33%
Singles /BIP	21.55%	÷1.040	×0.920	×0.963	×1.012	18.58%
Doubles /BIP	8.83%	÷0.923	×0.910	×0.963	×1.012	8.48%
Triples /BIP	0.35%	÷0.978	×0.880	×0.963	×1.012	0.31%
Home runs /BIP	2.47%	÷0.844	×0.800	—	×1.012	2.37%

Factors used: league row SL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 69, 1B 108, 2B 85, 3B 96, K 100, BB 96 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 24.8 → +1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.963.

Result: wOBA .321 → .281; ISO .129 → .128; BABIP .314 → .279. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2010 A+Myrtle Beach Pelicans · 318 PAwOBA .340 → .274 (−66)K% 20.8% → 29.9%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	20.75%	÷0.985	×1.420	—	—	29.92%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	9.75%	÷1.009	×0.630	—	×0.998	6.07%
HBP% /PA	2.20%	—	×0.860	—	×0.998	1.89%
Singles /BIP	22.49%	÷0.954	×0.940	×0.958	×0.998	21.18%
Doubles /BIP	9.09%	÷0.916	×0.830	×0.958	×0.998	7.87%
Triples /BIP	0.48%	÷1.150	×0.800	×0.958	×0.998	0.32%
Home runs /BIP	3.35%	÷1.048	×0.900	—	×0.998	2.87%

Factors used: league row CAR. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 110, 1B 91, 2B 83, 3B 130, K 97, BB 102 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.8 → −0.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.958.

Result: wOBA .340 → .274; ISO .153 → .123; BABIP .327 → .298. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).