Brett Jackson

PosCF

B/TL/R

Born1988-08-02

Age (2027)38

No MLB projection yet. Career stats below are historical.

Overview

AAALAST SEASON 2015

Year	Age	Lvl / Team	PA	AVG/OBP/SLG	HR	SB	wRC+	WAR	MLE AVG/OBP/SLG
2013	24	AAA/AA/ROK3 orgs	367	.210/.297/.330	6	9	30	—	.161/.228/.248
2014	25	AAAARI	271	.208/.299/.350	6	5	19	—	.133/.207/.206
2015	26	AAASF	189	.220/.330/.321	3	6	45	—	.175/.259/.241

Contract

No contract data on file.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.

show model inputsbasis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral

Methodology▸ how these numbers are built

All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.

Year	Age	Lvl	Team	MLB%	PA	AB	H	2B	3B	HR	BB	SO	HBP	SB	CS	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	BABIP	K%	BB%	wOBA	wRC+	BAT	RUN	FLD	POS	REP	WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments)
2009	20	A	Peoria Chiefs	—	128	112	33	5	1	7	11	32	5	11	1	295	383	545	927	250	356	25	9	407	94	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	20	ROK	AZL Cubs	—	15	11	5	0	1	0	3	4	0	0	0	455	571	636	1.208	182	625	27	20	489	149	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	21	AA	Tennessee Smokies	—	269	228	63	13	6	6	30	63	4	18	4	276	369	465	834	189	352	23	11	361	88	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	21	A+	Daytona Cubs	—	312	263	83	19	8	6	43	63	5	12	7	316	421	517	938	202	395	20	14	413	112	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	22	AAA	Iowa Cubs	—	215	185	55	13	2	10	28	64	0	6	1	297	390	551	941	254	402	30	13	407	100	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	22	AA	Tennessee Smokies	—	297	246	63	10	3	10	45	74	2	15	6	256	375	443	819	187	323	25	15	362	83	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	23	MLB	Chicago Cubs	—	142	120	21	6	1	4	22	59	0	0	3	175	303	342	644	167	298	42	15	296	86	-2	-1	+1	+2	+3	0.3
2012	23	AAA	Iowa Cubs	—	467	407	104	22	12	15	47	158	6	27	5	256	341	479	820	224	372	34	10	355	77	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	24	AAA	Iowa Cubs	—	242	215	48	7	3	6	21	77	3	7	5	223	301	367	669	144	316	32	9	298	35	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	24	AA	Tennessee Smokies	—	110	95	19	4	2	0	13	37	2	2	2	200	309	284	593	84	328	34	12	279	34	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	24	ROK	AZL Cubs	—	15	14	1	0	0	0	1	7	0	0	0	71	133	71	205		143	47	7	107	-77	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	25	AAA	Reno Aces	—	271	240	50	8	4	6	27	103	4	5	6	208	299	350	649	142	336	38	10	295	19	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	26	AAA	Sacramento River Cats	—	189	159	35	7	0	3	26	51	0	6	1	220	330	321	650	101	296	27	14	296	45	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career Totals (raw MLB only — historical actual)
MLB Career	—			—	142	120	21	6	1	4	22	59	0	0	3	175	303	342	644	167	298	42	15	296	87	-2	-1	+1	+2	+3	0.3
▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents)
2009	20	A MLE	Peoria Chiefs	—	128	116	27	4	1	5	7	44	5	11	1	233	305	414	718	181	314	34	5	307	94	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	20	ROK MLE	AZL Cubs	—	15	12	4	0	1	0	2	6	0	0	0	333	429	500	929	167	496	40	13	389	149	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	21	AA MLE	Tennessee Smokies	—	269	239	57	11	5	5	20	80	4	18	4	238	308	389	697	151	318	30	7	299	88	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	21	A+ MLE	Daytona Cubs	—	312	273	70	16	5	5	33	89	5	12	7	256	347	407	754	150	359	29	11	333	112	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	22	AAA MLE	Iowa Cubs	—	215	195	46	10	1	8	18	86	0	6	1	236	300	421	721	185	365	40	8	316	100	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	22	AA MLE	Tennessee Smokies	—	297	263	56	9	2	9	28	95	2	15	6	213	294	365	659	152	291	32	9	291	83	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	23	MLB MLE	Chicago Cubs	—	142	120	21	6	1	4	22	59	0	0	3	175	303	342	644	167	298	42	15	295	86	-2	-1	+1	+2	+3	0.3
2012	23	AAA MLE	Iowa Cubs	—	467	418	84	16	10	13	36	203	6	27	5	201	274	380	654	179	332	43	8	282	77	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	24	AAA MLE	Iowa Cubs	—	242	221	37	5	2	4	15	99	3	7	5	167	230	262	493	95	272	41	6	220	35	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	24	AA MLE	Tennessee Smokies	—	110	100	17	4	2	0	8	47	2	2	2	170	245	250	495	80	311	43	7	219	34	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	24	ROK MLE	AZL Cubs	—	15	14	0	0	0	0	1	10	0	0	0		67		67		111	67	7	55	-77	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	25	AAA MLE	Reno Aces	—	271	248	33	5	2	3	19	138	4	5	6	133	207	206	412	73	286	51	7	196	19	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	26	AAA MLE	Sacramento River Cats	—	189	166	29	5	0	2	19	63	0	6	1	175	259	241	500	66	251	33	10	235	45	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	20	A MLE	2 teams	—	143	128	31	4	2	5	9	49	5	11	1	242	317	422	739	180	347	34	6	316	100	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	20	A RAW	2 teams	—	143	123	38	5	2	7	14	36	5	11	1	309	401	553	954	244	383	25	10	415	100	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	21	A+ MLE	2 teams	—	581	512	128	27	11	10	53	169	9	30	11	250	331	404	735	154	350	29	9	317	101	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	21	A+ RAW	2 teams	—	581	491	146	32	14	12	73	126	9	30	11	297	397	493	890	196	375	22	13	389	101	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	22	AA MLE	2 teams	—	512	458	103	19	4	17	46	181	2	21	7	225	298	395	694	170	327	35	9	301	90	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	22	AA RAW	2 teams	—	512	431	118	23	5	20	73	138	2	21	7	274	381	490	871	216	355	27	14	381	90	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	23	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	609	538	104	22	10	17	58	262	6	27	8	193	279	366	645	173	330	43	10	285	79	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	23	AAA RAW	2 teams	—	609	527	125	28	13	19	69	217	6	27	8	237	332	448	780	211	358	36	11	341	79	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	24	AAA MLE	3 teams	—	367	335	54	8	4	4	24	156	5	9	7	161	228	245	473	84	284	43	7	213	30	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	24	AAA RAW	3 teams	—	367	324	68	11	5	6	35	121	5	9	7	210	297	330	627	120	313	33	10	284	30	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	25	AAA MLE	Reno Aces	—	271	248	33	5	2	3	19	138	4	5	6	133	207	206	412	73	280	51	7	196	19	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	25	AAA RAW	Reno Aces	—	271	240	50	8	4	6	27	103	4	5	6	208	299	350	649	142	336	38	10	295	19	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	26	AAA MLE	Sacramento River Cats	—	189	166	29	5	0	2	19	63	0	6	1	175	259	241	500	66	260	33	10	235	45	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	26	AAA RAW	Sacramento River Cats	—	189	159	35	7	0	3	26	51	0	6	1	220	330	321	650	101	296	27	14	296	45	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	20	A MLE	2 teams	—	143	128	31	4	2	5	9	49	5	11	1	242	317	422	739	180	333	34	6	316	100	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	21	A+ MLE	2 teams	—	581	514	128	27	11	10	53	169	9	30	11	249	331	403	734	154	340	29	9	317	101	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	22	AA MLE	2 teams	—	512	459	103	19	4	17	46	181	2	21	7	224	298	394	693	170	322	35	9	301	90	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	23	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	609	540	104	22	10	17	58	262	6	27	8	193	279	365	644	172	324	43	10	285	79	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	24	AAA MLE	3 teams	—	367	335	54	8	4	4	24	156	5	9	7	161	228	245	473	84	277	43	7	213	30	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	25	AAA MLE	Reno Aces	—	271	246	33	5	2	3	19	138	4	5	6	134	207	207	414	73	286	51	7	196	19	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	26	AAA MLE	Sacramento River Cats	—	189	168	29	5	0	2	19	63	0	6	1	173	259	238	498	65	251	33	10	235	45	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career Totals
▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected)
Career	—	A+C		—	142	120	21	6	1	4	22	59	0	0	3	175	303	342	644	167	298	42	15	296	72	-2	-1	+1	+2	+3	0.3
/ 162G	—	A+C		—	650	549	96	27	5	18	101	270	0	0	14	175	303	341	644	166	299	42	16	296	72	-10	-5	+5	+10	+14	1.4
Career	—	MLE		—	2672	2385	482	90	33	58	228	1018	31	109	41	202	280	340	621	138	320	38	9	274	72	-2	-1	+1	+2	+3	0.3
/ 162G	—	MLE		—	650	580	117	22	8	14	55	248	8	27	10	202	280	340	620	138	320	38	8	274	72	-10	-5	+5	+10	+14	1.4

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2015 AAASacramento River Cats · 189 PAwOBA .292 → .235 (−57)K% 27.0% → 33.2%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	26.98%	÷1.047	×1.290	—	—	33.25%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	13.23%	÷0.960	×0.710	—	×1.003	9.82%
HBP% /PA	0.00%	—	×0.980	—	×1.003	0.00%
Singles /BIP	23.15%	÷1.003	×0.900	×0.973	×1.003	20.28%
Doubles /BIP	6.48%	÷1.024	×0.810	×0.973	×1.003	5.00%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷0.925	×0.810	×0.973	×1.003	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	2.78%	÷0.982	×0.780	—	×1.003	2.21%

Factors used: league row PCL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 96, 1B 101, 2B 105, 3B 85, K 109, BB 92 — applied at half strength. Age: age 27 vs a level average of 27.2 → +0.3% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.973.

Result: wOBA .292 → .235; ISO .101 → .079; BABIP .296 → .251. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2014 AAAReno Aces · 271 PAwOBA .288 → .196 (−91)K% 38.0% → 50.8%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	38.01%	÷0.965	×1.290	—	—	50.81%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	9.96%	÷1.049	×0.710	—	×1.018	6.87%
HBP% /PA	1.48%	—	×0.980	—	×1.018	1.47%
Singles /BIP	23.36%	÷1.047	×0.900	×1.022	×1.018	20.89%
Doubles /BIP	5.84%	÷1.047	×0.810	×1.022	×1.018	4.70%
Triples /BIP	2.92%	÷1.150	×0.810	×1.022	×1.018	2.14%
Home runs /BIP	4.38%	÷1.116	×0.780	—	×1.018	3.11%

Factors used: league row PCL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 123, 1B 109, 2B 109, 3B 130, K 93, BB 110 — applied at half strength. Age: age 26 vs a level average of 27.2 → +1.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.022.

Result: wOBA .288 → .196; ISO .142 → .085; BABIP .336 → .286. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2013 AAAIowa Cubs · 242 PAwOBA .292 → .220 (−71)K% 31.8% → 40.9%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	31.82%	÷1.004	×1.290	—	—	40.90%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	8.68%	÷1.000	×0.710	—	×1.033	6.36%
HBP% /PA	1.24%	—	×0.980	—	×1.033	1.25%
Singles /BIP	23.19%	÷1.009	×0.900	×0.978	×1.033	20.90%
Doubles /BIP	5.07%	÷1.050	×0.810	×0.978	×1.033	3.95%
Triples /BIP	2.17%	÷1.012	×0.810	×0.978	×1.033	1.76%
Home runs /BIP	4.35%	÷1.130	×0.780	—	×1.033	3.10%

Factors used: league row PCL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 126, 1B 102, 2B 110, 3B 102, K 101, BB 100 — applied at half strength. Age: age 25 vs a level average of 27.2 → +3.3% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.2 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.978.

Result: wOBA .292 → .220; ISO .144 → .097; BABIP .316 → .272. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2013 AATennessee Smokies · 110 PAwOBA .272 → .219 (−54)K% 33.6% → 42.4%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	33.64%	÷0.968	×1.220	—	—	42.38%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	11.82%	÷1.060	×0.680	—	×0.998	7.57%
HBP% /PA	1.82%	—	×0.840	—	×0.998	1.52%
Singles /BIP	22.41%	÷0.990	×0.920	×1.019	×0.998	21.18%
Doubles /BIP	6.90%	÷0.970	×0.910	×1.019	×0.998	6.58%
Triples /BIP	3.45%	÷0.935	×0.880	×1.019	×0.998	3.30%
Home runs /BIP	0.00%	÷0.920	×0.800	—	×0.998	0.00%

Factors used: league row SL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 84, 1B 98, 2B 94, 3B 87, K 94, BB 112 — applied at half strength. Age: age 25 vs a level average of 24.8 → −0.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.019.

Result: wOBA .272 → .219; ISO .084 → .074; BABIP .328 → .311. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2013 ROKAZL Cubs · 15 PAwOBA .105 → .055 (−50)K% 46.7% → 67.2%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	46.67%	÷1.000	×1.440	—	—	67.20%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	6.67%	÷1.000	×0.620	—	×0.945	3.91%
HBP% /PA	0.00%	—	×0.720	—	×0.945	0.00%
Singles /BIP	14.29%	÷1.000	×0.820	—	×0.945	11.07%
Doubles /BIP	0.00%	÷1.000	×0.720	—	×0.945	0.00%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.000	×0.720	—	×0.945	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	0.00%	÷1.000	×0.780	—	×0.945	0.00%

Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 25 vs a level average of 19.5 → −5.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (5.5 yr older than average).

Result: wOBA .105 → .055; ISO .000 → .000; BABIP .143 → .111. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2012 AAAIowa Cubs · 467 PAwOBA .349 → .282 (−67)K% 33.8% → 43.5%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	33.83%	÷1.004	×1.290	—	—	43.48%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	9.85%	÷0.938	×0.710	—	×1.048	7.81%
HBP% /PA	1.28%	—	×0.980	—	×1.048	1.32%
Singles /BIP	22.09%	÷1.028	×0.900	×1.011	×1.048	20.48%
Doubles /BIP	8.84%	÷1.049	×0.810	×1.011	×1.048	7.22%
Triples /BIP	4.82%	÷0.953	×0.810	×1.011	×1.048	4.34%
Home runs /BIP	6.02%	÷0.863	×0.780	—	×1.048	5.71%

Factors used: league row PCL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 73, 1B 106, 2B 110, 3B 91, K 101, BB 88 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 27.2 → +4.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (3.2 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.011.

Result: wOBA .349 → .282; ISO .224 → .180; BABIP .372 → .332. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2011 AATennessee Smokies · 297 PAwOBA .354 → .291 (−63)K% 24.9% → 32.0%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	24.92%	÷0.951	×1.220	—	—	31.97%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	14.81%	÷1.090	×0.680	—	×1.027	9.50%
HBP% /PA	0.67%	—	×0.840	—	×1.027	0.58%
Singles /BIP	23.26%	÷1.029	×0.920	×0.992	×1.027	21.18%
Doubles /BIP	5.81%	÷1.001	×0.910	×0.992	×1.027	5.39%
Triples /BIP	1.74%	÷1.150	×0.880	×0.992	×1.027	1.36%
Home runs /BIP	5.81%	÷0.937	×0.800	—	×1.027	5.10%

Factors used: league row SL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 87, 1B 106, 2B 100, 3B 130, K 90, BB 118 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 24.8 → +2.7% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.992.

Result: wOBA .354 → .291; ISO .187 → .164; BABIP .323 → .291. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2011 AAAIowa Cubs · 215 PAwOBA .393 → .316 (−77)K% 29.8% → 39.8%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	29.77%	÷0.965	×1.290	—	—	39.78%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	11.63%	÷1.043	×0.710	—	×1.050	8.31%
HBP% /PA	0.00%	—	×0.980	—	×1.050	0.00%
Singles /BIP	24.79%	÷0.980	×0.900	×0.999	×1.050	23.89%
Doubles /BIP	10.74%	÷1.017	×0.810	×0.999	×1.050	8.98%
Triples /BIP	1.65%	÷1.086	×0.810	×0.999	×1.050	1.29%
Home runs /BIP	8.26%	÷0.934	×0.780	—	×1.050	7.25%

Factors used: league row PCL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 87, 1B 96, 2B 103, 3B 117, K 93, BB 109 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 27.2 → +5.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (4.2 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.999.

Result: wOBA .393 → .316; ISO .254 → .201; BABIP .402 → .365. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).