Wade Gaynor

Pos3B

B/TR/R

Born1988-04-19

Age (2027)39

No MLB projection yet. Career stats below are historical.

Overview

AALAST SEASON 2015

Year	Age	Lvl / Team	PA	AVG/OBP/SLG	HR	SB	wRC+	WAR	MLE AVG/OBP/SLG
2013	25	AADET	528	.226/.293/.375	12	12	46	—	.188/.239/.303
2014	26	AAA/AADET	421	.236/.299/.436	13	12	57	—	.194/.241/.355
2015	27	AAA/AADET	445	.192/.247/.331	11	12	13	—	.152/.188/.246

Contract

No contract data on file.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.

show model inputsbasis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral

Methodology▸ how these numbers are built

All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.

Year	Age	Lvl	Team	MLB%	PA	AB	H	2B	3B	HR	BB	SO	HBP	SB	CS	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	BABIP	K%	BB%	wOBA	wRC+	BAT	RUN	FLD	POS	REP	WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments)
2010	22	A	West Michigan Whitecaps	—	574	514	147	39	4	10	46	111	10	13	5	286	356	436	792	150	345	19	8	352	64	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	23	A+	Lakeland Flying Tigers	—	544	488	104	28	3	9	38	137	14	2	2	213	289	338	627	125	275	25	7	284	30	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	24	AA	Erie SeaWolves	—	41	35	8	1	0	2	6	8	0	1	0	229	341	429	770	200	240	20	15	345	61	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	24	A+	Lakeland Flying Tigers	—	430	368	93	18	5	13	49	88	9	9	3	253	354	435	789	182	296	20	11	350	65	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	25	AA	Erie SeaWolves	—	528	477	108	31	2	12	37	153	8	12	3	226	293	375	668	149	303	29	7	297	46	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	26	AAA	Toledo Mud Hens	—	330	299	66	21	2	7	23	100	2	12	1	221	281	375	655	154	303	30	7	287	42	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	26	AA	Erie SeaWolves	—	91	82	24	10	1	6	9	30	0	0	0	293	363	659	1.021	366	391	33	10	435	112	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	27	AAA	Toledo Mud Hens	—	52	48	9	4	1	0	3	10	0	2	1	188	235	312	548	125	231	19	6	240	11	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	27	AA	Erie SeaWolves	—	393	363	70	14	2	11	27	101	0	10	4	193	249	333	582	140	233	26	7	259	13	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents)
2010	22	A MLE	West Michigan Whitecaps	—	574	526	114	27	3	8	34	156	10	13	5	217	277	325	602	108	285	27	6	263	64	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	23	A+ MLE	Lakeland Flying Tigers	—	544	500	80	23	2	7	26	206	14	2	2	160	222	256	478	96	244	38	5	213	30	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	24	AA MLE	Erie SeaWolves	—	41	37	7	1	0	1	4	10	0	1	0	189	268	297	566	108	223	24	10	259	61	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	24	A+ MLE	Lakeland Flying Tigers	—	430	380	72	16	3	9	37	125	9	9	3	189	277	318	595	129	247	29	9	265	65	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	25	AA MLE	Erie SeaWolves	—	528	489	92	25	2	9	25	186	8	12	3	188	239	303	542	115	272	35	5	236	46	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	26	AAA MLE	Toledo Mud Hens	—	330	306	57	16	2	7	16	118	2	12	1	186	231	320	552	134	259	36	5	231	42	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	26	AA MLE	Erie SeaWolves	—	91	85	19	8	1	4	6	36	0	0	0	224	275	482	757	259	344	40	7	333	112	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	27	AAA MLE	Toledo Mud Hens	—	52	49	8	3	1	0	2	12	0	2	1	163	196	265	461	102	187	23	4	184	11	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	27	AA MLE	Erie SeaWolves	—	393	373	56	10	2	7	17	129	0	10	4	150	187	244	431	94	198	33	4	187	13	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	22	A MLE	West Michigan Whitecaps	—	574	526	114	27	3	8	34	156	10	13	5	217	277	325	602	108	290	27	6	263	64	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	22	A RAW	West Michigan Whitecaps	—	574	514	147	39	4	10	46	111	10	13	5	286	356	436	792	150	345	19	8	352	64	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	23	A+ MLE	Lakeland Flying Tigers	—	544	500	80	23	2	7	26	206	14	2	2	160	222	256	478	96	251	38	5	213	30	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	23	A+ RAW	Lakeland Flying Tigers	—	544	488	104	28	3	9	38	137	14	2	2	213	289	338	627	125	275	25	7	284	30	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	24	A+ MLE	2 teams	—	471	417	79	16	3	11	41	135	9	10	3	189	276	321	598	132	248	29	9	264	65	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	24	A+ RAW	2 teams	—	471	403	101	19	5	15	55	96	9	10	3	251	353	434	788	184	292	20	12	350	65	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	25	AA MLE	Erie SeaWolves	—	528	489	92	25	2	9	25	186	8	12	3	188	239	303	542	115	278	35	5	236	46	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	25	AA RAW	Erie SeaWolves	—	528	477	108	31	2	12	37	153	8	12	3	226	293	375	668	149	303	29	7	297	46	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	26	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	421	391	76	24	3	11	22	154	2	12	1	194	241	355	596	161	284	37	5	253	57	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	26	AAA RAW	2 teams	—	421	381	90	31	3	13	32	130	2	12	1	236	299	436	734	199	320	31	8	319	57	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	27	AA MLE	2 teams	—	445	423	62	13	2	7	18	141	0	12	5	147	181	236	418	90	198	32	4	187	12	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	27	AA RAW	2 teams	—	445	411	79	18	3	11	30	111	0	12	5	192	247	331	578	139	233	25	7	257	12	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	22	A MLE	West Michigan Whitecaps	—	574	525	114	27	3	8	34	156	10	13	5	217	277	326	603	109	285	27	6	263	64	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	23	A+ MLE	Lakeland Flying Tigers	—	544	499	80	23	2	7	26	206	14	2	2	160	222	257	479	96	244	38	5	213	30	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	24	A+ MLE	2 teams	—	471	418	79	16	3	11	41	135	9	10	3	189	276	321	597	132	245	29	9	264	65	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	25	AA MLE	Erie SeaWolves	—	528	490	92	25	2	9	25	186	8	12	3	188	239	302	542	114	272	35	5	236	46	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	26	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	421	394	76	24	3	11	22	154	2	12	1	193	241	353	594	160	277	37	5	253	57	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	27	AA MLE	2 teams	—	445	424	62	13	2	7	18	141	0	12	5	146	181	236	417	90	197	32	4	187	12	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career Totals
Career	—	MLE		—	2983	2746	503	128	15	53	166	978	43	61	19	183	241	299	540	115	259	33	6	237	46	-191	+5	+0	+11	+65	-11.3
/ 162G	—	MLE		—	650	598	110	28	3	12	36	213	9	13	4	184	241	301	542	117	259	33	6	237	46	-42	+1	+0	+2	+14	-2.5

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2015 AAErie SeaWolves · 393 PAwOBA .252 → .187 (−66)K% 25.7% → 32.7%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	25.70%	÷0.959	×1.220	—	—	32.68%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	6.62%	÷1.077	×0.700	—	×0.978	4.20%
HBP% /PA	0.00%	—	×0.850	—	×0.978	0.00%
Singles /BIP	16.41%	÷0.995	×0.970	×0.950	×0.978	14.86%
Doubles /BIP	5.34%	÷1.095	×0.860	×0.950	×0.978	3.90%
Triples /BIP	0.76%	÷1.074	×0.950	×0.950	×0.978	0.63%
Home runs /BIP	4.20%	÷1.100	×0.780	—	×0.978	2.91%

Factors used: league row EL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 120, 1B 99, 2B 119, 3B 115, K 92, BB 115 — applied at half strength. Age: age 27 vs a level average of 24.8 → −2.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.

Result: wOBA .252 → .187; ISO .140 → .095; BABIP .233 → .198. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2015 AAAToledo Mud Hens · 52 PAwOBA .238 → .184 (−54)K% 19.2% → 23.1%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	19.23%	÷1.000	×1.200	—	—	23.08%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	5.77%	÷1.085	×0.690	—	×1.003	3.68%
HBP% /PA	0.00%	—	×0.940	—	×1.003	0.00%
Singles /BIP	10.53%	÷0.988	×0.930	×0.950	×1.003	9.44%
Doubles /BIP	10.53%	÷1.083	×0.830	×0.950	×1.003	7.69%
Triples /BIP	2.63%	÷1.150	×0.970	×0.950	×1.003	2.12%
Home runs /BIP	0.00%	÷0.911	×0.840	—	×1.003	0.00%

Factors used: league row IL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 82, 1B 98, 2B 117, 3B 130, K 100, BB 117 — applied at half strength. Age: age 27 vs a level average of 27.2 → +0.3% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.

Result: wOBA .238 → .184; ISO .125 → .095; BABIP .231 → .187. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2014 AAAToledo Mud Hens · 330 PAwOBA .282 → .231 (−51)K% 30.3% → 35.7%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	30.30%	÷1.017	×1.200	—	—	35.75%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	6.97%	÷1.053	×0.690	—	×1.018	4.65%
HBP% /PA	0.61%	—	×0.940	—	×1.018	0.58%
Singles /BIP	18.09%	÷0.999	×0.930	×0.950	×1.018	16.29%
Doubles /BIP	10.55%	÷1.031	×0.830	×0.950	×1.018	8.22%
Triples /BIP	1.01%	÷1.049	×0.970	×0.950	×1.018	0.90%
Home runs /BIP	3.52%	÷0.899	×0.840	—	×1.018	3.35%

Factors used: league row IL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 80, 1B 100, 2B 106, 3B 110, K 103, BB 111 — applied at half strength. Age: age 26 vs a level average of 27.2 → +1.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.

Result: wOBA .282 → .231; ISO .154 → .131; BABIP .303 → .259. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2014 AAErie SeaWolves · 91 PAwOBA .422 → .333 (−89)K% 33.0% → 39.4%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	32.97%	÷1.020	×1.220	—	—	39.45%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	9.89%	÷0.981	×0.700	—	×0.988	6.97%
HBP% /PA	0.00%	—	×0.850	—	×0.988	0.00%
Singles /BIP	13.46%	÷1.042	×0.970	—	×0.988	12.39%
Doubles /BIP	19.23%	÷0.945	×0.860	—	×0.988	17.29%
Triples /BIP	1.92%	÷1.150	×0.950	—	×0.988	1.57%
Home runs /BIP	11.54%	÷0.975	×0.780	—	×0.988	9.12%

Factors used: league row EL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 95, 1B 108, 2B 89, 3B 130, K 104, BB 96 — applied at half strength. Age: age 26 vs a level average of 24.8 → −1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr older than average).

Result: wOBA .422 → .333; ISO .366 → .284; BABIP .391 → .344. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2013 AAErie SeaWolves · 528 PAwOBA .292 → .236 (−55)K% 29.0% → 35.2%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	28.98%	÷1.004	×1.220	—	—	35.22%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	7.01%	÷1.034	×0.700	—	×0.998	4.74%
HBP% /PA	1.52%	—	×0.850	—	×0.998	1.29%
Singles /BIP	19.44%	÷0.998	×0.970	×0.958	×0.998	18.08%
Doubles /BIP	9.57%	÷0.965	×0.860	×0.958	×0.998	8.16%
Triples /BIP	0.62%	÷0.902	×0.950	×0.958	×0.998	0.62%
Home runs /BIP	3.70%	÷1.020	×0.780	—	×0.998	2.83%

Factors used: league row EL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 104, 1B 100, 2B 93, 3B 80, K 101, BB 107 — applied at half strength. Age: age 25 vs a level average of 24.8 → −0.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.958.

Result: wOBA .292 → .236; ISO .149 → .116; BABIP .303 → .272. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2012 A+Lakeland Flying Tigers · 430 PAwOBA .344 → .265 (−79)K% 20.5% → 29.0%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	20.47%	÷1.004	×1.420	—	—	28.95%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	11.40%	÷0.982	×0.750	—	×0.988	8.60%
HBP% /PA	2.09%	—	×0.930	—	×0.988	1.92%
Singles /BIP	20.36%	÷1.040	×0.920	×0.950	×0.988	16.90%
Doubles /BIP	6.43%	÷0.970	×0.960	×0.950	×0.988	5.97%
Triples /BIP	1.79%	÷1.150	×0.810	×0.950	×0.988	1.18%
Home runs /BIP	4.64%	÷1.122	×0.880	—	×0.988	3.60%

Factors used: league row FSL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 124, 1B 108, 2B 94, 3B 130, K 101, BB 96 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 22.8 → −1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.

Result: wOBA .344 → .265; ISO .182 → .135; BABIP .296 → .247. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2012 AAErie SeaWolves · 41 PAwOBA .336 → .259 (−78)K% 19.5% → 25.1%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	19.51%	÷0.948	×1.220	—	—	25.11%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	14.63%	÷1.013	×0.700	—	×1.012	10.23%
HBP% /PA	0.00%	—	×0.850	—	×1.012	0.00%
Singles /BIP	18.52%	÷1.003	×0.970	—	×1.012	18.13%
Doubles /BIP	3.70%	÷1.042	×0.860	—	×1.012	3.09%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷0.900	×0.950	—	×1.012	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	7.41%	÷1.260	×0.780	—	×1.012	4.64%

Factors used: league row EL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 152, 1B 101, 2B 108, 3B 80, K 90, BB 103 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 24.8 → +1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr younger than average).

Result: wOBA .336 → .259; ISO .200 → .129; BABIP .240 → .223. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2011 A+Lakeland Flying Tigers · 544 PAwOBA .277 → .213 (−65)K% 25.2% → 37.8%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	25.18%	÷0.947	×1.420	—	—	37.75%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	6.80%	÷1.062	×0.750	—	×0.998	4.79%
HBP% /PA	2.57%	—	×0.930	—	×0.998	2.39%
Singles /BIP	18.23%	÷0.999	×0.920	×0.952	×0.998	15.96%
Doubles /BIP	7.98%	÷0.955	×0.960	×0.952	×0.998	7.62%
Triples /BIP	0.85%	÷1.150	×0.810	×0.952	×0.998	0.57%
Home runs /BIP	2.56%	÷0.962	×0.880	—	×0.998	2.34%

Factors used: league row FSL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 92, 1B 100, 2B 91, 3B 130, K 89, BB 112 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.8 → −0.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.952.

Result: wOBA .277 → .213; ISO .125 → .097; BABIP .275 → .244. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).