Noel Cuevas

PosCF

B/TR/R

Born1991-10-02

Age (2027)35

No MLB projection yet. Career stats below are historical.

Overview

INTLLAST SEASON 2021

Year	Age	Lvl / Team	PA	AVG/OBP/SLG	HR	SB	wRC+	WAR	MLE AVG/OBP/SLG
2019	27	AAA/INTL2 orgs	479	.293/.363/.422	6	7	91	—	.208/.273/.307
2020	28	INTLCriollos de C…	50	.190/.320/.357	1	1	96	—
2021	29	INTLIndios de May…	26	.208/.269/.208	0	0	40	—

Contract

No contract data on file.

Skills · percentileStatcast 2018-2019

Speed79

Barrel%10

xwOBA10

Avg EV10

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.

show model inputsbasis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral

Methodology▸ how these numbers are built

All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.

Year	Age	Lvl	Team	MLB%	PA	AB	H	2B	3B	HR	BB	SO	HBP	SB	CS	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	BABIP	K%	BB%	wOBA	wRC+	BAT	RUN	FLD	POS	REP	WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments)
2011	19	A+	Rancho Cucamonga Quakes	—	95	91	20	4	1	0	4	17	0	2	2	220	253	286	538	66	270	18	4	243	26	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	19	ROK	Ogden Raptors	—	267	246	70	16	5	8	14	55	3	13	6	285	331	488	819	203	332	21	5	353	57	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	20	A	Great Lakes Loons	—	164	150	34	5	2	2	8	25	4	7	1	227	284	327	611	100	258	15	5	274	45	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	20	ROK	Ogden Raptors	—	163	138	43	9	2	0	16	15	5	28	6	312	403	406	808	94	339	9	10	359	76	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	21	A+	Rancho Cucamonga Quakes	—	536	476	135	25	10	12	37	107	7	38	15	284	344	454	798	170	340	20	7	343	84	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	21	INTL	Indios de Mayaguez	—	32	30	6	2	0	0	1	10	0	0	2	200	226	267	492	67	300	31	3	215	32	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	22	AA	Chattanooga Lookouts	—	471	425	98	12	9	7	31	92	2	6	3	231	286	351	637	120	278	20	7	278	47	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	22	INTL	Indios de Mayaguez	—	73	65	15	4	1	0	8	14	0	2	5	231	315	323	638	92	294	19	11	293	84	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	23	AA	New Britain Rock Cats	—	444	406	107	21	2	4	17	86	8	31	12	264	306	355	660	91	324	19	4	290	60	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	24	AAA	Albuquerque Isotopes	—	151	137	32	4	3	1	8	28	4	4	2	234	295	328	624	95	284	19	5	280	40	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	24	AA	Hartford Yard Goats	—	209	194	66	14	3	2	6	27	1	4	4	340	363	474	837	134	381	13	3	356	113	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	24	INTL	Tiburones de Aguadilla	—	114	102	19	3	0	0	9	22	1	2	3	186	259	216	475	29	237	19	8	222	37	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	25	AAA	Albuquerque Isotopes	—	528	493	154	17	12	15	25	102	7	16	3	312	354	487	841	174	368	19	5	368	78	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	25	INTL	Caneros de los Mochis	—	183	173	42	5	2	4	6	34	4	3	2	243	284	364	648	121	281	19	3	290	83	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	26	MLB	Colorado Rockies	—	153	146	34	4	1	2	6	24	1	1	0	233	268	315	583	82	267	16	4	263	53	-9	+0	-2	-4	+3	-1.2
2018	26	AAA	Albuquerque Isotopes	—	177	160	53	10	4	5	16	23	0	3	5	331	392	537	930	206	361	13	9	405	103	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	26	INTL	Indios de Mayaguez	—	83	76	12	2	0	0	3	7	1	0	1	158	200	184	384	26	167	8	4	174	4	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	27	AAA	Albuquerque Isotopes	—	233	205	57	12	3	5	24	46	2	3	3	278	359	439	798	161	335	20	10	353	61	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	27	INTL	Atenienses de Manati	—	246	222	68	19	0	1	15	38	6	4	1	306	366	405	772	99	366	15	6	345	119	—	—	—	—	—	—
2020	28	INTL	Criollos de Caguas	—	50	42	8	2	1	1	6	9	2	1	0	190	320	357	677	167	219	18	12	311	96	—	—	—	—	—	—
2021	29	INTL	Indios de Mayaguez	—	26	24	5	0	0	0	2	6	0	0	0	208	269	208	478		278	23	8	228	40	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career Totals (raw MLB only — historical actual)
MLB Career	—			—	153	146	34	4	1	2	6	24	1	1	0	233	268	315	583	82	267	16	4	263	64	-7	+0	-2	-4	+3	-1.0
▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents)
2011	19	A+ MLE	Rancho Cucamonga Quakes	—	95	92	18	3	1	0	3	23	0	2	2	196	221	250	471	54	261	24	3	207	26	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	19	ROK MLE	Ogden Raptors	—	267	251	53	11	3	6	9	79	3	13	6	211	247	351	598	139	269	30	3	253	57	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	20	A MLE	Great Lakes Loons	—	164	153	32	4	2	2	5	34	4	7	1	209	253	301	554	92	250	21	3	235	45	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	20	ROK MLE	Ogden Raptors	—	163	144	37	7	2	0	10	22	5	28	6	257	327	333	660	76	274	13	6	281	76	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	21	A+ MLE	Rancho Cucamonga Quakes	—	536	486	121	20	8	11	27	141	7	38	15	249	298	391	689	142	309	26	5	292	84	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	22	AA MLE	Chattanooga Lookouts	—	471	436	91	11	7	6	20	115	2	6	3	209	247	307	554	99	261	24	4	237	47	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	23	AA MLE	New Britain Rock Cats	—	444	412	101	18	2	3	12	108	8	31	12	245	280	320	600	75	309	24	3	257	60	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	24	AAA MLE	Albuquerque Isotopes	—	151	140	27	3	2	1	5	38	4	4	2	193	242	264	506	71	258	25	3	228	40	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	24	AA MLE	Hartford Yard Goats	—	209	196	64	12	3	1	4	32	1	4	4	327	343	434	777	107	365	15	2	335	113	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	25	AAA MLE	Albuquerque Isotopes	—	528	502	126	13	8	9	16	138	7	16	3	251	284	363	646	112	324	26	3	283	78	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	26	MLB MLE	Colorado Rockies	—	153	147	33	4	1	2	5	24	1	1	0	224	255	306	561	82	267	16	3	247	53	-9	+0	-2	-4	+3	-1.2
2018	26	AAA MLE	Albuquerque Isotopes	—	177	165	45	9	3	3	11	30	0	3	5	273	318	418	736	145	313	17	6	321	103	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	27	AAA MLE	Albuquerque Isotopes	—	233	212	44	8	2	3	17	62	2	3	3	208	273	307	579	99	273	27	7	259	61	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	19	ROK MLE	2 teams	—	362	343	71	15	4	6	12	103	3	15	8	207	240	327	567	120	273	28	3	241	49	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	19	ROK RAW	2 teams	—	362	337	90	20	6	8	18	72	3	15	8	267	310	433	743	166	314	20	5	324	49	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	20	A MLE	2 teams	—	327	297	68	11	3	2	15	56	9	35	7	229	287	306	593	77	270	17	5	258	61	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	20	A RAW	2 teams	—	327	288	77	14	4	2	24	40	9	35	7	267	343	365	707	97	299	12	7	317	61	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	21	A+ MLE	2 teams	—	568	515	128	21	8	12	29	149	7	38	17	249	298	390	688	142	323	26	5	292	84	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	21	A+ RAW	2 teams	—	568	506	141	27	10	12	38	117	7	38	17	279	338	443	780	164	338	21	7	336	84	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	22	AA MLE	2 teams	—	544	506	105	13	8	6	23	133	2	8	8	208	245	300	545	93	269	24	4	237	47	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	22	AA RAW	2 teams	—	544	490	113	16	10	7	39	106	2	8	8	231	290	347	637	116	280	19	7	280	47	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	23	AA MLE	New Britain Rock Cats	—	444	412	101	18	2	3	12	108	8	31	12	245	280	320	600	75	323	24	3	257	60	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	23	AA RAW	New Britain Rock Cats	—	444	406	107	21	2	4	17	86	8	31	12	264	306	355	660	91	324	19	4	290	60	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	24	AA MLE	3 teams	—	474	444	122	20	7	3	12	92	6	10	9	275	303	372	675	97	337	19	3	290	82	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	24	AA RAW	3 teams	—	474	433	117	21	6	3	23	77	6	10	9	270	316	367	683	97	319	16	5	300	82	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	25	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	711	676	170	17	11	13	21	186	11	19	5	251	285	367	652	115	328	26	3	283	78	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	25	AAA RAW	2 teams	—	711	666	196	22	14	19	31	136	11	19	5	294	336	455	791	161	345	19	4	348	78	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	26	AAA MLE	3 teams	—	413	387	96	15	5	6	20	68	2	4	6	248	289	359	648	111	284	16	5	287	80	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	26	AAA RAW	3 teams	—	413	382	99	16	5	7	25	54	2	4	6	259	308	382	690	123	283	13	6	306	80	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	27	INTL MLE	2 teams	—	479	431	91	17	4	7	35	127	8	7	4	211	283	318	601	107	282	27	7	259	61	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	27	INTL RAW	2 teams	—	479	427	125	31	3	6	39	84	8	7	4	293	363	422	784	129	352	18	8	349	61	—	—	—	—	—	—
2020	28	INTL MLE	Criollos de Caguas	—	50	42	8	2	1	1	6	9	2	1	0	190	320	357	677	167	219	18	12	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
2020	28	INTL RAW	Criollos de Caguas	—	50	42	8	2	1	1	6	9	2	1	0	190	320	357	677	167	219	18	12	311	96	—	—	—	—	—	—
2021	29	INTL MLE	Indios de Mayaguez	—	26	24	5	0	0	0	2	6	0	0	0	208	269	208	478		278	23	8	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
2021	29	INTL RAW	Indios de Mayaguez	—	26	24	5	0	0	0	2	6	0	0	0	208	269	208	478		278	23	8	228	40	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	19	ROK MLE	2 teams	—	362	344	71	15	4	6	12	103	3	15	8	206	240	326	566	119	267	28	3	241	49	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	20	A MLE	2 teams	—	327	300	68	11	3	2	15	56	9	35	7	227	287	303	590	77	262	17	5	258	61	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	21	A+ MLE	2 teams	—	568	527	128	21	8	12	29	149	7	38	17	243	298	381	679	139	309	26	5	292	84	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	22	AA MLE	2 teams	—	544	514	105	13	8	6	23	133	2	8	8	204	245	296	541	91	261	24	4	237	47	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	23	AA MLE	New Britain Rock Cats	—	444	421	101	18	2	3	12	108	8	31	12	240	280	314	594	74	309	24	3	257	60	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	24	AA MLE	3 teams	—	474	453	122	20	7	3	12	92	6	10	9	269	303	364	667	95	320	19	3	290	82	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	25	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	711	673	170	17	11	13	21	186	11	19	5	253	285	368	654	116	324	26	3	283	78	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	26	AAA MLE	3 teams	—	413	388	96	15	5	6	20	68	2	4	6	247	289	358	647	111	292	16	5	287	80	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	27	INTL MLE	2 teams	—	479	433	91	17	4	7	35	127	8	7	4	210	283	316	599	106	273	27	7	259	61	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career Totals
▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected)
Career	—	A+C		—	153	146	34	4	1	2	6	24	1	1	0	233	268	315	583	82	267	16	4	263	65	-7	+0	-2	-4	+3	-1.0
/ 162G	—	A+C		—	650	620	144	17	4	8	25	102	4	4	0	232	266	311	577	79	267	16	4	263	65	-28	+1	-10	-19	+14	-4.3
Career	—	MLE		—	4398	4077	965	149	53	59	187	1037	58	168	76	237	280	343	623	106	301	24	4	264	65	-7	+0	-2	-4	+3	-1.0
/ 162G	—	MLE		—	650	603	143	22	8	9	28	153	9	25	11	237	282	345	627	108	301	24	4	264	65	-28	+1	-10	-19	+14	-4.3

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2019 AAAAlbuquerque Isotopes · 233 PAwOBA .346 → .259 (−87)K% 19.7% → 26.6%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	19.74%	÷0.957	×1.290	—	—	26.62%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	10.30%	÷0.974	×0.710	—	×0.992	7.45%
HBP% /PA	0.86%	—	×0.980	—	×0.992	0.83%
Singles /BIP	23.27%	÷0.974	×0.900	×0.950	×0.992	20.28%
Doubles /BIP	7.55%	÷1.071	×0.810	×0.950	×0.992	5.38%
Triples /BIP	1.89%	÷1.150	×0.810	×0.950	×0.992	1.25%
Home runs /BIP	3.14%	÷1.136	×0.780	—	×0.992	2.14%

Factors used: league row PCL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 127, 1B 95, 2B 114, 3B 130, K 91, BB 95 — applied at half strength. Age: age 28 vs a level average of 27.2 → −0.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.

Result: wOBA .346 → .259; ISO .161 → .106; BABIP .335 → .273. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2018 AAAAlbuquerque Isotopes · 177 PAwOBA .396 → .321 (−75)K% 13.0% → 17.1%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	12.99%	÷0.978	×1.290	—	—	17.15%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	9.04%	÷1.024	×0.710	—	×1.003	6.29%
HBP% /PA	0.00%	—	×0.980	—	×1.003	0.00%
Singles /BIP	24.82%	÷1.034	×0.900	×1.017	×1.003	22.04%
Doubles /BIP	7.30%	÷0.960	×0.810	×1.017	×1.003	6.28%
Triples /BIP	2.92%	÷0.973	×0.810	×1.017	×1.003	2.48%
Home runs /BIP	3.65%	÷1.162	×0.780	—	×1.003	2.46%

Factors used: league row PCL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 132, 1B 107, 2B 92, 3B 95, K 96, BB 105 — applied at half strength. Age: age 27 vs a level average of 27.2 → +0.3% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.017.

Result: wOBA .396 → .321; ISO .206 → .158; BABIP .361 → .313. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2017 AAAAlbuquerque Isotopes · 528 PAwOBA .358 → .283 (−75)K% 19.3% → 26.1%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	19.32%	÷0.956	×1.290	—	—	26.06%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	4.17%	÷0.996	×0.710	—	×1.018	3.02%
HBP% /PA	1.33%	—	×0.980	—	×1.018	1.32%
Singles /BIP	28.13%	÷1.019	×0.900	×1.028	×1.018	26.01%
Doubles /BIP	4.35%	÷1.045	×0.810	×1.028	×1.018	3.53%
Triples /BIP	3.07%	÷1.150	×0.810	×1.028	×1.018	2.26%
Home runs /BIP	3.84%	÷1.202	×0.780	—	×1.018	2.54%

Factors used: league row PCL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 140, 1B 104, 2B 109, 3B 130, K 91, BB 99 — applied at half strength. Age: age 26 vs a level average of 27.2 → +1.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.028.

Result: wOBA .358 → .283; ISO .174 → .117; BABIP .368 → .324. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2016 AAHartford Yard Goats · 209 PAwOBA .350 → .335 (−15)K% 12.9% → 15.4%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	12.92%	÷1.022	×1.220	—	—	15.42%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	2.39%	÷1.007	×0.700	—	×0.998	1.66%
HBP% /PA	0.48%	—	×0.850	—	×0.998	0.41%
Singles /BIP	28.14%	÷0.981	×0.970	×1.004	×0.998	27.89%
Doubles /BIP	8.38%	÷1.021	×0.860	×1.004	×0.998	7.07%
Triples /BIP	1.80%	÷0.900	×0.950	×1.004	×0.998	1.90%
Home runs /BIP	1.20%	÷1.094	×0.780	—	×0.998	0.85%

Factors used: league row EL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 119, 1B 96, 2B 104, 3B 80, K 104, BB 101 — applied at half strength. Age: age 25 vs a level average of 24.8 → −0.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.004.

Result: wOBA .350 → .335; ISO .134 → .119; BABIP .381 → .365. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2016 AAAAlbuquerque Isotopes · 151 PAwOBA .275 → .228 (−47)K% 18.5% → 25.2%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	18.54%	÷0.948	×1.290	—	—	25.22%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	5.30%	÷1.083	×0.710	—	×1.033	3.59%
HBP% /PA	2.65%	—	×0.980	—	×1.033	2.68%
Singles /BIP	22.02%	÷1.032	×0.900	×1.046	×1.033	20.76%
Doubles /BIP	3.67%	÷1.050	×0.810	×1.046	×1.033	3.06%
Triples /BIP	2.75%	÷1.150	×0.810	×1.046	×1.033	2.10%
Home runs /BIP	0.92%	÷1.202	×0.780	—	×1.033	0.61%

Factors used: league row PCL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 140, 1B 106, 2B 110, 3B 130, K 90, BB 117 — applied at half strength. Age: age 25 vs a level average of 27.2 → +3.3% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.2 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.046.

Result: wOBA .275 → .228; ISO .095 → .069; BABIP .284 → .258. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2015 AANew Britain Rock Cats · 444 PAwOBA .282 → .257 (−26)K% 19.4% → 24.3%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	19.37%	÷0.974	×1.220	—	—	24.25%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	3.60%	÷0.935	×0.700	—	×1.012	2.73%
HBP% /PA	1.80%	—	×0.850	—	×1.012	1.55%
Singles /BIP	25.00%	÷1.024	×0.970	×1.020	×1.012	24.45%
Doubles /BIP	6.56%	÷1.016	×0.860	×1.020	×1.012	5.74%
Triples /BIP	0.62%	÷0.900	×0.950	×1.020	×1.012	0.68%
Home runs /BIP	1.25%	÷1.133	×0.780	—	×1.012	0.87%

Factors used: league row EL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 127, 1B 105, 2B 103, 3B 80, K 95, BB 87 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 24.8 → +1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.020.

Result: wOBA .282 → .257; ISO .091 → .076; BABIP .324 → .309. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2014 AAChattanooga Lookouts · 471 PAwOBA .270 → .237 (−34)K% 19.5% → 24.5%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	19.53%	÷0.972	×1.220	—	—	24.53%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	6.37%	÷1.036	×0.680	—	×1.027	4.30%
HBP% /PA	0.42%	—	×0.840	—	×1.027	0.37%
Singles /BIP	21.02%	÷1.014	×0.920	×1.032	×1.027	20.20%
Doubles /BIP	3.60%	÷1.053	×0.910	×1.032	×1.027	3.30%
Triples /BIP	2.70%	÷1.150	×0.880	×1.032	×1.027	2.19%
Home runs /BIP	2.10%	÷1.026	×0.800	—	×1.027	1.68%

Factors used: league row SL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 105, 1B 103, 2B 111, 3B 130, K 94, BB 107 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 24.8 → +2.7% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.032.

Result: wOBA .270 → .237; ISO .120 → .100; BABIP .278 → .261. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2013 A+Rancho Cucamonga Quakes · 536 PAwOBA .337 → .292 (−45)K% 20.0% → 26.3%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	19.96%	÷1.018	×1.340	—	—	26.27%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	6.90%	÷0.971	×0.710	—	×1.012	5.11%
HBP% /PA	1.31%	—	×0.790	—	×1.012	1.04%
Singles /BIP	23.85%	÷0.993	×0.910	×1.029	×1.012	22.74%
Doubles /BIP	6.78%	÷1.038	×0.820	×1.029	×1.012	5.57%
Triples /BIP	2.71%	÷1.027	×0.760	×1.029	×1.012	2.09%
Home runs /BIP	3.25%	÷0.980	×0.920	—	×1.012	3.09%

Factors used: league row CAL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 96, 1B 99, 2B 108, 3B 105, K 104, BB 94 — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 22.8 → +1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.029.

Result: wOBA .337 → .292; ISO .170 → .145; BABIP .340 → .309. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

Not traceable per stint: some stints lack the counting stats the component translation needs. Level-wide factors that apply instead — .