Edgar Corcino

PosOF

B/TR/R

Born1992-06-07

Age (2027)35

No MLB projection yet. Career stats below are historical.

Overview

INTLLAST SEASON 2020

Year	Age	Lvl / Team	PA	AVG/OBP/SLG	HR	SB	wRC+	WAR	MLE AVG/OBP/SLG
2018	26	AAA/AA2 orgs	330	.264/.329/.422	7	3	70	—	.221/.265/.359
2019	27	A+/INTL2 orgs	264	.308/.379/.547	10	2	79	—	.229/.289/.401
2020	28	INTLAtenienses de…	30	.296/.367/.407	1	0	123	—

Contract

No contract data on file.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.

show model inputsbasis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral

Methodology▸ how these numbers are built

All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.

Year	Age	Lvl	Team	MLB%	PA	AB	H	2B	3B	HR	BB	SO	HBP	SB	CS	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	BABIP	K%	BB%	wOBA	wRC+	BAT	RUN	FLD	POS	REP	WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments)
2009	17	ROK	GCL Tigers	—	30	25	4	1	0	1	4	10	0	0	0	160	276	320	596	160	214	33	13	266	5	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	18	ROK	GCL Tigers	—	96	87	19	3	0	0	8	27	0	2	1	218	284	253	537	34	317	28	8	249	5	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	19	ROK	GCL Tigers	—	200	174	35	9	0	5	20	51	4	3	2	201	298	339	637	138	252	26	10	289	15	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	20	A	West Michigan Whitecaps	—	81	73	16	1	1	2	6	20	0	0	1	219	278	342	621	123	275	25	7	273	39	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	23	A	Cedar Rapids Kernels	—	373	330	90	16	3	4	35	61	1	9	3	273	344	376	720	103	321	16	9	320	59	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	24	AA	Chattanooga Lookouts	—	198	183	52	7	6	2	13	35	1	1	1	284	335	421	756	137	340	18	7	334	75	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	24	A+	Fort Myers Miracle	—	297	267	71	13	5	6	29	51	1	6	1	266	340	419	760	154	310	17	10	339	74	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	25	AAA	Rochester Red Wings	—	59	58	13	1	1	0	1	14	0	0	0	224	237	276	513	52	295	24	2	230	17	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	25	AA	Chattanooga Lookouts	—	447	401	121	19	1	6	38	66	2	4	3	302	365	399	764	97	344	15	9	341	78	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	26	AAA	Rochester Red Wings	—	93	88	23	4	1	2	4	21	0	0	0	261	293	398	691	136	318	23	4	303	59	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	26	AA	Chattanooga Lookouts	—	237	208	55	14	3	5	22	37	3	3	1	264	343	433	776	168	294	16	9	340	75	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	27	A+	Salem Red Sox	—	249	219	69	18	4	9	20	56	7	2	4	315	390	557	947	242	382	22	8	409	80	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	27	INTL	Atenienses de Manati	—	15	15	3	0	0	1	0	8	0	0	0	200	200	400	600	200	333	53	0	259	62	—	—	—	—	—	—
2020	28	INTL	Atenienses de Manati	—	30	27	8	0	0	1	3	7	0	0	1	296	367	407	774	111	368	23	10	350	123	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents)
2009	17	ROK MLE	GCL Tigers	—	30	26	3	1	0	1	3	14	0	0	0	115	207	269	476	154	173	47	10	176	5	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	18	ROK MLE	GCL Tigers	—	96	90	14	2	0	0	5	39	0	2	1	156	200	178	378	22	273	41	5	175	5	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	19	ROK MLE	GCL Tigers	—	200	182	25	6	0	4	12	73	4	3	2	137	207	236	443	99	189	36	6	191	15	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	20	A MLE	West Michigan Whitecaps	—	81	75	15	1	1	2	4	28	0	0	1	200	241	320	561	120	264	35	5	226	39	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	23	A MLE	Cedar Rapids Kernels	—	373	343	78	13	2	3	22	87	1	9	3	227	276	303	579	76	284	23	6	255	59	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	24	AA MLE	Chattanooga Lookouts	—	198	187	47	6	6	1	9	45	1	1	1	251	289	364	653	112	314	23	5	279	75	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	24	A+ MLE	Fort Myers Miracle	—	297	275	61	11	4	6	21	74	1	6	1	222	279	356	636	135	285	25	7	278	74	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	25	AAA MLE	Rochester Red Wings	—	59	58	12	1	1	0	1	17	0	0	0	207	220	259	479	52	276	29	2	194	17	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	25	AA MLE	Chattanooga Lookouts	—	447	413	107	16	1	5	26	80	2	4	3	259	306	339	645	80	299	18	6	284	78	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	26	AAA MLE	Rochester Red Wings	—	93	90	20	3	1	2	2	26	0	0	0	222	239	344	584	122	289	28	2	256	59	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	26	AA MLE	Chattanooga Lookouts	—	237	217	48	13	3	4	13	47	3	3	1	221	275	364	639	143	254	20	5	279	75	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	27	A+ MLE	Salem Red Sox	—	249	227	52	12	3	7	12	83	7	2	4	229	289	401	689	172	302	33	5	286	80	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	17	ROK MLE	GCL Tigers	—	30	26	3	1	0	1	3	14	0	0	0	115	207	269	476	154	182	47	10	176	5	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	17	ROK RAW	GCL Tigers	—	30	25	4	1	0	1	4	10	0	0	0	160	276	320	596	160	214	33	13	266	5	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	18	ROK MLE	GCL Tigers	—	96	90	14	2	0	0	5	39	0	2	1	156	200	178	378	22	275	41	5	175	5	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	18	ROK RAW	GCL Tigers	—	96	87	19	3	0	0	8	27	0	2	1	218	284	253	537	34	317	28	8	249	5	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	19	ROK MLE	GCL Tigers	—	200	182	25	6	0	4	12	73	4	3	2	137	207	236	443	99	198	36	6	191	15	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	19	ROK RAW	GCL Tigers	—	200	174	35	9	0	5	20	51	4	3	2	201	298	339	637	138	252	26	10	289	15	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	20	A MLE	West Michigan Whitecaps	—	81	75	15	1	1	2	4	28	0	0	1	200	241	320	561	120	289	35	5	226	39	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	20	A RAW	West Michigan Whitecaps	—	81	73	16	1	1	2	6	20	0	0	1	219	278	342	621	123	275	25	7	273	39	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	23	A MLE	Cedar Rapids Kernels	—	373	343	78	13	2	3	22	87	1	9	3	227	276	303	579	76	293	23	6	255	59	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	23	A RAW	Cedar Rapids Kernels	—	373	330	90	16	3	4	35	61	1	9	3	273	344	376	720	103	321	16	9	320	59	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	24	A+ MLE	2 teams	—	495	462	108	17	10	7	30	118	2	7	2	234	283	359	643	126	299	24	6	278	75	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	24	A+ RAW	2 teams	—	495	450	123	20	11	8	42	86	2	7	2	273	338	420	758	147	322	17	8	337	75	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	25	AA MLE	2 teams	—	506	471	118	16	2	5	27	97	2	4	3	251	294	325	619	74	302	19	5	274	71	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	25	AA RAW	2 teams	—	506	459	134	20	2	6	39	80	2	4	3	292	350	383	733	92	339	16	8	328	71	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	26	AA MLE	2 teams	—	330	307	69	16	4	6	15	73	3	3	1	225	268	362	629	137	270	22	5	273	71	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	26	AA RAW	2 teams	—	330	296	78	18	4	7	26	58	3	3	1	264	329	422	752	159	301	18	8	330	71	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	27	A+ MLE	2 teams	—	264	241	53	12	3	7	13	88	7	2	4	220	280	382	661	162	309	33	5	286	80	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	27	A+ RAW	2 teams	—	264	234	72	18	4	10	20	64	7	2	4	308	379	547	926	239	380	24	8	400	80	—	—	—	—	—	—
2020	28	INTL MLE	Atenienses de Manati	—	30	27	8	0	0	1	3	7	0	0	1	296	367	407	774	111	368	23	10	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
2020	28	INTL RAW	Atenienses de Manati	—	30	27	8	0	0	1	3	7	0	0	1	296	367	407	774	111	368	23	10	350	123	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	17	ROK MLE	GCL Tigers	—	30	27	3	1	0	1	3	14	0	0	0	111	207	259	466	148	173	47	10	176	5	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	18	ROK MLE	GCL Tigers	—	96	91	14	2	0	0	5	39	0	2	1	154	200	176	376	22	273	41	5	175	5	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	19	ROK MLE	GCL Tigers	—	200	182	25	6	0	4	12	73	4	3	2	137	207	236	443	99	189	36	6	191	15	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	20	A MLE	West Michigan Whitecaps	—	81	77	15	1	1	2	4	28	0	0	1	195	241	312	552	117	264	35	5	226	39	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	23	A MLE	Cedar Rapids Kernels	—	373	347	78	13	2	3	22	87	1	9	3	225	276	300	576	75	284	23	6	255	59	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	24	A+ MLE	2 teams	—	495	460	108	17	10	7	30	118	2	7	2	235	283	361	644	126	297	24	6	278	75	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	25	AA MLE	2 teams	—	506	472	118	16	2	5	27	97	2	4	3	250	294	324	618	74	296	19	5	274	71	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	26	AA MLE	2 teams	—	330	309	69	16	4	6	15	73	3	3	1	223	268	359	627	136	264	22	5	273	71	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	27	A+ MLE	2 teams	—	264	242	53	12	3	7	13	88	7	2	4	219	280	380	660	161	302	33	5	286	80	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career Totals
Career	—	MLE		—	2405	2224	491	84	22	36	134	624	19	30	18	221	271	327	598	106	288	26	6	256	59	-116	-1	+0	-14	+52	-8.2
/ 162G	—	MLE		—	650	601	133	23	6	10	36	169	5	8	5	221	271	329	600	108	288	26	6	256	59	-31	-0	+0	-4	+14	-2.2

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2019 A+Salem Red Sox · 249 PAwOBA .401 → .286 (−115)K% 22.5% → 33.3%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	22.49%	÷0.958	×1.420	—	—	33.34%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	7.63%	÷0.968	×0.630	—	×0.958	4.76%
HBP% /PA	2.81%	—	×0.860	—	×0.958	2.32%
Singles /BIP	23.31%	÷1.003	×0.940	×0.950	×0.958	19.89%
Doubles /BIP	11.04%	÷1.070	×0.830	×0.950	×0.958	7.79%
Triples /BIP	2.45%	÷0.972	×0.800	×0.950	×0.958	1.84%
Home runs /BIP	5.52%	÷1.080	×0.900	—	×0.958	4.41%

Factors used: league row CAR. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 116, 1B 101, 2B 114, 3B 94, K 92, BB 94 — applied at half strength. Age: age 27 vs a level average of 22.8 → −4.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (4.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.

Result: wOBA .401 → .286; ISO .242 → .167; BABIP .382 → .302. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2018 AAChattanooga Lookouts · 237 PAwOBA .336 → .279 (−56)K% 15.6% → 19.8%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	15.61%	÷0.961	×1.220	—	—	19.83%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	8.86%	÷1.078	×0.680	—	×0.988	5.52%
HBP% /PA	1.27%	—	×0.840	—	×0.988	1.05%
Singles /BIP	19.30%	÷1.072	×0.920	×0.991	×0.988	16.21%
Doubles /BIP	8.19%	÷0.979	×0.910	×0.991	×0.988	7.45%
Triples /BIP	1.75%	÷0.900	×0.880	×0.991	×0.988	1.68%
Home runs /BIP	2.92%	÷0.975	×0.800	—	×0.988	2.37%

Factors used: league row SL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 95, 1B 114, 2B 96, 3B 80, K 92, BB 116 — applied at half strength. Age: age 26 vs a level average of 24.8 → −1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.991.

Result: wOBA .336 → .279; ISO .168 → .150; BABIP .294 → .254. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2018 AAARochester Red Wings · 93 PAwOBA .293 → .256 (−37)K% 22.6% → 27.7%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	22.58%	÷0.978	×1.200	—	—	27.71%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	3.23%	÷1.008	×0.690	—	×1.018	2.25%
HBP% /PA	0.00%	—	×0.940	—	×1.018	0.00%
Singles /BIP	23.88%	÷1.023	×0.930	×1.004	×1.018	22.18%
Doubles /BIP	5.97%	÷1.009	×0.830	×1.004	×1.018	5.02%
Triples /BIP	1.49%	÷1.150	×0.970	×1.004	×1.018	1.29%
Home runs /BIP	2.99%	÷0.879	×0.840	—	×1.018	2.90%

Factors used: league row IL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 76, 1B 105, 2B 102, 3B 130, K 96, BB 102 — applied at half strength. Age: age 26 vs a level average of 27.2 → +1.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.004.

Result: wOBA .293 → .256; ISO .136 → .121; BABIP .318 → .289. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2017 AAChattanooga Lookouts · 447 PAwOBA .334 → .284 (−51)K% 14.8% → 17.9%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	14.77%	÷1.008	×1.220	—	—	17.87%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	8.05%	÷0.940	×0.680	—	×0.998	5.82%
HBP% /PA	0.45%	—	×0.840	—	×0.998	0.38%
Singles /BIP	28.36%	÷1.007	×0.920	×0.970	×0.998	25.07%
Doubles /BIP	5.67%	÷1.084	×0.910	×0.970	×0.998	4.61%
Triples /BIP	0.30%	÷1.018	×0.880	×0.970	×0.998	0.25%
Home runs /BIP	1.79%	÷0.975	×0.800	—	×0.998	1.47%

Factors used: league row SL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 95, 1B 101, 2B 117, 3B 104, K 102, BB 88 — applied at half strength. Age: age 25 vs a level average of 24.8 → −0.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.970.

Result: wOBA .334 → .284; ISO .097 → .080; BABIP .344 → .299. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2017 AAARochester Red Wings · 59 PAwOBA .223 → .194 (−30)K% 23.7% → 28.6%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	23.73%	÷0.997	×1.200	—	—	28.56%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	1.69%	÷1.080	×0.690	—	×1.033	1.12%
HBP% /PA	0.00%	—	×0.940	—	×1.033	0.00%
Singles /BIP	25.00%	÷1.019	×0.930	×1.006	×1.033	23.72%
Doubles /BIP	2.27%	÷1.085	×0.830	×1.006	×1.033	1.81%
Triples /BIP	2.27%	÷1.085	×0.970	×1.006	×1.033	2.11%
Home runs /BIP	0.00%	÷0.956	×0.840	—	×1.033	0.00%

Factors used: league row IL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 91, 1B 104, 2B 117, 3B 117, K 99, BB 116 — applied at half strength. Age: age 25 vs a level average of 27.2 → +3.3% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.2 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.006.

Result: wOBA .223 → .194; ISO .052 → .043; BABIP .295 → .276. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2016 A+Fort Myers Miracle · 297 PAwOBA .329 → .278 (−51)K% 17.2% → 24.8%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	17.17%	÷0.983	×1.420	—	—	24.81%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	9.43%	÷0.974	×0.750	—	×0.988	7.17%
HBP% /PA	0.34%	—	×0.930	—	×0.988	0.31%
Singles /BIP	21.76%	÷0.985	×0.920	×0.997	×0.988	20.02%
Doubles /BIP	6.02%	÷1.012	×0.960	×0.997	×0.988	5.63%
Triples /BIP	2.31%	÷0.907	×0.810	×0.997	×0.988	2.04%
Home runs /BIP	2.78%	÷0.881	×0.880	—	×0.988	2.74%

Factors used: league row FSL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 76, 1B 97, 2B 102, 3B 81, K 97, BB 95 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 22.8 → −1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.997.

Result: wOBA .329 → .278; ISO .154 → .135; BABIP .310 → .285. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2016 AAChattanooga Lookouts · 198 PAwOBA .327 → .279 (−48)K% 17.7% → 22.5%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	17.68%	÷0.961	×1.220	—	—	22.45%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	6.57%	÷1.039	×0.680	—	×1.012	4.35%
HBP% /PA	0.51%	—	×0.840	—	×1.012	0.43%
Singles /BIP	25.00%	÷1.005	×0.920	×1.009	×1.012	23.37%
Doubles /BIP	4.73%	÷1.108	×0.910	×1.009	×1.012	3.96%
Triples /BIP	4.05%	÷0.900	×0.880	×1.009	×1.012	4.05%
Home runs /BIP	1.35%	÷1.301	×0.800	—	×1.012	0.84%

Factors used: league row SL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 160, 1B 101, 2B 122, 3B 80, K 92, BB 108 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 24.8 → +1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.009.

Result: wOBA .327 → .279; ISO .137 → .115; BABIP .340 → .314. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2015 ACedar Rapids Kernels · 373 PAwOBA .313 → .255 (−58)K% 16.4% → 23.2%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	16.35%	÷0.959	×1.360	—	—	23.20%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	8.85%	÷1.008	×0.690	—	×0.990	6.00%
HBP% /PA	0.27%	—	×0.780	—	×0.990	0.21%
Singles /BIP	24.91%	÷1.015	×0.920	×1.014	×0.990	22.66%
Doubles /BIP	5.95%	÷1.010	×0.830	×1.014	×0.990	4.91%
Triples /BIP	1.12%	÷1.150	×0.910	×1.014	×0.990	0.89%
Home runs /BIP	1.49%	÷1.134	×0.800	—	×0.990	1.04%

Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 127, 1B 103, 2B 102, 3B 130, K 92, BB 102 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.0 → −1.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.014.

Result: wOBA .313 → .255; ISO .103 → .078; BABIP .321 → .284. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

Not traceable per stint: some stints lack the counting stats the component translation needs. Level-wide factors that apply instead — .