Anderson Feliz

Pos2B

B/TS/R

Born1992-05-11

Age (2027)35

No MLB projection yet. Career stats below are historical.

Overview

INTLLAST SEASON 2022

Year	Age	Lvl / Team	PA	AVG/OBP/SLG	HR	SB	wRC+	WAR	MLE AVG/OBP/SLG
2018	26	AAA/AA/INTL3 orgs	555	.261/.325/.370	10	20	65	—	.244/.293/.335
2019	27	AAA/AA/INTL3 orgs	410	.244/.343/.352	5	5	65	—	.198/.251/.287
2022	30	INTLGigantes de C…	39	.229/.308/.286	0	0	73	—

Contract

No contract data on file.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.

show model inputsbasis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral

Methodology▸ how these numbers are built

All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.

Year	Age	Lvl	Team	MLB%	PA	AB	H	2B	3B	HR	BB	SO	HBP	SB	CS	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	BABIP	K%	BB%	wOBA	wRC+	BAT	RUN	FLD	POS	REP	WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments)
2009	17	ROK	DSL Yankees 2	—	164	142	36	5	3	1	21	36	1	7	2	254	354	352	706	99	333	22	13	324	27	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	18	A+	Tampa Yankees	—	28	25	7	1	0	1	3	9	0	2	0	280	357	440	797	160	400	32	11	357	69	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	18	ROK	GCL Yankees	—	213	198	54	9	6	4	15	44	0	11	7	273	324	439	763	167	333	21	7	337	45	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	19	A	Charleston RiverDogs	—	502	438	95	27	3	6	52	129	5	16	7	217	307	333	640	116	291	26	10	290	40	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	20	A+	Tampa Yankees	—	80	67	16	5	1	0	12	19	0	5	2	239	354	343	698	104	327	24	15	318	61	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	20	A	Charleston RiverDogs	—	84	73	23	6	1	1	9	23	1	6	1	315	398	466	863	151	449	27	11	381	89	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	21	A+	Tampa Yankees	—	154	136	36	4	2	1	16	37	0	4	4	265	342	346	688	81	354	24	10	311	63	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	22	A+	Tampa Yankees	—	86	79	15	1	1	2	4	24	0	1	1	190	229	304	533	114	236	28	5	230	12	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	22	ROK	GCL Yankees1	—	21	16	6	1	0	1	5	8	0	4	0	375	524	625	1.149	250	714	38	24	499	89	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	24	AA	Altoona Curve	—	386	347	89	22	4	4	35	88	0	7	1	256	325	378	702	121	333	23	9	313	62	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	25	AAA	Indianapolis Indians	—	145	134	28	7	0	3	9	41	0	3	1	209	259	328	587	119	275	28	6	261	46	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	25	AA	Altoona Curve	—	204	175	43	9	3	2	26	46	0	9	4	246	343	366	709	120	323	23	13	318	68	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	25	INTL	Toros del Este	—	134	120	36	7	3	1	11	30	0	4	5	300	359	433	792	133	393	22	8	345	120	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	26	AAA	Norfolk Tides	—	48	45	11	0	1	0	3	19	0	0	0	244	292	289	581	44	423	40	6	266	31	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	26	AA	Bowie Baysox	—	436	393	110	19	1	10	38	97	3	20	5	280	348	410	758	130	348	22	9	339	77	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	26	INTL	Toros del Este	—	71	67	11	0	1	0	4	27	0	0	1	164	211	194	405	30	275	38	6	190	14	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	27	AAA	Norfolk Tides	—	149	135	28	7	0	1	13	47	0	0	1	207	277	281	559	74	310	32	9	257	21	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	27	AA	Bowie Baysox	—	157	137	39	13	0	3	17	36	1	5	2	285	368	445	813	161	360	23	11	359	74	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	27	INTL	Toros del Este	—	104	80	19	3	0	1	21	30	1	0	1	237	402	312	714	75	353	29	20	336	113	—	—	—	—	—	—
2022	30	INTL	Gigantes de Carolina	—	39	35	8	0	1	0	3	8	1	0	0	229	308	286	593	57	296	21	8	276	73	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents)
2009	17	ROK MLE	DSL Yankees 2	—	164	148	23	3	2	0	15	44	1	7	2	155	238	203	441	47	219	27	9	208	27	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	18	A+ MLE	Tampa Yankees	—	28	26	6	1	0	1	2	13	0	2	0	231	286	385	670	154	389	46	7	270	69	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	18	ROK MLE	GCL Yankees	—	213	203	40	6	4	3	10	63	0	11	7	197	235	310	545	113	269	30	5	234	45	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	19	A MLE	Charleston RiverDogs	—	502	458	84	23	2	4	32	174	5	16	7	183	244	269	513	85	275	35	6	228	40	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	20	A+ MLE	Tampa Yankees	—	80	71	14	4	1	0	8	27	0	5	2	197	278	282	560	85	313	34	10	258	61	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	20	A MLE	Charleston RiverDogs	—	84	76	21	5	1	1	6	32	1	6	1	276	337	408	745	132	425	38	7	300	89	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	21	A+ MLE	Tampa Yankees	—	154	139	32	4	2	1	13	51	0	4	4	230	296	309	605	79	336	33	8	261	63	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	22	A+ MLE	Tampa Yankees	—	86	80	13	1	1	2	3	36	0	1	1	163	193	275	468	113	221	42	3	186	12	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	22	ROK MLE	GCL Yankees1	—	21	18	5	1	0	1	3	12	0	4	0	278	381	500	881	222	539	57	14	300	89	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	24	AA MLE	Altoona Curve	—	386	358	80	18	3	3	24	110	0	7	1	223	272	316	588	92	312	28	6	260	62	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	25	AAA MLE	Indianapolis Indians	—	145	136	27	6	0	3	7	48	0	3	1	199	238	309	547	110	273	33	5	236	46	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	25	AA MLE	Altoona Curve	—	204	184	42	9	3	2	17	58	0	9	4	228	294	342	636	114	308	28	8	269	68	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	26	AAA MLE	Norfolk Tides	—	48	46	10	0	1	0	2	23	0	0	0	217	250	261	511	43	403	48	4	214	31	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	26	AA MLE	Bowie Baysox	—	436	405	100	16	1	7	26	123	3	20	5	247	297	343	640	96	334	28	6	282	77	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	27	AAA MLE	Norfolk Tides	—	149	140	24	6	0	1	8	58	0	0	1	171	216	236	452	64	279	39	5	199	21	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	27	AA MLE	Bowie Baysox	—	157	143	32	10	0	2	11	47	1	5	2	224	284	336	620	112	304	30	7	277	74	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	17	ROK MLE	DSL Yankees 2	—	164	148	23	3	2	0	15	44	1	7	2	155	238	203	441	47	221	27	9	208	27	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	17	ROK RAW	DSL Yankees 2	—	164	142	36	5	3	1	21	36	1	7	2	254	354	352	706	99	333	22	13	324	27	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	18	ROK MLE	2 teams	—	241	229	46	7	4	4	12	76	0	13	7	201	241	319	559	118	282	32	5	238	47	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	18	ROK RAW	2 teams	—	241	223	61	10	6	5	18	53	0	13	7	274	328	439	767	166	339	22	7	339	47	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	19	A MLE	Charleston RiverDogs	—	502	458	84	23	2	4	32	174	5	16	7	183	244	269	513	85	283	35	6	228	40	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	19	A RAW	Charleston RiverDogs	—	502	438	95	27	3	6	52	129	5	16	7	217	307	333	640	116	291	26	10	290	40	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	20	A MLE	2 teams	—	164	147	34	9	2	1	14	59	1	11	3	231	302	340	643	109	375	36	9	280	75	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	20	A RAW	2 teams	—	164	140	39	11	2	1	21	42	1	11	3	279	377	407	784	129	388	26	13	350	75	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	21	A+ MLE	Tampa Yankees	—	154	139	32	4	2	1	13	51	0	4	4	230	296	309	605	79	352	33	8	261	63	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	21	A+ RAW	Tampa Yankees	—	154	136	36	4	2	1	16	37	0	4	4	265	342	346	688	81	354	24	10	311	63	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	22	A+ MLE	2 teams	—	107	98	15	1	1	2	6	47	0	5	1	153	202	245	447	92	255	44	6	208	27	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	22	A+ RAW	2 teams	—	107	95	21	2	1	3	9	32	0	5	1	221	288	358	646	137	290	30	8	283	27	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	24	AA MLE	Altoona Curve	—	386	358	80	18	3	3	24	110	0	7	1	223	272	316	588	92	314	28	6	260	62	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	24	AA RAW	Altoona Curve	—	386	347	89	22	4	4	35	88	0	7	1	256	325	378	702	121	333	23	9	313	62	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	25	AA MLE	3 teams	—	483	442	94	20	4	6	33	146	0	16	10	213	267	317	584	104	302	30	7	255	59	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	25	AA RAW	3 teams	—	483	429	107	23	6	6	46	117	0	16	10	249	322	373	695	124	329	24	10	308	59	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	26	AA MLE	3 teams	—	555	518	125	19	2	8	32	167	3	20	6	241	289	332	621	91	340	30	6	275	72	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	26	AA RAW	3 teams	—	555	505	132	19	3	10	45	143	3	20	6	261	325	370	696	109	346	26	8	314	72	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	27	AA MLE	3 teams	—	410	377	74	21	0	4	26	140	2	5	4	196	252	284	536	88	295	34	6	239	48	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	27	AA RAW	3 teams	—	410	352	86	23	0	5	51	113	2	5	4	244	343	352	695	108	340	28	12	316	48	—	—	—	—	—	—
2022	30	INTL MLE	Gigantes de Carolina	—	39	35	8	0	1	0	3	8	1	0	0	229	308	286	593	57	296	21	8	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
2022	30	INTL RAW	Gigantes de Carolina	—	39	35	8	0	1	0	3	8	1	0	0	229	308	286	593	57	296	21	8	276	73	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	17	ROK MLE	DSL Yankees 2	—	164	147	23	3	2	0	15	44	1	7	2	156	238	204	442	48	219	27	9	208	27	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	18	ROK MLE	2 teams	—	241	227	46	7	4	4	12	76	0	13	7	203	241	322	562	119	283	32	5	238	47	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	19	A MLE	Charleston RiverDogs	—	502	460	84	23	2	4	32	174	5	16	7	183	244	267	512	85	275	35	6	228	40	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	20	A MLE	2 teams	—	164	148	34	9	2	1	14	59	1	11	3	230	302	338	640	108	370	36	9	280	75	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	21	A+ MLE	Tampa Yankees	—	154	140	32	4	2	1	13	51	0	4	4	229	296	307	603	79	336	33	8	261	63	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	22	A+ MLE	2 teams	—	107	100	15	1	1	2	6	47	0	5	1	150	202	240	442	90	283	44	6	208	27	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	24	AA MLE	Altoona Curve	—	386	359	80	18	3	3	24	110	0	7	1	223	272	315	587	92	312	28	6	260	62	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	25	AA MLE	3 teams	—	483	447	94	20	4	6	33	146	0	16	10	210	267	313	581	103	293	30	7	255	59	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	26	AA MLE	3 teams	—	555	515	125	19	2	8	32	167	3	20	6	243	289	334	623	91	341	30	6	275	72	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	27	AA MLE	3 teams	—	410	379	74	21	0	4	26	140	2	5	4	195	252	282	534	87	292	34	6	239	48	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career Totals
Career	—	MLE		—	3205	2949	615	125	23	33	210	1022	13	104	45	209	264	300	564	92	305	32	7	246	53	-180	+3	+0	+11	+69	-9.9
/ 162G	—	MLE		—	650	598	125	25	5	7	43	207	3	21	9	209	266	303	569	94	305	32	7	246	53	-37	+1	+0	+2	+14	-2.0

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2019 AABowie Baysox · 157 PAwOBA .354 → .277 (−78)K% 22.9% → 29.8%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	22.93%	÷0.940	×1.220	—	—	29.76%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	10.83%	÷1.020	×0.700	—	×0.978	7.27%
HBP% /PA	0.64%	—	×0.850	—	×0.978	0.53%
Singles /BIP	22.77%	÷1.031	×0.970	×0.950	×0.978	19.90%
Doubles /BIP	12.87%	÷0.987	×0.860	×0.950	×0.978	10.42%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.116	×0.950	×0.950	×0.978	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	2.97%	÷0.987	×0.780	—	×0.978	2.30%

Factors used: league row EL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 97, 1B 106, 2B 97, 3B 123, K 88, BB 104 — applied at half strength. Age: age 27 vs a level average of 24.8 → −2.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.

Result: wOBA .354 → .277; ISO .161 → .124; BABIP .360 → .304. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2019 AAANorfolk Tides · 149 PAwOBA .250 → .199 (−52)K% 31.5% → 38.9%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	31.54%	÷0.973	×1.200	—	—	38.89%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	8.72%	÷1.103	×0.690	—	×1.003	5.48%
HBP% /PA	0.00%	—	×0.940	—	×1.003	0.00%
Singles /BIP	22.73%	÷1.033	×0.930	×1.013	×1.003	20.80%
Doubles /BIP	7.95%	÷0.990	×0.830	×1.013	×1.003	6.78%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷0.954	×0.970	×1.013	×1.003	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	1.14%	÷0.889	×0.840	—	×1.003	1.08%

Factors used: league row IL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 78, 1B 107, 2B 98, 3B 91, K 95, BB 121 — applied at half strength. Age: age 27 vs a level average of 27.2 → +0.3% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.013.

Result: wOBA .250 → .199; ISO .074 → .061; BABIP .310 → .279. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2018 AABowie Baysox · 436 PAwOBA .330 → .282 (−49)K% 22.2% → 28.3%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	22.25%	÷0.960	×1.220	—	—	28.27%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	8.49%	÷0.978	×0.700	—	×0.988	6.00%
HBP% /PA	0.69%	—	×0.850	—	×0.988	0.58%
Singles /BIP	27.03%	÷0.996	×0.970	×1.023	×0.988	26.59%
Doubles /BIP	6.42%	÷0.971	×0.860	×1.023	×0.988	5.75%
Triples /BIP	0.34%	÷0.900	×0.950	×1.023	×0.988	0.36%
Home runs /BIP	3.38%	÷1.060	×0.780	—	×0.988	2.46%

Factors used: league row EL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 112, 1B 99, 2B 94, 3B 80, K 92, BB 96 — applied at half strength. Age: age 26 vs a level average of 24.8 → −1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.023.

Result: wOBA .330 → .282; ISO .130 → .100; BABIP .348 → .334. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2018 AAANorfolk Tides · 48 PAwOBA .259 → .214 (−46)K% 39.6% → 47.1%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	39.58%	÷1.009	×1.200	—	—	47.07%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	6.25%	÷0.997	×0.690	—	×1.018	4.40%
HBP% /PA	0.00%	—	×0.940	—	×1.018	0.00%
Singles /BIP	38.46%	÷0.984	×0.930	—	×1.018	37.01%
Doubles /BIP	0.00%	÷1.063	×0.830	—	×1.018	0.00%
Triples /BIP	3.85%	÷1.150	×0.970	—	×1.018	3.30%
Home runs /BIP	0.00%	÷0.964	×0.840	—	×1.018	0.00%

Factors used: league row IL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 93, 1B 97, 2B 113, 3B 130, K 102, BB 99 — applied at half strength. Age: age 26 vs a level average of 27.2 → +1.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr younger than average).

Result: wOBA .259 → .214; ISO .044 → .034; BABIP .423 → .403. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2017 AAAltoona Curve · 204 PAwOBA .309 → .269 (−40)K% 22.5% → 28.2%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	22.55%	÷0.974	×1.220	—	—	28.24%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	12.25%	÷1.008	×0.700	—	×0.998	8.49%
HBP% /PA	0.00%	—	×0.850	—	×0.998	0.00%
Singles /BIP	22.48%	÷1.060	×0.970	×1.049	×0.998	21.53%
Doubles /BIP	6.98%	÷0.909	×0.860	×1.049	×0.998	6.91%
Triples /BIP	2.33%	÷1.150	×0.950	×1.049	×0.998	2.01%
Home runs /BIP	1.55%	÷1.035	×0.780	—	×0.998	1.17%

Factors used: league row EL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 107, 1B 112, 2B 82, 3B 130, K 95, BB 102 — applied at half strength. Age: age 25 vs a level average of 24.8 → −0.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.049.

Result: wOBA .309 → .269; ISO .120 → .106; BABIP .323 → .308. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2017 AAAIndianapolis Indians · 145 PAwOBA .255 → .236 (−20)K% 28.3% → 32.9%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	28.28%	÷1.030	×1.200	—	—	32.94%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	6.21%	÷0.952	×0.690	—	×1.033	4.65%
HBP% /PA	0.00%	—	×0.940	—	×1.033	0.00%
Singles /BIP	19.35%	÷0.950	×0.930	×1.035	×1.033	20.27%
Doubles /BIP	7.53%	÷1.046	×0.830	×1.035	×1.033	6.39%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.150	×0.970	×1.035	×1.033	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	3.23%	÷0.850	×0.840	—	×1.033	3.29%

Factors used: league row IL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 70, 1B 90, 2B 109, 3B 130, K 106, BB 90 — applied at half strength. Age: age 25 vs a level average of 27.2 → +3.3% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.2 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.035.

Result: wOBA .255 → .236; ISO .119 → .110; BABIP .275 → .273. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2016 AAAltoona Curve · 386 PAwOBA .303 → .260 (−43)K% 22.8% → 28.5%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	22.80%	÷0.975	×1.220	—	—	28.52%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	8.55%	÷0.988	×0.700	—	×1.012	6.13%
HBP% /PA	0.00%	—	×0.850	—	×1.012	0.00%
Singles /BIP	22.78%	÷1.050	×0.970	×1.042	×1.012	22.20%
Doubles /BIP	8.49%	÷1.059	×0.860	×1.042	×1.012	7.28%
Triples /BIP	1.54%	÷1.150	×0.950	×1.042	×1.012	1.35%
Home runs /BIP	1.54%	÷1.016	×0.780	—	×1.012	1.20%

Factors used: league row EL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 103, 1B 110, 2B 112, 3B 130, K 95, BB 98 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 24.8 → +1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.042.

Result: wOBA .303 → .260; ISO .121 → .099; BABIP .333 → .312. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2014 A+Tampa Yankees · 86 PAwOBA .229 → .186 (−43)K% 27.9% → 41.7%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	27.91%	÷0.950	×1.420	—	—	41.69%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	4.65%	÷0.978	×0.750	—	×1.012	3.61%
HBP% /PA	0.00%	—	×0.930	—	×1.012	0.00%
Singles /BIP	20.00%	÷1.019	×0.920	×1.024	×1.012	18.72%
Doubles /BIP	1.82%	÷1.003	×0.960	×1.024	×1.012	1.80%
Triples /BIP	1.82%	÷0.900	×0.810	×1.024	×1.012	1.70%
Home runs /BIP	3.64%	÷0.882	×0.880	—	×1.012	3.67%

Factors used: league row FSL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 76, 1B 104, 2B 101, 3B 80, K 90, BB 96 — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 22.8 → +1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.024.

Result: wOBA .229 → .186; ISO .114 → .097; BABIP .236 → .221. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

Not traceable per stint: some stints lack the counting stats the component translation needs. Level-wide factors that apply instead — .