Francisco Williams
| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 24 | AAAPiratas de Ca… | 104 | .193/.297/.193 | 0 | 1 | 34 | — | .198/.277/.198 |
| 2017 | 25 | AAAPiratas de Ca… | 237 | .245/.304/.288 | 1 | 3 | 55 | — | .249/.295/.291 |
| 2019 | 27 | AAAPiratas de Ca… | 105 | .248/.255/.366 | 4 | 1 | 37 | — | .228/.235/.287 |
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2012 | 20 | AAA | Piratas de Campeche | — | 26 | 23 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 87 | 160 | 130 | 290 | 43 | 118 | 27 | 8 | 138 | -33 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 22 | AAA | Piratas de Campeche | — | 188 | 156 | 40 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 20 | 37 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 256 | 356 | 359 | 715 | 103 | 322 | 20 | 11 | 315 | 80 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 23 | AAA | Piratas de Campeche | — | 85 | 72 | 17 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 22 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 236 | 329 | 278 | 607 | 42 | 333 | 26 | 8 | 277 | 65 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 24 | AAA | Piratas de Campeche | — | 104 | 88 | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 21 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 193 | 297 | 193 | 490 | 254 | 20 | 11 | 236 | 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| 2017 | 25 | AAA | Piratas de Campeche | — | 237 | 208 | 51 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 14 | 56 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 245 | 304 | 288 | 592 | 43 | 327 | 24 | 6 | 263 | 55 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 27 | AAA | Piratas de Campeche | — | 105 | 101 | 25 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 22 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 248 | 255 | 366 | 621 | 119 | 280 | 21 | 1 | 267 | 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2012 | 20 | AAA MLE | Piratas de Campeche | — | 26 | 23 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 87 | 160 | 130 | 290 | 43 | 109 | 31 | 8 | 120 | -33 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 22 | AAA MLE | Piratas de Campeche | — | 188 | 163 | 42 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 13 | 44 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 258 | 328 | 337 | 665 | 80 | 320 | 23 | 7 | 287 | 80 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 23 | AAA MLE | Piratas de Campeche | — | 85 | 74 | 18 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 26 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 243 | 317 | 284 | 601 | 41 | 342 | 31 | 6 | 265 | 65 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 24 | AAA MLE | Piratas de Campeche | — | 104 | 91 | 18 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 26 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 198 | 277 | 198 | 475 | 262 | 25 | 8 | 218 | 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| 2017 | 25 | AAA MLE | Piratas de Campeche | — | 237 | 213 | 53 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 66 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 249 | 295 | 291 | 586 | 42 | 327 | 28 | 4 | 250 | 55 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 27 | AAA MLE | Piratas de Campeche | — | 105 | 101 | 23 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 25 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 228 | 235 | 287 | 522 | 59 | 268 | 24 | 1 | 223 | 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 20 | AAA MLE | Piratas de Campeche | — | 26 | 23 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 87 | 160 | 130 | 290 | 43 | 125 | 31 | 8 | 120 | -33 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 20 | AAA RAW | Piratas de Campeche | — | 26 | 23 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 87 | 160 | 130 | 290 | 43 | 118 | 27 | 8 | 138 | -33 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 22 | AAA MLE | Piratas de Campeche | — | 188 | 163 | 42 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 13 | 44 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 258 | 328 | 337 | 665 | 80 | 345 | 23 | 7 | 287 | 80 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 22 | AAA RAW | Piratas de Campeche | — | 188 | 156 | 40 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 20 | 37 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 256 | 356 | 359 | 715 | 103 | 322 | 20 | 11 | 315 | 80 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 23 | AAA MLE | Piratas de Campeche | — | 85 | 74 | 18 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 26 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 243 | 317 | 284 | 601 | 41 | 367 | 31 | 6 | 265 | 65 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 23 | AAA RAW | Piratas de Campeche | — | 85 | 72 | 17 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 22 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 236 | 329 | 278 | 607 | 42 | 333 | 26 | 8 | 277 | 65 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 24 | AAA MLE | Piratas de Campeche | — | 104 | 91 | 18 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 26 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 198 | 277 | 198 | 475 | 277 | 25 | 8 | 218 | 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| 2016 | 24 | AAA RAW | Piratas de Campeche | — | 104 | 88 | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 21 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 193 | 297 | 193 | 490 | 254 | 20 | 11 | 236 | 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| 2017 | 25 | AAA MLE | Piratas de Campeche | — | 237 | 213 | 53 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 66 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 249 | 295 | 291 | 586 | 42 | 351 | 28 | 4 | 250 | 55 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 25 | AAA RAW | Piratas de Campeche | — | 237 | 208 | 51 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 14 | 56 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 245 | 304 | 288 | 592 | 43 | 327 | 24 | 6 | 263 | 55 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 27 | AAA MLE | Piratas de Campeche | — | 105 | 101 | 23 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 25 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 228 | 235 | 287 | 522 | 59 | 284 | 24 | 1 | 223 | 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 27 | AAA RAW | Piratas de Campeche | — | 105 | 101 | 25 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 22 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 248 | 255 | 366 | 621 | 119 | 280 | 21 | 1 | 267 | 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 20 | AAA MLE | Piratas de Campeche | — | 26 | 24 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 83 | 160 | 125 | 285 | 42 | 109 | 31 | 8 | 120 | -33 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 22 | AAA MLE | Piratas de Campeche | — | 188 | 169 | 42 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 13 | 44 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 249 | 328 | 325 | 653 | 77 | 320 | 23 | 7 | 287 | 80 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 23 | AAA MLE | Piratas de Campeche | — | 85 | 77 | 18 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 26 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 234 | 317 | 273 | 590 | 39 | 342 | 31 | 6 | 265 | 65 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 24 | AAA MLE | Piratas de Campeche | — | 104 | 93 | 18 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 26 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 194 | 277 | 194 | 471 | 262 | 25 | 8 | 218 | 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| 2017 | 25 | AAA MLE | Piratas de Campeche | — | 237 | 221 | 53 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 66 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 240 | 295 | 281 | 576 | 41 | 327 | 28 | 4 | 250 | 55 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 27 | AAA MLE | Piratas de Campeche | — | 105 | 103 | 23 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 25 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 223 | 235 | 282 | 517 | 58 | 268 | 24 | 1 | 223 | 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | MLE | — | 745 | 665 | 156 | 12 | 4 | 4 | 39 | 195 | 13 | 8 | 6 | 235 | 290 | 283 | 573 | 48 | 323 | 26 | 5 | 248 | 54 | -41 | -1 | +0 | +3 | +16 | -2.3 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 580 | 135 | 10 | 3 | 3 | 34 | 170 | 11 | 7 | 5 | 233 | 288 | 276 | 563 | 43 | 321 | 26 | 5 | 248 | 54 | -35 | -1 | +0 | +2 | +14 | -2.0 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2019 AAAPiratas de Campeche · 105 PAwOBA .259 → .223 (−36)K% 21.0% → 23.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 20.95% | ÷1.071 | ×1.200 | — | — | 23.47% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 0.95% | ÷1.033 | ×0.690 | — | ×1.003 | 0.64% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.940 | — | ×1.003 | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 26.58% | ÷0.954 | ×0.930 | — | ×1.003 | 25.98% |
| Doubles /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.971 | ×0.830 | — | ×1.003 | 0.00% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.987 | ×0.920 | — | ×1.003 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 5.06% | ÷1.196 | ×0.700 | — | ×1.003 | 2.97% |
Factors used: level-wide AAA factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 139, 1B 91, 2B 94, 3B 97, K 114, BB 107 — applied at half strength. Age: age 27 vs a level average of 27.2 → +0.3% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr younger than average).
Result: wOBA .259 → .223; ISO .119 → .070; BABIP .280 → .268. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2017 AAAPiratas de Campeche · 237 PAwOBA .258 → .250 (−8)K% 23.6% → 27.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 23.63% | ÷1.024 | ×1.200 | — | — | 27.69% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 5.91% | ÷0.986 | ×0.690 | — | ×1.033 | 4.27% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.69% | — | ×0.940 | — | ×1.033 | 1.64% |
| Singles /BIP | 29.61% | ÷1.003 | ×0.930 | ×1.050 | ×1.033 | 29.78% |
| Doubles /BIP | 2.63% | ÷0.953 | ×0.830 | ×1.050 | ×1.033 | 2.49% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.66% | ÷0.959 | ×0.920 | ×1.050 | ×1.033 | 0.68% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.66% | ÷1.263 | ×0.700 | — | ×1.033 | 0.38% |
Factors used: level-wide AAA factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 153, 1B 101, 2B 91, 3B 92, K 105, BB 97 — applied at half strength. Age: age 25 vs a level average of 27.2 → +3.3% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.2 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.
Result: wOBA .258 → .250; ISO .043 → .038; BABIP .327 → .327. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2016 AAAPiratas de Campeche · 104 PAwOBA .231 → .218 (−13)K% 20.2% → 25.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 20.19% | ÷0.966 | ×1.200 | — | — | 25.10% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 10.58% | ÷0.984 | ×0.690 | — | ×1.048 | 7.78% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.92% | — | ×0.940 | — | ×1.048 | 1.89% |
| Singles /BIP | 25.37% | ÷0.989 | ×0.930 | ×1.050 | ×1.048 | 26.24% |
| Doubles /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.075 | ×0.830 | ×1.050 | ×1.048 | 0.00% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.900 | ×0.920 | ×1.050 | ×1.048 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.132 | ×0.700 | — | ×1.048 | 0.00% |
Factors used: level-wide AAA factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 126, 1B 98, 2B 115, 3B 80, K 93, BB 97 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 27.2 → +4.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (3.2 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.
Result: wOBA .231 → .218; ISO .000 → .000; BABIP .254 → .262. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2015 AAAPiratas de Campeche · 85 PAwOBA .274 → .265 (−8)K% 25.9% → 30.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 25.88% | ÷1.025 | ×1.200 | — | — | 30.30% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 8.24% | ÷1.132 | ×0.690 | — | ×1.050 | 5.27% |
| HBP% /PA | 3.53% | — | ×0.940 | — | ×1.050 | 3.48% |
| Singles /BIP | 30.00% | ÷0.999 | ×0.930 | ×1.050 | ×1.050 | 30.78% |
| Doubles /BIP | 2.00% | ÷0.981 | ×0.830 | ×1.050 | ×1.050 | 1.87% |
| Triples /BIP | 2.00% | ÷0.900 | ×0.920 | ×1.050 | ×1.050 | 2.25% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.067 | ×0.700 | — | ×1.050 | 0.00% |
Factors used: level-wide AAA factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 113, 1B 100, 2B 96, 3B 80, K 105, BB 126 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 27.2 → +5.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (4.2 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.
Result: wOBA .274 → .265; ISO .042 → .046; BABIP .333 → .342. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2014 AAAPiratas de Campeche · 188 PAwOBA .307 → .287 (−19)K% 19.7% → 23.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 19.68% | ÷1.008 | ×1.200 | — | — | 23.44% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 10.11% | ÷1.055 | ×0.690 | — | ×1.050 | 6.94% |
| HBP% /PA | 2.13% | — | ×0.940 | — | ×1.050 | 2.10% |
| Singles /BIP | 25.21% | ÷0.995 | ×0.930 | ×1.047 | ×1.050 | 25.90% |
| Doubles /BIP | 5.04% | ÷1.010 | ×0.830 | ×1.047 | ×1.050 | 4.56% |
| Triples /BIP | 1.68% | ÷1.150 | ×0.920 | ×1.047 | ×1.050 | 1.48% |
| Home runs /BIP | 1.68% | ÷1.245 | ×0.700 | — | ×1.050 | 0.99% |
Factors used: level-wide AAA factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 149, 1B 99, 2B 102, 3B 130, K 102, BB 111 — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 27.2 → +5.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (5.2 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.047.
Result: wOBA .307 → .287; ISO .103 → .085; BABIP .322 → .320. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2012 AAAPiratas de Campeche · 26 PAwOBA .140 → .120 (−20)K% 26.9% → 31.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 26.92% | ÷1.032 | ×1.200 | — | — | 31.29% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 7.69% | ÷0.969 | ×0.690 | — | ×1.050 | 5.75% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.940 | — | ×1.050 | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 6.25% | ÷0.982 | ×0.930 | — | ×1.050 | 6.21% |
| Doubles /BIP | 6.25% | ÷1.027 | ×0.830 | — | ×1.050 | 5.31% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.900 | ×0.920 | — | ×1.050 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.331 | ×0.700 | — | ×1.050 | 0.00% |
Factors used: level-wide AAA factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 166, 1B 96, 2B 105, 3B 80, K 106, BB 94 — applied at half strength. Age: age 20 vs a level average of 27.2 → +5.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (7.2 yr younger than average).
Result: wOBA .140 → .120; ISO .043 → .038; BABIP .118 → .109. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).