Luis Porchas
| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | 24 | AAAOlmecas de Ta… | 214 | .270/.337/.307 | 0 | 5 | 63 | — | .258/.308/.289 |
| 2015 | 25 | AAAOlmecas de Ta… | 108 | .253/.304/.305 | 0 | 3 | 53 | — | .247/.284/.299 |
| 2016 | 26 | AAAOlmecas de Ta… | 70 | .304/.418/.357 | 0 | 2 | 85 | — | .271/.358/.305 |
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2009 | 19 | AAA | Olmecas de Tabasco | — | 68 | 62 | 12 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 13 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 194 | 242 | 210 | 452 | 16 | 245 | 19 | 6 | 206 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 20 | AAA | Olmecas de Tabasco | — | 75 | 66 | 12 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 182 | 250 | 258 | 508 | 76 | 207 | 12 | 5 | 226 | 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 21 | AAA | Olmecas de Tabasco | — | 32 | 26 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 269 | 367 | 269 | 636 | 350 | 19 | 3 | 289 | 72 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| 2012 | 22 | AAA | Olmecas de Tabasco | — | 37 | 32 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 344 | 400 | 344 | 744 | 423 | 16 | 8 | 326 | 91 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| 2013 | 23 | AAA | Olmecas de Tabasco | — | 166 | 145 | 37 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 28 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 255 | 303 | 352 | 655 | 97 | 298 | 17 | 4 | 277 | 63 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 24 | AAA | Olmecas de Tabasco | — | 214 | 189 | 51 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 43 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 270 | 337 | 307 | 643 | 37 | 349 | 20 | 8 | 290 | 63 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 25 | AAA | Olmecas de Tabasco | — | 108 | 95 | 24 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 22 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 253 | 304 | 305 | 609 | 53 | 324 | 20 | 6 | 264 | 53 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 26 | AAA | Olmecas de Tabasco | — | 70 | 56 | 17 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 14 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 304 | 418 | 357 | 775 | 54 | 405 | 20 | 14 | 346 | 85 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2009 | 19 | AAA MLE | Olmecas de Tabasco | — | 68 | 63 | 12 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 16 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 190 | 227 | 206 | 434 | 16 | 249 | 24 | 4 | 194 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 20 | AAA MLE | Olmecas de Tabasco | — | 75 | 67 | 12 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 179 | 236 | 254 | 490 | 75 | 208 | 15 | 4 | 218 | 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 21 | AAA MLE | Olmecas de Tabasco | — | 32 | 26 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 269 | 367 | 269 | 636 | 335 | 22 | 3 | 275 | 72 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| 2012 | 22 | AAA MLE | Olmecas de Tabasco | — | 37 | 33 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 333 | 371 | 333 | 705 | 402 | 19 | 5 | 302 | 91 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| 2013 | 23 | AAA MLE | Olmecas de Tabasco | — | 166 | 147 | 38 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 35 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 259 | 297 | 354 | 651 | 95 | 289 | 21 | 2 | 261 | 63 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 24 | AAA MLE | Olmecas de Tabasco | — | 214 | 194 | 50 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 55 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 258 | 308 | 289 | 596 | 31 | 344 | 26 | 6 | 262 | 63 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 25 | AAA MLE | Olmecas de Tabasco | — | 108 | 97 | 24 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 27 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 247 | 284 | 299 | 583 | 52 | 313 | 25 | 4 | 247 | 53 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 26 | AAA MLE | Olmecas de Tabasco | — | 70 | 59 | 16 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 17 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 271 | 358 | 305 | 663 | 34 | 356 | 24 | 10 | 294 | 85 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 19 | AAA MLE | Olmecas de Tabasco | — | 68 | 63 | 12 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 16 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 190 | 227 | 206 | 434 | 16 | 255 | 24 | 4 | 194 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 19 | AAA RAW | Olmecas de Tabasco | — | 68 | 62 | 12 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 13 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 194 | 242 | 210 | 452 | 16 | 245 | 19 | 6 | 206 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 20 | AAA MLE | Olmecas de Tabasco | — | 75 | 67 | 12 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 179 | 236 | 254 | 490 | 75 | 211 | 15 | 4 | 218 | 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 20 | AAA RAW | Olmecas de Tabasco | — | 75 | 66 | 12 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 182 | 250 | 258 | 508 | 76 | 207 | 12 | 5 | 226 | 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 21 | AAA MLE | Olmecas de Tabasco | — | 32 | 26 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 269 | 367 | 269 | 636 | 368 | 22 | 3 | 275 | 72 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| 2011 | 21 | AAA RAW | Olmecas de Tabasco | — | 32 | 26 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 269 | 367 | 269 | 636 | 350 | 19 | 3 | 289 | 72 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| 2012 | 22 | AAA MLE | Olmecas de Tabasco | — | 37 | 33 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 333 | 371 | 333 | 705 | 423 | 19 | 5 | 302 | 91 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| 2012 | 22 | AAA RAW | Olmecas de Tabasco | — | 37 | 32 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 344 | 400 | 344 | 744 | 423 | 16 | 8 | 326 | 91 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| 2013 | 23 | AAA MLE | Olmecas de Tabasco | — | 166 | 147 | 38 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 35 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 259 | 297 | 354 | 651 | 95 | 321 | 21 | 2 | 261 | 63 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 23 | AAA RAW | Olmecas de Tabasco | — | 166 | 145 | 37 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 28 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 255 | 303 | 352 | 655 | 97 | 298 | 17 | 4 | 277 | 63 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 24 | AAA MLE | Olmecas de Tabasco | — | 214 | 194 | 50 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 55 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 258 | 308 | 289 | 596 | 31 | 360 | 26 | 6 | 262 | 63 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 24 | AAA RAW | Olmecas de Tabasco | — | 214 | 189 | 51 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 43 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 270 | 337 | 307 | 643 | 37 | 349 | 20 | 8 | 290 | 63 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 25 | AAA MLE | Olmecas de Tabasco | — | 108 | 97 | 24 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 27 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 247 | 284 | 299 | 583 | 52 | 338 | 25 | 4 | 247 | 53 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 25 | AAA RAW | Olmecas de Tabasco | — | 108 | 95 | 24 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 22 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 253 | 304 | 305 | 609 | 53 | 324 | 20 | 6 | 264 | 53 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 26 | AAA MLE | Olmecas de Tabasco | — | 70 | 59 | 16 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 17 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 271 | 358 | 305 | 663 | 34 | 381 | 24 | 10 | 294 | 85 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 26 | AAA RAW | Olmecas de Tabasco | — | 70 | 56 | 17 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 14 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 304 | 418 | 357 | 775 | 54 | 405 | 20 | 14 | 346 | 85 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 19 | AAA MLE | Olmecas de Tabasco | — | 68 | 65 | 12 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 16 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 185 | 227 | 200 | 427 | 15 | 249 | 24 | 4 | 194 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 20 | AAA MLE | Olmecas de Tabasco | — | 75 | 70 | 12 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 171 | 236 | 243 | 479 | 71 | 208 | 15 | 4 | 218 | 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 21 | AAA MLE | Olmecas de Tabasco | — | 32 | 28 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 250 | 367 | 250 | 617 | 335 | 22 | 3 | 275 | 72 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| 2012 | 22 | AAA MLE | Olmecas de Tabasco | — | 37 | 35 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 314 | 371 | 314 | 686 | 402 | 19 | 5 | 302 | 91 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| 2013 | 23 | AAA MLE | Olmecas de Tabasco | — | 166 | 157 | 38 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 35 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 242 | 297 | 331 | 628 | 89 | 289 | 21 | 2 | 261 | 63 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 24 | AAA MLE | Olmecas de Tabasco | — | 214 | 198 | 50 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 55 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 253 | 308 | 283 | 591 | 30 | 344 | 26 | 6 | 262 | 63 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 25 | AAA MLE | Olmecas de Tabasco | — | 108 | 102 | 24 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 27 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 235 | 284 | 284 | 569 | 49 | 313 | 25 | 4 | 247 | 53 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 26 | AAA MLE | Olmecas de Tabasco | — | 70 | 62 | 16 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 17 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 258 | 358 | 290 | 649 | 32 | 356 | 24 | 10 | 294 | 85 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | MLE | — | 770 | 686 | 170 | 20 | 2 | 3 | 36 | 175 | 13 | 15 | 8 | 248 | 298 | 296 | 594 | 48 | 327 | 23 | 5 | 255 | 59 | -38 | -0 | +0 | +8 | +17 | -1.4 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 579 | 144 | 17 | 2 | 3 | 30 | 148 | 11 | 13 | 7 | 249 | 298 | 301 | 599 | 52 | 328 | 23 | 5 | 255 | 59 | -32 | -0 | +0 | +7 | +14 | -1.1 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2016 AAAOlmecas de Tabasco · 70 PAwOBA .338 → .294 (−44)K% 20.0% → 24.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 20.00% | ÷0.977 | ×1.200 | — | — | 24.56% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 14.29% | ÷0.933 | ×0.690 | — | ×1.003 | 10.59% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.43% | — | ×0.940 | — | ×1.003 | 1.35% |
| Singles /BIP | 33.33% | ÷1.022 | ×0.930 | — | ×1.003 | 30.42% |
| Doubles /BIP | 7.14% | ÷1.142 | ×0.830 | — | ×1.003 | 5.21% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.920 | — | ×1.003 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.872 | ×0.700 | — | ×1.003 | 0.00% |
Factors used: level-wide AAA factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 74, 1B 104, 2B 128, 3B 100, K 95, BB 87 — applied at half strength. Age: age 27 vs a level average of 27.2 → +0.3% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr younger than average).
Result: wOBA .338 → .294; ISO .054 → .041; BABIP .405 → .356. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2015 AAAOlmecas de Tabasco · 108 PAwOBA .259 → .247 (−12)K% 20.4% → 25.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 20.37% | ÷0.969 | ×1.200 | — | — | 25.23% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 5.56% | ÷0.986 | ×0.690 | — | ×1.018 | 3.96% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.93% | — | ×0.940 | — | ×1.018 | 0.89% |
| Singles /BIP | 27.40% | ÷1.017 | ×0.930 | ×1.050 | ×1.018 | 26.78% |
| Doubles /BIP | 4.11% | ÷1.011 | ×0.830 | ×1.050 | ×1.018 | 3.61% |
| Triples /BIP | 1.37% | ÷0.986 | ×0.920 | ×1.050 | ×1.018 | 1.37% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.011 | ×0.700 | — | ×1.018 | 0.00% |
Factors used: level-wide AAA factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 102, 1B 103, 2B 102, 3B 97, K 94, BB 97 — applied at half strength. Age: age 26 vs a level average of 27.2 → +1.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.
Result: wOBA .259 → .247; ISO .053 → .050; BABIP .324 → .313. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2014 AAAOlmecas de Tabasco · 214 PAwOBA .281 → .262 (−19)K% 20.1% → 25.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 20.09% | ÷0.939 | ×1.200 | — | — | 25.67% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 7.48% | ÷0.980 | ×0.690 | — | ×1.033 | 5.44% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.93% | — | ×0.940 | — | ×1.033 | 0.91% |
| Singles /BIP | 30.14% | ÷1.013 | ×0.930 | ×1.049 | ×1.033 | 29.98% |
| Doubles /BIP | 4.79% | ÷0.974 | ×0.830 | ×1.049 | ×1.033 | 4.43% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.920 | ×1.049 | ×1.033 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.935 | ×0.700 | — | ×1.033 | 0.00% |
Factors used: level-wide AAA factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 87, 1B 103, 2B 95, 3B 100, K 88, BB 96 — applied at half strength. Age: age 25 vs a level average of 27.2 → +3.3% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.2 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.049.
Result: wOBA .281 → .262; ISO .037 → .034; BABIP .349 → .344. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2013 AAAOlmecas de Tabasco · 166 PAwOBA .270 → .261 (−8)K% 16.9% → 20.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 16.87% | ÷0.972 | ×1.200 | — | — | 20.83% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 3.61% | ÷1.050 | ×0.690 | — | ×1.048 | 2.49% |
| HBP% /PA | 2.41% | — | ×0.940 | — | ×1.048 | 2.37% |
| Singles /BIP | 24.79% | ÷1.034 | ×0.930 | ×1.050 | ×1.048 | 24.54% |
| Doubles /BIP | 4.27% | ÷1.040 | ×0.830 | ×1.050 | ×1.048 | 3.75% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.900 | ×0.920 | ×1.050 | ×1.048 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 2.56% | ÷0.875 | ×0.700 | — | ×1.048 | 2.15% |
Factors used: level-wide AAA factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 75, 1B 107, 2B 108, 3B 80, K 94, BB 110 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 27.2 → +4.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (3.2 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.
Result: wOBA .270 → .261; ISO .097 → .087; BABIP .298 → .289. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2012 AAAOlmecas de Tabasco · 37 PAwOBA .318 → .302 (−15)K% 16.2% → 19.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 16.22% | ÷0.982 | ×1.200 | — | — | 19.83% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 8.11% | ÷1.046 | ×0.690 | — | ×1.050 | 5.62% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.940 | — | ×1.050 | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 42.31% | ÷1.029 | ×0.930 | — | ×1.050 | 40.16% |
| Doubles /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.984 | ×0.830 | — | ×1.050 | 0.00% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.952 | ×0.920 | — | ×1.050 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.933 | ×0.700 | — | ×1.050 | 0.00% |
Factors used: level-wide AAA factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 87, 1B 106, 2B 97, 3B 90, K 96, BB 109 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 27.2 → +5.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (4.2 yr younger than average).
Result: wOBA .318 → .302; ISO .000 → .000; BABIP .423 → .402. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2011 AAAOlmecas de Tabasco · 32 PAwOBA .282 → .275 (−7)K% 18.8% → 23.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 18.75% | ÷0.974 | ×1.200 | — | — | 23.11% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 3.12% | ÷1.032 | ×0.690 | — | ×1.050 | 2.19% |
| HBP% /PA | 9.38% | — | ×0.940 | — | ×1.050 | 9.25% |
| Singles /BIP | 35.00% | ÷1.019 | ×0.930 | — | ×1.050 | 33.54% |
| Doubles /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.991 | ×0.830 | — | ×1.050 | 0.00% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.040 | ×0.920 | — | ×1.050 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.828 | ×0.700 | — | ×1.050 | 0.00% |
Factors used: level-wide AAA factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 66, 1B 104, 2B 98, 3B 108, K 95, BB 106 — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 27.2 → +5.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (5.2 yr younger than average).
Result: wOBA .282 → .275; ISO .000 → .000; BABIP .350 → .335. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2010 AAAOlmecas de Tabasco · 75 PAwOBA .224 → .218 (−6)K% 12.0% → 14.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 12.00% | ÷0.965 | ×1.200 | — | — | 14.92% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 5.33% | ÷1.077 | ×0.690 | — | ×1.050 | 3.59% |
| HBP% /PA | 2.67% | — | ×0.940 | — | ×1.050 | 2.63% |
| Singles /BIP | 14.04% | ÷1.015 | ×0.930 | ×1.050 | ×1.050 | 14.17% |
| Doubles /BIP | 5.26% | ÷0.927 | ×0.830 | ×1.050 | ×1.050 | 5.20% |
| Triples /BIP | 1.75% | ÷1.022 | ×0.920 | ×1.050 | ×1.050 | 1.74% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.904 | ×0.700 | — | ×1.050 | 0.00% |
Factors used: level-wide AAA factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 81, 1B 103, 2B 85, 3B 104, K 93, BB 115 — applied at half strength. Age: age 21 vs a level average of 27.2 → +5.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (6.2 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.
Result: wOBA .224 → .218; ISO .076 → .078; BABIP .207 → .208. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2009 AAAOlmecas de Tabasco · 68 PAwOBA .201 → .194 (−7)K% 19.1% → 22.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 19.12% | ÷1.000 | ×1.200 | — | — | 22.94% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 5.88% | ÷1.000 | ×0.690 | — | ×1.050 | 4.26% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.940 | — | ×1.050 | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 22.45% | ÷1.000 | ×0.930 | ×1.050 | ×1.050 | 23.02% |
| Doubles /BIP | 2.04% | ÷1.000 | ×0.830 | ×1.050 | ×1.050 | 1.87% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.920 | ×1.050 | ×1.050 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.700 | — | ×1.050 | 0.00% |
Factors used: level-wide AAA factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 20 vs a level average of 27.2 → +5.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (7.2 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.
Result: wOBA .201 → .194; ISO .016 → .015; BABIP .245 → .249. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).