Exicardo Cayones

PosLF

B/TL/L

Born1991-10-09

Age (2027)35

No MLB projection yet. Career stats below are historical.

Overview

ALAST SEASON 2015

Year	Age	Lvl / Team	PA	AVG/OBP/SLG	HR	SB	wRC+	WAR	MLE AVG/OBP/SLG
2013	21	ABurlington Be…	243	.233/.349/.322	2	11	61	—	.212/.298/.278
2014	22	A+/A/INTL3 orgs	424	.263/.371/.364	3	7	74	—	.231/.310/.315
2015	23	ABurlington Be…	45	.129/.386/.161	0	0	40	—	.118/.318/.147

Contract

No contract data on file.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.

show model inputsbasis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral

Methodology▸ how these numbers are built

All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.

Year	Age	Lvl	Team	MLB%	PA	AB	H	2B	3B	HR	BB	SO	HBP	SB	CS	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	BABIP	K%	BB%	wOBA	wRC+	BAT	RUN	FLD	POS	REP	WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments)
2009	17	ROK	VSL Pirates	—	242	205	62	18	2	1	23	30	10	4	6	302	399	424	824	122	347	12	10	367	59	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	18	ROK	GCL Pirates	—	181	152	40	11	2	0	15	34	11	7	5	263	371	362	733	99	336	19	8	333	52	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	19	ROK	GCL Pirates	—	98	82	24	5	3	0	11	21	2	2	3	293	389	427	816	134	393	21	11	356	55	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	21	A	Burlington Bees	—	243	202	47	6	3	2	28	64	8	11	4	233	349	322	671	89	324	26	12	307	61	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	22	A+	Inland Empire 66ers	—	167	148	42	10	1	0	17	39	1	6	2	284	361	365	726	81	385	23	10	330	63	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	22	A	Burlington Bees	—	200	160	41	11	1	2	34	42	1	1	2	256	390	375	765	119	331	21	17	344	80	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	22	INTL	Caribes de Anzoategui	—	57	46	10	2	0	1	8	15	0	0	0	217	333	326	659	109	281	26	14	291	83	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	23	A	Burlington Bees	—	45	31	4	1	0	0	10	10	3	0	1	129	386	161	548	32	182	22	22	293	40	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents)
2009	17	ROK MLE	VSL Pirates	—	242	212	44	12	1	0	16	37	10	4	6	208	294	274	568	66	239	15	7	255	59	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	18	ROK MLE	GCL Pirates	—	181	158	31	8	1	0	9	49	11	7	5	196	287	259	546	63	275	27	5	245	52	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	19	ROK MLE	GCL Pirates	—	98	86	18	3	2	0	7	30	2	2	3	209	284	291	575	81	305	31	7	249	55	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	21	A MLE	Burlington Bees	—	243	212	45	5	3	1	18	80	8	11	4	212	298	278	577	66	311	33	7	258	61	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	22	A+ MLE	Inland Empire 66ers	—	167	153	37	8	1	0	12	53	1	6	2	242	301	307	608	65	356	32	7	262	63	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	22	A MLE	Burlington Bees	—	200	171	38	9	1	2	23	55	1	1	2	222	318	322	640	99	304	28	12	286	80	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	23	A MLE	Burlington Bees	—	45	34	4	1	0	0	7	13	3	0	1	118	318	147	465	29	149	29	16	227	40	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	17	ROK MLE	VSL Pirates	—	242	212	44	12	1	0	16	37	10	4	6	208	294	274	568	66	249	15	7	255	59	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	17	ROK RAW	VSL Pirates	—	242	205	62	18	2	1	23	30	10	4	6	302	399	424	824	122	347	12	10	367	59	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	18	ROK MLE	GCL Pirates	—	181	158	31	8	1	0	9	49	11	7	5	196	287	259	546	63	282	27	5	245	52	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	18	ROK RAW	GCL Pirates	—	181	152	40	11	2	0	15	34	11	7	5	263	371	362	733	99	336	19	8	333	52	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	19	ROK MLE	GCL Pirates	—	98	86	18	3	2	0	7	30	2	2	3	209	284	291	575	81	321	31	7	249	55	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	19	ROK RAW	GCL Pirates	—	98	82	24	5	3	0	11	21	2	2	3	293	389	427	816	134	393	21	11	356	55	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	21	A MLE	Burlington Bees	—	243	212	45	5	3	1	18	80	8	11	4	212	298	278	577	66	328	33	7	258	61	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	21	A RAW	Burlington Bees	—	243	202	47	6	3	2	28	64	8	11	4	233	349	322	671	89	324	26	12	307	61	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	22	A MLE	3 teams	—	424	374	87	20	2	2	39	125	2	7	4	233	308	313	621	80	339	29	9	275	72	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	22	A RAW	3 teams	—	424	354	93	23	2	3	59	96	2	7	4	263	371	364	735	102	347	23	14	331	72	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	23	A MLE	Burlington Bees	—	45	34	4	1	0	0	7	13	3	0	1	118	318	147	465	29	182	29	16	227	40	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	23	A RAW	Burlington Bees	—	45	31	4	1	0	0	10	10	3	0	1	129	386	161	548	32	182	22	22	293	40	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	17	ROK MLE	VSL Pirates	—	242	214	44	12	1	0	16	37	10	4	6	206	294	271	565	65	239	15	7	255	59	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	18	ROK MLE	GCL Pirates	—	181	159	31	8	1	0	9	49	11	7	5	195	287	258	544	63	275	27	5	245	52	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	19	ROK MLE	GCL Pirates	—	98	89	18	3	2	0	7	30	2	2	3	202	284	281	565	79	305	31	7	249	55	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	21	A MLE	Burlington Bees	—	243	215	45	5	3	1	18	80	8	11	4	209	298	274	573	65	311	33	7	258	61	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	22	A MLE	3 teams	—	424	380	87	20	2	2	39	125	2	7	4	229	308	308	616	79	328	29	9	275	72	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	23	A MLE	Burlington Bees	—	45	35	4	1	0	0	7	13	3	0	1	114	318	143	461	29	149	29	16	227	40	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career Totals
Career	—	MLE		—	1233	1076	229	49	9	3	96	334	36	31	23	213	299	283	582	71	301	27	8	260	62	-56	-3	+0	-13	+27	-4.6
/ 162G	—	MLE		—	650	567	122	26	5	2	51	176	19	16	12	215	301	289	591	74	304	27	8	260	62	-30	-2	+0	-7	+14	-2.5

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2015 ABurlington Bees · 45 PAwOBA .294 → .227 (−67)K% 22.2% → 29.4%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	22.22%	÷1.029	×1.360	—	—	29.36%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	22.22%	÷0.936	×0.690	—	×0.980	16.05%
HBP% /PA	6.67%	—	×0.780	—	×0.980	5.10%
Singles /BIP	14.29%	÷1.107	×0.920	—	×0.980	11.63%
Doubles /BIP	4.76%	÷0.992	×0.830	—	×0.980	3.91%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.150	×0.910	—	×0.980	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	0.00%	÷1.423	×0.800	—	×0.980	0.00%

Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 185, 1B 121, 2B 98, 3B 130, K 106, BB 87 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 22.0 → −2.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.0 yr older than average).

Result: wOBA .294 → .227; ISO .032 → .028; BABIP .182 → .149. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2014 ABurlington Bees · 200 PAwOBA .338 → .286 (−52)K% 21.0% → 27.7%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	21.00%	÷1.030	×1.360	—	—	27.73%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	16.50%	÷0.998	×0.690	—	×0.990	11.30%
HBP% /PA	0.50%	—	×0.780	—	×0.990	0.39%
Singles /BIP	22.88%	÷0.994	×0.920	×1.041	×0.990	21.81%
Doubles /BIP	9.32%	÷1.023	×0.830	×1.041	×0.990	7.79%
Triples /BIP	0.85%	÷0.923	×0.910	×1.041	×0.990	0.86%
Home runs /BIP	1.69%	÷0.935	×0.800	—	×0.990	1.43%

Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 87, 1B 99, 2B 105, 3B 85, K 106, BB 100 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.0 → −1.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.041.

Result: wOBA .338 → .286; ISO .119 → .105; BABIP .331 → .304. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2014 A+Inland Empire 66ers · 167 PAwOBA .322 → .262 (−60)K% 23.4% → 31.5%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	23.35%	÷0.994	×1.340	—	—	31.47%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	10.18%	÷1.048	×0.710	—	×0.998	6.88%
HBP% /PA	0.60%	—	×0.790	—	×0.998	0.47%
Singles /BIP	28.44%	÷0.984	×0.910	×1.050	×0.998	27.55%
Doubles /BIP	9.17%	÷1.063	×0.820	×1.050	×0.998	7.42%
Triples /BIP	0.92%	÷1.108	×0.760	×1.050	×0.998	0.66%
Home runs /BIP	0.00%	÷0.820	×0.920	—	×0.998	0.00%

Factors used: league row CAL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 64, 1B 97, 2B 113, 3B 122, K 99, BB 110 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.8 → −0.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.

Result: wOBA .322 → .262; ISO .081 → .060; BABIP .385 → .356. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2013 ABurlington Bees · 243 PAwOBA .302 → .258 (−44)K% 26.3% → 33.1%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	26.34%	÷1.081	×1.360	—	—	33.13%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	11.11%	÷1.018	×0.690	—	—	7.53%
HBP% /PA	3.29%	—	×0.780	—	—	2.57%
Singles /BIP	26.09%	÷0.961	×0.920	×1.038	—	25.93%
Doubles /BIP	4.35%	÷1.102	×0.830	×1.038	—	3.40%
Triples /BIP	2.17%	÷0.929	×0.910	×1.038	—	2.21%
Home runs /BIP	1.45%	÷1.267	×0.800	—	—	0.92%

Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 153, 1B 92, 2B 120, 3B 86, K 116, BB 104 — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 22.0 → +0.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.038.

Result: wOBA .302 → .258; ISO .089 → .072; BABIP .324 → .311. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2011 ROKGCL Pirates · 98 PAwOBA .347 → .249 (−99)K% 21.4% → 30.9%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	21.43%	÷1.000	×1.440	—	—	30.86%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	11.22%	÷1.000	×0.620	—	×0.995	6.92%
HBP% /PA	2.04%	—	×0.720	—	×0.995	1.46%
Singles /BIP	26.23%	÷1.000	×0.820	×0.990	×0.995	21.19%
Doubles /BIP	8.20%	÷1.000	×0.720	×0.990	×0.995	5.82%
Triples /BIP	4.92%	÷1.000	×0.720	×0.990	×0.995	3.49%
Home runs /BIP	0.00%	÷1.000	×0.780	—	×0.995	0.00%

Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 20 vs a level average of 19.5 → −0.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.5 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.990.

Result: wOBA .347 → .249; ISO .134 → .093; BABIP .393 → .305. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2010 ROKGCL Pirates · 181 PAwOBA .325 → .245 (−80)K% 18.8% → 27.0%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	18.78%	÷1.000	×1.440	—	—	27.05%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	7.73%	÷1.000	×0.620	—	×1.008	4.83%
HBP% /PA	6.08%	—	×0.720	—	×1.008	4.41%
Singles /BIP	22.88%	÷1.000	×0.820	×1.031	×1.008	19.49%
Doubles /BIP	9.32%	÷1.000	×0.720	×1.031	×1.008	6.97%
Triples /BIP	1.69%	÷1.000	×0.720	×1.031	×1.008	1.27%
Home runs /BIP	0.00%	÷1.000	×0.780	—	×1.008	0.00%

Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 19 vs a level average of 19.5 → +0.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.5 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.031.

Result: wOBA .325 → .245; ISO .099 → .072; BABIP .336 → .275. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2009 DSLVSL Pirates · 242 PAwOBA .361 → .255 (−107)K% 12.4% → 15.1%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	12.40%	÷1.000	×1.220	—	—	15.12%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	9.50%	÷1.000	×0.700	—	×1.008	6.70%
HBP% /PA	4.13%	—	×0.700	—	×1.008	2.91%
Singles /BIP	23.43%	÷1.000	×0.680	×1.050	×1.008	16.85%
Doubles /BIP	10.29%	÷1.000	×0.600	×1.050	×1.008	6.53%
Triples /BIP	1.14%	÷1.000	×0.600	×1.050	×1.008	0.73%
Home runs /BIP	0.57%	÷1.000	×0.470	—	×1.008	0.27%

Factors used: level-wide DSL factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 18 vs a level average of 18.5 → +0.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.5 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.

Result: wOBA .361 → .255; ISO .122 → .078; BABIP .347 → .239. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

Not traceable per stint: some stints lack the counting stats the component translation needs. Level-wide factors that apply instead — .