Stephen Strasburg
| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 32 | MLBWSH | 2 | 2 | 5 | 10.80 | 5.50 | 8.7% | 4.3% | -0.0 | ||
| 2021 | 33 | MIX2 levels | 6 | 6 | 26 | 3.81 | 4.64 | 24.3% | 12.6% | 0.2 | K 22.1% · BB 12.6% · FIP 5.14 | |
| 2022 | 34 | MIX3 levels | 4 | 4 | 18 | 4.91 | 3.15 | 24.3% | 10.8% | 0.5 | K 24.3% · BB 10.8% · FIP 3.16 | |
| 2023 | 35 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2024 | 36 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2025 | 37 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2026 | 38 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 29 | MLBWSH | 60 | .130/.161/.241 | 2 | 0 | 0 | -0.6 | |
| 2018 | 30 | MLBWSH | 51 | .122/.163/.122 | 0 | 0 | -35 | -0.7 | |
| 2019 | 31 | MLBWSH | 80 | .167/.200/.222 | 1 | 0 | 9 | -0.7 | |
| 2020 | 32 | No MLB games played | |||||||
| 2021 | 33 | No MLB games played | |||||||
| 2022 | 34 | No MLB games played | |||||||
| 2023 | 35 | No MLB games played | |||||||
| 2024 | 36 | No MLB games played | |||||||
| 2025 | 37 | No MLB games played | |||||||
| 2026 | 38 | No MLB games played | |||||||
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2010 | 22 | MLB MLE | Washington Nationals | 12 | 12 | 68 | 274 | 92 | 17 | 5 | 100% | 5.7 | 33.6% | 6.2% | 27.4% | 1.8% | 2.91 | 2.05 | +3.0 |
| 2010 | 22 | MLB RAW | Washington Nationals | 12 | 12 | 68 | 274 | 92 | 17 | 5 | 100% | 5.7 | 33.6% | 6.2% | 27.4% | 1.8% | 2.91 | 2.10 | +3.0 |
| 2011 | 23 | MLB MLE | Washington Nationals | 5 | 5 | 24 | 88 | 24 | 2 | 0 | 100% | 4.8 | 27.3% | 2.3% | 25.0% | 0.0% | 1.50 | 1.08 | +1.4 |
| 2011 | 23 | MLB RAW | Washington Nationals | 5 | 5 | 24 | 88 | 24 | 2 | 0 | 100% | 4.8 | 27.3% | 2.3% | 25.0% | 0.0% | 1.50 | 1.35 | +1.3 |
| 2012 | 24 | MLB MLE | Washington Nationals | 28 | 28 | 159 | 653 | 197 | 47 | 15 | 100% | 5.7 | 30.2% | 7.2% | 23.0% | 2.3% | 3.16 | 2.72 | +5.4 |
| 2012 | 24 | MLB RAW | Washington Nationals | 28 | 28 | 159 | 653 | 197 | 47 | 15 | 100% | 5.7 | 30.2% | 7.2% | 23.0% | 2.3% | 3.16 | 2.74 | +5.4 |
| 2013 | 25 | MLB MLE | Washington Nationals | 30 | 30 | 183 | 731 | 191 | 55 | 16 | 100% | 6.1 | 26.1% | 7.5% | 18.6% | 2.2% | 3.00 | 3.05 | +5.4 |
| 2013 | 25 | MLB RAW | Washington Nationals | 30 | 30 | 183 | 731 | 191 | 55 | 16 | 100% | 6.1 | 26.1% | 7.5% | 18.6% | 2.2% | 3.00 | 3.05 | +5.4 |
| 2014 | 26 | MLB MLE | Washington Nationals | 34 | 34 | 215 | 868 | 242 | 39 | 23 | 100% | 6.3 | 27.9% | 4.5% | 23.4% | 2.6% | 3.14 | 2.77 | +7.3 |
| 2014 | 26 | MLB RAW | Washington Nationals | 34 | 34 | 215 | 868 | 242 | 39 | 23 | 100% | 6.3 | 27.9% | 4.5% | 23.4% | 2.6% | 3.14 | 2.78 | +7.2 |
| 2015 | 27 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 26 | 26 | 142 | 581 | 177 | 27 | 14 | 100% | 5.5 | 29.6% | 5.0% | 24.7% | 2.7% | 3.49 | 2.70 | +4.9 |
| 2015 | 27 | MIX RAW | 3 levels | 26 | 26 | 142 | 581 | 177 | 27 | 14 | 100% | 5.5 | 30.5% | 4.6% | 25.8% | 2.4% | 3.49 | 2.46 | +5.4 |
| 2016 | 28 | MLB MLE | Washington Nationals | 24 | 24 | 148 | 598 | 183 | 43 | 15 | 100% | 6.2 | 30.6% | 7.2% | 23.4% | 2.5% | 3.60 | 2.80 | +4.9 |
| 2016 | 28 | MLB RAW | Washington Nationals | 24 | 24 | 148 | 598 | 183 | 43 | 15 | 100% | 6.2 | 30.6% | 7.2% | 23.4% | 2.5% | 3.60 | 2.82 | +4.9 |
| 2017 | 29 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 29 | 29 | 180 | 720 | 209 | 43 | 13 | 100% | 6.2 | 29.1% | 6.0% | 23.1% | 1.9% | 2.50 | 2.42 | +7.0 |
| 2017 | 29 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 29 | 29 | 180 | 720 | 209 | 43 | 13 | 100% | 6.2 | 29.0% | 6.0% | 23.1% | 1.8% | 2.50 | 2.43 | +7.0 |
| 2018 | 30 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 24 | 24 | 139 | 582 | 168 | 37 | 19 | 100% | 5.8 | 28.7% | 6.6% | 22.1% | 3.3% | 3.56 | 3.33 | +3.5 |
| 2018 | 30 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 24 | 24 | 139 | 582 | 168 | 37 | 19 | 100% | 5.8 | 28.9% | 6.4% | 22.5% | 3.3% | 3.56 | 3.26 | +3.7 |
| 2019 | 31 | MLB MLE | Washington Nationals | 33 | 33 | 209 | 841 | 251 | 52 | 24 | 100% | 6.3 | 29.8% | 6.2% | 23.7% | 2.9% | 3.32 | 2.93 | +6.6 |
| 2019 | 31 | MLB RAW | Washington Nationals | 33 | 33 | 209 | 841 | 251 | 52 | 24 | 100% | 6.3 | 29.8% | 6.2% | 23.7% | 2.9% | 3.32 | 2.94 | +6.5 |
| 2020 | 32 | MLB MLE | Washington Nationals | 2 | 2 | 5 | 23 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 2.5 | 8.7% | 4.3% | 4.3% | 4.3% | 10.80 | 5.30 | +0.0 |
| 2020 | 32 | MLB RAW | Washington Nationals | 2 | 2 | 5 | 23 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 2.5 | 8.7% | 4.3% | 4.3% | 4.3% | 10.80 | 5.50 | -0.0 |
| 2021 | 33 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 6 | 6 | 26 | 111 | 27 | 14 | 4 | 100% | 4.3 | 22.1% | 12.6% | 9.5% | 4.2% | 3.81 | 5.14 | +0.1 |
| 2021 | 33 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 6 | 6 | 26 | 111 | 27 | 14 | 4 | 100% | 4.3 | 24.3% | 12.6% | 11.7% | 3.6% | 3.81 | 4.64 | +0.2 |
| 2022 | 34 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 4 | 4 | 18 | 74 | 18 | 8 | 1 | 100% | 4.6 | 24.3% | 10.8% | 13.5% | 1.4% | 4.91 | 3.16 | +0.5 |
| 2022 | 34 | MIX RAW | 3 levels | 4 | 4 | 18 | 74 | 18 | 8 | 1 | 100% | 4.6 | 24.3% | 10.8% | 13.5% | 1.4% | 4.91 | 3.15 | +0.5 |
| ▸ Career totals (raw MLB only — as recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| MLB Career | — | 247 | 247 | 1470 | 5962 | 1723 | 374 | 149 | 100% | 6.0 | 28.9% | 6.3% | 22.6% | 2.5% | 3.24 | 2.84 | +47.9 | ||
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 247 | 247 | 1470 | 5962 | 1723 | 374 | 149 | 100% | 6.0 | 28.9% | 6.3% | 22.6% | 2.5% | 3.24 | 2.83 | +48.1 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 34 | 34 | 200 | 811 | 234 | 51 | 20 | 100% | 6.0 | 28.9% | 6.3% | 22.6% | 2.5% | 3.24 | 2.83 | +6.5 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 257 | 257 | 1517 | 6144 | 1773 | 389 | 153 | 100% | 5.9 | 28.9% | 6.3% | 22.5% | 2.5% | 3.21 | 2.83 | +47.9 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 34 | 34 | 200 | 810 | 234 | 51 | 20 | 100% | 5.9 | 28.9% | 6.3% | 22.5% | 2.5% | 3.21 | 2.83 | +6.5 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2022 AFredericksburg Nationals · 8 IPFIP 2.69 → 3.70 (+1.01)K% 29.0% → 21.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 29.03% | — | ×0.740 | 21.48% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 16.13% | — | ×1.180 | 19.03% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷1.074 | ×1.300 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 115).
Result: FIP 2.69 → 3.70, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 AAARochester Red Wings · 6 IPFIP 2.04 → 2.28 (+0.23)K% 20.0% → 17.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 20.00% | — | ×0.880 | 17.60% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 5.00% | — | ×1.050 | 5.25% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷1.084 | ×1.100 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors — K ×0.88, BB ×1.05, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 117).
Result: FIP 2.04 → 2.28, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2018 A+Potomac Nationals · 9 IPFIP 2.21 → 3.20 (+0.99)K% 31.6% → 24.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 31.58% | — | ×0.770 | 24.32% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 2.63% | — | ×1.150 | 3.03% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.63% | ÷1.017 | ×1.250 | 3.23% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 103).
Result: FIP 2.21 → 3.20, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2015 AAASyracuse Chiefs · 10 IPFIP -0.12 → 0.32 (+0.44)K% 42.1% → 37.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 42.11% | — | ×0.880 | 37.05% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 2.63% | — | ×1.050 | 2.76% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷1.183 | ×1.100 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors — K ×0.88, BB ×1.05, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 137).
Result: FIP -0.12 → 0.32, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2015 AAHarrisburg Senators · 5 IPFIP 0.57 → 1.05 (+0.48)K% 30.0% → 24.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 30.00% | — | ×0.810 | 24.30% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 0.00% | — | ×1.100 | 0.00% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷0.986 | ×1.200 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 97).
Result: FIP 0.57 → 1.05, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).