Tyler Lyons

P New York Yankees
Age 39 LHP 6'2" / 210 lbs MLB
Overview
MLBRPLAST SEASON 2020
YearAgeLvl / TeamGGSIPERAFIPK%BB%WARMLE rates
201830MIX3 levels373415.273.9523.3%7.4%0.3K 22.9% · BB 7.5% · FIP 4.01
201931MIX2 levels520633.863.3530.0%8.6%0.9K 27.2% · BB 8.9% · FIP 3.60
202032MLBNYY10221.604.900.0%10.0%-0.0
202133No MLB games played
202234No MLB games played
202335No MLB games played
202436No MLB games played
202537No MLB games played
202638No MLB games played
Last 3 seasons WAR 1.2
Contract
No contract data on file.
Skills · percentileStatcast 2019
K%90
xwOBA vs25
FB Velo10
ERA—
FIP—
K%—
BB%—
K-BB%—
Proj IP—
Statcast · Contract
Statcast Percentiles
FB Velo
p1089.8
Whiff%
p9035.2%
K%
p9031.5%
xwOBA vs
p250.341

Contract

No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.
basis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed

Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.

YearAge LvlTeam GGSIPBF KBBHR GS%IP/G K%BB%K-BB%HR% ERAFIP WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments)
▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year)
201325MLB MLESt. Louis Cardinals128532234316567%4.419.3%7.2%12.1%2.4%4.753.70+1.1
201325MLB RAWSt. Louis Cardinals128532234316567%4.419.3%7.2%12.1%2.2%4.753.61+1.1
201426MLB MLESt. Louis Cardinals11437155369436%3.323.2%5.8%17.4%2.8%4.423.40+0.5
201426MLB RAWSt. Louis Cardinals11437155369436%3.323.2%5.8%17.4%2.6%4.423.29+0.6
201527MIX MLE2 levels3324155652156282473%4.722.2%4.4%17.8%3.6%3.373.78+3.0
201527MIX RAW2 levels3324155652156282473%4.723.9%4.3%19.6%3.7%3.373.64+3.3
201628MLB MLESt. Louis Cardinals30048187461490%1.624.6%7.5%17.1%5.2%3.384.81-0.1
201628MLB RAWSt. Louis Cardinals30048187461490%1.624.6%7.5%17.1%4.8%3.384.50+0.0
201729MIX MLE4 levels566793208921611%1.428.5%7.3%21.2%1.9%2.952.65+1.8
201729MIX RAW4 levels566793208921611%1.427.8%6.6%21.3%1.9%2.952.63+1.8
201830MIX MLE3 levels37341176411368%1.122.9%7.5%15.4%3.4%5.274.01+0.3
201830MIX RAW3 levels37341176411368%1.123.3%7.4%15.9%3.4%5.273.95+0.3
201931MIX MLE2 levels52063257772280%1.227.2%8.9%18.2%3.0%3.863.60+0.7
201931MIX RAW2 levels52063257772280%1.230.0%8.6%21.4%3.1%3.863.35+0.9
202032MLB MLENew York Yankees102100100%1.70.0%10.0%-10.0%0.0%21.604.37+0.0
202032MLB RAWNew York Yankees102100100%1.70.0%10.0%-10.0%0.0%21.604.90-0.0
▸ Career totals (raw MLB only — as recorded)
MLB Career—162202831187289824012%1.724.3%6.9%17.4%3.4%4.303.77+2.6
▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected)
Career— RAW162202831187289824012%1.724.3%6.9%17.4%3.4%4.303.77+2.6
/ 200 IP— RAW11514200840204582812%1.724.3%6.9%17.4%3.4%4.303.77+1.9
Career— MLE2324547719804711286319%2.123.8%6.5%17.3%3.2%3.833.66+2.6
/ 200 IP— MLE9719200830197542619%2.123.8%6.5%17.3%3.2%3.833.66+1.9

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2019 AAAScranton/Wilkes-Barre RailRiders · 50 IPFIP 2.87 → 3.24 (+0.37)K% 29.6% → 26.0%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF29.56%—×0.88026.01%
BB% (unintentional) /BF9.36%—×1.0509.83%
HR / BF /BF1.97%÷1.087×1.1001.99%

Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors — K ×0.88, BB ×1.05, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 117).

Result: FIP 2.87 → 3.24, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2018 AAAMemphis Redbirds · 22 IPFIP 3.20 → 3.80 (+0.59)K% 25.9% → 22.8%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF25.93%—×0.88022.81%
BB% (unintentional) /BF7.41%—×1.0507.78%
HR / BF /BF2.47%÷0.909×1.1002.99%

Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors — K ×0.88, BB ×1.05, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 82).

Result: FIP 3.20 → 3.80, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2017 AAAMemphis Redbirds · 18 IPFIP 3.16 → 3.62 (+0.46)K% 23.9% → 21.1%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF23.94%—×0.88021.07%
BB% (unintentional) /BF4.23%—×1.0504.44%
HR / BF /BF2.82%÷0.980×1.1003.16%

Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors — K ×0.88, BB ×1.05, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 96).

Result: FIP 3.16 → 3.62, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2015 AAAMemphis Redbirds · 95 IPFIP 3.13 → 3.23 (+0.10)K% 24.2% → 21.3%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF24.18%—×0.88021.28%
BB% (unintentional) /BF3.27%—×1.0503.44%
HR / BF /BF3.02%÷1.224×1.1002.72%

Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors — K ×0.88, BB ×1.05, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 145).

Result: FIP 3.13 → 3.23, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).