Beamer Weems

PosSS

B/TR/R

Born1987-07-28

Age (2027)40

No MLB projection yet. Career stats below are historical.

Overview

AAALAST SEASON 2015

Year	Age	Lvl / Team	PA	AVG/OBP/SLG	HR	wRC+	WAR	MLE AVG/OBP/SLG
2011	24	AASD	311	.246/.330/.415	9	61	—	.193/.256/.330
2012	25	AAATucson Padres	270	.241/.306/.351	5	42	—	.195/.246/.279
2015	28	AAA/AATEX	233	.231/.297/.335	2	31	—	.179/.229/.249

Contract

No contract data on file.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.

show model inputsbasis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral

Methodology▸ how these numbers are built

All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.

Year	Age	Lvl	Team	MLB%	PA	AB	H	2B	3B	HR	BB	SO	HBP	SB	CS	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	BABIP	K%	BB%	wOBA	wRC+	BAT	RUN	FLD	POS	REP	WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments)
2008	21	AA	San Antonio Missions	—	19	17	5	2	0	0	2	3	0	0	0	294	368	412	780	118	357	16	11	351	90	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	22	A+	Lake Elsinore Storm	—	456	359	91	21	3	3	76	76	13	10	5	253	400	354	754	100	313	17	17	348	82	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	23	AA	San Antonio Missions	—	116	94	14	5	1	0	18	22	1	1	2	149	287	223	510	74	192	19	16	246	34	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	24	AA	San Antonio Missions	—	311	272	67	17	1	9	28	68	7	0	2	246	330	415	746	169	296	22	9	331	61	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	25	AAA	Tucson Padres	—	270	245	59	12	0	5	20	57	3	0	1	241	306	351	657	110	293	21	7	296	42	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	28	AAA	Round Rock Express	—	213	192	47	14	1	2	19	34	1	0	1	245	316	359	675	115	288	16	9	305	40	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	28	AA	Frisco RoughRiders	—	20	20	2	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	100	100	100	200		105	5	0	90	-64	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents)
2008	21	AA MLE	San Antonio Missions	—	19	18	5	2	0	0	1	4	0	0	0	278	316	389	705	111	333	21	5	301	90	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	22	A+ MLE	Lake Elsinore Storm	—	456	382	85	18	2	3	55	102	13	10	5	223	340	304	644	81	288	22	12	290	82	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	23	AA MLE	San Antonio Missions	—	116	101	15	5	1	0	13	27	1	1	2	149	252	218	470	69	193	23	11	219	34	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	24	AA MLE	San Antonio Missions	—	311	285	55	13	1	8	17	87	7	0	2	193	256	330	585	137	245	28	5	258	61	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	25	AAA MLE	Tucson Padres	—	270	251	49	9	0	4	14	75	3	0	1	195	246	279	525	84	256	28	5	230	42	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	28	AAA MLE	Round Rock Express	—	213	198	37	10	1	1	13	43	1	0	1	187	241	263	503	76	234	20	6	228	40	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	28	AA MLE	Frisco RoughRiders	—	20	20	2	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	100	100	100	200		90	5	0	74	-64	—	—	—	—	—	—
2008	21	AA MLE	San Antonio Missions	—	19	18	5	2	0	0	1	4	0	0	0	278	316	389	705	111	357	21	5	301	90	—	—	—	—	—	—
2008	21	AA RAW	San Antonio Missions	—	19	17	5	2	0	0	2	3	0	0	0	294	368	412	780	118	357	16	11	351	90	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	22	A+ MLE	Lake Elsinore Storm	—	456	382	85	18	2	3	55	102	13	10	5	223	340	304	644	81	295	22	12	290	82	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	22	A+ RAW	Lake Elsinore Storm	—	456	359	91	21	3	3	76	76	13	10	5	253	400	354	754	100	313	17	17	348	82	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	23	AA MLE	San Antonio Missions	—	116	101	15	5	1	0	13	27	1	1	2	149	252	218	470	69	200	23	11	219	34	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	23	AA RAW	San Antonio Missions	—	116	94	14	5	1	0	18	22	1	1	2	149	287	223	510	74	192	19	16	246	34	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	24	AA MLE	San Antonio Missions	—	311	285	55	13	1	8	17	87	7	0	2	193	256	330	585	137	246	28	5	258	61	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	24	AA RAW	San Antonio Missions	—	311	272	67	17	1	9	28	68	7	0	2	246	330	415	746	169	296	22	9	331	61	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	25	AAA MLE	Tucson Padres	—	270	251	49	9	0	4	14	75	3	0	1	195	246	279	525	84	260	28	5	230	42	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	25	AAA RAW	Tucson Padres	—	270	245	59	12	0	5	20	57	3	0	1	241	306	351	657	110	293	21	7	296	42	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	28	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	233	218	39	10	1	1	13	44	1	0	1	179	228	248	476	69	220	19	6	215	32	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	28	AAA RAW	2 teams	—	233	212	49	14	1	2	19	35	1	0	1	231	297	335	632	104	269	15	8	286	32	—	—	—	—	—	—
2008	21	AA MLE	San Antonio Missions	—	19	18	5	2	0	0	1	4	0	0	0	278	316	389	705	111	333	21	5	301	90	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	22	A+ MLE	Lake Elsinore Storm	—	456	385	85	18	2	3	55	102	13	10	5	221	340	301	641	81	288	22	12	290	82	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	23	AA MLE	San Antonio Missions	—	116	101	15	5	1	0	13	27	1	1	2	149	252	218	470	69	193	23	11	219	34	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	24	AA MLE	San Antonio Missions	—	311	284	55	13	1	8	17	87	7	0	2	194	256	331	587	137	245	28	5	258	61	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	25	AAA MLE	Tucson Padres	—	270	251	49	9	0	4	14	75	3	0	1	195	246	279	525	84	256	28	5	230	42	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	28	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	233	217	39	10	1	1	13	44	1	0	1	180	228	249	477	69	222	19	6	215	32	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career Totals
Career	—	MLE		—	1405	1255	248	57	5	16	113	339	25	11	11	198	277	289	566	92	257	24	8	253	58	-71	-2	+0	+15	+30	-2.8
/ 162G	—	MLE		—	650	581	114	26	2	7	52	157	12	5	5	196	276	284	560	88	255	24	8	253	58	-33	-1	+0	+7	+14	-1.3

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2015 AAARound Rock Express · 213 PAwOBA .297 → .228 (−69)K% 16.0% → 20.0%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	15.96%	÷1.031	×1.290	—	—	19.98%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	8.92%	÷1.014	×0.710	—	×0.992	6.20%
HBP% /PA	0.47%	—	×0.980	—	×0.992	0.46%
Singles /BIP	18.99%	÷1.007	×0.900	×0.952	×0.992	16.03%
Doubles /BIP	8.86%	÷1.029	×0.810	×0.952	×0.992	6.59%
Triples /BIP	0.63%	÷0.900	×0.810	×0.952	×0.992	0.54%
Home runs /BIP	1.27%	÷1.184	×0.780	—	×0.992	0.83%

Factors used: league row PCL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 137, 1B 101, 2B 106, 3B 80, K 106, BB 103 — applied at half strength. Age: age 28 vs a level average of 27.2 → −0.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.952.

Result: wOBA .297 → .228; ISO .115 → .083; BABIP .288 → .234. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2015 AAFrisco RoughRiders · 20 PAwOBA .088 → .074 (−14)K% 5.0% → 5.9%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	5.00%	÷1.033	×1.220	—	—	5.90%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	0.00%	÷0.976	×0.700	—	×0.968	0.00%
HBP% /PA	0.00%	—	×0.870	—	×0.968	0.00%
Singles /BIP	10.53%	÷1.047	×0.920	—	×0.968	8.96%
Doubles /BIP	0.00%	÷1.026	×0.840	—	×0.968	0.00%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.150	×0.940	—	×0.968	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	0.00%	÷0.946	×0.800	—	×0.968	0.00%

Factors used: league row TL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 89, 1B 109, 2B 105, 3B 130, K 107, BB 95 — applied at half strength. Age: age 28 vs a level average of 24.8 → −3.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (3.2 yr older than average).

Result: wOBA .088 → .074; ISO .000 → .000; BABIP .105 → .090. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2012 AAATucson Padres · 270 PAwOBA .290 → .230 (−59)K% 21.1% → 27.8%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	21.11%	÷0.979	×1.290	—	—	27.81%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	7.41%	÷1.052	×0.710	—	×1.033	5.17%
HBP% /PA	1.11%	—	×0.980	—	×1.033	1.12%
Singles /BIP	22.34%	÷1.007	×0.900	×0.974	×1.033	20.08%
Doubles /BIP	6.38%	÷1.013	×0.810	×0.974	×1.033	5.14%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.150	×0.810	×0.974	×1.033	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	2.66%	÷1.050	×0.780	—	×1.033	2.04%

Factors used: league row PCL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 110, 1B 101, 2B 103, 3B 130, K 96, BB 110 — applied at half strength. Age: age 25 vs a level average of 27.2 → +3.3% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.2 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.974.

Result: wOBA .290 → .230; ISO .110 → .082; BABIP .293 → .256. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2011 AASan Antonio Missions · 311 PAwOBA .323 → .258 (−65)K% 21.9% → 28.1%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	21.86%	÷0.950	×1.220	—	—	28.08%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	8.68%	÷1.128	×0.700	—	×1.012	5.45%
HBP% /PA	2.25%	—	×0.870	—	×1.012	1.98%
Singles /BIP	19.61%	÷1.069	×0.920	×0.969	×1.012	16.54%
Doubles /BIP	8.33%	÷1.037	×0.840	×0.969	×1.012	6.62%
Triples /BIP	0.49%	÷0.900	×0.940	×0.969	×1.012	0.50%
Home runs /BIP	4.41%	÷0.889	×0.800	—	×1.012	4.02%

Factors used: league row TL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 78, 1B 114, 2B 107, 3B 80, K 90, BB 126 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 24.8 → +1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.969.

Result: wOBA .323 → .258; ISO .169 → .145; BABIP .296 → .245. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2010 AASan Antonio Missions · 116 PAwOBA .243 → .219 (−25)K% 19.0% → 23.2%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	18.97%	÷0.996	×1.220	—	—	23.23%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	15.52%	÷0.984	×0.700	—	×1.027	11.33%
HBP% /PA	0.86%	—	×0.870	—	×1.027	0.77%
Singles /BIP	11.11%	÷0.953	×0.920	×1.050	×1.027	11.56%
Doubles /BIP	6.94%	÷0.927	×0.840	×1.050	×1.027	6.79%
Triples /BIP	1.39%	÷1.129	×0.940	×1.050	×1.027	1.25%
Home runs /BIP	0.00%	÷0.869	×0.800	—	×1.027	0.00%

Factors used: league row TL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 74, 1B 91, 2B 85, 3B 126, K 99, BB 97 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 24.8 → +2.7% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.

Result: wOBA .243 → .219; ISO .074 → .074; BABIP .192 → .193. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2009 A+Lake Elsinore Storm · 456 PAwOBA .341 → .290 (−50)K% 16.7% → 22.3%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	16.67%	÷1.000	×1.340	—	—	22.33%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	16.67%	÷1.000	×0.710	—	×1.012	11.98%
HBP% /PA	2.85%	—	×0.790	—	×1.012	2.28%
Singles /BIP	22.61%	÷1.000	×0.910	×1.030	×1.012	21.45%
Doubles /BIP	7.42%	÷1.000	×0.820	×1.030	×1.012	6.34%
Triples /BIP	1.06%	÷1.000	×0.760	×1.030	×1.012	0.84%
Home runs /BIP	1.06%	÷1.000	×0.920	—	×1.012	0.99%

Factors used: league row CAL. Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 22.8 → +1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.030.

Result: wOBA .341 → .290; ISO .100 → .088; BABIP .313 → .288. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2008 AASan Antonio Missions · 19 PAwOBA .343 → .301 (−42)K% 15.8% → 19.3%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	15.79%	÷1.000	×1.220	—	—	19.26%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	10.53%	÷1.000	×0.700	—	×1.050	7.74%
HBP% /PA	0.00%	—	×0.870	—	×1.050	0.00%
Singles /BIP	21.43%	÷1.000	×0.920	—	×1.050	20.70%
Doubles /BIP	14.29%	÷1.000	×0.840	—	×1.050	12.60%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.000	×0.940	—	×1.050	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	0.00%	÷1.000	×0.800	—	×1.050	0.00%

Factors used: league row TL. Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 21 vs a level average of 24.8 → +5.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (3.8 yr younger than average).

Result: wOBA .343 → .301; ISO .118 → .103; BABIP .357 → .333. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).