Chris Rusin
P Albuquerque Isotopes| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 32 | MIX3 levels | 27 | 10 | 74 | 5.38 | 4.17 | 13.9% | 6.8% | 0.3 | K 12.4% · BB 6.7% · FIP 4.15 | |
| 2020 | 33 | MLBATL | 1 | 0 | 3 | 8.10 | 7.90 | 17.6% | 17.6% | -0.1 | ||
| 2021 | 34 | AAACOL | 30 | 0 | 32 | 10.41 | 8.66 | 14.4% | 8.8% | — | K 12.7% · BB 9.2% · FIP 7.70 | |
| 2022 | 35 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2023 | 36 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2024 | 37 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2025 | 38 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2026 | 39 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
Statcast · Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2012 | 25 | MLB MLE | Chicago Cubs | 7 | 7 | 30 | 135 | 21 | 11 | 4 | 100% | 4.2 | 15.6% | 8.1% | 7.4% | 3.1% | 6.37 | 4.51 | +0.3 |
| 2012 | 25 | MLB RAW | Chicago Cubs | 7 | 7 | 30 | 135 | 21 | 11 | 4 | 100% | 4.2 | 15.6% | 8.1% | 7.4% | 3.0% | 6.37 | 4.55 | +0.3 |
| 2013 | 26 | MLB MLE | Chicago Cubs | 13 | 13 | 66 | 282 | 36 | 21 | 8 | 100% | 5.1 | 12.8% | 7.4% | 5.3% | 2.9% | 3.93 | 4.58 | +0.6 |
| 2013 | 26 | MLB RAW | Chicago Cubs | 13 | 13 | 66 | 282 | 36 | 21 | 8 | 100% | 5.1 | 12.8% | 7.4% | 5.3% | 2.8% | 3.93 | 4.53 | +0.7 |
| 2014 | 27 | MLB MLE | Chicago Cubs | 4 | 0 | 13 | 58 | 8 | 4 | 1 | 0% | 3.2 | 13.8% | 6.9% | 6.9% | 1.8% | 7.11 | 3.79 | +0.1 |
| 2014 | 27 | MLB RAW | Chicago Cubs | 4 | 0 | 13 | 58 | 8 | 4 | 1 | 0% | 3.2 | 13.8% | 6.9% | 6.9% | 1.7% | 7.11 | 3.81 | +0.1 |
| 2015 | 28 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 31 | 28 | 166 | 755 | 104 | 46 | 25 | 90% | 5.4 | 13.5% | 6.2% | 7.3% | 3.0% | 5.53 | 4.40 | +1.9 |
| 2015 | 28 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 31 | 28 | 166 | 755 | 104 | 46 | 25 | 90% | 5.4 | 13.8% | 6.1% | 7.7% | 3.3% | 5.53 | 4.64 | +1.5 |
| 2016 | 29 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 32 | 10 | 94 | 396 | 80 | 24 | 6 | 31% | 2.9 | 19.7% | 6.0% | 13.7% | 1.3% | 3.94 | 2.89 | +1.9 |
| 2016 | 29 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 32 | 10 | 94 | 396 | 80 | 24 | 6 | 31% | 2.9 | 20.2% | 6.1% | 14.1% | 1.5% | 3.94 | 2.99 | +1.8 |
| 2017 | 30 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 61 | 0 | 88 | 351 | 74 | 18 | 9 | 0% | 1.4 | 20.9% | 5.3% | 15.6% | 2.3% | 2.57 | 3.30 | +1.3 |
| 2017 | 30 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 61 | 0 | 88 | 351 | 74 | 18 | 9 | 0% | 1.4 | 21.1% | 5.1% | 16.0% | 2.6% | 2.57 | 3.36 | +1.2 |
| 2018 | 31 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 52 | 0 | 58 | 256 | 48 | 27 | 7 | 0% | 1.1 | 19.5% | 10.4% | 9.1% | 2.6% | 6.05 | 4.18 | +0.3 |
| 2018 | 31 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 52 | 0 | 58 | 256 | 48 | 27 | 7 | 0% | 1.1 | 18.8% | 10.5% | 8.2% | 2.7% | 6.05 | 4.41 | +0.1 |
| 2019 | 32 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 27 | 10 | 74 | 339 | 47 | 23 | 8 | 37% | 2.7 | 12.4% | 6.7% | 5.7% | 2.3% | 5.38 | 4.15 | +0.4 |
| 2019 | 32 | MIX RAW | 3 levels | 27 | 10 | 74 | 339 | 47 | 23 | 8 | 37% | 2.7 | 13.9% | 6.8% | 7.1% | 2.4% | 5.38 | 4.17 | +0.3 |
| 2020 | 33 | MLB MLE | Atlanta Braves | 1 | 0 | 3 | 17 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0% | 3.3 | 17.6% | 17.6% | 0.0% | 5.9% | 8.10 | 7.07 | -0.1 |
| 2020 | 33 | MLB RAW | Atlanta Braves | 1 | 0 | 3 | 17 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0% | 3.3 | 17.6% | 17.6% | 0.0% | 5.9% | 8.10 | 7.90 | -0.1 |
| 2021 | 34 | AAA MLE | Albuquerque Isotopes | 30 | 0 | 32 | 160 | 23 | 14 | 14 | 0% | 1.1 | 12.7% | 9.2% | 3.5% | 8.2% | 10.41 | 7.70 | — |
| 2021 | 34 | AAA RAW | Albuquerque Isotopes | 30 | 0 | 32 | 160 | 23 | 14 | 14 | 0% | 1.1 | 14.4% | 8.8% | 5.6% | 8.8% | 10.41 | 8.66 | — |
| ▸ Career totals (raw MLB only — as recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| MLB Career | — | 189 | 49 | 469 | 2026 | 341 | 140 | 55 | 26% | 2.5 | 16.8% | 6.9% | 9.9% | 2.7% | 4.65 | 4.07 | +2.7 | ||
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 189 | 49 | 469 | 2026 | 341 | 140 | 55 | 26% | 2.5 | 16.8% | 6.9% | 9.9% | 2.7% | 4.65 | 4.04 | +2.8 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 81 | 21 | 200 | 865 | 146 | 60 | 23 | 26% | 2.5 | 16.8% | 6.9% | 9.9% | 2.7% | 4.65 | 4.04 | +1.2 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 258 | 68 | 623 | 2749 | 433 | 192 | 78 | 26% | 2.4 | 15.8% | 7.0% | 8.8% | 2.8% | 5.07 | 4.21 | +2.7 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 83 | 22 | 200 | 883 | 139 | 62 | 25 | 26% | 2.4 | 15.8% | 7.0% | 8.8% | 2.8% | 5.07 | 4.21 | +1.1 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2021 AAAAlbuquerque Isotopes · 32 IPFIP 7.80 → 7.70 (−0.10)K% 14.4% → 12.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 14.37% | — | ×0.880 | 12.65% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 8.75% | — | ×1.050 | 9.19% |
| HR / BF /BF | 8.75% | ÷1.172 | ×1.100 | 8.21% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors — K ×0.88, BB ×1.05, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 134).
Result: FIP 7.80 → 7.70, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2019 AAAAlbuquerque Isotopes · 66 IPFIP 4.00 → 4.15 (+0.14)K% 14.0% → 12.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 14.05% | — | ×0.880 | 12.36% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 6.35% | — | ×1.050 | 6.67% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.34% | ÷1.136 | ×1.100 | 2.27% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors — K ×0.88, BB ×1.05, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 127).
Result: FIP 4.00 → 4.15, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2019 AAHartford Yard Goats · 7 IPFIP 2.96 → 3.35 (+0.38)K% 16.1% → 13.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 16.13% | — | ×0.810 | 13.06% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 9.68% | — | ×1.100 | 10.65% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷1.190 | ×1.200 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 138).
Result: FIP 2.96 → 3.35, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2016 AAAAlbuquerque Isotopes · 9 IPFIP 3.10 → 3.28 (+0.18)K% 23.9% → 21.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 23.91% | — | ×0.880 | 21.04% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 6.52% | — | ×1.050 | 6.85% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.17% | ÷1.202 | ×1.100 | 1.99% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors — K ×0.88, BB ×1.05, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 140).
Result: FIP 3.10 → 3.28, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2015 AAAAlbuquerque Isotopes · 34 IPFIP 4.99 → 5.13 (+0.14)K% 11.2% → 9.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 11.18% | — | ×0.880 | 9.84% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 6.21% | — | ×1.050 | 6.52% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.73% | ÷1.105 | ×1.100 | 3.71% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors — K ×0.88, BB ×1.05, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 121).
Result: FIP 4.99 → 5.13, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).