Jeremy Rathjen
| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | 23 | ALAD | 527 | .232/.338/.349 | 7 | 33 | 55 | — | .197/.278/.292 |
| 2014 | 24 | A+LAA | 398 | .269/.352/.480 | 16 | 9 | 84 | — | .220/.285/.398 |
| 2015 | 25 | AA/A+2 orgs | 253 | .193/.257/.339 | 7 | 3 | 28 | — | .156/.206/.261 |
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2012 | 22 | ROK | Ogden Raptors | — | 325 | 262 | 85 | 17 | 1 | 9 | 48 | 55 | 10 | 16 | 8 | 324 | 447 | 500 | 947 | 176 | 378 | 17 | 15 | 417 | 87 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 23 | A | Great Lakes Loons | — | 527 | 444 | 103 | 29 | 1 | 7 | 56 | 99 | 15 | 33 | 6 | 232 | 338 | 349 | 687 | 117 | 283 | 19 | 11 | 310 | 55 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 24 | A+ | Rancho Cucamonga Quakes | — | 398 | 342 | 92 | 20 | 2 | 16 | 39 | 93 | 5 | 9 | 2 | 269 | 352 | 480 | 832 | 211 | 322 | 23 | 10 | 357 | 84 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 25 | AA | Tulsa Drillers | — | 221 | 203 | 40 | 9 | 1 | 7 | 15 | 55 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 197 | 262 | 355 | 617 | 158 | 234 | 25 | 7 | 277 | 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 25 | A+ | Rancho Cucamonga Quakes | — | 32 | 30 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 167 | 219 | 233 | 452 | 67 | 217 | 22 | 6 | 209 | -15 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2012 | 22 | ROK MLE | Ogden Raptors | — | 325 | 281 | 67 | 12 | 1 | 7 | 29 | 79 | 10 | 16 | 8 | 238 | 331 | 363 | 694 | 125 | 290 | 24 | 9 | 297 | 87 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 23 | A MLE | Great Lakes Loons | — | 527 | 463 | 91 | 24 | 1 | 6 | 37 | 130 | 15 | 33 | 6 | 197 | 278 | 292 | 569 | 95 | 249 | 25 | 7 | 250 | 55 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 24 | A+ MLE | Rancho Cucamonga Quakes | — | 398 | 354 | 78 | 16 | 1 | 15 | 27 | 120 | 5 | 9 | 2 | 220 | 285 | 398 | 683 | 178 | 272 | 30 | 7 | 293 | 84 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 25 | AA MLE | Tulsa Drillers | — | 221 | 207 | 34 | 7 | 1 | 5 | 11 | 68 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 164 | 217 | 280 | 497 | 116 | 215 | 31 | 5 | 218 | 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 25 | A+ MLE | Rancho Cucamonga Quakes | — | 32 | 31 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 97 | 125 | 129 | 254 | 32 | 174 | 31 | 3 | 146 | -15 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 22 | ROK MLE | Ogden Raptors | — | 325 | 281 | 67 | 12 | 1 | 7 | 29 | 79 | 10 | 16 | 8 | 238 | 331 | 363 | 694 | 125 | 303 | 24 | 9 | 297 | 87 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 22 | ROK RAW | Ogden Raptors | — | 325 | 262 | 85 | 17 | 1 | 9 | 48 | 55 | 10 | 16 | 8 | 324 | 447 | 500 | 947 | 176 | 378 | 17 | 15 | 417 | 87 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 23 | A MLE | Great Lakes Loons | — | 527 | 463 | 91 | 24 | 1 | 6 | 37 | 130 | 15 | 33 | 6 | 197 | 278 | 292 | 569 | 95 | 259 | 25 | 7 | 250 | 55 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 23 | A RAW | Great Lakes Loons | — | 527 | 444 | 103 | 29 | 1 | 7 | 56 | 99 | 15 | 33 | 6 | 232 | 338 | 349 | 687 | 117 | 283 | 19 | 11 | 310 | 55 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 24 | A+ MLE | Rancho Cucamonga Quakes | — | 398 | 354 | 78 | 16 | 1 | 15 | 27 | 120 | 5 | 9 | 2 | 220 | 285 | 398 | 683 | 178 | 284 | 30 | 7 | 293 | 84 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 24 | A+ RAW | Rancho Cucamonga Quakes | — | 398 | 342 | 92 | 20 | 2 | 16 | 39 | 93 | 5 | 9 | 2 | 269 | 352 | 480 | 832 | 211 | 322 | 23 | 10 | 357 | 84 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 25 | AA MLE | 2 teams | — | 253 | 238 | 37 | 8 | 1 | 5 | 12 | 78 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 155 | 206 | 261 | 466 | 105 | 206 | 31 | 5 | 209 | 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 25 | AA RAW | 2 teams | — | 253 | 233 | 45 | 11 | 1 | 7 | 17 | 62 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 193 | 257 | 339 | 596 | 146 | 232 | 25 | 7 | 268 | 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 22 | ROK MLE | Ogden Raptors | — | 325 | 283 | 67 | 12 | 1 | 7 | 29 | 79 | 10 | 16 | 8 | 237 | 331 | 360 | 692 | 124 | 290 | 24 | 9 | 297 | 87 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 23 | A MLE | Great Lakes Loons | — | 527 | 470 | 91 | 24 | 1 | 6 | 37 | 130 | 15 | 33 | 6 | 194 | 278 | 287 | 565 | 94 | 249 | 25 | 7 | 250 | 55 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 24 | A+ MLE | Rancho Cucamonga Quakes | — | 398 | 363 | 78 | 16 | 1 | 15 | 27 | 120 | 5 | 9 | 2 | 215 | 285 | 388 | 673 | 174 | 272 | 30 | 7 | 293 | 84 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 25 | AA MLE | 2 teams | — | 253 | 236 | 37 | 8 | 1 | 5 | 12 | 78 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 157 | 206 | 263 | 468 | 106 | 210 | 31 | 5 | 209 | 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | MLE | — | 1503 | 1336 | 273 | 60 | 4 | 33 | 105 | 407 | 33 | 61 | 17 | 204 | 279 | 329 | 608 | 125 | 266 | 27 | 7 | 265 | 65 | -62 | +5 | +0 | -16 | +33 | -4.1 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 578 | 118 | 26 | 2 | 14 | 45 | 176 | 14 | 26 | 7 | 204 | 278 | 329 | 607 | 125 | 266 | 27 | 7 | 265 | 65 | -27 | +2 | +0 | -7 | +14 | -1.8 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2015 AATulsa Drillers · 221 PAwOBA .269 → .218 (−51)K% 24.9% → 30.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 24.89% | ÷0.989 | ×1.220 | — | — | 30.71% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 6.79% | ÷0.976 | ×0.700 | — | ×0.998 | 4.86% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.36% | — | ×0.870 | — | ×0.998 | 1.18% |
| Singles /BIP | 15.54% | ÷0.938 | ×0.920 | ×0.990 | ×0.998 | 15.05% |
| Doubles /BIP | 6.08% | ÷1.006 | ×0.840 | ×0.990 | ×0.998 | 5.02% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.68% | ÷0.900 | ×0.940 | ×0.990 | ×0.998 | 0.70% |
| Home runs /BIP | 4.73% | ÷1.039 | ×0.800 | — | ×0.998 | 3.63% |
Factors used: league row TL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 108, 1B 88, 2B 101, 3B 80, K 98, BB 95 — applied at half strength. Age: age 25 vs a level average of 24.8 → −0.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.990.
Result: wOBA .269 → .218; ISO .158 → .119; BABIP .234 → .215. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2015 A+Rancho Cucamonga Quakes · 32 PAwOBA .203 → .146 (−57)K% 21.9% → 30.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 21.88% | ÷0.970 | ×1.340 | — | — | 30.22% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 6.25% | ÷0.958 | ×0.710 | — | ×0.978 | 4.53% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.790 | — | ×0.978 | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 13.04% | ÷1.046 | ×0.910 | — | ×0.978 | 11.10% |
| Doubles /BIP | 8.70% | ÷1.109 | ×0.820 | — | ×0.978 | 6.29% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.150 | ×0.760 | — | ×0.978 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.898 | ×0.920 | — | ×0.978 | 0.00% |
Factors used: league row CAL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 80, 1B 109, 2B 122, 3B 130, K 94, BB 92 — applied at half strength. Age: age 25 vs a level average of 22.8 → −2.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.2 yr older than average).
Result: wOBA .203 → .146; ISO .067 → .044; BABIP .217 → .174. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2014 A+Rancho Cucamonga Quakes · 398 PAwOBA .349 → .293 (−56)K% 23.4% → 30.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 23.37% | ÷1.036 | ×1.340 | — | — | 30.23% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 9.55% | ÷0.979 | ×0.710 | — | ×0.988 | 6.84% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.26% | — | ×0.790 | — | ×0.988 | 0.98% |
| Singles /BIP | 21.69% | ÷1.034 | ×0.910 | ×0.995 | ×0.988 | 18.75% |
| Doubles /BIP | 8.03% | ÷1.000 | ×0.820 | ×0.995 | ×0.988 | 6.48% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.80% | ÷0.998 | ×0.760 | ×0.995 | ×0.988 | 0.60% |
| Home runs /BIP | 6.43% | ÷0.934 | ×0.920 | — | ×0.988 | 6.26% |
Factors used: league row CAL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 87, 1B 107, 2B 100, 3B 100, K 107, BB 96 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 22.8 → −1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.995.
Result: wOBA .349 → .293; ISO .211 → .191; BABIP .322 → .272. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2013 AGreat Lakes Loons · 527 PAwOBA .303 → .250 (−53)K% 18.8% → 24.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 18.79% | ÷1.035 | ×1.360 | — | — | 24.69% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 10.63% | ÷1.023 | ×0.690 | — | ×0.990 | 7.10% |
| HBP% /PA | 2.85% | — | ×0.780 | — | ×0.990 | 2.20% |
| Singles /BIP | 19.13% | ÷1.006 | ×0.920 | ×0.998 | ×0.990 | 17.29% |
| Doubles /BIP | 8.41% | ÷0.983 | ×0.830 | ×0.998 | ×0.990 | 7.01% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.29% | ÷0.960 | ×0.910 | ×0.998 | ×0.990 | 0.27% |
| Home runs /BIP | 2.03% | ÷0.898 | ×0.800 | — | ×0.990 | 1.79% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 80, 1B 101, 2B 97, 3B 92, K 107, BB 105 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.0 → −1.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.998.
Result: wOBA .303 → .250; ISO .117 → .101; BABIP .283 → .249. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2012 ROKOgden Raptors · 325 PAwOBA .410 → .297 (−113)K% 16.9% → 24.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 16.92% | ÷1.000 | ×1.440 | — | — | 24.37% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 14.77% | ÷1.000 | ×0.610 | — | ×0.975 | 8.78% |
| HBP% /PA | 3.08% | — | ×0.720 | — | ×0.975 | 2.16% |
| Singles /BIP | 28.02% | ÷1.000 | ×0.820 | ×0.999 | ×0.975 | 22.38% |
| Doubles /BIP | 8.21% | ÷1.000 | ×0.720 | ×0.999 | ×0.975 | 5.76% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.48% | ÷1.000 | ×0.720 | ×0.999 | ×0.975 | 0.34% |
| Home runs /BIP | 4.35% | ÷1.000 | ×0.750 | — | ×0.975 | 3.18% |
Factors used: league row PIO. Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 19.5 → −2.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.5 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.999.
Result: wOBA .410 → .297; ISO .176 → .128; BABIP .378 → .290. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).