Roberto Lopez

PosLF

B/TR/R

Born1985-10-01

Age (2027)41

No MLB projection yet. Career stats below are historical.

Overview

INTLLAST SEASON 2020

Year	Age	Lvl / Team	PA	AVG/OBP/SLG	HR	SB	wRC+	WAR	MLE AVG/OBP/SLG
2017	31	AAA/INTL2 orgs	403	.273/.350/.411	12	4	73	—	.235/.282/.346
2019	33	AAA/INTL2 orgs	392	.257/.340/.360	9	4	58	—	.210/.260/.293
2020	34	INTLYaquis de Obr…	146	.242/.372/.375	4	0	118	—

Contract

No contract data on file.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.

show model inputsbasis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral

Methodology▸ how these numbers are built

All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.

Year	Age	Lvl	Team	MLB%	PA	AB	H	2B	3B	HR	BB	SO	HBP	SB	CS	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	BABIP	K%	BB%	wOBA	wRC+	BAT	RUN	FLD	POS	REP	WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments)
2008	22	ROK	Orem Owlz	—	319	270	108	28	1	14	34	23	11	3	2	400	486	667	1.152	267	397	7	11	493	132	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	23	A	Cedar Rapids Kernels	—	420	354	96	18	0	11	40	52	17	5	7	271	372	415	788	144	284	12	10	350	78	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	24	AA	Arkansas Travelers	—	325	276	66	13	1	7	29	53	9	0	5	239	331	370	701	130	265	16	9	309	66	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	24	A+	Rancho Cucamonga Quakes	—	211	182	63	19	1	5	13	35	10	5	2	346	420	544	963	198	392	17	6	413	121	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	25	AAA	Salt Lake Bees	—	34	30	5	1	0	0	3	2	1	0	2	167	265	200	465	33	179	6	9	227	17	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	25	AA	Arkansas Travelers	—	376	331	91	30	1	12	32	59	9	2	4	275	355	480	835	205	302	16	9	366	94	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	26	AA	Arkansas Travelers	—	580	524	135	36	1	16	38	69	13	5	7	258	323	422	745	164	268	12	7	330	71	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	27	AAA	Salt Lake Bees	—	476	432	125	26	4	10	34	74	4	11	4	289	347	438	784	148	325	16	7	345	70	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	27	INTL	Caneros de los Mochis	—	117	102	24	2	0	2	9	24	4	0	1	235	322	314	635	78	286	21	8	291	83	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	28	AAA	Salt Lake Bees	—	440	400	117	21	2	11	25	70	7	4	5	292	345	438	782	145	326	16	6	343	67	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	28	INTL	Leones del Caracas	—	19	18	5	1	0	1	1	5	0	0	0	278	316	500	816	222	333	26	5	357	128	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	29	AAA	Piratas de Campeche	—	359	312	92	15	1	10	34	43	6	2	2	295	375	446	821	151	312	12	9	361	80	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	29	INTL	Aguilas de Mexicali	—	39	34	7	0	0	0	5	8	0	0	1	206	308	206	514		269	21	13	252	57	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	30	AAA	Toros de Tijuana	—	175	156	42	8	0	8	15	33	0	2	0	269	333	474	808	205	293	19	9	348	68	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	31	AAA	Toros de Tijuana	—	311	277	81	8	1	11	28	55	3	4	4	292	364	448	811	155	330	18	9	359	75	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	31	INTL	Aguilas de Mexicali	—	92	78	16	1	1	1	9	9	2	0	0	205	303	282	585	77	221	10	10	266	66	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	33	AAA	Tecos de los Dos Laredos	—	340	304	78	8	0	9	27	56	4	3	1	257	325	372	697	115	285	16	8	312	50	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	33	INTL	Sultanes de Monterrey	—	52	38	10	0	0	0	11	4	1	1	0	263	440	263	703		286	8	21	336	113	—	—	—	—	—	—
2020	34	INTL	Yaquis de Obregon	—	146	120	29	4	0	4	23	17	2	0	2	242	372	375	747	133	250	12	16	342	118	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents)
2008	22	ROK MLE	Orem Owlz	—	319	285	86	20	1	11	19	33	11	3	2	302	368	495	863	193	298	10	6	364	132	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	23	A MLE	Cedar Rapids Kernels	—	420	368	84	15	0	9	26	71	17	5	7	228	309	342	651	114	241	17	6	283	78	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	24	AA MLE	Arkansas Travelers	—	325	287	60	12	1	7	18	62	9	0	5	209	277	331	608	122	226	19	6	266	66	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	24	A+ MLE	Rancho Cucamonga Quakes	—	211	186	55	15	1	5	9	47	10	5	2	296	361	468	829	172	334	22	4	347	121	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	25	AAA MLE	Salt Lake Bees	—	34	31	5	1	0	0	2	2	1	0	2	161	235	194	429	32	163	6	6	193	17	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	25	AA MLE	Arkansas Travelers	—	376	343	82	26	1	11	20	72	9	2	4	239	298	417	715	178	265	19	5	307	94	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	26	AA MLE	Arkansas Travelers	—	580	538	119	29	1	15	24	84	13	5	7	221	271	362	634	141	228	14	4	273	71	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	27	AAA MLE	Salt Lake Bees	—	476	442	104	20	3	8	24	99	4	11	4	235	281	348	629	113	275	21	5	272	70	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	28	AAA MLE	Salt Lake Bees	—	440	408	96	16	2	7	17	92	7	4	5	235	278	336	614	100	274	21	4	267	67	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	29	AAA MLE	Piratas de Campeche	—	359	327	82	13	1	7	19	50	6	2	2	251	304	361	665	110	263	14	5	286	80	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	30	AAA MLE	Toros de Tijuana	—	175	162	36	7	0	4	9	37	0	2	0	222	263	340	603	117	262	21	5	269	68	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	31	AAA MLE	Toros de Tijuana	—	311	289	68	6	1	8	16	66	3	4	4	235	282	346	628	111	276	21	5	279	75	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	33	AAA MLE	Tecos de los Dos Laredos	—	340	314	66	5	0	7	17	68	4	3	1	210	260	293	553	83	239	20	5	242	50	—	—	—	—	—	—
2008	22	ROK MLE	Orem Owlz	—	319	285	86	20	1	11	19	33	11	3	2	302	368	495	863	193	306	10	6	364	132	—	—	—	—	—	—
2008	22	ROK RAW	Orem Owlz	—	319	270	108	28	1	14	34	23	11	3	2	400	486	667	1.152	267	397	7	11	493	132	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	23	A MLE	Cedar Rapids Kernels	—	420	368	84	15	0	9	26	71	17	5	7	228	309	342	651	114	253	17	6	283	78	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	23	A RAW	Cedar Rapids Kernels	—	420	354	96	18	0	11	40	52	17	5	7	271	372	415	788	144	284	12	10	350	78	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	24	AA MLE	2 teams	—	536	473	115	27	2	12	27	109	19	5	7	243	310	385	695	142	282	20	5	298	88	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	24	AA RAW	2 teams	—	536	458	129	32	2	12	42	88	19	5	7	282	366	439	805	157	315	16	8	350	88	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	25	AA MLE	2 teams	—	410	374	87	27	1	11	22	75	10	2	6	233	293	398	691	166	262	18	5	298	88	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	25	AA RAW	2 teams	—	410	361	96	31	1	12	35	61	10	2	6	266	347	457	804	191	290	15	9	354	88	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	26	AA MLE	Arkansas Travelers	—	580	538	119	29	1	15	24	84	13	5	7	221	271	362	634	141	234	14	4	273	71	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	26	AA RAW	Arkansas Travelers	—	580	524	135	36	1	16	38	69	13	5	7	258	323	422	745	164	268	12	7	330	71	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	27	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	593	547	128	25	3	10	30	123	8	11	5	234	284	346	629	112	280	21	5	272	70	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	27	AAA RAW	2 teams	—	593	534	149	28	4	12	43	98	8	11	5	279	342	414	756	135	318	17	7	334	70	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	28	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	459	427	101	17	2	8	17	95	7	4	5	237	277	342	619	105	282	21	4	267	67	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	28	AAA RAW	2 teams	—	459	418	122	22	2	12	26	75	7	4	5	292	344	440	784	148	326	16	6	343	67	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	29	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	398	364	89	14	1	7	21	56	6	2	3	245	297	346	643	102	269	14	5	286	80	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	29	AAA RAW	2 teams	—	398	346	99	15	1	10	39	51	6	2	3	286	368	422	790	136	308	13	10	350	80	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	30	AAA MLE	Toros de Tijuana	—	175	162	36	7	0	4	9	37	0	2	0	222	263	340	603	117	262	21	5	269	68	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	30	AAA RAW	Toros de Tijuana	—	175	156	42	8	0	8	15	33	0	2	0	269	333	474	808	205	293	19	9	348	68	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	31	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	403	371	89	8	1	11	21	85	5	4	4	240	290	356	645	116	283	21	5	279	75	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	31	AAA RAW	2 teams	—	403	355	97	9	2	12	37	64	5	4	4	273	350	411	761	138	304	16	9	338	75	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	33	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	392	360	76	6	0	8	20	78	5	4	1	211	262	294	557	83	245	20	5	242	50	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	33	AAA RAW	2 teams	—	392	342	88	8	0	9	38	60	5	4	1	257	340	360	700	102	285	15	10	315	50	—	—	—	—	—	—
2020	34	INTL MLE	Yaquis de Obregon	—	146	120	29	4	0	4	23	17	2	0	2	242	372	375	747	133	250	12	16	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
2020	34	INTL RAW	Yaquis de Obregon	—	146	120	29	4	0	4	23	17	2	0	2	242	372	375	747	133	250	12	16	342	118	—	—	—	—	—	—
2008	22	ROK MLE	Orem Owlz	—	319	286	86	20	1	11	19	33	11	3	2	301	368	493	861	192	298	10	6	364	132	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	23	A MLE	Cedar Rapids Kernels	—	420	374	84	15	0	9	26	71	17	5	7	225	309	337	646	112	241	17	6	283	78	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	24	AA MLE	2 teams	—	536	485	115	27	2	12	27	109	19	5	7	237	310	375	685	138	269	20	5	298	88	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	25	AA MLE	2 teams	—	410	375	87	27	1	11	22	75	10	2	6	232	293	397	690	165	257	18	5	298	88	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	26	AA MLE	Arkansas Travelers	—	580	538	119	29	1	15	24	84	13	5	7	221	271	362	634	141	228	14	4	273	71	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	27	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	593	550	128	25	3	10	30	123	8	11	5	233	284	344	627	111	275	21	5	272	70	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	28	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	459	432	101	17	2	8	17	95	7	4	5	234	277	338	615	104	274	21	4	267	67	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	29	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	398	368	89	14	1	7	21	56	6	2	3	242	297	342	639	101	263	14	5	286	80	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	30	AAA MLE	Toros de Tijuana	—	175	164	36	7	0	4	9	37	0	2	0	220	263	335	599	116	262	21	5	269	68	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	31	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	403	374	89	8	1	11	21	85	5	4	4	238	290	353	643	115	276	21	5	279	75	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	33	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	392	364	76	6	0	8	20	78	5	4	1	209	262	291	554	82	239	20	5	242	50	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career Totals
Career	—	MLE		—	4831	4389	1039	199	12	110	259	863	103	47	49	237	295	363	658	126	268	18	5	275	72	-161	-10	+0	-52	+105	-12.0
/ 162G	—	MLE		—	650	591	141	27	2	15	35	116	14	6	7	239	297	367	665	129	269	18	5	275	72	-22	-2	+0	-7	+14	-1.6

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2019 AAATecos de los Dos Laredos · 340 PAwOBA .306 → .242 (−64)K% 16.5% → 19.9%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	16.47%	÷0.994	×1.200	—	—	19.89%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	7.94%	÷1.019	×0.690	—	×0.940	5.06%
HBP% /PA	1.18%	—	×0.940	—	×0.940	1.04%
Singles /BIP	24.60%	÷0.956	×0.930	×0.950	×0.940	21.38%
Doubles /BIP	3.23%	÷1.103	×0.830	×0.950	×0.940	2.17%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.150	×0.920	×0.950	×0.940	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	3.63%	÷0.919	×0.700	—	×0.940	2.60%

Factors used: level-wide AAA factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 84, 1B 91, 2B 120, 3B 130, K 99, BB 104 — applied at half strength. Age: age 34 vs a level average of 27.2 → −6.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (6.8 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.

Result: wOBA .306 → .242; ISO .115 → .083; BABIP .285 → .239. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2017 AAAToros de Tijuana · 311 PAwOBA .349 → .279 (−70)K% 17.7% → 21.2%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	17.68%	÷0.999	×1.200	—	—	21.25%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	8.36%	÷1.033	×0.690	—	×0.952	5.32%
HBP% /PA	0.96%	—	×0.940	—	×0.952	0.86%
Singles /BIP	27.48%	÷0.988	×0.930	×0.959	×0.952	23.62%
Doubles /BIP	3.60%	÷1.007	×0.830	×0.959	×0.952	2.71%
Triples /BIP	0.45%	÷1.150	×0.920	×0.959	×0.952	0.33%
Home runs /BIP	4.95%	÷0.892	×0.700	—	×0.952	3.70%

Factors used: level-wide AAA factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 78, 1B 98, 2B 101, 3B 130, K 100, BB 107 — applied at half strength. Age: age 32 vs a level average of 27.2 → −4.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (4.8 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.959.

Result: wOBA .349 → .279; ISO .155 → .118; BABIP .330 → .276. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2016 AAAToros de Tijuana · 175 PAwOBA .340 → .269 (−72)K% 18.9% → 21.3%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	18.86%	÷1.062	×1.200	—	—	21.31%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	8.57%	÷1.055	×0.690	—	×0.962	5.39%
HBP% /PA	0.00%	—	×0.940	—	×0.962	0.00%
Singles /BIP	21.14%	÷0.967	×0.930	×1.012	×0.962	19.79%
Doubles /BIP	6.50%	÷0.926	×0.830	×1.012	×0.962	5.67%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷0.941	×0.920	×1.012	×0.962	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	6.50%	÷1.278	×0.700	—	×0.962	3.43%

Factors used: level-wide AAA factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 156, 1B 93, 2B 85, 3B 88, K 112, BB 111 — applied at half strength. Age: age 31 vs a level average of 27.2 → −3.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (3.8 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.012.

Result: wOBA .340 → .269; ISO .205 → .131; BABIP .293 → .262. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2015 AAAPiratas de Campeche · 359 PAwOBA .353 → .286 (−67)K% 12.0% → 14.0%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	11.98%	÷1.025	×1.200	—	—	14.02%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	8.91%	÷1.132	×0.690	—	×0.972	5.28%
HBP% /PA	1.67%	—	×0.940	—	×0.972	1.53%
Singles /BIP	24.54%	÷0.999	×0.930	×0.961	×0.972	21.33%
Doubles /BIP	5.58%	÷0.981	×0.830	×0.961	×0.972	4.41%
Triples /BIP	0.37%	÷0.900	×0.920	×0.961	×0.972	0.35%
Home runs /BIP	3.72%	÷1.067	×0.700	—	×0.972	2.37%

Factors used: level-wide AAA factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 113, 1B 100, 2B 96, 3B 80, K 105, BB 126 — applied at half strength. Age: age 30 vs a level average of 27.2 → −2.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.8 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.961.

Result: wOBA .353 → .286; ISO .151 → .111; BABIP .312 → .263. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2014 AAASalt Lake Bees · 440 PAwOBA .338 → .267 (−71)K% 15.9% → 20.8%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	15.91%	÷0.986	×1.290	—	—	20.82%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	5.68%	÷1.043	×0.710	—	×0.982	3.80%
HBP% /PA	1.59%	—	×0.980	—	×0.982	1.53%
Singles /BIP	25.15%	÷1.013	×0.900	×0.992	×0.982	21.78%
Doubles /BIP	6.36%	÷1.005	×0.810	×0.992	×0.982	5.00%
Triples /BIP	0.61%	÷0.958	×0.810	×0.992	×0.982	0.50%
Home runs /BIP	3.33%	÷1.139	×0.780	—	×0.982	2.24%

Factors used: league row PCL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 128, 1B 103, 2B 101, 3B 92, K 97, BB 109 — applied at half strength. Age: age 29 vs a level average of 27.2 → −1.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.8 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.992.

Result: wOBA .338 → .267; ISO .145 → .103; BABIP .326 → .274. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2013 AAASalt Lake Bees · 476 PAwOBA .340 → .272 (−68)K% 15.5% → 20.8%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	15.55%	÷0.964	×1.290	—	—	20.80%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	7.14%	÷1.016	×0.710	—	×0.992	4.95%
HBP% /PA	0.84%	—	×0.980	—	×0.992	0.82%
Singles /BIP	23.74%	÷0.997	×0.900	×0.976	×0.992	20.75%
Doubles /BIP	7.26%	÷0.977	×0.810	×0.976	×0.992	5.83%
Triples /BIP	1.12%	÷1.150	×0.810	×0.976	×0.992	0.76%
Home runs /BIP	2.79%	÷0.973	×0.780	—	×0.992	2.22%

Factors used: league row PCL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 95, 1B 99, 2B 95, 3B 130, K 93, BB 103 — applied at half strength. Age: age 28 vs a level average of 27.2 → −0.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.976.

Result: wOBA .340 → .272; ISO .148 → .113; BABIP .325 → .275. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2012 AAArkansas Travelers · 580 PAwOBA .323 → .273 (−50)K% 11.9% → 14.5%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	11.90%	÷1.003	×1.220	—	—	14.47%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	6.38%	÷1.076	×0.700	—	×0.978	4.06%
HBP% /PA	2.24%	—	×0.870	—	×0.978	1.91%
Singles /BIP	18.02%	÷1.012	×0.920	×0.996	×0.978	15.95%
Doubles /BIP	7.91%	÷1.046	×0.840	×0.996	×0.978	6.19%
Triples /BIP	0.22%	÷1.150	×0.940	×0.996	×0.978	0.17%
Home runs /BIP	3.52%	÷0.819	×0.800	—	×0.978	3.36%

Factors used: league row TL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 64, 1B 102, 2B 109, 3B 130, K 101, BB 115 — applied at half strength. Age: age 27 vs a level average of 24.8 → −2.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.996.

Result: wOBA .323 → .273; ISO .164 → .146; BABIP .268 → .228. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2011 AAArkansas Travelers · 376 PAwOBA .356 → .307 (−49)K% 15.7% → 19.2%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	15.69%	÷0.998	×1.220	—	—	19.19%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	7.98%	÷1.071	×0.700	—	×0.988	5.15%
HBP% /PA	2.39%	—	×0.870	—	×0.988	2.06%
Singles /BIP	17.65%	÷1.023	×0.920	×1.017	×0.988	15.95%
Doubles /BIP	11.03%	÷0.999	×0.840	×1.017	×0.988	9.32%
Triples /BIP	0.37%	÷1.048	×0.940	×1.017	×0.988	0.33%
Home runs /BIP	4.41%	÷0.849	×0.800	—	×0.988	4.11%

Factors used: league row TL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 70, 1B 105, 2B 100, 3B 110, K 100, BB 114 — applied at half strength. Age: age 26 vs a level average of 24.8 → −1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.017.

Result: wOBA .356 → .307; ISO .205 → .187; BABIP .302 → .265. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

Not traceable per stint: some stints lack the counting stats the component translation needs. Level-wide factors that apply instead — .