Paul Hoenecke

Pos3B

B/TL/R

Born1990-07-08

Age (2027)37

No MLB projection yet. Career stats below are historical.

Overview

AALAST SEASON 2017

Year	Age	Lvl / Team	PA	AVG/OBP/SLG	HR	SB	wRC+	WAR	MLE AVG/OBP/SLG
2015	25	AA/A+2 orgs	443	.288/.330/.450	10	2	59	—	.215/.251/.337
2016	26	AA/A+2 orgs	201	.269/.295/.456	9	1	66	—	.224/.240/.367
2017	27	AALAD	184	.220/.258/.405	7	1	24	—	.160/.192/.274

Contract

No contract data on file.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.

show model inputsbasis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral

Methodology▸ how these numbers are built

All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.

Year	Age	Lvl	Team	MLB%	PA	AB	H	2B	3B	HR	BB	SO	HBP	SB	CS	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	BABIP	K%	BB%	wOBA	wRC+	BAT	RUN	FLD	POS	REP	WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments)
2012	22	ROK	Ogden Raptors	—	183	169	65	23	4	5	12	23	0	2	1	385	425	657	1.082	272	420	13	7	462	99	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	23	A	Great Lakes Loons	—	169	152	35	10	0	2	15	25	0	2	0	230	299	336	635	105	262	15	9	286	42	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	23	ROK	AZL Dodgers	—	37	34	6	2	0	2	3	6	0	1	0	176	243	412	655	235	154	16	8	287	15	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	24	A	Great Lakes Loons	—	539	482	119	37	2	15	47	99	4	8	4	247	319	425	744	178	278	18	9	327	55	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	25	AA	Tulsa Drillers	—	21	20	3	0	0	1	1	11	0	0	0	150	190	300	490	150	250	52	5	218	-20	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	25	A+	Rancho Cucamonga Quakes	—	422	393	116	33	2	9	23	76	2	2	0	295	337	458	795	163	343	18	5	348	63	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	26	AA	Tulsa Drillers	—	144	139	40	6	0	7	4	21	1	0	1	288	312	482	795	194	297	15	3	349	78	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	26	A+	Rancho Cucamonga Quakes	—	57	54	12	3	0	2	2	9	0	1	0	222	250	389	639	167	227	16	4	276	37	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	27	AA	Tulsa Drillers	—	184	173	38	11	0	7	7	44	2	1	0	220	258	405	663	185	250	24	4	289	24	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents)
2012	22	ROK MLE	Ogden Raptors	—	183	174	47	15	3	4	7	33	0	2	1	270	298	460	758	190	302	18	4	315	99	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	23	A MLE	Great Lakes Loons	—	169	158	31	8	0	2	9	33	0	2	0	196	240	285	524	89	228	20	5	230	42	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	23	ROK MLE	AZL Dodgers	—	37	35	4	1	0	1	2	9	0	1	0	114	162	229	391	114	112	24	5	191	15	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	24	A MLE	Great Lakes Loons	—	539	498	95	28	1	12	31	125	4	8	4	191	244	323	567	133	223	23	6	249	55	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	25	AA MLE	Tulsa Drillers	—	21	20	2	0	0	1	1	14	0	0	0	100	143	250	393	150	238	67	5	139	-20	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	25	A+ MLE	Rancho Cucamonga Quakes	—	422	399	88	22	1	8	17	105	2	2	0	221	256	341	597	120	273	25	4	261	63	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	26	AA MLE	Tulsa Drillers	—	144	141	34	5	0	5	2	26	1	0	1	241	257	383	640	142	268	18	1	284	78	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	26	A+ MLE	Rancho Cucamonga Quakes	—	57	55	10	2	0	2	1	12	0	1	0	182	196	327	524	145	193	21	2	223	37	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	27	AA MLE	Tulsa Drillers	—	184	175	28	8	0	4	5	56	2	1	0	160	192	274	467	114	206	30	3	204	24	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	22	ROK MLE	Ogden Raptors	—	183	174	47	15	3	4	7	33	0	2	1	270	298	460	758	190	309	18	4	315	99	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	22	ROK RAW	Ogden Raptors	—	183	169	65	23	4	5	12	23	0	2	1	385	425	657	1.082	272	420	13	7	462	99	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	23	A MLE	2 teams	—	206	193	35	10	0	3	11	41	0	3	0	181	225	280	505	98	213	20	5	223	37	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	23	A RAW	2 teams	—	206	186	41	12	0	4	18	31	0	3	0	220	289	349	639	129	243	15	9	286	37	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	24	A MLE	Great Lakes Loons	—	539	498	95	28	1	12	31	125	4	8	4	191	244	323	567	133	226	23	6	249	55	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	24	A RAW	Great Lakes Loons	—	539	482	119	37	2	15	47	99	4	8	4	247	319	425	744	178	278	18	9	327	55	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	25	A+ MLE	2 teams	—	443	419	90	22	1	9	18	119	2	2	0	215	251	337	587	122	275	27	4	255	59	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	25	A+ RAW	2 teams	—	443	413	119	33	2	10	24	87	2	2	0	288	330	450	781	162	341	20	5	342	59	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	26	AA MLE	2 teams	—	201	196	45	8	0	7	3	38	1	1	1	230	245	378	623	148	250	19	1	267	67	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	26	AA RAW	2 teams	—	201	193	52	9	0	9	6	30	1	1	1	269	295	456	751	187	277	15	3	328	67	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	27	AA MLE	Tulsa Drillers	—	184	175	28	8	0	4	5	56	2	1	0	160	192	274	467	114	205	30	3	204	24	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	27	AA RAW	Tulsa Drillers	—	184	173	38	11	0	7	7	44	2	1	0	220	258	405	663	185	250	24	4	289	24	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	22	ROK MLE	Ogden Raptors	—	183	174	47	15	3	4	7	33	0	2	1	270	298	460	758	190	302	18	4	315	99	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	23	A MLE	2 teams	—	206	193	35	10	0	3	11	41	0	3	0	181	225	280	505	98	207	20	5	223	37	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	24	A MLE	Great Lakes Loons	—	539	499	95	28	1	12	31	125	4	8	4	190	244	323	567	132	223	23	6	249	55	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	25	A+ MLE	2 teams	—	443	420	90	22	1	9	18	119	2	2	0	214	251	336	586	121	271	27	4	255	59	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	26	AA MLE	2 teams	—	201	195	45	8	0	7	3	38	1	1	1	231	245	379	624	149	247	19	1	267	67	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	27	AA MLE	Tulsa Drillers	—	184	175	28	8	0	4	5	56	2	1	0	160	192	274	467	114	206	30	3	204	24	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career Totals
Career	—	MLE		—	1756	1655	340	91	5	39	75	412	9	17	6	205	244	337	581	132	247	23	4	252	56	-91	+1	+0	+6	+38	-4.7
/ 162G	—	MLE		—	650	613	126	34	2	14	28	153	3	6	2	206	244	336	580	131	248	24	4	252	56	-34	+0	+0	+2	+14	-1.7

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2017 AATulsa Drillers · 184 PAwOBA .284 → .204 (−80)K% 23.9% → 30.5%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	23.91%	÷0.955	×1.220	—	—	30.54%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	3.80%	÷1.058	×0.700	—	×0.978	2.46%
HBP% /PA	1.09%	—	×0.870	—	×0.978	0.92%
Singles /BIP	15.50%	÷1.005	×0.920	×0.971	×0.978	13.48%
Doubles /BIP	8.53%	÷1.000	×0.840	×0.971	×0.978	6.80%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.150	×0.940	×0.971	×0.978	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	5.43%	÷1.295	×0.800	—	×0.978	3.28%

Factors used: league row TL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 159, 1B 101, 2B 100, 3B 130, K 91, BB 112 — applied at half strength. Age: age 27 vs a level average of 24.8 → −2.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.971.

Result: wOBA .284 → .204; ISO .185 → .117; BABIP .250 → .206. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2016 AATulsa Drillers · 144 PAwOBA .336 → .284 (−52)K% 14.6% → 17.9%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	14.58%	÷0.996	×1.220	—	—	17.86%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	2.08%	÷0.935	×0.700	—	×0.988	1.54%
HBP% /PA	0.69%	—	×0.870	—	×0.988	0.60%
Singles /BIP	22.88%	÷0.990	×0.920	×1.002	×0.988	21.05%
Doubles /BIP	5.08%	÷0.926	×0.840	×1.002	×0.988	4.56%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷0.900	×0.940	×1.002	×0.988	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	5.93%	÷1.020	×0.800	—	×0.988	4.60%

Factors used: league row TL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 104, 1B 98, 2B 85, 3B 80, K 99, BB 87 — applied at half strength. Age: age 26 vs a level average of 24.8 → −1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.002.

Result: wOBA .336 → .284; ISO .194 → .152; BABIP .297 → .268. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2016 A+Rancho Cucamonga Quakes · 57 PAwOBA .273 → .223 (−50)K% 15.8% → 21.6%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	15.79%	÷0.979	×1.340	—	—	21.61%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	3.51%	÷1.046	×0.710	—	×0.968	2.31%
HBP% /PA	0.00%	—	×0.790	—	×0.968	0.00%
Singles /BIP	15.56%	÷1.043	×0.910	×1.012	×0.968	13.29%
Doubles /BIP	6.67%	÷0.938	×0.820	×1.012	×0.968	5.71%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.142	×0.760	×1.012	×0.968	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	4.44%	÷1.003	×0.920	—	×0.968	3.95%

Factors used: league row CAL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 101, 1B 109, 2B 88, 3B 128, K 96, BB 109 — applied at half strength. Age: age 26 vs a level average of 22.8 → −3.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (3.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.012.

Result: wOBA .273 → .223; ISO .167 → .141; BABIP .227 → .193. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2015 A+Rancho Cucamonga Quakes · 422 PAwOBA .342 → .261 (−81)K% 18.0% → 24.9%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	18.01%	÷0.970	×1.340	—	—	24.88%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	5.45%	÷0.958	×0.710	—	×0.978	3.95%
HBP% /PA	0.47%	—	×0.790	—	×0.978	0.37%
Singles /BIP	22.71%	÷1.046	×0.910	×0.985	×0.978	19.04%
Doubles /BIP	10.41%	÷1.109	×0.820	×0.985	×0.978	7.41%
Triples /BIP	0.63%	÷1.150	×0.760	×0.985	×0.978	0.40%
Home runs /BIP	2.84%	÷0.898	×0.920	—	×0.978	2.84%

Factors used: league row CAL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 80, 1B 109, 2B 122, 3B 130, K 94, BB 92 — applied at half strength. Age: age 25 vs a level average of 22.8 → −2.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.985.

Result: wOBA .342 → .261; ISO .163 → .127; BABIP .343 → .273. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2015 AATulsa Drillers · 21 PAwOBA .212 → .139 (−73)K% 52.4% → 64.6%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	52.38%	÷0.989	×1.220	—	—	64.63%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	4.76%	÷0.976	×0.700	—	×0.998	3.41%
HBP% /PA	0.00%	—	×0.870	—	×0.998	0.00%
Singles /BIP	22.22%	÷0.938	×0.920	—	×0.998	21.74%
Doubles /BIP	0.00%	÷1.006	×0.840	—	×0.998	0.00%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷0.900	×0.940	—	×0.998	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	11.11%	÷1.039	×0.800	—	×0.998	8.54%

Factors used: league row TL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 108, 1B 88, 2B 101, 3B 80, K 98, BB 95 — applied at half strength. Age: age 25 vs a level average of 24.8 → −0.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr older than average).

Result: wOBA .212 → .139; ISO .150 → .086; BABIP .250 → .238. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2014 AGreat Lakes Loons · 539 PAwOBA .321 → .249 (−72)K% 18.4% → 23.1%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	18.37%	÷1.083	×1.360	—	—	23.07%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	8.35%	÷0.973	×0.690	—	×0.980	5.80%
HBP% /PA	0.74%	—	×0.780	—	×0.980	0.57%
Singles /BIP	16.97%	÷1.017	×0.920	×0.952	×0.980	14.31%
Doubles /BIP	9.66%	÷1.022	×0.830	×0.952	×0.980	7.32%
Triples /BIP	0.52%	÷1.150	×0.910	×0.952	×0.980	0.39%
Home runs /BIP	3.92%	÷1.002	×0.800	—	×0.980	3.06%

Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 100, 1B 103, 2B 104, 3B 130, K 117, BB 95 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 22.0 → −2.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.0 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.952.

Result: wOBA .321 → .249; ISO .178 → .136; BABIP .278 → .223. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2013 AGreat Lakes Loons · 169 PAwOBA .278 → .230 (−48)K% 14.8% → 19.4%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	14.79%	÷1.035	×1.360	—	—	19.44%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	8.28%	÷1.023	×0.690	—	×0.990	5.53%
HBP% /PA	0.00%	—	×0.780	—	×0.990	0.00%
Singles /BIP	18.11%	÷1.006	×0.920	×0.988	×0.990	16.20%
Doubles /BIP	7.87%	÷0.983	×0.830	×0.988	×0.990	6.50%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷0.960	×0.910	×0.988	×0.990	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	1.57%	÷0.898	×0.800	—	×0.990	1.39%

Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 80, 1B 101, 2B 97, 3B 92, K 107, BB 105 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.0 → −1.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.988.

Result: wOBA .278 → .230; ISO .105 → .089; BABIP .262 → .228. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2013 ROKAZL Dodgers · 37 PAwOBA .279 → .191 (−88)K% 16.2% → 23.4%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	16.22%	÷1.000	×1.440	—	—	23.35%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	8.11%	÷1.000	×0.620	—	×0.965	4.85%
HBP% /PA	0.00%	—	×0.720	—	×0.965	0.00%
Singles /BIP	7.14%	÷1.000	×0.820	—	×0.965	5.65%
Doubles /BIP	7.14%	÷1.000	×0.720	—	×0.965	4.96%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.000	×0.720	—	×0.965	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	7.14%	÷1.000	×0.780	—	×0.965	5.38%

Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 19.5 → −3.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (3.5 yr older than average).

Result: wOBA .279 → .191; ISO .235 → .165; BABIP .154 → .112. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).