Adam Conley
P Durham Bulls| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 28 | MIX2 levels | 60 | 8 | 91 | 4.57 | 4.05 | 19.8% | 8.2% | 0.5 | K 19.0% · BB 8.4% · FIP 4.32 | |
| 2019 | 29 | MLBMIA | 60 | 0 | 61 | 6.53 | 4.63 | 18.7% | 8.1% | -0.1 | ||
| 2021 | 31 | MIX2 levels | 44 | 0 | 51 | 3.55 | 4.09 | 24.5% | 11.8% | 0.3 | K 22.5% · BB 12.2% · FIP 4.42 | |
| 2022 | 32 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2023 | 33 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2024 | 34 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2025 | 35 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2026 | 36 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
Statcast · Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2015 | 25 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 34 | 29 | 174 | 717 | 140 | 59 | 11 | 85% | 5.1 | 18.2% | 8.5% | 9.7% | 1.7% | 3.00 | 3.55 | +3.9 |
| 2015 | 25 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 34 | 29 | 174 | 717 | 140 | 59 | 11 | 85% | 5.1 | 19.5% | 8.2% | 11.3% | 1.5% | 3.00 | 3.33 | +4.4 |
| 2016 | 26 | MLB MLE | Miami Marlins | 25 | 25 | 133 | 584 | 124 | 55 | 13 | 100% | 5.3 | 21.2% | 9.4% | 11.8% | 2.3% | 3.85 | 3.79 | +2.6 |
| 2016 | 26 | MLB RAW | Miami Marlins | 25 | 25 | 133 | 584 | 124 | 55 | 13 | 100% | 5.3 | 21.2% | 9.4% | 11.8% | 2.2% | 3.85 | 3.75 | +2.7 |
| 2017 | 27 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 34 | 32 | 165 | 738 | 113 | 63 | 26 | 94% | 4.9 | 14.6% | 8.7% | 5.9% | 3.8% | 5.89 | 5.07 | +0.6 |
| 2017 | 27 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 34 | 32 | 165 | 738 | 113 | 63 | 26 | 94% | 4.9 | 15.3% | 8.5% | 6.8% | 3.5% | 5.89 | 4.92 | +0.9 |
| 2018 | 28 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 60 | 8 | 91 | 378 | 75 | 31 | 11 | 13% | 1.5 | 19.0% | 8.4% | 10.7% | 3.2% | 4.57 | 4.32 | +0.2 |
| 2018 | 28 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 60 | 8 | 91 | 378 | 75 | 31 | 11 | 13% | 1.5 | 19.8% | 8.2% | 11.6% | 2.9% | 4.57 | 4.05 | +0.5 |
| 2019 | 29 | MLB MLE | Miami Marlins | 60 | 0 | 61 | 283 | 53 | 23 | 10 | 0% | 1.0 | 18.7% | 8.1% | 10.6% | 3.7% | 6.53 | 4.59 | -0.0 |
| 2019 | 29 | MLB RAW | Miami Marlins | 60 | 0 | 61 | 283 | 53 | 23 | 10 | 0% | 1.0 | 18.7% | 8.1% | 10.6% | 3.5% | 6.53 | 4.63 | -0.1 |
| 2021 | 31 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 44 | 0 | 51 | 204 | 50 | 24 | 6 | 0% | 1.2 | 22.5% | 12.2% | 10.3% | 3.0% | 3.55 | 4.42 | +0.1 |
| 2021 | 31 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 44 | 0 | 51 | 204 | 50 | 24 | 6 | 0% | 1.2 | 24.5% | 11.8% | 12.7% | 2.9% | 3.55 | 4.09 | +0.3 |
| ▸ Career totals (raw MLB only — as recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| MLB Career | — | 191 | 56 | 434 | 1889 | 374 | 159 | 56 | 29% | 2.3 | 19.8% | 8.4% | 11.4% | 3.0% | 4.71 | 4.15 | +2.0 | ||
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 191 | 56 | 434 | 1889 | 374 | 159 | 56 | 29% | 2.3 | 19.8% | 8.4% | 11.4% | 3.0% | 4.71 | 4.12 | +2.2 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 88 | 26 | 200 | 871 | 172 | 73 | 26 | 29% | 2.3 | 19.8% | 8.4% | 11.4% | 3.0% | 4.71 | 4.12 | +1.0 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 257 | 94 | 674 | 2904 | 533 | 260 | 83 | 37% | 2.6 | 18.4% | 8.9% | 9.4% | 2.9% | 4.44 | 4.25 | +2.0 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 76 | 28 | 200 | 861 | 158 | 77 | 25 | 37% | 2.6 | 18.4% | 8.9% | 9.4% | 2.9% | 4.44 | 4.25 | +0.9 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2021 AAADurham Bulls · 31 IPFIP 4.35 → 4.78 (+0.42)K% 26.6% → 23.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 26.56% | — | ×0.880 | 23.38% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 14.06% | — | ×1.050 | 14.77% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.12% | ÷1.059 | ×1.100 | 3.25% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors — K ×0.88, BB ×1.05, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 112).
Result: FIP 4.35 → 4.78, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2018 AAANew Orleans Baby Cakes · 40 IPFIP 4.78 → 5.26 (+0.48)K% 14.2% → 12.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 14.20% | — | ×0.880 | 12.50% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 7.95% | — | ×1.050 | 8.35% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.41% | ÷0.952 | ×1.100 | 3.94% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors — K ×0.88, BB ×1.05, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 90).
Result: FIP 4.78 → 5.26, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2017 AAANew Orleans Baby Cakes · 62 IPFIP 4.39 → 4.86 (+0.47)K% 14.9% → 13.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 14.91% | — | ×0.880 | 13.12% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 9.09% | — | ×1.050 | 9.55% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.55% | ÷0.928 | ×1.100 | 3.02% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors — K ×0.88, BB ×1.05, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 86).
Result: FIP 4.39 → 4.86, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2015 AAANew Orleans Zephyrs · 107 IPFIP 3.17 → 3.48 (+0.31)K% 18.6% → 16.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 18.58% | — | ×0.880 | 16.35% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 8.94% | — | ×1.050 | 9.39% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.92% | ÷0.975 | ×1.100 | 1.04% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors — K ×0.88, BB ×1.05, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 95).
Result: FIP 3.17 → 3.48, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).