Tyler Chatwood
P Reno Aces| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 31 | MIX2 levels | 41 | 0 | 42 | 4.46 | 3.86 | 23.8% | 16.9% | 0.3 | K 26.2% · BB 14.5% · FIP 3.54 | |
| 2023 | 33 | MIX3 levels | 15 | 2 | 16 | 2.76 | 4.57 | 12.5% | 14.1% | — | K 12.5% · BB 14.1% · FIP 4.68 | |
| 2024 | 34 | MIX2 levels | 3 | 1 | 2 | 22.50 | 8.10 | 6.7% | 26.7% | — | K 6.7% · BB 26.7% · FIP 5.91 | |
| 2025 | 35 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2026 | 36 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
Statcast · Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2011 | 21 | MLB MLE | Los Angeles Angels | 27 | 25 | 142 | 633 | 74 | 67 | 14 | 93% | 5.3 | 11.7% | 10.6% | 1.1% | 2.2% | 4.75 | 4.64 | +1.2 |
| 2011 | 21 | MLB RAW | Los Angeles Angels | 27 | 25 | 142 | 633 | 74 | 67 | 14 | 93% | 5.3 | 11.7% | 10.6% | 1.1% | 2.2% | 4.75 | 4.75 | +1.1 |
| 2012 | 22 | MLB MLE | Colorado Rockies | 19 | 12 | 65 | 294 | 41 | 31 | 9 | 63% | 3.4 | 13.9% | 10.5% | 3.4% | 2.7% | 5.43 | 4.75 | +0.5 |
| 2012 | 22 | MLB RAW | Colorado Rockies | 19 | 12 | 65 | 294 | 41 | 31 | 9 | 63% | 3.4 | 13.9% | 10.5% | 3.4% | 3.1% | 5.43 | 5.08 | +0.2 |
| 2013 | 23 | MLB MLE | Colorado Rockies | 20 | 20 | 111 | 476 | 66 | 36 | 5 | 100% | 5.6 | 13.9% | 7.6% | 6.3% | 0.9% | 3.15 | 3.40 | +2.7 |
| 2013 | 23 | MLB RAW | Colorado Rockies | 20 | 20 | 111 | 476 | 66 | 36 | 5 | 100% | 5.6 | 13.9% | 7.6% | 6.3% | 1.1% | 3.15 | 3.47 | +2.6 |
| 2014 | 24 | MLB MLE | Colorado Rockies | 4 | 4 | 24 | 101 | 20 | 8 | 4 | 100% | 6.0 | 19.8% | 7.9% | 11.9% | 3.5% | 4.50 | 4.36 | +0.3 |
| 2014 | 24 | MLB RAW | Colorado Rockies | 4 | 4 | 24 | 101 | 20 | 8 | 4 | 100% | 6.0 | 19.8% | 7.9% | 11.9% | 4.0% | 4.50 | 4.60 | +0.2 |
| 2015 | 25 | A+ MLE | Modesto Nuts | 2 | 2 | 4 | 17 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 100% | 2.0 | 29.4% | 11.8% | 17.6% | 5.9% | 2.25 | 5.34 | — |
| 2015 | 25 | A+ RAW | Modesto Nuts | 2 | 2 | 4 | 17 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 100% | 2.0 | 29.4% | 11.8% | 17.6% | 5.9% | 2.25 | 5.35 | — |
| 2016 | 26 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 29 | 29 | 167 | 705 | 123 | 71 | 15 | 100% | 5.8 | 17.5% | 10.2% | 7.3% | 2.0% | 3.66 | 4.00 | +2.8 |
| 2016 | 26 | MIX RAW | 3 levels | 29 | 29 | 167 | 705 | 123 | 71 | 15 | 100% | 5.8 | 17.4% | 10.1% | 7.4% | 2.1% | 3.66 | 4.07 | +2.6 |
| 2017 | 27 | MLB MLE | Colorado Rockies | 33 | 25 | 148 | 631 | 120 | 75 | 20 | 76% | 4.5 | 19.0% | 11.9% | 7.1% | 2.8% | 4.69 | 4.54 | +1.5 |
| 2017 | 27 | MLB RAW | Colorado Rockies | 33 | 25 | 148 | 631 | 120 | 75 | 20 | 76% | 4.5 | 19.0% | 11.9% | 7.1% | 3.2% | 4.69 | 4.76 | +1.1 |
| 2018 | 28 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 26 | 22 | 110 | 519 | 89 | 104 | 9 | 85% | 4.2 | 17.5% | 19.3% | -1.9% | 1.9% | 5.55 | 5.13 | +0.3 |
| 2018 | 28 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 26 | 22 | 110 | 519 | 89 | 104 | 9 | 85% | 4.2 | 17.1% | 20.0% | -2.9% | 1.7% | 5.55 | 5.37 | +0.0 |
| 2019 | 29 | MLB MLE | Chicago Cubs | 38 | 5 | 77 | 324 | 74 | 37 | 8 | 13% | 2.0 | 22.8% | 11.4% | 11.4% | 2.6% | 3.76 | 4.03 | +0.5 |
| 2019 | 29 | MLB RAW | Chicago Cubs | 38 | 5 | 77 | 324 | 74 | 37 | 8 | 13% | 2.0 | 22.8% | 11.4% | 11.4% | 2.5% | 3.76 | 3.97 | +0.5 |
| 2020 | 30 | MLB MLE | Chicago Cubs | 5 | 5 | 19 | 86 | 25 | 9 | 2 | 100% | 3.7 | 29.1% | 10.5% | 18.6% | 2.4% | 5.30 | 3.30 | +0.5 |
| 2020 | 30 | MLB RAW | Chicago Cubs | 5 | 5 | 19 | 86 | 25 | 9 | 2 | 100% | 3.7 | 29.1% | 10.5% | 18.6% | 2.3% | 5.30 | 3.26 | +0.5 |
| 2021 | 31 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 41 | 0 | 42 | 189 | 45 | 32 | 2 | 0% | 1.0 | 26.2% | 14.5% | 11.7% | 1.5% | 4.46 | 3.54 | +0.5 |
| 2021 | 31 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 41 | 0 | 42 | 189 | 45 | 32 | 2 | 0% | 1.0 | 23.8% | 16.9% | 6.9% | 1.1% | 4.46 | 3.86 | +0.3 |
| 2023 | 33 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 15 | 2 | 16 | 64 | 8 | 9 | 1 | 13% | 1.1 | 12.5% | 14.1% | -1.6% | 1.6% | 2.76 | 4.68 | — |
| 2023 | 33 | MIX RAW | 3 levels | 15 | 2 | 16 | 64 | 8 | 9 | 1 | 13% | 1.1 | 12.5% | 14.1% | -1.6% | 1.6% | 2.76 | 4.57 | — |
| 2024 | 34 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 3 | 1 | 2 | 15 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 33% | 0.7 | 6.7% | 26.7% | -20.0% | 0.0% | 22.50 | 5.91 | — |
| 2024 | 34 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 3 | 1 | 2 | 15 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 33% | 0.7 | 6.7% | 26.7% | -20.0% | 0.0% | 22.50 | 5.91 | — |
| 2024 | 34 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 3 | 1 | 2 | 15 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 33% | 0.7 | 6.7% | 26.7% | -20.0% | 0.0% | 22.50 | 8.10 | — |
| ▸ Career totals (raw MLB only — as recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| MLB Career | — | 229 | 143 | 879 | 3845 | 660 | 446 | 88 | 62% | 3.8 | 17.2% | 11.6% | 5.6% | 2.3% | 4.45 | 4.42 | +10.1 | ||
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 229 | 143 | 879 | 3845 | 660 | 446 | 88 | 62% | 3.8 | 17.2% | 11.6% | 5.6% | 2.3% | 4.45 | 4.38 | +10.6 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 52 | 33 | 200 | 875 | 150 | 102 | 20 | 62% | 3.8 | 17.2% | 11.6% | 5.6% | 2.3% | 4.45 | 4.38 | +2.4 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 262 | 152 | 927 | 4054 | 698 | 477 | 87 | 58% | 3.5 | 17.2% | 11.8% | 5.4% | 2.1% | 4.40 | 4.31 | +10.1 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 57 | 33 | 200 | 874 | 150 | 103 | 19 | 58% | 3.5 | 17.2% | 11.8% | 5.4% | 2.1% | 4.40 | 4.31 | +2.3 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2023 ABradenton Marauders · 7 IPFIP 6.23 → 7.56 (+1.33)K% 12.9% → 9.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 12.90% | — | ×0.740 | 9.55% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 19.35% | — | ×1.180 | 22.84% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.23% | ÷0.971 | ×1.300 | 4.32% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 94).
Result: FIP 6.23 → 7.56, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 AAAReno Aces · 8 IPFIP 3.80 → 3.76 (−0.05)K% 6.7% → 5.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 6.67% | — | ×0.860 | 5.73% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 10.00% | — | ×0.900 | 9.00% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷1.012 | ×1.100 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 102).
Result: FIP 3.80 → 3.76, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2021 AAASacramento River Cats · 10 IPFIP 4.92 → 5.24 (+0.32)K% 15.9% → 14.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 15.91% | — | ×0.880 | 14.00% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 25.00% | — | ×1.050 | 26.25% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷0.995 | ×1.100 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors — K ×0.88, BB ×1.05, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 99).
Result: FIP 4.92 → 5.24, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2018 AAAIowa Cubs · 7 IPFIP 5.91 → 6.23 (+0.31)K% 12.1% → 10.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 12.12% | — | ×0.880 | 10.67% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 30.30% | — | ×1.050 | 31.82% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷0.919 | ×1.100 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors — K ×0.88, BB ×1.05, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 84).
Result: FIP 5.91 → 6.23, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).