Wade Kirkland

PosSS
B/TR/R
Born1989-04-04
Age (2027)38
No MLB projection yet. Career stats below are historical.
Overview
AALAST SEASON 2016
YearAgeLvl / TeamPAAVG/OBP/SLGHRSBwRC+WARMLE AVG/OBP/SLG
201425A+OAK243.241/.288/.3774625—.173/.214/.268
201526AAOAK243.258/.286/.3675532—.203/.227/.286
201627AAOAK274.215/.250/.289225—.162/.187/.204
Contract
No contract data on file.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.
basis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built

All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.

YearAge LvlTeam MLB% PAAB H2B3BHR BBSOHBP SBCS AVGOBPSLGOPS ISOBABIP K%BB% wOBAwRC+ BATRUNFLDPOSREP WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments)
201122 ABurlington Bees — 291258 561613 20738 53 217294322615 105286 257 278 33 — — — — — —
201223 ABurlington Bees — 424379 903138 289911 54 237309398707 161298 237 312 42 — — — — — —
201324 A+Stockton Ports — 239223 491806 10655 12 220269381650 161281 274 288 27 — — — — — —
201425 A+Stockton Ports — 243228 551714 10745 60 241288377665 136340 304 297 25 — — — — — —
201526 AAMidland RockHounds — 243229 59815 6753 50 258286367653 109358 312 286 32 — — — — — —
201627 AAMidland RockHounds — 274256 55922 11831 24 215250289539 74308 304 239 5 — — — — — —
▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents)
201122 A MLEBurlington Bees — 291265 481312 131048 53 181241260502 79272 364 217 33 — — — — — —
201223 A MLEBurlington Bees — 424387 692326 2014511 54 178239295534 116256 345 231 42 — — — — — —
201324 A+ MLEStockton Ports — 239226 361304 7845 12 159202270472 111228 353 208 27 — — — — — —
201425 A+ MLEStockton Ports — 243231 401113 7995 60 173214268482 95282 413 205 25 — — — — — —
201526 AA MLEMidland RockHounds — 243231 47514 4993 50 203227286513 82315 412 215 32 — — — — — —
201627 AA MLEMidland RockHounds — 274260 42611 71101 24 162187204390 42266 403 176 5 — — — — — —
201122 A MLEBurlington Bees — 291265 481312 131048 53 181241260502 79284 364 217 33 — — — — — —
201122 A RAWBurlington Bees — 291258 561613 20738 53 217294322615 105286 257 278 33 — — — — — —
201223 A MLEBurlington Bees — 424387 692326 2014511 54 178239295534 116264 345 231 42 — — — — — —
201223 A RAWBurlington Bees — 424379 903138 289911 54 237309398707 161298 237 312 42 — — — — — —
201324 A+ MLEStockton Ports — 239226 361304 7845 12 159202270472 111230 353 208 27 — — — — — —
201324 A+ RAWStockton Ports — 239223 491806 10655 12 220269381650 161281 274 288 27 — — — — — —
201425 A+ MLEStockton Ports — 243231 401113 7995 60 173214268482 95287 413 205 25 — — — — — —
201425 A+ RAWStockton Ports — 243228 551714 10745 60 241288377665 136340 304 297 25 — — — — — —
201526 AA MLEMidland RockHounds — 243231 47514 4993 50 203227286513 82331 412 215 32 — — — — — —
201526 AA RAWMidland RockHounds — 243229 59815 6753 50 258286367653 109358 312 286 32 — — — — — —
201627 AA MLEMidland RockHounds — 274260 42611 71101 24 162187204390 42273 403 176 5 — — — — — —
201627 AA RAWMidland RockHounds — 274256 55922 11831 24 215250289539 74308 304 239 5 — — — — — —
201122 A MLEBurlington Bees — 291268 481312 131048 53 179241257499 78272 364 217 33 — — — — — —
201223 A MLEBurlington Bees — 424390 692326 2014511 54 177239292532 115256 345 231 42 — — — — — —
201324 A+ MLEStockton Ports — 239225 361304 7845 12 160202271473 111228 353 208 27 — — — — — —
201425 A+ MLEStockton Ports — 243229 401113 7995 60 175214271485 96282 413 205 25 — — — — — —
201526 AA MLEMidland RockHounds — 243234 47514 4993 50 201227282509 81315 412 215 32 — — — — — —
201627 AA MLEMidland RockHounds — 274264 42611 71101 24 159187201387 42266 403 176 5 — — — — — —
▸ Career Totals
Career— MLE — 17141600 28271620 5864133 2413 176221266486 89276 373 211 29 -145 -0 +0 +18 +37 -9.2
/ 162G— MLE — 650607 1072728 2224313 95 176222267488 91275 373 211 29 -55 -0 +0 +7 +14 -3.5

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2016 AAMidland RockHounds · 274 PAwOBA .233 → .176 (−57)K% 30.3% → 40.2%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×GB/FB ×Age ×= MLE
K% /PA30.29%÷0.920×1.220——40.19%
BB% (unintentional) /PA4.01%÷1.062×0.700—×0.9782.59%
HBP% /PA0.36%—×0.870—×0.9780.31%
Singles /BIP24.28%÷1.022×0.920×1.009×0.97821.55%
Doubles /BIP5.20%÷1.075×0.840×1.009×0.9784.01%
Triples /BIP1.16%÷1.150×0.940×1.009×0.9780.93%
Home runs /BIP1.16%÷0.999×0.800—×0.9780.91%

Factors used: league row TL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 100, 1B 104, 2B 115, 3B 130, K 84, BB 112 — applied at half strength. Age: age 27 vs a level average of 24.8 → −2.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.009.

Result: wOBA .233 → .176; ISO .074 → .052; BABIP .308 → .266. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2015 AAMidland RockHounds · 243 PAwOBA .280 → .215 (−65)K% 30.9% → 40.6%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×GB/FB ×Age ×= MLE
K% /PA30.86%÷0.928×1.220——40.59%
BB% (unintentional) /PA2.47%÷1.106×0.700—×0.9881.54%
HBP% /PA1.23%—×0.870—×0.9881.06%
Singles /BIP29.22%÷0.990×0.920×0.997×0.98826.77%
Doubles /BIP5.19%÷1.125×0.840×0.997×0.9883.82%
Triples /BIP0.65%÷1.150×0.940×0.997×0.9880.52%
Home runs /BIP3.25%÷0.982×0.800—×0.9882.61%

Factors used: league row TL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 96, 1B 98, 2B 125, 3B 130, K 86, BB 121 — applied at half strength. Age: age 26 vs a level average of 24.8 → −1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.997.

Result: wOBA .280 → .215; ISO .109 → .077; BABIP .358 → .315. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2014 A+Stockton Ports · 243 PAwOBA .289 → .205 (−84)K% 30.5% → 40.9%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×GB/FB ×Age ×= MLE
K% /PA30.45%÷0.997×1.340——40.93%
BB% (unintentional) /PA4.12%÷1.020×0.710—×0.9782.80%
HBP% /PA2.06%—×0.790—×0.9781.59%
Singles /BIP21.43%÷0.992×0.910×0.979×0.97818.81%
Doubles /BIP11.04%÷1.044×0.820×0.979×0.9788.30%
Triples /BIP0.65%÷1.011×0.760×0.979×0.9780.47%
Home runs /BIP2.60%÷1.112×0.920—×0.9782.10%

Factors used: league row CAL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 122, 1B 98, 2B 109, 3B 102, K 99, BB 104 — applied at half strength. Age: age 25 vs a level average of 22.8 → −2.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.979.

Result: wOBA .289 → .205; ISO .136 → .091; BABIP .340 → .282. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2013 A+Stockton Ports · 239 PAwOBA .281 → .208 (−73)K% 27.2% → 35.0%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×GB/FB ×Age ×= MLE
K% /PA27.20%÷1.042×1.340——34.98%
BB% (unintentional) /PA4.18%÷1.020×0.710—×0.9882.88%
HBP% /PA2.09%—×0.790—×0.9881.63%
Singles /BIP15.82%÷1.022×0.910×0.950×0.98813.22%
Doubles /BIP11.39%÷0.968×0.820×0.950×0.9889.06%
Triples /BIP0.00%÷1.095×0.760×0.950×0.9880.00%
Home runs /BIP3.80%÷1.129×0.920—×0.9883.06%

Factors used: league row CAL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 126, 1B 104, 2B 94, 3B 119, K 108, BB 104 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 22.8 → −1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.

Result: wOBA .281 → .208; ISO .161 → .118; BABIP .281 → .228. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2012 ABurlington Bees · 424 PAwOBA .305 → .231 (−74)K% 23.3% → 34.2%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×GB/FB ×Age ×= MLE
K% /PA23.35%÷0.929×1.360——34.17%
BB% (unintentional) /PA6.37%÷0.956×0.690—×0.9904.55%
HBP% /PA2.59%—×0.780—×0.9902.00%
Singles /BIP17.14%÷1.008×0.920×0.984×0.99015.23%
Doubles /BIP11.07%÷0.977×0.830×0.984×0.9909.16%
Triples /BIP1.07%÷0.971×0.910×0.984×0.9900.98%
Home runs /BIP2.86%÷1.014×0.800—×0.9902.23%

Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 103, 1B 102, 2B 95, 3B 94, K 86, BB 91 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.0 → −1.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.984.

Result: wOBA .305 → .231; ISO .161 → .118; BABIP .298 → .256. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2011 ABurlington Bees · 291 PAwOBA .273 → .217 (−57)K% 25.1% → 35.9%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×GB/FB ×Age ×= MLE
K% /PA25.09%÷0.950×1.360——35.91%
BB% (unintentional) /PA6.87%÷1.098×0.690——4.32%
HBP% /PA2.75%—×0.780——2.14%
Singles /BIP19.46%÷0.964×0.920×1.019—18.93%
Doubles /BIP8.65%÷0.919×0.830×1.019—7.96%
Triples /BIP0.54%÷0.900×0.910×1.019—0.56%
Home runs /BIP1.62%÷1.375×0.800——0.94%

Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 175, 1B 93, 2B 84, 3B 80, K 90, BB 120 — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 22.0 → +0.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.019.

Result: wOBA .273 → .217; ISO .105 → .077; BABIP .286 → .272. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).