Eduardo Sosa

PosCF

B/TL/L

Born1991-03-14

Age (2027)36

No MLB projection yet. Career stats below are historical.

Overview

INTLLAST SEASON 2021

Year	Age	Lvl / Team	PA	AVG/OBP/SLG	HR	wRC+	WAR
2019	28	INTLCaribes de An…	76	.286/.333/.443	2	116	—
2020	29	INTLCaribes de An…	49	.295/.354/.341	0	97	—
2021	30	INTLTigres de Ara…	34	.323/.364/.387	0	110	—

Contract

No contract data on file.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.

show model inputsbasis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral

Methodology▸ how these numbers are built

All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.

Year	Age	Lvl	Team	MLB%	PA	AB	H	2B	3B	HR	BB	SO	HBP	SB	CS	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	BABIP	K%	BB%	wOBA	wRC+	BAT	RUN	FLD	POS	REP	WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments)
2008	17	ROK	DSL Yankees 2	—	296	254	80	18	5	4	34	54	6	30	8	315	408	472	881	157	384	18	11	391	57	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	18	ROK	GCL Yankees	—	187	165	33	7	1	2	16	47	3	11	4	200	283	291	574	91	263	25	9	262	12	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	20	A	Charleston RiverDogs	—	337	310	79	15	3	2	20	79	2	14	2	255	304	342	646	87	335	23	6	288	50	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	21	A+	Tampa Yankees	—	265	241	57	8	3	1	17	54	4	8	6	237	298	307	605	71	299	20	6	274	38	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	21	A	Charleston RiverDogs	—	165	148	34	3	4	2	14	42	1	2	4	230	301	345	645	115	305	25	8	288	45	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	22	A+	Tampa Yankees	—	160	142	29	4	0	0	13	36	2	5	3	204	280	232	513	28	271	22	8	239	26	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	28	INTL	Caribes de Anzoategui	—	76	70	20	3	1	2	4	16	1	0	0	286	333	443	776	157	346	21	5	340	116	—	—	—	—	—	—
2020	29	INTL	Caribes de Anzoategui	—	49	44	13	0	1	0	3	10	1	0	0	295	354	341	695	45	382	20	6	312	97	—	—	—	—	—	—
2021	30	INTL	Tigres de Aragua	—	34	31	10	2	0	0	1	7	1	0	0	323	364	387	751	65	417	21	3	331	110	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents)
2008	17	ROK MLE	DSL Yankees 2	—	296	264	52	11	3	2	24	66	6	30	8	197	279	284	563	87	250	22	8	252	57	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	18	ROK MLE	GCL Yankees	—	187	171	25	5	1	1	10	68	3	11	4	146	207	205	411	58	219	36	5	186	12	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	20	A MLE	Charleston RiverDogs	—	337	318	72	13	2	1	12	106	2	14	2	226	259	289	548	63	329	31	4	242	50	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	21	A+ MLE	Tampa Yankees	—	265	247	50	7	3	1	11	78	4	8	6	202	248	267	515	65	283	29	4	225	38	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	21	A MLE	Charleston RiverDogs	—	165	154	30	2	4	1	8	58	1	2	4	195	239	279	518	84	298	35	5	235	45	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	22	A+ MLE	Tampa Yankees	—	160	145	26	4	0	0	10	49	2	5	3	179	242	207	449	28	263	31	6	207	26	—	—	—	—	—	—
2008	17	ROK MLE	DSL Yankees 2	—	296	264	52	11	3	2	24	66	6	30	8	197	279	284	563	87	253	22	8	252	57	—	—	—	—	—	—
2008	17	ROK RAW	DSL Yankees 2	—	296	254	80	18	5	4	34	54	6	30	8	315	408	472	881	157	384	18	11	391	57	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	18	ROK MLE	GCL Yankees	—	187	171	25	5	1	1	10	68	3	11	4	146	207	205	411	58	231	36	5	186	12	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	18	ROK RAW	GCL Yankees	—	187	165	33	7	1	2	16	47	3	11	4	200	283	291	574	91	263	25	9	262	12	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	20	A MLE	Charleston RiverDogs	—	337	318	72	13	2	1	12	106	2	14	2	226	259	289	548	63	335	31	4	242	50	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	20	A RAW	Charleston RiverDogs	—	337	310	79	15	3	2	20	79	2	14	2	255	304	342	646	87	335	23	6	288	50	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	21	A+ MLE	2 teams	—	430	400	80	9	7	2	20	136	5	10	10	200	247	273	520	73	295	32	5	229	41	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	21	A+ RAW	2 teams	—	430	389	91	11	7	3	31	96	5	10	10	234	299	321	620	87	301	22	7	280	41	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	22	A+ MLE	Tampa Yankees	—	160	145	26	4	0	0	10	49	2	5	3	179	242	207	449	28	268	31	6	207	26	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	22	A+ RAW	Tampa Yankees	—	160	142	29	4	0	0	13	36	2	5	3	204	280	232	513	28	271	22	8	239	26	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	28	INTL MLE	Caribes de Anzoategui	—	76	70	20	3	1	2	4	16	1	0	0	286	333	443	776	157	346	21	5	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	28	INTL RAW	Caribes de Anzoategui	—	76	70	20	3	1	2	4	16	1	0	0	286	333	443	776	157	346	21	5	340	116	—	—	—	—	—	—
2020	29	INTL MLE	Caribes de Anzoategui	—	49	44	13	0	1	0	3	10	1	0	0	295	354	341	695	45	382	20	6	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
2020	29	INTL RAW	Caribes de Anzoategui	—	49	44	13	0	1	0	3	10	1	0	0	295	354	341	695	45	382	20	6	312	97	—	—	—	—	—	—
2021	30	INTL MLE	Tigres de Aragua	—	34	31	10	2	0	0	1	7	1	0	0	323	364	387	751	65	417	21	3	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
2021	30	INTL RAW	Tigres de Aragua	—	34	31	10	2	0	0	1	7	1	0	0	323	364	387	751	65	417	21	3	331	110	—	—	—	—	—	—
2008	17	ROK MLE	DSL Yankees 2	—	296	264	52	11	3	2	24	66	6	30	8	197	279	284	563	87	250	22	8	252	57	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	18	ROK MLE	GCL Yankees	—	187	172	25	5	1	1	10	68	3	11	4	145	207	203	410	58	219	36	5	186	12	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	20	A MLE	Charleston RiverDogs	—	337	320	72	13	2	1	12	106	2	14	2	225	259	287	547	62	329	31	4	242	50	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	21	A+ MLE	2 teams	—	430	402	80	9	7	2	20	136	5	10	10	199	247	271	518	72	289	32	5	229	41	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	22	A+ MLE	Tampa Yankees	—	160	147	26	4	0	0	10	49	2	5	3	177	242	204	446	27	263	31	6	207	26	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career Totals
Career	—	MLE		—	1569	1443	298	47	15	8	84	458	21	70	27	207	260	277	537	70	294	29	5	206	25	-140	+3	+0	+6	+34	-9.9
/ 162G	—	MLE		—	650	598	122	19	6	3	35	190	9	29	11	204	259	271	529	67	292	29	5	206	25	-58	+1	+0	+2	+14	-4.1

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2013 A+Tampa Yankees · 160 PAwOBA .235 → .207 (−28)K% 22.5% → 30.7%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	22.50%	÷1.041	×1.420	—	—	30.68%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	8.12%	÷0.954	×0.750	—	×1.012	6.46%
HBP% /PA	1.25%	—	×0.930	—	×1.012	1.18%
Singles /BIP	23.58%	÷1.005	×0.920	×1.037	×1.012	22.65%
Doubles /BIP	3.77%	÷0.974	×0.960	×1.037	×1.012	3.90%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷0.970	×0.810	×1.037	×1.012	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	0.00%	÷0.929	×0.880	—	×1.012	0.00%

Factors used: league row FSL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 86, 1B 101, 2B 95, 3B 94, K 108, BB 91 — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 22.8 → +1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.037.

Result: wOBA .235 → .207; ISO .028 → .027; BABIP .271 → .263. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2012 A+Tampa Yankees · 265 PAwOBA .269 → .225 (−43)K% 20.4% → 29.4%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	20.38%	÷0.984	×1.420	—	—	29.42%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	6.42%	÷1.160	×0.750	—	×1.027	4.26%
HBP% /PA	1.51%	—	×0.930	—	×1.027	1.44%
Singles /BIP	24.06%	÷1.050	×0.920	×1.047	×1.027	22.67%
Doubles /BIP	4.28%	÷1.081	×0.960	×1.047	×1.027	4.08%
Triples /BIP	1.60%	÷0.900	×0.810	×1.047	×1.027	1.55%
Home runs /BIP	0.53%	÷0.949	×0.880	—	×1.027	0.51%

Factors used: league row FSL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 90, 1B 110, 2B 116, 3B 80, K 97, BB 132 — applied at half strength. Age: age 21 vs a level average of 22.8 → +2.7% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.047.

Result: wOBA .269 → .225; ISO .071 → .062; BABIP .299 → .283. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2012 ACharleston RiverDogs · 165 PAwOBA .280 → .235 (−46)K% 25.5% → 35.0%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	25.45%	÷0.974	×1.340	—	—	35.02%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	7.88%	÷1.032	×0.660	—	×1.015	5.11%
HBP% /PA	0.61%	—	×0.770	—	×1.015	0.47%
Singles /BIP	23.58%	÷0.954	×0.920	×1.010	×1.015	23.32%
Doubles /BIP	2.83%	÷1.020	×0.820	×1.010	×1.015	2.33%
Triples /BIP	3.77%	÷0.900	×0.940	×1.010	×1.015	4.04%
Home runs /BIP	1.89%	÷1.142	×0.820	—	×1.015	1.38%

Factors used: league row SAL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 128, 1B 91, 2B 104, 3B 80, K 95, BB 106 — applied at half strength. Age: age 21 vs a level average of 22.0 → +1.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.010.

Result: wOBA .280 → .235; ISO .115 → .096; BABIP .305 → .298. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2011 ACharleston RiverDogs · 337 PAwOBA .281 → .242 (−40)K% 23.4% → 31.6%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	23.44%	÷0.993	×1.340	—	—	31.64%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	5.93%	÷1.117	×0.660	—	×1.030	3.61%
HBP% /PA	0.59%	—	×0.770	—	×1.030	0.47%
Singles /BIP	25.54%	÷0.984	×0.920	×1.050	×1.030	25.81%
Doubles /BIP	6.49%	÷0.979	×0.820	×1.050	×1.030	5.88%
Triples /BIP	1.30%	÷1.150	×0.940	×1.050	×1.030	1.15%
Home runs /BIP	0.87%	÷1.150	×0.820	—	×1.030	0.64%

Factors used: league row SAL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 130, 1B 97, 2B 96, 3B 130, K 99, BB 123 — applied at half strength. Age: age 20 vs a level average of 22.0 → +3.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.

Result: wOBA .281 → .242; ISO .087 → .070; BABIP .335 → .329. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2009 ROKGCL Yankees · 187 PAwOBA .258 → .186 (−72)K% 25.1% → 36.2%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	25.13%	÷1.000	×1.440	—	—	36.19%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	8.56%	÷1.000	×0.620	—	×1.022	5.42%
HBP% /PA	1.60%	—	×0.720	—	×1.022	1.18%
Singles /BIP	19.49%	÷1.000	×0.820	×1.030	×1.022	16.84%
Doubles /BIP	5.93%	÷1.000	×0.720	×1.030	×1.022	4.50%
Triples /BIP	0.85%	÷1.000	×0.720	×1.030	×1.022	0.64%
Home runs /BIP	1.69%	÷1.000	×0.780	—	×1.022	1.35%

Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 18 vs a level average of 19.5 → +2.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.5 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.030.

Result: wOBA .258 → .186; ISO .091 → .064; BABIP .263 → .219. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2008 DSLDSL Yankees 2 · 296 PAwOBA .383 → .252 (−131)K% 18.2% → 22.3%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	18.24%	÷1.000	×1.220	—	—	22.26%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	11.49%	÷1.000	×0.700	—	×1.022	8.22%
HBP% /PA	2.03%	—	×0.700	—	×1.022	1.45%
Singles /BIP	26.50%	÷1.000	×0.680	×0.980	×1.022	18.05%
Doubles /BIP	9.00%	÷1.000	×0.600	×0.980	×1.022	5.41%
Triples /BIP	2.50%	÷1.000	×0.600	×0.980	×1.022	1.50%
Home runs /BIP	2.00%	÷1.000	×0.470	—	×1.022	0.96%

Factors used: level-wide DSL factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 17 vs a level average of 18.5 → +2.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.5 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.980.

Result: wOBA .383 → .252; ISO .157 → .090; BABIP .384 → .250. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

Not traceable per stint: some stints lack the counting stats the component translation needs. Level-wide factors that apply instead — .