Liam Hendriks
P Iowa Cubs| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 35 | MIX2 levels | 6 | 0 | 5 | 0.00 | 3.10 | 14.3% | 9.5% | — | K 14.3% · BB 9.5% · FIP 3.10 |
| 2025 | 36 | MIX3 levels | 17 | 2 | 17 | 5.40 | 4.24 | 23.9% | 12.7% | 0.1 | K 20.3% · BB 11.9% · FIP 4.79 |
| 2026 | 37 | MIX2 levels | 5 | 1 | 5 | 0.00 | 0.90 | 41.2% | 5.9% | — | K 41.2% · BB 5.9% · FIP 0.37 |
| 2027PROJ | 38 | MLBCHC | 5 | 0 | 5 | 4.24 | 4.32 | 24.5% | 9.7% | 0.0 | |
| 2028PROJ | 39 | MLBCHC | 30 | 0 | 31 | 4.55 | 4.76 | 23.4% | 10.4% | -0.1 |
Statcast · Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2011 | 22 | MLB MLE | Minnesota Twins | 4 | 4 | 23 | 100 | 16 | 6 | 3 | 100% | 5.8 | 16.0% | 6.0% | 10.0% | 3.0% | 6.17 | 4.15 | +0.3 |
| 2011 | 22 | MLB RAW | Minnesota Twins | 4 | 4 | 23 | 100 | 16 | 6 | 3 | 100% | 5.8 | 16.0% | 6.0% | 10.0% | 3.0% | 6.17 | 4.17 | +0.3 |
| 2012 | 23 | MLB MLE | Minnesota Twins | 16 | 16 | 85 | 381 | 50 | 23 | 17 | 100% | 5.3 | 13.1% | 6.0% | 7.1% | 4.4% | 5.59 | 5.19 | +0.2 |
| 2012 | 23 | MLB RAW | Minnesota Twins | 16 | 16 | 85 | 381 | 50 | 23 | 17 | 100% | 5.3 | 13.1% | 6.0% | 7.1% | 4.5% | 5.59 | 5.33 | +0.1 |
| 2013 | 24 | MLB MLE | Minnesota Twins | 10 | 8 | 47 | 224 | 34 | 13 | 10 | 80% | 4.7 | 15.2% | 5.8% | 9.4% | 4.4% | 6.85 | 4.99 | +0.2 |
| 2013 | 24 | MLB RAW | Minnesota Twins | 10 | 8 | 47 | 224 | 34 | 13 | 10 | 80% | 4.7 | 15.2% | 5.8% | 9.4% | 4.5% | 6.85 | 5.23 | +0.1 |
| 2014 | 25 | MLB MLE | Kansas City Royals | 9 | 6 | 33 | 143 | 23 | 7 | 3 | 67% | 3.6 | 16.1% | 4.9% | 11.2% | 2.3% | 5.23 | 3.61 | +0.7 |
| 2014 | 25 | MLB RAW | Kansas City Royals | 9 | 6 | 33 | 143 | 23 | 7 | 3 | 67% | 3.6 | 16.1% | 4.9% | 11.2% | 2.1% | 5.23 | 3.53 | +0.7 |
| 2015 | 26 | MLB MLE | Toronto Blue Jays | 58 | 0 | 65 | 261 | 71 | 10 | 3 | 0% | 1.1 | 27.2% | 3.8% | 23.4% | 1.1% | 2.92 | 1.92 | +2.1 |
| 2015 | 26 | MLB RAW | Toronto Blue Jays | 58 | 0 | 65 | 261 | 71 | 10 | 3 | 0% | 1.1 | 27.2% | 3.8% | 23.4% | 1.1% | 2.92 | 1.97 | +2.0 |
| 2016 | 27 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 57 | 0 | 70 | 298 | 75 | 13 | 6 | 0% | 1.2 | 25.8% | 4.0% | 21.8% | 2.4% | 3.71 | 2.74 | +1.5 |
| 2016 | 27 | MIX RAW | 3 levels | 57 | 0 | 70 | 298 | 75 | 13 | 6 | 0% | 1.2 | 25.2% | 4.4% | 20.8% | 2.0% | 3.71 | 2.63 | +1.6 |
| 2017 | 28 | MLB MLE | Oakland Athletics | 70 | 0 | 64 | 273 | 78 | 23 | 7 | 0% | 0.9 | 28.6% | 8.4% | 20.1% | 2.8% | 4.22 | 3.30 | +1.0 |
| 2017 | 28 | MLB RAW | Oakland Athletics | 70 | 0 | 64 | 273 | 78 | 23 | 7 | 0% | 0.9 | 28.6% | 8.4% | 20.1% | 2.6% | 4.22 | 3.16 | +1.1 |
| 2018 | 29 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 48 | 9 | 49 | 207 | 65 | 14 | 4 | 19% | 1.0 | 28.9% | 6.9% | 22.0% | 2.1% | 3.47 | 2.70 | +1.1 |
| 2018 | 29 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 48 | 9 | 49 | 207 | 65 | 14 | 4 | 19% | 1.0 | 31.4% | 6.8% | 24.6% | 1.9% | 3.47 | 2.37 | +1.3 |
| 2019 | 30 | MLB MLE | Oakland Athletics | 75 | 2 | 85 | 332 | 124 | 16 | 5 | 3% | 1.1 | 37.3% | 4.8% | 32.5% | 1.7% | 1.80 | 1.46 | +3.2 |
| 2019 | 30 | MLB RAW | Oakland Athletics | 75 | 2 | 85 | 332 | 124 | 16 | 5 | 3% | 1.1 | 37.3% | 4.8% | 32.5% | 1.5% | 1.80 | 1.51 | +3.1 |
| 2020 | 31 | MLB MLE | Oakland Athletics | 24 | 0 | 25 | 92 | 37 | 2 | 1 | 0% | 1.1 | 40.2% | 2.2% | 38.0% | 1.2% | 1.78 | 0.63 | +1.2 |
| 2020 | 31 | MLB RAW | Oakland Athletics | 24 | 0 | 25 | 92 | 37 | 2 | 1 | 0% | 1.1 | 40.2% | 2.2% | 38.0% | 1.1% | 1.78 | 0.93 | +1.1 |
| 2021 | 32 | MLB MLE | Chicago White Sox | 69 | 0 | 71 | 267 | 113 | 6 | 11 | 0% | 1.0 | 42.3% | 2.2% | 40.1% | 4.0% | 2.54 | 2.03 | +2.2 |
| 2021 | 32 | MLB RAW | Chicago White Sox | 69 | 0 | 71 | 267 | 113 | 6 | 11 | 0% | 1.0 | 42.3% | 2.2% | 40.1% | 4.1% | 2.54 | 2.18 | +2.0 |
| 2022 | 33 | MLB MLE | Chicago White Sox | 58 | 0 | 58 | 235 | 85 | 15 | 7 | 0% | 1.0 | 36.2% | 6.4% | 29.8% | 2.9% | 2.81 | 2.46 | +1.4 |
| 2022 | 33 | MLB RAW | Chicago White Sox | 58 | 0 | 58 | 235 | 85 | 15 | 7 | 0% | 1.0 | 36.2% | 6.4% | 29.8% | 3.0% | 2.81 | 2.51 | +1.4 |
| 2023 | 34 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 11 | 0 | 10 | 42 | 8 | 2 | 4 | 0% | 0.9 | 19.0% | 4.8% | 14.3% | 9.5% | 8.10 | 7.32 | -0.3 |
| 2023 | 34 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 11 | 0 | 10 | 42 | 8 | 2 | 4 | 0% | 0.9 | 19.0% | 4.8% | 14.3% | 9.5% | 8.10 | 7.30 | -0.3 |
| 2024 | 35 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 6 | 0 | 5 | 21 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0.8 | 14.3% | 9.5% | 4.8% | 0.0% | 0.00 | 3.10 | — |
| 2024 | 35 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 6 | 0 | 5 | 21 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0.8 | 14.3% | 9.5% | 4.8% | 0.0% | 0.00 | 3.10 | — |
| 2024 | 35 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 6 | 0 | 5 | 21 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0.8 | 14.3% | 9.5% | 4.8% | 0.0% | 0.00 | 3.10 | — |
| 2025 | 36 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 17 | 2 | 17 | 71 | 17 | 9 | 2 | 12% | 1.0 | 20.3% | 11.9% | 8.5% | 3.5% | 5.40 | 4.79 | -0.0 |
| 2025 | 36 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 17 | 2 | 17 | 71 | 17 | 9 | 2 | 12% | 1.0 | 20.3% | 11.9% | 8.5% | 3.5% | 5.40 | 4.79 | -0.0 |
| 2025 | 36 | MIX RAW | 3 levels | 17 | 2 | 17 | 71 | 17 | 9 | 2 | 12% | 1.0 | 23.9% | 12.7% | 11.3% | 2.8% | 5.40 | 4.24 | +0.1 |
| 2026 | 37 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 5 | 1 | 5 | 17 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 20% | 1.0 | 41.2% | 5.9% | 35.3% | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.37 | — |
| 2026 | 37 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 5 | 1 | 5 | 17 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 20% | 1.0 | 41.2% | 5.9% | 35.3% | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.37 | — |
| 2026 | 37 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 5 | 1 | 5 | 17 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 20% | 1.0 | 41.2% | 5.9% | 35.3% | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.90 | — |
| ▸ Career totals (raw MLB only — as recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| MLB Career | — | 490 | 44 | 664 | 2766 | 739 | 150 | 79 | 9% | 1.4 | 26.7% | 5.4% | 21.3% | 2.9% | 3.88 | 3.10 | +11.5 | ||
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 38 | MLB | CHC | 5 | 0 | 5 | 21 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 0% | 1.0 | 24.5% | 9.7% | 14.9% | 3.1% | 4.24 | 4.32 | +0.0 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 39 | MLB MLE | CHC | 30 | 0 | 31 | 131 | 31 | 14 | 5 | 0% | 1.0 | 23.4% | 10.4% | 13.0% | 3.5% | 4.55 | 4.76 | -0.1 |
| 2028 | 39 | MLB CTX | CHC | 30 | 0 | 31 | 131 | 31 | 14 | 5 | 0% | 1.0 | 23.4% | 10.4% | 13.0% | 3.5% | 4.55 | 4.76 | -0.1 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 520 | 44 | 695 | 2897 | 770 | 164 | 84 | 8% | 1.3 | 26.6% | 5.6% | 20.9% | 2.9% | 3.91 | 3.16 | +11.6 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 150 | 13 | 200 | 834 | 222 | 47 | 24 | 8% | 1.3 | 26.6% | 5.6% | 20.9% | 2.9% | 3.91 | 3.16 | +3.3 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 537 | 48 | 713 | 2964 | 800 | 161 | 86 | 9% | 1.3 | 27.0% | 5.4% | 21.6% | 2.9% | 3.81 | 3.10 | +11.4 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 151 | 13 | 200 | 832 | 225 | 45 | 24 | 9% | 1.3 | 27.0% | 5.4% | 21.6% | 2.9% | 3.81 | 3.10 | +3.3 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2023 AAACharlotte Knights · 5 IPFIP 9.24 → 9.11 (−0.13)K% 22.7% → 19.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 22.73% | — | ×0.860 | 19.55% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 4.55% | — | ×0.900 | 4.09% |
| HR / BF /BF | 13.64% | ÷1.152 | ×1.100 | 13.02% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 130).
Result: FIP 9.24 → 9.11, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2018 AAANashville Sounds · 25 IPFIP 0.60 → 1.11 (+0.51)K% 41.7% → 36.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 41.75% | — | ×0.880 | 36.74% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 3.88% | — | ×1.050 | 4.08% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.97% | ÷0.988 | ×1.100 | 1.08% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors — K ×0.88, BB ×1.05, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 98).
Result: FIP 0.60 → 1.11, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2016 AAANashville Sounds · 5 IPFIP 3.10 → 3.32 (+0.22)K% 15.0% → 13.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 15.00% | — | ×0.880 | 13.20% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 10.00% | — | ×1.050 | 10.50% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷0.856 | ×1.100 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors — K ×0.88, BB ×1.05, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 71).
Result: FIP 3.10 → 3.32, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
Career Comps
Completed MLB careers (no pro action in 2+ yrs) whose totals — actual + projected — most resemble this player's. Pool: 1,234 reliever careers (754 from 1990-2025 + 480 historical, 1901-2023), also matched on career-to-date at the same age. * Historical (Lahman) careers: rates era-adjusted to 2001-24 league levels; WAR is an OGILVIE proxy.
| Player | 162s | IP/yr | K% | BB% | HR/9 | ERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OGILVIE CAREER PROJECTION | 3.7 | 53 | 26.4% | 6.4% | 1.12 | 3.93 |
| Jake McGee ('22) | 2.9 | 48 | 26.0% | 6.6% | 1.10 | 3.71 |
| Joel Peralta ('16) | 3.2 | 54 | 23.0% | 7.0% | 1.32 | 4.03 |
| Joe Sambito ('76-'87, 8 WAR*) | 3.1 | 70 | 26.8%* | 7.5%* | 1.06* | 3.65* |
| Joe Hoerner ('63-'77, 8 WAR*) | 2.8 | 51 | 23.2%* | 7.9%* | 1.21* | 3.52* |
| Sergio Romo ('22) | 3.6 | 52 | 27.0% | 6.1% | 1.06 | 3.21 |
| Steve Hamilton ('61-'72, 10 WAR*) | 3.3 | 66 | 25.2%* | 7.7%* | 0.92* | 3.71* |